User talk:Ashanda

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

About the image of Dumitru Cornilescu[edit]

I copied the image from the rumanian page of Wikipedia so it cannot be an author rights violation. In addition I would say that it is a photography of public dominion.

Camilo Barcelona Alcázar (talk) 16:52, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for writing. If you look at the Romanian image page, it quite clearly states that the image is indeed copyrighted and being used under the fair use doctrine. Judging for myself, I'd have to say the man looks to be about fifty years old in the photograph. Since he was born in 1891, that would place the photo in the 1940s sometime, too late to be in public domain automatically in most jurisdictions. If you have better information that proves it actually is in the public domain, please feel free to post it. If they allow it, what you should do is upload the image *locally* to the Spanish Wikipedia and assert the *fair use* doctrine. Make sure to read and follow the rules set forth for doing so on the Spanish Wikipedia- I know they can be confusing on the English Wikipedia. If you don't follow the rules they lay down, the image is likely to be deleted from there too. Thanks again for writing. Feel free to contact me if you have any more questions. — Ashanda 21:06, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Conversation was continued at my talk page on the English Wikipedia. — Ashanda 23:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token 98e50860f7e1ebea9440af51e9576bb4[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Category discussion notification Category:Stained glass images of saints has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−