User talk:Asav

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

TUSC token c3afe287a1669690e7d5e630ce3efd3a[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Adil Khan.jpg[edit]

Hi Asav! I see that you've tagged this image as verified, using the ticked ID assigned to the e-mail I sent. Is it now safe to delete this image from en.wp? Regards, decltype (talk) 02:48, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

I would think so. I wasn't aware that it existed on en.wp before you told me here. So go ahead. If there's a problem, we'll have a copy on Commons, where it rightly belongs anyway. Asav (talk) 04:12, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
Will do, thanks. decltype (talk) 15:17, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Ldb teddy.jpg[edit]

Hi, I cleaned up the file, added a category and a proper upload log, but it still misses a license. Please add the one from the ticket. Thank you Hekerui (talk) 21:33, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

You're right, I must have missed it. It's fixed now. Thanks for the clean-up and reminder! Asav (talk) 22:03, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Saemmler.jpg[edit]

Bitte passe beim Commonstransfer besser auf, der Autor fehlt noch. File:Saemmler.jpg Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:20, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Ich hab den Transfer korrigiert, aber bitte pass in Zukunft darauf auf, ob du wirklich die Informationen übertragen hast. Gruß Hekerui (talk) 08:55, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Tut mir leid, die Transfer-Tools scheinen nicht immaer ganz zuverlässig zu sein. Ich werde da man extra aufmerksam sein. Danke für den Tipp! Asav (talk) 10:18, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
Genauer gesagt: Der Commonshelper hat immer ein Problem mit Dateien, die das OTRS-Template enthalten. Dort überträgt er fast keine Infos in das Info-Template. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 14:53, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi Asav, bitte arbeite ordentlicher - so geht das nicht: File:Martin_Heidegger_for_WP.jpg! Die OTRS-Nummer fehlt in Commons - die musst du immer(!) manuell nachtragen. Außerdem ist unklar für welche Lizenz die Freigabe ist. Stand dort nur CC drin (weil du zusätzlich CC in dewiki eingefügt hast)? Oder auch GFDL? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 14:12, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Ich hab das korrigiert aber das muss wirklich besser werden, bitte. Du hast die Seite einfach aus dem Move-to-commons assistant rauskopiert und nicht ein zweites Mal raufgeschaut. Ich habe die cc-by-sa-3.0 Lizenz gewählt weil das die Lizenz war die du bei dewiki gleichzeitig mit der OTRS-Nachricht der Beschreibung hinzugefügt hast. lg Hekerui (talk) 18:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Und noch eine Extrafrage: das Bild wurde nach einer Fotografie von Fritz Eschen angefertigt, der 1964 gestorben ist, also unmöglich seine Zustimmung für Veröffentlichung einer Bearbeitung unter einer freien Lizenz gegeben haben kann und auch noch bei weitem nicht lange genug tot ist, dass das Urheberrecht nicht mehr greift. Ist die Zustimmung des nachfolgenden Urheberrechtshalters (Kinder etc.) in OTRS-Ticket vorhanden oder steht da, dass das Foto ein "Work for hire" war, d. h. hat der Fotograf sein Urheberrecht abgetreten hat? Falls nicht, könnte das Bild nicht unter einen freien Lizenz angeboten werden und eine Löschung wäre nötig. Hekerui (talk) 18:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Bei File:Nikospiperis.png hattest du beim Transfer nach Commons auch vergessen die Lizenz hinzuzufügen, es gab kein ursprüngliches Datei-Logbuch und der Name des Autors (sofern angegeben) fehlt. Es macht mich ein bisschen stutzig, dass das Bild von der Homepage des Künstlers kommt, da müsste doch in der Email stehen, wer es geschossen hat oder das der Künstler das frei lizenziert. Hekerui (talk) 18:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Wie gesagt war ich mir nicht im klaren, dass das Tool nicht funktioniert, und ich passe jetzt besser auf.
Die zwei Lizenzen betreffend: Ich habe nach einer ziemlich langen (15 Emails umfassenden) Briefwechslung etablieren können, dass die Lizenz autentisch ist. (Weitere Details sind im Ticket zu finden). Die Heidegger-Illustration ist weit vom Original entfernt, und dazu zweifellos vom Stil und der Ausführung her ein autonomes Werk. Das ein Photo als Vorlage gedient hat, ändert nicht daran, das das Urheberrecht ausschliesslich dem Künstler gehört. Gerichtliche Copyright-Praxis in der USA legt Wert auf "[the] amount of originality required for copyright protection", und die ist hier vorhanden. Asav (talk) 00:25, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Hallo Asav, wenn du meinen Kommentar von 14:53, 19 September 2010 oben gelesen hättest, hättest du wissen müssen, dass du insbesondere (man muss aber immer kontrollieren - nicht nur bei OTRS-Dateien) beim Transfer von OTRS-Dateien aufpassen musst. Wie auch immer. Wenn weitere Unklarheiten bestehen, dann frage bitte.
Zu File:Martin_Heidegger_for_WP.jpg: Die Rechte des Fotografen, der die Vorlage produziert hat, sind hier auch nach meiner und nach von mir befragten anderen Leuten nach deutschem Urheberrecht (wenn das hier zur Anwendung käme) wohl nicht relevant. Das Gemälde ist doch sehr frei und selbstständig. Toll, dass du das für US-Recht nachrecherchiert hast!
Aber Als was hat der Maler das Bild denn freigegeben? Nur unter CC oder auch unter GFDL? Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 01:00, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
"[the] amount of originality required for copyright protection" - du hast das mit dem Originalfoto verglichen? Link doch bitte das Foto, damit jeder den Vergleich machen kann. Das deutsche Recht ist wegen Commonsregelungen zum Glück unwichtig - der Standard auf dewiki für Urheberrechtsverletzungen ist sehr beliebig. Hekerui (talk) 08:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Saibo, das Bild har nur CC-Lizenz.
Hekerui, das es von einem Photo grundverschieden und ein autonomes Werk ist, benötigt keiner Vergleichuung mit dem Original. Es ist offenbar. Wenn es dich trotzdem interessiert, findest du hier ein Photo. Asav (talk) 11:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
Danke Asav. Beim nächsten Mal lösche dann bitte in der de.wiki-Datei die falsch aufgeführten Lizenzen mit einem Versionskommentar wie "nur als CC freigegeben". Dann ist das klarer. Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 00:08, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the turtle trap help[edit]

I am thinking we could use a better article on "how to get permission" over at the EN WP. I tried following the practice perfectly (and am getting stuff through), yet I feel like I have caused some extra efforts from the volunteers and from the granters.

  • Think we should clarify what the granter needs to respond with (and make it incumbent on the requester to get that) prior to uploading a pic and an OTRS ticket. As it is now, NONE of the "boilerplate permission" letters adress this. But that is what is needed when things really go down.
  • More and better guidance on what licence to request would be helpful. There is a blistering array of licences and without reading the full text of all of them, I'm not even sure what to cite and waht to ask for from the granter. I thought CCSA3.0SA was the generic one to use, but wonder now if I am in error.

TCO (talk) 16:12, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

[[File:Frederick Noronha.jpg]][edit]

Hi! You uploaded this image to Wikimedia Commons, but I'm somewhat confused as to who holds the copyright. Do you know? I'll have to nominate it for deletion unless OTRS gets permission from the original author, even if publication is okay with the image subject. Asav (talk) 03:30, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

The image was taken from flickr:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/fn-goa/4386544605/

My opinion is that Noronha himself is the copyright holder and that the image was taken from his camera by a friend. However, i suggest that you clarify it from the subject of the photo himself. Joyson Noel Holla at me 05:28, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

I have. There's no usable license information on the Flickr page, though. Well, we'll just have to wait and see... Asav (talk) 16:45, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Did you contact Noronha? Joyson Noel Holla at me 04:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
It's an OTRS matter, so if you have access, you can look it up in the queue. Asav (talk) 06:51, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
No. I don't have access. I've applied though. Thanks for issuing the ticket. Joyson Noel Holla at me 14:57, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

File:George Hawi.jpg[edit]

Please delete this image. I uploaded it in Wikipedia under fair use terms, but another user has mistaken me for it's author and moved it to Commons. Thanks. Joyson Noel Holla at me 10:16, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

I've asked the original uploader for more information about the image (see User talk:Bilal66), and changed the authorship on Wikimedia Commons. As far as I can tell, there is no reason to outright delete the image, but maybe I've missed something? Asav (talk) 10:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

MAD-alfie-1960[edit]

Hi,

Du hast hier den Hinweis auf den Löschantrag entfernt, diesen aber nie geschlossen (was du als Nicht-admin ja auch nicht dürftest). Dieser ist nachwievor aktiv und hat keinerlei Hinweis auf den aktuellen Stand. Könntest du dich dort bitte äußern, was den in dem OTRS-Ticket steht, damit klar wird, warum du das Lösch-Template entfernt hast, damit endlich ein Admin diesen LA schließen kann. Danke. -- Cecil (talk) 18:44, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Der Löschantrag wegen fehlender Lizenz wurde entfernt, weil {{PermissionOTRS|id=2010080810000791}} eine gültige Lizenz enthält. Asav (talk) 22:41, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Den Löschantrag hast du eben nicht entfernt (dürftest du ja auch gar nicht), der ist nachwievor da und aktiv. Du hast nur den Hinweis darauf gelöscht, was eigentlich absolut nicht ok ist. Wenn eine Situation geklärt ist, dann schreibs in den Löschantrag oder benachrichtige einen Admin, damit der den Antrag schließt. Aber so halbgar bitte nie wieder. -- Cecil (talk) 00:36, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Dein Verweis zeigte auf die Bildseite, nicht die assoziierte Diskussion, deshalb has Missverständnis. Ich habe eine kurze Erklärung auf der Diskussionsseite zugefügt. Das Bild ist zweifellos ein autonomes Kunstwerk. Asav (talk) 03:22, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

MAD program output PD reason[edit]

I've posted a question at File talk:MAD-alfie-1960.jpg#Copyright/PD chain, because I can't figure which level of work is PD-ineligible as opposed to PD-old or PD-self. Since you were involved in the tagging, and have OTRS access, I'm hoping you (or someone) can explain what is going on there, and which tags apply to which level of that work. --Closeapple (talk) 05:11, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

OTRS of File:Ok5.JPG[edit]

Hello Asav, you had added the OTRS tag to File:Jeanderuyt3.JPG. Is it also valid for File:Ok5.JPG? Was it not own work or why was an otrs tag needed at all? Thank you! Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:10, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

No, it's not. That ticket only specifies Jeanderuyt3.JPG. Asav (talk) 22:04, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
Was it not own work or why was an otrs tag needed at all? As you can see there is OTRS pending on the Ok5.jpg. Thanks for your help! Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:16, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Bombing in Oslo 2011 Infographic, english.svg[edit]

Hi Asav,

I went ahead and translated File:Bomb attack on Oslo 2011 (Infographic) Last version.svg to English (here: File:Bombing in Oslo 2011 Infographic, english.svg) since I found the illustration very nice. Unfortunately I was under the impression that UploadWizard had the appropriate functionality for indicating that this was a minimally altered version of an original on Commons, but as it turns out it treats this case as an entirely new upload. I've attempted to manually add the appropriate attribution information to make clear that this isn't my work in any meaningful sense of the word, but I'm not sufficiently familiar with the template system and requirements on Commons to be sure I've got it right. Could you take a look at this image and make sure it's correct? I would have preferred to simply say it was your work, but was worried there would then be some question regarding the difference between alleged author and the uploader. If you don't think this will be an issue, please do feel free to set yourself as the author (as far as I know, simple mechanical translation of very short text strings does not impart a new copyright under any legal doctrine, neither Norwegian nor Amercian). Anyways, kudos on the excellent work on this image! --Xover (talk) 19:42, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Please be aware that the image has been updated to reflect changes to the bomb placement. I've marked older versions for deletion. The updated version can be found at File:Bomb attack on Oslo 2011 (Updated infographic).svg. The attribution is fine, thanks! And thanks for the kudos, too :) Asav (talk) 21:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi Asav, the graphic is nice but unfortunately wrong. The vehicle needs to be turned 90° counterclockwise so that its front is towards the lower entry part of the building and it stands parallel to the road "Grubbegt." - or in other words it must show its back to the user, not its right side. I have this info from the surveillance video, that captured the vehicle, when it was parked there minutes before the explosion. Please turn the vehicle or eliminate it and show only the red circle. --92.228.80.80 00:22, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

I see you've already raised that question on the German WP. It's a question of time, and I'll see if I can make the adjustment you suggest. Asav (talk) 15:12, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Foto[edit]

Warum soll das Bild gelöscht werden File:Sternwarte Hannover im Betrieb kleiner.jpg??? --AxelHH (talk) 09:37, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Ich verstehe nicht, worin die URV liegen soll, das Bild ist von Benutzer Skyman 1693. Bitte benachrichtige mich auf meiner Disk. --AxelHH (talk) 21:56, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Hatfield College Chapel.jpg[edit]

Hello, seeing your deletion request message at File:Hatfield College Chapel.jpg, I have started a deletion request. From the comments I got there, I don't think it should be speedy deleted.--Zolo (talk) 16:09, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

I'm not at all happy with your actions in this matter, and have responded on the image's talk page as well as reinstated the tag. Please do not remove OTRS tags without access to the relevant ticket! Thank you. Asav (talk) 16:43, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Amino acids[edit]

Regarding amino acid table. Thank you for your compliments and suggestions. However you are confusing the proprieties of polarity and hydrophobicity. Tyrosine is classified in my table as hydrophobic, which is correct. Thank you for you oppinion. Dan Cojocari

File:TwistPhelan.jpeg OTRS[edit]

Hallo Asav, I hope you do check the license which is onl file pages when you apply a OTRS tag? ;-) Has File:TwistPhelan.jpeg a license tag as specified in the OTRS mail? Not really.

Sorry, I just had a mean feeling. :-) Please add the license. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 00:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

The file is properly licensed under CC-by-sa 3.0, using our standard license text in ticket 2011111610055521. Where do you see a problem? Asav (talk) 06:45, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
Err, please look at the file page please and search for the license - to you see it? Or do I have bad eyes?! Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
thanks. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 20:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

File:MilesChinn (BW).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MilesChinn (BW).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 09:45, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Farmand 1947.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Farmand 1947.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 14:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Poet David Mason Outdoors, 2012.jpg[edit]

You added OTRS permission here. It says that this is licensed under both CC-BY-SA 1.0 and {{Attribution}}. Are you sure that this is correct? It looks like a strange licence combination. --Stefan4 (talk) 21:21, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

You're absolutely right! It was uploaded as 1.0, but the OTRS ticket says 3.0. I corrected the tag. Thanks for paying attention! Asav (talk) 21:26, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
And is the {{attribution}} template supposed to be there? --Stefan4 (talk) 21:36, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
Well, it was added by the original uploader. "Redistribution, derivative work, commercial use, and all other use is permitted, provided that the copyright holder is properly attributed." essentially says the same as cc-by-sa-3.0, don't you think? Asav (talk) 21:40, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

OTRS ticket 2012082110002073[edit]

Hello Asav. The above ticket licenses a manual's text in wikibooks (Talk:InteriCAD T6 User Manual). I want to ask you if, apart of their text, they also license the images that they uploaded here (but were deleted aw copyvios). Through an email exchange I understand that they want to freely license both text and images -I suggested contacting the OTRS which they did, but did they also license the images as well as text? If they didn't, I'll have them send another email. Thanks, Badseed talk 15:52, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

The ticket license applies to the pdf files as such. It make no exceptions for images, so both text and illustrations are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License version 1.3, according to the e-mail. Asav (OTRS) | Talk 15:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
Thank you for the quick answer. So i take it that the images are OK to stay as GFDL, under the aforementioned ticket. However I'll see if I can get a CC-BY-SA license as well for the images. - Badseed talk 16:32, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Ticket:2012090410009838 and File:Jade Alexis Living Jade9.jpg[edit]

I just let you know that I deleted this file upon request of Rjd0060. You tagged it with Ticket:2011111010013747. Regards -- Rillke(q?) 20:38, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

RfA[edit]

Moin! Hier fehlt noch die entsprechende Unterseite. Viele Grüße, NNW (talk) 08:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Danke! Ich hatte den entsprechenden Abschnitt Commons:Administrators#How do I become an administrator? nicht gesehen. Ich versuch's jetzt. Asav (OTRS) | Talk 08:24, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Cal Rein by Peter Coulson.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cal Rein by Peter Coulson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FASTILY (TALK) 07:52, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Blender 2.65-splash.png[edit]

Könntest du die Quelle bitte vollständig angeben, also die Seite, wo dieses Bild gezeigt wird. --Túrelio (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Wie du auf der Seite Category:Blender 3D splash screens sehen kannst, ist das Bild eines der 38 »splash screens« in der Serie der Blenderausgaben. Das Bild erscheint im Programm an sich. Die Illustration gibt es auf der Seite http://www.blender.org/development/release-logs/blender-265/ zu sehen. (Ich habe die Adresse in der Beschreibung zugefügt.) Blender ist GPL-lizensiert, und das umfasst auch das Eröffnungsbild, nur das Logo ist als Trademark beschützt, allerdings hat das Blender Institute immer den Gebrauch auf Wikimedia zugelassen. Ich hoffe das beantwortet deine Frage! Asav (OTRS) | Talk 17:12, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Alles klar. Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Abel-statue i Slottsparken.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Abel-statue i Slottsparken.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:46, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Cal Rein by Peter Coulson.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cal Rein by Peter Coulson.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

– Philosopher Let us reason together. 11:11, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Bent Patey.jpg[edit]

Asav, you added OTRS ticket to the above file. Can you look up it's license - I have no access to it. --Jarekt (talk) 14:23, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

✓OK I've added the license. Asav (OTRS) | Talk 16:09, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks --Jarekt (talk) 17:06, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Shostakovich Symphony 7 (Leningrad) Flute Theme.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Shostakovich Symphony 7 (Leningrad) Flute Theme.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 11:36, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.