User talk:Antoine.01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Blue a v.svg Laatste bericht van Antoine.01

<< Back to the user page...
<< To archief 2012 page...
<< To archief 2013 page...

Welcome to my talk page![edit]

Please sign your message by clicking the signature icon above the edit field
Click here to start a new topic in Dutch only, please?

Copyright status: File:ER-logo.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ER-logo.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 20:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Beste Jarekt, Dit is het logo van een Utrechts bedrijf (ElectroRail) die niet meer bestaat wat op een suikerzakje staat en die ik heb gescand en vervolgens heb geüpload naar Wikimedia Commons. Vr. gr. Flag utrecht city.gif Antoine.01Animexample2.gifoverleg(Antoine) 23:09, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Dear Jarekt, This is the logo of a company Utrecht (Electrorail) which no longer exists as a sugar packet and state that I have scanned and then uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Sincerely Flag utrecht city.gif Antoine.01Animexample2.gifoverleg(Antoine) 13:15, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:ER-logo.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:ER-logo.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ( This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:ER-logo.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 21:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Beste JuTa, ik heb inmiddels een mail gezonden naar permissions-commons en uitgelegd hoe het zit met deze upload van het ER-logo.JPG bestand. Ik wacht nu hun beslissing hierover maar af, vr. gr. Flag utrecht city.gif Antoine.01Animexample2.gifoverleg(Antoine) 15:26, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Antoine.01,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Please be a bit more careful[edit]

[1] you accidentally removed a license tag. --Denniss (talk) 06:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Beste Dennis, Ik zal er voortaan opletten en bedankt voor de waarschuwing. Vr. gr. Flag utrecht city.gif Antoine.01Animexample2.gifoverleg(Antoine) 07:12, 9 April 2014 (UTC)


Waarom maak je categorieën die beginnen met "Orgelbau"? Maak je een onderscheid tussen de mens zelf en zijn atelier? Dan moeten we dat ook voor bijvoorbeeld schilders gaan doen. Ik vind dit een zinloos onderscheid. mvg Henxter (talk) 07:48, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

Praktisch al die andere had ik een jaar geleden ook al zo gemaakt. Dan kan daar, indien een afbeeldingen van de werkplaats voorhanden is en alles wat daar mee te maken heeft, daarin komen te staan. Zie hiervoor voorbeeld Category:Orgelbau F.C. Smits. En dan bij Category:F.C. Smits organs de orgels die de persoon in kwestie ooit heeft gemaakt (vandaar). Oké, jij vindt dit zinloos, ik persoonlijk niet. En dat jij de persoon in kwestie daarnaast ook een eigen categorie geeft, daar is na mijn mening niets mis mee! Vr. gr. Flag utrecht city.gif Antoine.01Animexample2.gifoverleg(Antoine) 15:41, 27 August 2014 (UTC)