User talk:BS Thurner Hof

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Hallo! - und Willkommen auf Wikimedia Commons! Schön dass Du hier mitarbeitest. Beginne am besten mit dem lesen der Seite Commons:Erste Schritte. Für das Auffinden der Bilder ist es vor allem wichtig, dass die Bilder in einen Artikel eingebaut werden und dieser dann in eine Kategorie gesetzt wird. Wenn nur die Bildbeschreibungsseiten in eine Kategorie gesetzt werden dann funktioniert die Suchfunktion links nicht und es besteht die Gefahr, dass die Bilder doppelt mit unterschiedlichen Namen hochgeladen werden. Da Du ja viele Tierbilder hochlädst ist der Artikelname gleich dem wissenschaftlichen Namen. Eine gute Hilfe ist auch die Seite Wikipedia:Wikimedia Commons. Gruss! Nordelch 16:47, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Noch ein paar Hinweise. Auf den Commons existieren die Tierfamilien meist als Kategorie mit wissenschaftlichem Namen (Beispiel: [[Category:Anatidae]] - Entenvögel). Du brauchst also nur auf der deutschen Wikipedia nachschauen wie dieser Name lautet und kannst so Deine Tierart verlinken.
Tip zum Kopieren: Taste [Strg/ Ctrl] plus Taste [C] für Kopieren in Arbeitsspeicher; Taste [Strg/ Ctrl] plus Taste [V] für Einfügen. Weiterhin viel Spass hier! Nordelch 20:48, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Tragelaphus spekei Weibchen
Kontroliere noch mal die Beschreibungsseite zum Bild rechts - da steht Schwarzstorch also deutsche Beschreibung. Nordelch 21:04, 11 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Ich muss schon wieder meckern. :-) Die Bilder der Waldohreule (Asio otus) waren bei Waldkauz (Strix aluco) eingeordnet. Bitte nicht persönlich nehmen - Fehler macht jeder. Nordelch 20:13, 12 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Image:Gladiator Bronzemedaillon.jpg[edit]

Hi, please add a copyright license to this photo. You can find a number of acceptable licenses at Commons:Copyright tags. Thuresson 04:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:428px-Common Kestrel 1.jpg[edit]

Bitte keine thumbs hochladen. --Saperaud 23:54, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:712px-Common Kestrel 2.jpg[edit]

Hello! I have proposed the above picture for the deletion, because Image:Common Kestrel 2.jpg is the same, only with higher resolution. Hope that's OK with you. --romanm (talk) 22:46, 10 December 2005 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Betta_albimarginata_060311_7.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Betta_albimarginata_060311_7.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Rüdiger Wölk 22:32, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Betta albimarginata 060311 2.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Betta albimarginata 060311 2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Koernerbroetchen 20:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Affenente 0508071.jpg[edit]

Hi! Du hast bei diesem Bild einmal in der Beschreibung oben die lizenz GFDL angegeben und unten eine verbundene GFDL Mit CC-BY... Was ist denn nun richtig? Grüße, __ ABF __ 11:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Australische_Moorenthe_Aythya_australis_050526_1_Ausschnitt.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 12:45, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bletilla_striata_2007-05-13_375.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:06, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Ferocactus_acanthus_v_leconter_0505262.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Iris_'Admiral'_2007-05-13_378.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Iris-Barbata-Hybride_Radiation_0505135.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 13:41, 17 July 2007 (UTC)


Image:Ferocactus acanthus v leconter 0505262.jpg[edit]

Hallo, einen Kaktus mit diesem Namen gibt es leider nicht. Könntest Du Ferocactus acanthodes var. lecontei (Engelm.) G.E.Linds. gemeint haben? Das klingt noch am ähnlichsten und ist ein Synonym zu Ferocactus cylindraceus ssp. lecontei (Engelm.) N.P.Taylor. Gebe mir doch bitte kurz Bescheid, dann setze ich das Bild an die richtige Stelle. Wo hast Du das Bild eigentlich gemacht, in einem BG? Gruß, --Ies 15:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)


Hallo BS Thurner Hof, dein Bild Image:Eulenpokal-Stadt-Schaffhausen-Fayence-16Jhr.jpg ist in der Category:Sculptures in Cologne eingeordnet, obwohl in der Beschreibung "Ehrenpokal der Stadt Schaffhausen" steht. Ist das tatsächlich korrekt? Falls nicht, ist damit die Schweizer Stadt Schaffhausen gemeint? -- Túrelio 09:21, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, BS Thurner Hof!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 07:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Indetification[edit]

Hello my friend,
First, a big thank you for the wonderfull images File:Naso lopezi - Lopez-Nashornfisch.jpg and File:Naso lopezi - Lopez-Nashornfisch imponierend.jpg.
But could you confirm me which species it is ? Naso lopezi as the image name suggest it or Naso vlamingii as your description says.
Cheers Liné1 (talk) 12:43, 28 October 2009 (UTC)


Piepmätze[edit]

Hallo BS Thurner Hof,
die Piepmätze auf File:2007-02-17 059 Pirolgrasmücke Hypergerus atriceps .jpg und File:2007-02-17 052 Pirolgrasmücke Hypergerus atriceps.jpg scheinen einer anderen Spezies anzugehören als im Datennamen angegeben. Hättest du etwas gegen die vorgeschlagene Umbenennung? --Túrelio (talk) 10:54, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Please help replace this outdated license[edit]

Hello!

Thank you for donating images to the Wikimedia Commons. You have uploaded some images in the past with the license {{PD}}. While this was a license acceptable in the early days of Wikimedia, since January 2006, this license has been deprecated and since October 2008 no new uploads with this license was allowed.

The license on older images should be replaced with a better and more specific license/permissions and you can help by checking the images and adding {{PD-self}} if you are the author or one of the other templates that you can see in the template on the image page.

Thank you for your help. If you need help feel free to ask at Commons talk:Licensing or contact User:Zscout370.

The images we would like you to check are:

BotMultichillT 20:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

Your votes for POTY[edit]

Hello, you voted for few images in the final round. It is against the rules. You may vote only for one image. Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 14:09, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:PhiladelphiaInquirerJuly151916.gif[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:PhiladelphiaInquirerJuly151916.gif, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 17:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Location?[edit]

Hi BS Thurner Hof - do you have photo locations for File:Blutweiderich 0507303.jpg, File:Blutweiderich 0507302.jpg, File:Blutweiderich 0507241.jpg, File:Blutweiderich 0506115.jpg, File:Blutweiderich 0506112.jpg please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 22:48, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schwein Pinselohrschwein 0509011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwein Pinselohrschwein 0509011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear BS Thurner Hof,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)