User talk:Animalparty

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Animalparty!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Animalparty,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Elvis Brothers pic[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Animalparty. You have new messages at Robman94's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Robman94 (talk) 17:59, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Re:Renalia ilustraciones[edit]

Thanks for warning me. I had a small problem with my English spelling and I wrote Esporangia instead Sporangia. I already fixed it. Falconaumanni...llámame Carlos 19:22, 4 December 2014 (UTC)


well at least im not uploading fair use,or for the regisauids all of them are based onthis (I used it to fill in the gaps of regisaurus and,the most similar thing that was free is the morganucodon)and anyway the image below has issues so it would problematic if it would be in the articles(the back is like that of a rat and im not sure of the forelimbs--Regisaurusjacobi (talk) 08:33, 14 January 2015 (UTC)



i was actually going to nominate it for deletion today.also the name contains bad language(racissimus means racist)also, it is in completely wrong format(it should be PNG)thanks for nominating ps:would you mind nominating this.its a copyvio from and i dont think they have permission to use it--Regisaurusjacobi (talk) 07:47, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

wait a minute:if i remove the spikes i might make a moghreberia out of it--Regisaurusjacobi (talk) 07:49, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
@Regisaurusjacobi: I've nomincated that file for deletion, as it does appear to be non-free. As for your works, racissimus meaning racist, if true, is neither "bad" nor reason for deletion, as Commons is not censored (see COM:CENSORSHIP). However, before you decide to upload more original works, please see COM:EDUSE regarding what is appropriate and not appropriate within the project scope of Commons. Examples of unrealistically useful files include Artwork created by the uploader without obvious educational use, and ''Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality. I believe File:Mulosaurus racissimus.jpg and all of your Land Before Time fan art qualifies as "not realistically useful for educational purposes" and suggest you consider posting them on Flickr or some other file hosting website (see also Commons:Fan art and COM:NOTHOST). Animalparty (talk) 20:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)
I wonder why could this copyvio be transferred to commons for the images is it ok if I create a wiki of my own?--Regisaurusjacobi (talk) 09:28, 20 January 2015 (UTC)
@Regisaurusjacobi: People upload copyrighted material all the time, sometimes on purpose (e.g. falsely claiming {{own work}} or {{PD-self}}) or not understanding Commons:Licensing, or by mistakenly thinking an image is free (see Commons:License laundering). Hundreds, if not thousands, of photos are speedily deleted or nominated for deletion everyday. Animalparty (talk) 19:41, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

File permission for File:Tiffany in March 2014 (01).jpg[edit]

I thought the bottom of that website is a (CC BY 4.0). At the right corner near the end of the page. Let me know. I'm still new to this. Thanks.--TerryAlex (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

I asked a different editor and he confirmed it for me that the picture was good. Thank you :)--TerryAlex (talk) 18:08, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
You are correct. I admit I did not see the tiny CC-BY-4.0 logo, and sure enough, it's there. I will trust that the photos hosted on the website are in fact licensed as such by "Sweet3Haven9". Thanks for your contributions. Animalparty (talk) 20:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)