User talk:Apdency

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Archives[edit]

2009 - 2010 - 2011 - 2012 - 2013

Fire-damaged cat[edit]

Dag Apdency: jij hebt foto's van Groesbeekseweg 152 van vóór de brand als :Category:Fire-damaged buildings in the Netherlands geclassificeerd. De foto's tonen echter géén fire-damaged building, maar de tekst duidt op fire-damage in hun geschiedenis. Als de geschiedenis meetelt, zouden wel heel veel gebouwen in die categorie komen. Vergelijk bv. met Foto A en Foto B waarvan slechts éen in Category:Rijksmonumenten under construction is. --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:30, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Aanvankelijk dacht ik ook dat categorieën die in hun naam een toestand aanduiden, alleen maar afbeeldingen zouden bevatten die die toestand laten zien, totdat ik Category:Destroyed buildings in the Netherlands zag, waarin ook gebouwen worden getoond die nog overeind staan. Maar als voor 'Fire-damaged' wel zo'n 'visueel' criterium is vastgesteld, moet ik me daar natuurlijk aan conformeren. Apdency (talk) 12:02, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
  • Category:Destroyed buildings in the Netherlands: eenmaal gesloopt is er geen gebouw meer, maar slechts een foto-archief. Er kan natuurlijk herbouw plaatsgevonden hebben. Waarom daar ook herbouwde gebouwen in de categorie staan: de cat van het betreffende gebouw niet uitgesplitst in sub-cats misschien?
  • Of er zo'n visueel criterium is vastgelegd weet ik niet, maar ik zou daar wel voor kiezen. Fire-damaged is, net als under construction een tijdelijke situatie. Category:De Onderneming (Schaijk) zou als voorbeeld kunnen dienen: de foto's van 1971 (de romp en ruineresten) ieder afzonderlijk in cat fire-damage plaatsen; of samen in een subcat Category:De Onderneming Schaijk, fire-damage 1971; en de hele molen (zw-foto's van vóór de brand en de kleurenfoto's van na de brand) in de huidige cat. Wat denk je daarvan? --Havang(nl) (talk) 13:06, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Mijn idee is tot nu toe geweest: 'under construction' is een duidelijk tijdelijke situatie, 'destroyed' en 'fire-damaged' daarentegen kunnen heel goed definitief zijn. Dat even als verschilaanduiding.
Maar kun je daar praktisch wat mee? Jouw benadering zou kunnen, daarnaast zou je bij gevallen als de Groesbeekseweg 152 de afstand tussen een term als 'fire-damaged' en de getoonde ongeschonden toestand kunnen vergroten door een categorie voor het gebouw zelf aan te maken. Een categorie waar dan wel 'fire-damaged' aan hangt, die echter niet aan de plaatjes hangt. Dan geef je te kennen dat er sprake is of is geweest van brandschade. Apdency (talk) 17:07, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Dacht hetzelfde, en heb vandaag foto's gemaakt Smile. --Havang(nl) (talk) 19:04, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

File:SPD Bundestagwahlposter 2009.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:SPD Bundestagwahlposter 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File:CDU Bundestagwahlposter 2009.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CDU Bundestagwahlposter 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:38, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Isselburg municipal election posters 2009.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Isselburg municipal election posters 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File:CDU EP 2009 elections poster.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CDU EP 2009 elections poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 16:09, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Papegaaiposter Bond tegen het vloeken.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Papegaaiposter Bond tegen het vloeken.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JurgenNL (talk) 08:16, 12 June 2014 (UTC)