User talk:Aroche

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Aroche!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)


Image Tagging Image:Crithmum maritimum 2.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Crithmum maritimum 2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 15:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Eryngium maritimum 3.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Eryngium maritimum 3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. EugeneZelenko 21:58, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Erysimum_cheiri5.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 17:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Digitalis lutea 1.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Digitalis lutea 1.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Oxam Hartog 00:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Crambe maritima fl.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Crambe maritima fl.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Loco085 04:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

all your pictures[edit]

Hallo Aroche,

I see you are uploading many pictures with the license {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}}. That's excellent. You are also organizing them well. The statement: Source : [1] however is puzzling, as it suggests that you took them from that site, while your license suggests that you made the pictures yourself. Could you please explain this difference?

Feel free to reply in French if that comes easier to you than English, I read a little bit of French so I'll try to understand it.

thanks in advance,

TeunSpaans 07:16, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

I have stopped contributing forv a while, so my answer is very late. The answer to this question is very simple, : I am the author of these phtos, and I am also the webmaster of this website[2], where I publish most of my pictures. I hope this is not a copyright problem.--Aroche 16:56, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

Merci![edit]

Merci beaucoup pour l'identification d'un certain nombre de mes photos de fleurs - J'ai été me demander ce que bon nombre de ceux qui l'étaient. Cheers! --Bossi (talkgallerycontrib) 21:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Danke![edit]

Hi Aroche, I thank You very much for identification of Aponogeton distachyos and Agapanthus africanus. --Hedwig Storch 02:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Catégories[edit]

Salut, Aroche, content de voir que tu t'attaques cette fois-ci à flickr ! Pour les espèces que tu importes, il est important de les catégoriser précisement avec le nom scientifique de l'espèce, de façon à pouvoir les repérer plus facilement, comme par exemple avec ceci. Il faut bien sûr bleuir les catégories :) Cordialement. PurpleHz 00:12, 23 April 2008 (UTC)

Merci de tes conseils. Par inexpérience, et peut-être aussi par paresse, j'étais assez réticent à créer de nouvelles catégories. J'essaierai de le faire à l'avenir.--Aroche 21:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Polygonum_hydropiper1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Polygonum_hydropiper1.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. abf /talk to me/ 13:50, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Images de la flore de Thomé[edit]

Salut, merci pour les versions nettoyées des images. Je crois que c'est préférable de les charger sous un nouveau nom par exemple en remplacant 0 par 1 ou en ajoutant clean. Il faut alors ranger les versions propres dans la catégorie Thomé, Flora von Deutschland (modified).

Frédéric 21:39, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

C'est ce que j'ai fait en général,mais il est vrai que j'en ai modifié directement certaines. Je ne le ferai plus à l'avenir.--Aroche 09:23, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Misidentification and broken link on the page Image:Veronica agrestis1.jpg[edit]

Dear Aroche,

Image:Veronica agrestis1.jpg is not Veronica agrestis. I believe that it might be Veronica persica instead. I added a note about the reasons for my opinion on the discussion page connected to the image. Apart from this the source link is broken. I suppose that you moved your pages elsewhere. You might consider moving the image to Veronica persica or to Category:Unidentified_Veronica and correcting the broken link. Best regards, Robert Flogaus-Faust 62.134.80.142 21:04, 16 September 2008 (UTC).



Image:Blason ville fr Péron (Ain).svg[edit]

Bonjour, je contribue au projet blason et je suis tombé par hasard sur ton blason. Ton dessin comporte une erreur au niveau de la clé. En effet selon le site communal [[3]], les penons sont en haut alors que tu les fais en bas. Cdt--Spax89 (talk) 09:55, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Voilà, c'est réparé. Merci de ta vigilance ! --Aroche (talk) 19:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 61b3ba30dda7085458af49f2165e680b[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for categorizing File:Samana plant.JPG. --Captain-tucker (talk) 11:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Aroche!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:39, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour Mister Aroche, je suis tombé par hasard sur le blason de Gouville-sur-Mer dont je suis l'auteur et j'ai été quelque peu étonné de la manière dont vous le représentez et le blasonnez, sans doute par ignorance de sa genèse liée à l'histoire même de notre commune. Les armoiries de Gouville ont été créées en 1999 à l'occasion du jumelage avec la ville d'Harburg, en Souabe (Bavière). Blasonnées par moi-même quelque peu féru en héraldique et approuvées par le Conseil municipal, elles sont désormais les armoiries officielles de notre ville. L'histoire de Gouville se partage dès l'origine entre terre et mer, d'où la partition entre sinople et azur qui sont également les couleurs du département de la Manche.

Du côté "terre", en 1789 le territoire du Gouville actuel se partageait entre trois paroisses, du nord au sud : Montcarville, Gouville et Linverville. Au moment de la création des communes, à la Révolution, il y eut quelque temps trois communes distinctes créées à partir de ces paroisses. Mais en 1792, alors que les curés de Montcarville et de Linverville refusaient de prêter serment, seul celui de Gouville adoptait la constitution civil du clergé et, en récompense, une seule commune, celle de Gouville, est venue rassembler les trois paroisses.D'où deux coqs tournés à "dextre" et un seul à "sénestre", car n'oublions pas que déjà à cette époque les traditionnalistes siégeaient à droite dans l'Assemblée et les progressistes à gauche. Le choix du "dextre" et du "senestre" au lieu du "contourné" explique plus clairement l'historique du blasonnement et éclaire en partie "l'enquerre" qui en découle normalement. D'autre part les coqs qui représentent les clochers dont ils sont les girouettes sont fixés sur une axe qui doit apparaître.

Du côté mer, le phare de Gouville qui fut bâti sur le rocher du Sénéquet à la suite du naufrage de l'Antilope était habité par des gardiens régulièrement relevés par mer et son entrée ne se situe pas au niveau du rocher lui-même souvent immergé mais à mi-hauteur de la tour peinte en noir vers le bas et en blanc vers le haut. D'autre part le rocher qui apparaît à mi-marée est ainsi symbolisé sur l'écu et l'onde d'où il émerge est blasonnée "d'azur" et se confond sur l'écu avec l'azur du ciel, seul le mouvement ondulé apparaît au pied du rocher, l'onde ne doit donc avoir aucune épaisseur.

J'espère que ces explications vous permettront de mieux comprendre mon intervention, alors que d'autre part je suis bien heureux pour notre commune que ses armes apparaissent sur le web.

Gentiana Acaulis vs Gentiana clusii[edit]

Hello Aroche. First of all excuse for my english(i'm not english!). I've noticed that you have categorized two file (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flora_Appennino_Tosco_Emiliano_001.JPG and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flora_Appennino_Tosco_Emiliano_002.JPG) as Gentiana acaulis. One other wikipedian say to me that flower was a Gentiana clusii (you can read at the address http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussioni_utente:Innocenti.rob). It's wrong? Or may be possible? I have at least one other photo but i don't know if it can be useful. Say to me what you think. Thanks a lot.--Innocenti.rob (talk) 18:06, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Unidentified plant 6025.JPG[edit]

Hello Aroche, thank You for identification. Greetings --Hedwig Storch (talk) 19:55, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

File:BlackCardamom.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 00:55, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Failed upload?[edit]

Hi, I notice that File:Machaeranthera tanacetifolia.jpg has an info page, but apparently not the actual image file. Did uploading fail partway through perhaps?? Stan Shebs (talk) 12:16, 18 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Profits champetres 6.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC)


File:Poincaré Thermodynamique Fig11.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 20:38, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Projet Monuments Historiques français[edit]

Dear Commons user,

We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français !

In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français.

We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 23:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Photo Jean et Jacques Médecin[edit]

Bonjour,

La photographie de Jean et Jacques Médecin que j'ai téléchargée provient du site des Archives départementales des Alpes Maritimes, où chaque photographie est clairement documentée par une légende, indiquant si elle est sous copyright, autorisée à la publication après demande préalable ou libre de droits. Cette photographie était libre de droits. Vous pouvez le vérifier vous-même à la page suivante : http://www.basesdocumentaires-cg06.fr/os-html/foto/home.html Merci de m'expliquer alors pourquoi la mention "libre de droits" ne suffit pas à sa publication sur Wikipédia (surtout si elle est d'un auteur inconnu !) et si les Archives des A-M elles-mêmes demandent qu'on mentionne bien sa provenance (ce qui est l'indication qu'elle est à la libre disposition de ceux qui veulent s'en servir !) --Praxinoa (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

J'ajoute une précision : pour accéder à la photo en question, chercher "Jacques Médecin" puis cliquer sur la photo n°7 dans la liste qui se présentera.

--Praxinoa (talk) 13:54, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

file:Znak ofitserskiy (18 c.).jpg[edit]

Hi! maybe you know right English word for that thing?--Shakko (talk) 20:11, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Protoanguilla palau.jpg[edit]

Bonjour, tu as demandé la suppression de cette image. L'article en lui-même est clairement publié sous licence CC-BY (http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2011/08/16/rspb.2011.1289.full#ack-1), et je pense que les illustrations associées le sont aussi, bien que ce ne soit pas explicité. Cela mériterait en tout cas une deletion request plutôt qu'une suppression rapide. cordialement, --Aroche (talk) 13:59, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour, ce n'est pas par plaisir que j'ai demandé sa suppression, car cette image a une grande valeur encyclopédique. Je me suis simplement reporté à la politique de confidentialité de la Royal Society. Je n'ai jamais vu de leurs travaux récents sous licence CC-BY-SA, en témoigne la catégorie de Commons. De plus, l'importateur de l'image semble avoir déjà eu des soucis de copyrights. Peut être que je me trompe, mais il serait plus prudent de contacter l'auteur de l'article. Cordialement--Citron (talk) 10:14, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Aroche,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Gekko ulikovskii[edit]

Really aGekko ulikovskii?

Hello Aroche, you uploaded this image from flickr. Are you sure that it really shows a Gekko ulikovskii/Gekko badenii? I doubt this according to the description given in literature. But I have never seen them in reality, so I might be wrong. I would only want to know, if you are sure or do you only rely on the flickr title of the picture? – Felix Reimann (talk) 09:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Copyright status: File:Blason ville fr Valençay (Indre).svg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Blason ville fr Valençay (Indre).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 18:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Blason ville fr Péronnas (Ain).svg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Blason ville fr Péronnas (Ain).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 04:15, 28 August 2013 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Labattblueboy (talk) 02:09, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Need to Hire Heraldry Artist[edit]

I am looking to hire an artist to create vector coats of arms for me. Please contact me at coadb@mail.com.

-John L.