User talk:Art-top/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Quality Image Promotion

2012-07-12 Гатчина. Ингербургские ворота. Статуя на воротах, вид сзади.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-07-12 Гатчина. Ингербургские ворота. Статуя на воротах, вид сзади.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Evidence of permission

Please help me better describing the permission data for

I do not know what category of ownership these files fall into, but I definitely have the right to publish them in Commons, see also the respective file talks.--Michael.riessler (talk) 07:36, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Authors/copyrightholders must confirm permission to publish photos through the OTRS service. With this have any problems?
  • Авторы/правообладатели должны подтвердить разрешение на публикацию фотографий через службу OTRS. С этим есть какие-то проблемы? Я вижу, что подписи к изображениям Вы делали на русском языке. Мне было бы предпочтительнее использовать в переписке его, если Вы им владеете. --Art-top (talk) 07:39, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2012-07-12 Гатчина. Церковь Святого Николая.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-07-12 Гатчина. Церковь Святого Николая.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-07-30 Гатчина. Чесменский обелиск (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-07-30 Гатчина. Чесменский обелиск (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Сисоп?

Я в связи с недавним поднятием вопроса на форуме по поводу нехватки админов в который раз уже думаю, что как раз русскоязычных сильно недостаёт, в текущем и последнем году, по-моему, вообще новых не появлялось. Ты активен в проекте, знаешь здешние правила, английский и основы копирайта. Почему бы, стало быть, тебе не получить флаг? Что скажешь, Артём? - A.Savin 19:37, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

  • Даже не знаю :) Второе предложение в течение двух недель (первое было здесь)... Может, действительно стоит. Беру таймаут. --Art-top (talk) 06:51, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
    • Сорри, сейчас первый раз увидел то предложение. У Евгения больше доверия со стороны сообщества, лучше, если он номинирует. Но, в случае чего, можешь и ко мне обратиться; для меня тоже было бы честью. - A.Savin 07:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Участник A.Savin упрекал меня в том, что я слежу за нарушениями прав архитекторов и скульпторов ради корыстных целей — чтобы сделать карьеру администратора. Я должен предупредить вас об этом. Видимо, для него администрирование не забота, а карьера, и он сможет попрекать вас этим.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 08:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
    Прошу прощения, но флаг администратора не имеет никакого отношения к "карьере". Это дополнительная нагрузка и ответственность. "Карьеры" в вики и родственных проектах вообще нет. По моему мнению. --Art-top (talk) 09:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
@Art-top. Я и не думаю, что тебе флаг нужен в качестве некоей медали. А на то, что некоторые таварищи считают его таковой, мне глубоко плевать. - A.Savin 14:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
А я и не думаю, что ты так думаешь :) --Art-top (talk) 15:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
@A.Savin. Тогда зачем же вы писали, якобы я защищаю права архитекторов ради карьеры, скажите пожалуйста? Неужели вы раньше думали одно, а теперь другое?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 16:21, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2012-07-11 Гатчинский Павловский собор.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-07-11 Гатчинский Павловский собор.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

?

[1]. Materialscientist (talk) 08:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Sorry, my mistake. --Art-top (talk) 09:31, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission

I have sent a mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org regarding permission for File:Brave Filmographics.png but still it shows 'This file is missing evidence of permission' — Preceding unsigned comment added by Testing81 (talk • contribs)

✓ Done. --Art-top (talk) 19:24, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

While sending mail i left subject blank, is there any format for subject when i send mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org regarding permission. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Testing81 (talk • contribs)

Permission are processed manually by operators. --Art-top (talk) 05:18, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

I have sent a mail for below files also

Please remove 'This file is missing evidence of permission' tag for above mentioned files also. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Testing81 (talk • contribs)

✓ Done. --Art-top (talk) 09:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
    • I have deleted these files as they contained a copyrighted movie poster/DVD cover. --Denniss (talk) 01:13, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission

Please leave the pictures uploaded by me because they are OK. The copyright is OK, most of the pictures are made by more, the others are small resolution pictures from some Romanian cities. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Musichistory2009 (talk • contribs)

Sorry, but someone else's work upload to Commons without the permission of their authors can not be. The permission can be sent through the service COM:OTRS. Your photos (if they were nominated in the list), must be uploaded in full resolution with the original exif data. Propose to carry out further discussion on the nomination page: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Musichistory2009. --Art-top (talk) 20:12, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

File permission - work in progress

Ciao, I'm sorry I did not reply earlier but being quite "young" in wiki I did not know how to do and even had no idea on what to do :). I received many messages regarding MANY, MANY files I uploaded for my contribution (see my talk, all messages from you warning about problems in the files). I'm working on fixing the problem and OCTR procedure is already ongoing. Sorry again for the delay. --Sandra.Cavallucci (talk) 13:03, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

  • I combined several warnings into one theme on your talk page, because can not just delete the message. I hope all goes well. If you need help ask, even though my English is bad enough. There is also a forum where you can ask for help from other English-speaking users: Commons:Village pump. --Art-top (talk) 04:17, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Mishalow Marko Vas3.jpg

Why did you tag this image as missing permission when it has a PD-old tag? I need to know what kind of permission to look for in the email? Thank you for your time, MorganKevinJ(talk) 01:04, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

  • This is a scanned photograph, taken in 1947, clearly this is not the user's own work. This image could not be posted to the Ukraine before January 1, 1946 (see {{PD-Ukraine}}), there is no evidence that it is all done in the Ukraine; {{PD-Old}} is also not appropriate (work to be published until 1942, when the author is unknown). Permission to publish under a free license can be from him as from the copyright holder or beneficial owner of the copyright. --Art-top (talk) 04:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Disagreements with User:PereslavlFoto

Hi! It seems that you have been disagreeing with User:PereslavlFoto in some deletion requests lately, for example in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jvargues13. In case you are interested: he has started a discussion about the topic at COM:VPC#Is free license always doubtful license?. --Stefan4 (talk) 22:16, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your message! --Art-top (talk) 22:25, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Чувствую себя персонажем Аверченко. Значит, все мои снимки на коммонс — это краденые фотографии, потому что я не могу доказать иного. Потому что слова анонима из интернета ничего не значат, а являться в OTRS с паспортом и письмом от нотариуса я не буду никогда. Значит, на одной стороне медали пропаганда CC как перспективных и удобных лицензий, а на другой стороне медали, когда автор обращается к этим CC лицензиям, он получает встречный вопрос: ворюга, что же ты чужие снимки украл и прикрываешься лицензиями? Хуже того, после того как я, ворюга, загрузил сюда фотографии, общество требует от меня соблюдать лицензию и лишает права отзыва: мол, хотя они у тебя и краденые и доказательства никакого ты не дал, однако отменять поступка не имеешь права, ворюга. Поневоле задумаешься: не лучше ли было идти в фотобанк и торговать фотографиями, чем раздавать их по пословице «не делай добра, не получишь зла».--PereslavlFoto (talk) 23:40, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar etc

Tireless Contributor Barnstar.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your work on deletion requests of out of scope images and others. INeverCry 21:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
  • BTW, I noticed you have en-1 listed on your userpage, but I think you're much better than that. You're atleast en-2. Face-smile.svg INeverCry 21:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
    Thanks for Barnstar! :) My personal English is really bad, but the translate.google.ru helps ;) --Art-top (talk) 21:39, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
That works pretty good! INeverCry 22:10, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

Copyright inspector barnstar.png The Copyright inspector Barnstar
Your work is appreciated. Thank you. INeverCry 16:22, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you! :) --Art-top (talk) 17:27, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2012-08-05 Гатчина, улица Нестерова.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-08-05 Гатчина, улица Нестерова.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

  • Впрочем, на мой взгляд, тут неверный баланс белого. Фотография имеет жёлтый оттенок, а ведь небо не жёлтое и стена не жёлтая.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:43, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
    На небе жёлтоватого оттенка не вижу, возможно из-за калибровки монитора. Если он есть, его ещё могло дать заходящее солнце, поскольку фотография делалась уже ближе к вечеру. А цвет здания действительно жёлтый, здесь можно посмотреть другие его фотографии, правда снятые в пасмурную погоду. --Art-top (talk) 11:08, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Please remove my deleltion

Trophy.png Please
Hello, I do not know another way to contact you, as I am new to Wikipedia. However, I do see that for some reason you have flagged all the images I downloaded as copyright infringements. I know Vanessa (the person I posted about) and I know that 4 of the 6 photos were taken by a family member and the 2 "professional"photos were taken by friends of whom gave her copyrights to use them. Please, help me understand what I can do to help this matter, I do not want to get marked as a person who does not follow copyrights. Thank you very much, I really appreciate your time and understanding. VanessaRose3737 (talk) 05:16, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2012-08-04 Башня Дворцовой церкви Большого Гатчинского дворца (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-08-04 Башня Дворцовой церкви Большого Гатчинского дворца (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

I got permission from the owner

you add Copyright violations template to some photos that i uploaded. but I got permission from the owner — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceas08 (talk • contribs)

  • Ask the copyright owners to send permission to publish this file under a free license through COM:OTRS. At the moment, I can see in the files sources copyright symbol. --Art-top (talk) 20:55, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

I am new at commons. Which license should I do? owner gave permission to publish at wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceas08 (talk • contribs)

  • No license "for publication in Wikipedia." Here are uploading files, which can be used by anyone, including for commercial purposes and to make derivative works. Once again I ask you to carefully read the text COM:OTRS and messages on your page. --Art-top (talk) 21:07, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

ok. i undrestand i will say owner to sign up here and upload files. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ceas08 (talk • contribs)

  • Here all anonymous. Username says nothing. Better to use OTRS or at least place a permission on the source page. --Art-top (talk) 21:22, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Philosophy of Happiness

I am the author. It is completly my work. I have all copyrights.--Nobody60 (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

  • I see this cover, published earlier, for example here. To previously published works should send the permission at COM:OTRS. --Art-top (talk) 21:12, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I am the author. I am Nils Horn. I have all copyrights. --Nobody60 (talk) 22:04, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

I replied on your talk page. --Art-top (talk) 07:39, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

I gave the permission to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org --Nobody60 (talk) 11:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Files I have uploaded

Please check my response to your claim here. Thanks (RMizo (talk) 11:47, 29 August 2012 (UTC))

Quality Image Promotion

2012-07-19 Электропоезд ЭР2Т на Балтийском вокзале в Гатчине.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-07-19 Электропоезд ЭР2Т на Балтийском вокзале в Гатчине.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Донор - за что вы удалили все мои фото?????????

Вы предложили к удалению все мои фотки. И как я заметил все их удалили!!!!!!!! Я мягко говоря просто в шоке от увиденного. Если ещё есть возможность то восстановите их пожалуйста. Ведь каждая из них ссылалась на определённую страницу, а то и на несколько страниц. Ладно бы Осирион. Понятно что я там не был в 1912 году. Но остальные фото за что удалять? Почему я пишу сейчас? Да просто я не видел вашего предупреждения.

  • Донор (talk) 21:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
    Причина указана здесь: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Донор, а именно - в качестве правообладателя в exif-данных файлов были указаны сторонние сайты, разрешение на которых отсутствовало. Запрос на восстановление файлов можно подать здесь: Commons:Undeletion requests (на английском языке). --Art-top (talk) 18:55, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

"В качестве правообладателя в exif-данных файлов были указаны сторонние сайты, разрешение на которых отсутствовало." Интересно какое я ещё должен давать разрешение на свои собственные фотографии? В exif-е в качестве авторских прав я писал либо адрес своего сайта, либо адрес моего ЖЖ. Ладно бы если удалили бы в течение недели несколько фоток, а то ведь около СОТНИ фотографий и за раз! На моей странице в Википедии я чёрным по белому написал адрес моего сайта и блога. При регистрации на Википедии указал почтовый ящик тот же что указан внизу этой страницы. Спрашивается что ещё я должен был указать? Донор (talk) 22:53, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

1) Википедия и Викисклад - разные проекты, в Википедии я практически не участвую. 2) Ваш почтовый ящик я могу увидеть в единственном случае - если напишу письмо через местный сервис и Вы мне ответите. 3) Ссылки на какие-либо страницы подтверждающие свободные лицензии, в описании файлов отсутствовали. 4) На сайте http://donor.tiras.biz/ стоит "© Донорство в Приднестровье 2009. Все права защищены", на сайте ЖЖ также нет никаких разрешений на публикацию изображений под свободной лицензией. 5) Все аккаунты в проектах Викимедиа анонимны и не позволяют соотнести автора изображения, опубликованного на другом сайте и автора изображения, загруженного в проект. 6) Подтверждение авторства через COM:OTRS для ранее опубликованных работ от авторов, которые одновременно являются участниками Викисклада - обычная практика. 7) Предупреждения о необходимости подтверждения авторства на Вашей странице имеются с ноября 2011 года, никакой реакции не последовало. 8) На Викискладе не приветствуется реклама сайтов. 9) Я не имею технической возможности удалять/восстанавливать файлы, я не администратор.
Что можно сделать: отправить разрешение через службу ru:ВП:OTRS (см. также ru:ВП:ДОБРО) - самый надёжный вариант, либо разместить на Ваших сайтах разрешение на публикацию изображений под свободной лицензией. Также можно просто попросить администраторов (ссылку на восстановление файлов см. выше) восстановить файлы, объяснив ситуацию. --Art-top (talk) 20:34, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
P. S. Вероятно это мой последний пост, завтра я уезжаю на месяц. Если возникнут вопросы - обращайтесь на местный русскоязычный форум либо подождите до моего приезда. --Art-top (talk) 20:34, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2012-08-17 Статуя "Мудрость". Большой Гатчинский дворец..jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-08-17 Статуя "Мудрость". Большой Гатчинский дворец..jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-08-17 Башня Арсенального каре Большого Гатчинского дворца.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-08-17 Башня Арсенального каре Большого Гатчинского дворца.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-07-30 Одна из статуй "Лев" на Террасе-пристани. Гатчина.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-07-30 Одна из статуй "Лев" на Террасе-пристани. Гатчина.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-09-04 Черноморская вода. Севастополь (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-04 Черноморская вода. Севастополь (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:NorthBridge194.JPG

Вы эту не посмотрите? Не могу поверить, что у нас нет ни одной фотографии этого парка. Заранее спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Уже :) Вот ещё фотографии того же самого моста: File:Мост в Гатчинском парке около Холодной ванны.jpg, File:Чугунный мост в Гатчинском парке около Холодной ванны - 2011.05.14.jpg. Таких мостов в Гатчинском парке несколько, все они идут под одним номером. --Art-top (talk) 19:08, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
    Так я даже категорию парка найти не могу - пишут парк Зверинец, у нас такого нет, я сам в Дворцовом парке такого не помню - хотя, конечно, я там не весь парк обошёл.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:11, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
    Да, я ошибся, это не тот мост. Может быть завтра удастся вдоль речки Тёплой прогуляться. Парк Зверинец не обфотографирован, там нет достопримечательностей, это просто лесопарковая зона. Категорию было создавать не для чего. Сейчас сделаю и для него категорию, может и найду в своих архивах фотографии, чтобы не совсем пустая была. --Art-top (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
    Ага, понятно, спасибо.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
    Категорию сделал. Фотографии по возможности. --Art-top (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
    Замечательно.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:38, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Filemover

Hi Artyom. I've added the filemover right to your account here. I did this so that you would have the choice of moving files on your own. If you would rather use rename requests, I'd be happy to continue moving them for you. Have a good day. INeverCry 21:26, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Thank you! I will use the flag carefully. --Art-top (talk) 21:36, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2012-09-17 Баптистерий с ротондой. Херсонес Таврический (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-17 Баптистерий с ротондой. Херсонес Таврический (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2012-09-17 Базилика 1935 года. Херсонес Таврический (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-17 Базилика 1935 года. Херсонес Таврический (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2012-09-09 Памятник затопленным кораблям в Севастополе (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-09 Памятник затопленным кораблям в Севастополе (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-10-03 Гатчина. Карпин мост (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-10-03 Гатчина. Карпин мост (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Admin? again

Commons Administrator.svg I saw that Eugene Zelenko asked you about this in July. I would love to be able to do one of these for you some time soon. In the past few weeks, since Fastily resigned his adminship, I've noticed that alot of my own deletion nominations are sitting around waiting to be closed. These are usually simple out of scope images, as I'm sure you've seen. Also, many of the files that show up here are obvious copyvios, which shouldn't give you trouble if you're concerned about language. Let me know what you think. INeverCry 23:53, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your suggestion! I take time out to night. --Art-top (talk) 08:20, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
  • I apologize for the delay in response. Unfortunately, in the near future my activity in the project is likely to be minimal due to various circumstances. In this regard, is nominated in the administrators at the moment does not make sense, I do not normally able to track the discussion. --Art-top (talk) 03:55, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
That's ok. Maybe some time in the future. Good luck with every thing you're going to be doing. ;) INeverCry 04:26, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! :) --Art-top (talk) 04:27, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Your opinion

Hi Artyom. Can you take a look at these files: here and tell me what you think of their scope/educational value please? INeverCry 20:35, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Private security activities too encyclopedic topic. But these images have a number of drawbacks. On specific images:
  • File:Allchop.ru.gif - logo of site of security companies portal - no significance
  • File:2rtrT2t1t2.jpg, File:1T1t1.jpg, File:Allchop.ru.jpg - if any of these people guards - is unclear, do not illustrate, there is no coherent description / file names, unknown people - not significant
  • File:Grupa R 7.jpg, File:Grupa R 6.jpg, File:Grupa R 2.jpg - looks like an advertisement to a certain security organization (shoulder patches, the inscription on the wall) - no advertising on Commons
  • Other photographs, I think, can be left. --Art-top (talk) 09:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the quick response. I've nominated the logo and File:Grupa R 6.jpg for deletion, as they're clearly out of scope to me. File:Grupa R 7.jpg and File:Grupa R 2.jpg show security procedures and this may be of some educational value, I'm not quite sure. The cropped group photo is used in Частная охранная деятельность в России, so I guess I'll leave that and the uncropped one alone for now. INeverCry 16:30, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

File:MarleneAguilar new.jpg

i have the authorization of this picture coming from the Owner.. She is Willing to contact you if there is a problem with the photo. .thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.54.92.18 (talk • contribs)

File:Mithgol21Sept2006.png

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mithgol21Sept2006.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

MaxBioHazard (talk) 08:20, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Messier 74 ULX.jpg

Hi Art-top!

I noticed you've put a warning on this file. I have already emailed necessary and sufficient information to permissions about this file. It's in the cue but I do not know if it has a ticket number. I do not have access to this information. Just FYI. --Marshallsumter (talk) 23:44, 25 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Art-top,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 20:22, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2012-09-14 Севастополь. Плавучий госпиталь "Енисей".jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-14 Севастополь. Плавучий госпиталь "Енисей".jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-09-14 Севастополь. Пассажирское судно «Ост».jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-14 Севастополь. Пассажирское судно «Ост».jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2012-09-14 Севастополь. Малый противолодочный катер на подводных крыльях «Владимирец» (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-14 Севастополь. Малый противолодочный катер на подводных крыльях «Владимирец» (4).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2012-09-05 Севастополь. Малый противолодочный катер на подводных крыльях «Владимирец».jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-05 Севастополь. Малый противолодочный катер на подводных крыльях «Владимирец».jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2012-09-14 Севастополь. Ролкер "Адмирал Лазарев" (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-14 Севастополь. Ролкер "Адмирал Лазарев" (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Re:

Thank you. I send a message in the sysop noticeboard. I's not pending, the tickets were received.+PrinceWilly 12:19, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2012-09-05 Севастополь. Уличная урна.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-05 Севастополь. Уличная урна.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion

2012-09-14 Севастополь. Гидрографическое судно «Донузлав» (4).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-14 Севастополь. Гидрографическое судно «Донузлав» (4).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

?

Dear Art-top , i'am new to wikimedia and just have read the message you left on my user talk ,which is about the license of some picture i uploaded , those pictures are provided by the authors directly, the authors including myself, are several high school science teachers from Taiwan , thus the CC license is definitely confirmed by e-mails from the authors.

but i have a trouble of not knowing how to tell wikiedia team about this , there seems have no option as "i'm sure it's CC licensed by the author" and some picture is first published here thus does not have any "source" to provide (the only source is my camera...)

may you tell me how to prevent the files from being deleted? those images surely are original works... and i have dozens of such kind to upload in the future...... thank you! Yonoodle (talk) 07:04, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

  • The author (if it is not you) should clearly express permission to publish their work under a free license (including for commercial use and to prepare derivative works). To do this, the author should send the permission to the service COM:OTRS (approximate text of the letter can be found here: Commons:Email templates). For their own work as a source set {{own}}. --Art-top (talk) 07:21, 6 November 2012 (UTC)

Godkiller & Occupy Permissions

Hi, I posted a link to permissions for the Godkiller and Occupy Comics image files in the source section of the files and also on their talk pages in some cases.

I have now emailed screengrabs and links to OTRS.

You can see permissions for Godkiller files here [2] and permissions for Occupy Comics files here [3]

This is related to the files File:Godkiller Walk Among Us cover art.jpg, File:Godkiller Silent War audiobook.jpg, File:Godkiller Walk Among Us ep 2 dvd.jpg, File:Godkiller Walk Among Us limited edition cover.jpg, File:Godkiller Issue 2 comic book cover.jpg, File:Occupy Comics issue 2 cover.jpg

Thank you --Mechagodzilla 16:57, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

  • ✓ Done. --Art-top (talk) 05:12, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

2012-09-17 Херсонес Таврический. Башня Зенона (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2012-09-17 Херсонес Таврический. Башня Зенона (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyvio complaints

Please be careful when making copyright violation complaints. In this case, you complained about an image because it appeared in a blog post, and the image was deleted. There was no evidence of a violation, however: the blogger probably copied the image from Wikipedia, not the other way around. Note that you can't just look at the date the image was uploaded to Commons, because many images are moved to Commons from other Wikimedia projects. In this case, the image is marked as having been uploaded to the English Wikipedia in 2007, well before the date of the blog posting.--Srleffler (talk) 07:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Please note that the image in a blog in a much higher resolution than on Commons, it is already causing suspicion. It is unlikely that a blogger copied it from the Commons. Perhaps the image on Commons and on blogs have the same source, which is set at the moment is difficult for the prescription of time. Professional images in small resolution suspicious. --Art-top (talk) 09:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Category pages

Hi Art-top. You don't have to create those category pages manually anymore; Dschwen does it with his bot now, see here for my request. Trijnsteltalk 15:14, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

This is good news :) --Art-top (talk) 10:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Derivative copyright template

It's useless to add this template to images of permanently publicly-displayed artworks in countries with "FOP". AnonMoos (talk) 17:06, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Specifically, what is it? --Art-top (talk) 10:10, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
GerbCustodia.jpg, which is a photograph of a coat of arms painted on a wall in Jerusalem. AnonMoos (talk) 13:00, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
I have no confidence that the coat of arms falls under the definition "work of applied art". If it's an old coat of arms should be license type "PD-Old" and the relevant date (not the date the picture was taken). --Art-top (talk) 12:05, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Happy holidays

Christmas bells.png Happy Holidays!
I hope that things are going well for you. Happy Holidays and best wishes for the New Year! INeverCry 21:10, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Thank you very much for your congratulations! And you Happy New Year! --Art-top (talk) 08:28, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Улучшение шаблона My Files 2

Здравствуйте. Не могли бы вы сделать так, чтобы пользователь мог указывать не одну категорию, а несколько? В таком случае ссылка ставилась бы на первую, но при этом бы приплюсовывалось количество файлов и в других категориях. Просто у меня изображения рассортированы в древовидную структуру с несколькими подкатегориями, а не только в Uploads by User:Ain92. Заранее спасибо. Ain92 (talk) 20:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Сделать можно, только это мало кому надо. Как альтернативный вариант можно использовать примерно такую конструкцию (как у меня на странице):

{{User Files 2|num={{#expr:{{PAGESINCAT:Audio by Art-top|R}}+{{PAGESINCAT:All drawings, created by Art-top|R}}+{{PAGESINCAT:All files, uploaded by Art-top from various sources|R}}+{{PAGESINCAT:All photos, created by Art-top|R}}+{{PAGESINCAT:Scanned by Art-top|R}}}}}}

File:ArtsakhBank in Stepankert.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ArtsakhBank in Stepankert.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 02:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Urach_Kanzel_1974.jpg

You commented on that file November 15, 2012. The file has since been deleted. However: the copyright holder did send the free license to permissions-de@wikiemdia.org, with copy to me, as I indicated. What can I do to get the file re-awakened? To whom can I send the copy to me of the free licence?

Your help would be greatly appreciated.

I am confused. Can you identify me? I am user:Coranton. Could you perhaps answer on my discussion page in the German Wikipedia?

File. Javid Samadov

I got the official permission from the photographer that took the picture Javid Samadov.jpg . Here it is -

Con la presente autorizzo l'uso delle foto che ho realizzato al Sig. Javid Samadov nel Teatro di Osimo (ITALY), cedo quindi tutti i diritti relativi alle foto in questione al SIg. Javid Samadov che ne potrà fare l'uso che meglio crede. In fede Bruno Severini

Via Trento 164 60027, Osimo AN ITALY

Codice Fiscale SVRBRN 61R29G157I

tel +390717249247

    +390717249247 

fax +390717231554 bruno.severini@alice.it


Please, undelete the picture on the page "Javid Samadov". Thank you!

--Rengdir (talk) 13:12, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Rengdir

Gadget

Hello, saw you editing at pt.wikipedia. Are you a gadget? Gusta (talk) 06:26, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

  • No, I'm not a bot :) All edits in pt-wiki were made me by hand as part of Wikidata works. --Art-top (talk) 07:45, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

File:2012-09-05 Севастополь. IMG 2757.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2012-09-05 Севастополь. IMG 2757.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

File:2012-09-05 Севастополь. IMG 2758.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2012-09-05 Севастополь. IMG 2758.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kulmalukko (talk) 18:55, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Памятник защитникам Приднестровья (Кицканы).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Памятник защитникам Приднестровья (Кицканы).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cezarika1 (talk) 05:19, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Памятник защитникам Приднестровья (Бендеры).jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Памятник защитникам Приднестровья (Бендеры).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cezarika1 (talk) 07:18, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Town crown (Russia, simple, var. 1).svg

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Town crown (Russia, simple, var. 1).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 18:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

  • File is restored, the description updated. --Art-top (talk) 20:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Moscow Lyceum 1501 panorama1.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow Lyceum 1501 panorama1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 16 July 2013 08:57 (UTC)

File:Moscow Lyceum 1501 panorama2.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow Lyceum 1501 panorama2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 16 July 2013 08:58 (UTC) 08:58, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Moscow Lyceum 1501 panorama3.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Moscow Lyceum 1501 panorama3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

//  Gikü  said  done  Tuesday, 16 July 2013 08:59 (UTC) 08:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your photo Priazovye

  • Hi, Артём, I have seen your photo in the Telegraph (The Russian intelligence ship Priazovye (Artem Topchiy/Wikipedia)), thanks,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 12:19, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
    • Спасибо за ссылку! Авторство указано, а лицензия - нет, но ругаться не буду, неохота (тем более на английском), пусть это остаётся на их совести. Кстати, сегодня вернулся из Севастополя, опять привёз фотографии судов, как в прошлом году. Пока залил только одну фотографию, подготавливаю для заливки остальные. --Art-top (talk) 12:44, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Огромное спасибо, Артём, это самая правильная фотография, мои статьи на немецком и эстонском до сих пор были без фотографий этого судна, так как оно находилось на Кубе, сейчас говорят стоит в Сочи, сейчас вставлю фотку в статью, ещё раз большой thanks,--PjotrMahh1 (talk) 06:54, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
    • Не за что! Есть ещё фотографии этого судна с разных ракурсов и более крупные. Подробно сфотографировал круизник Генерал Ватутiн, несколько фотографий Зiркi Днепра, Azamara Journey и других кораблей - военных, грузовых, пассажирских. Все закачаю потихоньку. --Art-top (talk) 15:43, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 06:59, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

  • Thanks! Unfortunately, since I do not know the language, can make contributions of a technical nature. --Art-top (talk) 07:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)