User talk:Basar

Welcome to the Commons, Basar!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}} For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alex G. Spanos Stadium2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light not the best, but I think it's QI. Dori 02:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:Santa Ana River Mouth2.jpg

I just looked at that image in QI. GIMP eh? It needs some additional cropping on the right and lower edges and you might as well crop away those weird highlights from the rocks near the lower edge while you are at it.

Did you use other software before GIMP? -- carol (talk) 00:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

You're right. And it's coming from UFRaw which I use to convert from the raw before I use GIMP. I had thought that priors ones were the result of a miss-crop after rotating but apparently not. Thanks for catching this. Basar (talk) 03:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

You can ask that declined images be discussed, even your own. I would discuss the decline of this image, except for it smells like an lame attempt to keep up the Christian analogies there and that has a "nicer odor" without the rental user there. -- carol (talk) 21:16, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

Ya, looks like someone did that for me and that it'll pass. Basar (talk) 02:51, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

I used to have a joke about a lake that I lived near but did not see that often. Lake Erie. In the seventies, the pollution of those lakes was very much a subject that was on the news often and in politicing (the Clean Water Act was then). There was a local rumor that Lake Erie had caught on fire once also. That is the background for my joke. The joke was something like: Lake Erie, where walking on water is no big deal. That being said, there does seem to be a relationship between the cleanliness of the Great Lakes and the unemployment levels in that area....

Your image is good enough, much better than mine that are similar and not as good as several I have seen there. For whatever that is worth :) -- carol (talk) 03:15, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chroicocephalus philadelphia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fabulous quality. --99of9 05:13, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heliodoxa jacula2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Like a jewel--Korall 07:15, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sayornis saya2.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect -- Archaeodontosaurus 07:27, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tigrisoma mexicanum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a white fringe around the whole animal. Can you do something about that? --Cayambe 19:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)  Comment Good catch. I've reduced sharpening. Basar 21:49, 25 December 2009 (UTC) Now Qi for me - Darius Baužys 08:59, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus heermanni13.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Red bird's beak bring a nice bonus to the picture. --Makele-90 07:54, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sayornis saya2.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sayornis saya2.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Myadestes melanops.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 20:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Limnodromus scolopaceus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive ! - Darius Baužys 06:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)  Comment I would support FP. --99of9 06:53, 10 January 2010 (UTC) FP for me --George Chernilevsky 09:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC) Yes and VI to! -- Archaeodontosaurus 09:40, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Anas acuta15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good - Darius Baužys 08:11, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Limnodromus scolopaceus (Long-billed Dowitcher).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

all criteria met, best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 23:13, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi Basar! It is my nomination, however result - yours! One more award for your nice job.
With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:31, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Limnodromus scolopaceus.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Limnodromus scolopaceus.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:01, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

POTD

Hi Basar!

File:Limnodromus scolopaceus.jpg is picture of the day on April, 5th, 2010.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:44, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for placing it as a picture of the day and nominating it for VI, it is a nice honor :)

--Best wishes, Basar (talk) 06:49, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Butorides virescens2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very nice and good for FP IMO --George Chernilevsky 09:11, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ardea herodias51.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Totodu74 10:18, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stelgidopteryx serripennis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Nevit 04:14, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpodacus mexicanus5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Cephas 00:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carpodacus mexicanus6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Amazing shot, it looks like a camouflage. Danilo P 23:45, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Carpodacus mexicanus6.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Carpodacus mexicanus6.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 16:00, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aythya affinis.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --George Chernilevsky 11:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aythya marila.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Von.grzanka 20:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baeolophus bicolor 15.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:56, 17 April 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Your adult Northern Rough-winged swallow photo is so beautiful! Locust Valley (talk) 12:46, 12 March 2024 (UTC)