User talk:Bastique

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Please start a topic by posting "Add topic"

File:Israeli_soldier_at_Abraham_mosque.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Israeli_soldier_at_Abraham_mosque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Chesdovi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Outside_the_Project_Scope.pdf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Outside_the_Project_Scope.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Senator2029talk 04:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | português do Brasil | +/−

Dear Bastique. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnstel (talk) 21:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Oh, poo. Here I thought I was getting messages by email, and I wasn't. And this never came up as a notice when I logged into Commons. I'm sad about this, didn't really want it to happen. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 03:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Personality rights deletion[edit]

I'm with you when it comes to deleting on a goodwill base rather than playing "gotcha". You don't have be a lone wolf. The deletion discussion mentioned on the mailing list had me pretty horrified. Time to be more active on the DR page... --Dschwen (talk) 16:34, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes, it's pretty a fairly daunting discussion. The trick, I think, for some, is to maintain composure and not insult the intelligence or question motive of those who have been involved in the discussions. I think the regrettable decisions have been combination of poorly worded requests + limited involvement in discussions + focus on licensing over courtesy. I believe it's only a matter of broadening our thought process. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 18:12, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Double DR closure[edit]

Because of your double closure, overlooking the two preceeding DRs for the same file, and for overlooking the evidence made in the arguments in the DR, I am forced to take this matter to AN/U. If you would like to defend why you kept it, despite all the evidence, feel free to. This is not about on you or your adminship, this is simply a matter that must be dealt with, and IDK where else to take it. Fry1989 eh? 06:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank you Bastique for finally pretty this issue to rest. Jetijones (talk) 16:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

I don't think this means that the issue is at rest. Merely that your version of the image remains undeleted. Anyway. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 17:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

File:68735-Kholoud.jpg[edit]

Hey bastique, in relation to File:68735-Kholoud.jpg, I have reverted the OTRS permission, due to its appearance on other websites before the upload date, such as this from 7 February 2011. It is possible that Tarteeb is the copyright holder, and that they have uploaded, but there are obviously going to be some doubt (low res, etc), that only OTRS can fulfill. russavia (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey Russavia, Tarteeb has already contacted OTRS and fulfilled that matter... the OTRS agent instructed Tarteeb to upload it himself. The evidence is in the email. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 01:14, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
Let me be clear, the uploader has identified himself as the copyright holder prior to uploading the image. The OTRS agent involved instructed the uploader how to upload and release the image. The fact that the image is low res and appears on the web as of a prior date does not negate the uploader's claim of ownership. The image would have been released to news agencies prior to their upload here to Commons. The uploader intentionally chose a release on Commons releasing the image which is good enough, isn't it? Copyright ownership + intent to release + the right steps? No problem. I don't see the reason to cause people to jump through bigger hoops. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 01:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Template:Wtf[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:Wtf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

91.57.85.33 02:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Calder Eagle[edit]

Do I understand that the outcome of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eagle by A.Calder.jpg means that my own photos of this same sculpture, which were deleted as copyvios, may now be restored? - Jmabel ! talk 15:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

I closed the discussion because it was a new discussion that had unwittingly reopened a settled discussion. If the underlying sculpture is in fact in the public domain because of lack of notice, then any photographs of the sculpture would be permitted as photographs of a public domain piece of artwork. I advise you to take this to COM:U and cite that precedent. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 15:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
I just saw that you said your files were deleted as "out of scope" rather than for copyright reasons. If they were deleted out of scope, then this discussion would not apply. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 15:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Never mind, your phrasing "out of scope for copyright reasons" confused me. If they were deleted on grounds of copyright, then if the underlying sculpture is public domain, they should, in fact, be restored. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 15:59, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Location?[edit]

Hi Bastique - do you have a photo location for File:Colinus virginianus (m).jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 14:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Central Florida (Venus, Highlands County). I just added a Geolocation to the picture :) --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 01:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Admin Request[edit]

I want to be Administrator on Afan Oromo section. I think no one is acting on that section I think. Is that possible? Teferi Kebebew (talk) 07:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Ask this question at COM:VP. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 05:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Negative_images[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Negative_images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

McZusatz (talk) 17:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Edit request[edit]

At File:Wikimedia New York City logo.svg I would like to add "Logotipo de Wikimedia Ciudad de Nueva York (Inglés)" in Spanish, and tack "(English)" at the end, as I want to see if one could have a Spanish version of this logo made. Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 03:45, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

done Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 03:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Thank you :) WhisperToMe (talk) 10:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:To Commons.svg[edit]

Hello!

When you edited this image 2 years ago, you added four fragments to it, but you did not specify their origin. IMHO it is unlikely that each of 4 pictures is either a public domain image or your own work. Including other images in your work without providing the attribution may violate licenses of those images. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Hello!
It's unlikely I did anything to violate licenses. So no. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 04:55, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Je ne vous crois pas. Spécifiez l'attribution s.v.p. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
Note, the above reads "I don't believe you. Please specify attributions." This user is accusing me--someone with an active history on Commons, as an administrator (still), bureaucrat, and checkuser; a former steward, as well as having been a longtime employee of the Wikimedia Foundation--of lying. In the first place, we don't accuse other users of lying without evidence, or past history of making things up. Since I'm not active lately, I don't know if this kind of uncivil behavior is becoming normal around here or not, but it's a regrettable trend. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 22:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
I don't care that you don't believe me. That is your problem, not mine. The attribution is already perfectly specified and clear. If there are portions of images there that you don't think I created myself, then I used public domain images that don't require attribution. So stop menacing me, s.v.p. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


Incnis, you have any reason to doubt Cary here? Any proof any of those images aren't PD as he says? Béria Lima msg 23:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

  • Well, Incnis Mrsi was absolutely right in his suspicions, those images are not public domain. At the very least the guitar (File:Babicz Octane Blue Flame.jpg) used without any attribution was CC-BY-SA 3.0. I'm not even going to search origin of other added pictures, it's the burden of uploader, not mine. --Trycatch (talk) 14:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
    You are making claims (the guitar used;) as well with no factual basis. You also find it easy to accuse people of things that are unprovable. Again, it doesn't matter that you think one image is derived from the other, it does not make it a fact. The included image is so entirely different from the earlier image that making any attribution or proof of derivation from one to the other is impossible. The included portions are so small that proof of derivation is impossible to make, and the de minimis nature of their use (they do not actually provide any creative value on their own originality to the underlying SVG). There is no copyright "violation" involved.
    I'm sure that both you and Incnis Mrsi can find better things to do with your time than nit-picking fights with Commons users who have been less active in recent years. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
    Rather than get into a war of principals with people who would rather start fights with other users over picayune matters, I've replaced the tiny de minimis image thumbnails with other tiny de minimis images thumbnails. Maybe the users who spend time questing these can get a life now. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 19:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
    No, it was not de minimis, not even close, and yeah, it was a blatant copyright violation. Btw, expected reaction was something like "thanks for pointing out of my mistake" and not that bunch of nonsense attacks, but thanks for cleaning up after yourself anyway -- I understand that for some people it's just hard to be polite. --Trycatch (talk) 09:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
    No, it was not "blatant copyright violation", not even close, and yeah, it was de minimis. Btw, expected reaction is something like, "It looks like there might be a problem with this image" and not that bunch of nonsense attacks. I'm sure you work hard to see the project is spotless, but it probably blinds you to the way you deal with other people--your way of handling people leaves a lot to be desired. Frankly, you're the one with a hard time being polite, it would seem. -- Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
    Was File:Babicz_Octane_Blue_Flame.jpg (its JPEG data) included to your upload entirely? If not, then by which factor was it scaled down? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
    Also, there is no such thing as a "copyright violation." The matter involved licensing, not copyright. You should probably learn to figure out what it is you're talking about before you go to people's talk pages and berate them. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto squirrel car 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto squirrel car 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto squirrel car.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto squirrel car.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Maker faire 2009 squirrel car squirrel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maker faire 2009 squirrel car squirrel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto hippy vehicle 092.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto hippy vehicle 092.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:23, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto hippy vehicle 094.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto hippy vehicle 094.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 13:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Bastique 20061023[edit]

Hi, Cary Bass, as you rightly say, this image should be renamed. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 07:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Please be clear. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
The image says: latest version (probably need to rename the image...so what :)). That is why, and it is also a totally different image, so I do not quite understand. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
I should delete this image anyway. It serves no useful purpose, and it is a personal image. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Okay, if that is what you want. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 16:41, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

Help: no-FoP Italy[edit]

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Chapter logo for Wikimedia Cascadia?[edit]

Hi there. I see you uploaded the chapter logos for WM NYC. If you have the ability and time, would it be possible to upload logos (or other images such as banners, barnstars, etc.) for Wikimedia Cascadia? I am not familiar with how to create similar logos, so I made an appeal for assistance here. If you are not able to help, no worries, just had to ask! (I will likely ask several contributors for assistance, so it might be worth checking to see if someone else has already offered to help or has uploaded images -- thanks!) --Another Believer (talk) 22:19, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Flip image[edit]

Can you flip the image so that it more like the Symantec logo? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Symantec_1.svg http://v12ntoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/symantec-logo.gif --2.216.55.12 20:40, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | português do Brasil | +/−

Dear Bastique. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you Trijnsteltalk 23:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Template:ConvertToSVG-MN[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:ConvertToSVG-MN has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ricordisamoa 09:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Маьрша энциклопеди.svg[edit]

Здравствуйте. Сделал логотип для чеченской википедии но не как не могу выбрать шрифт пожалуйста сделайте шрифт как здесь. С/у -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 08:34, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

I ask how to change the font on the Russian here. -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 08:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rudolf-Hillebrecht-Platz Hannover Bauverwaltung Büste Stadtbaurat Rudolf Hillebrecht Bildhauer Siegfried Zimmermann.jpg[edit]

Hello!

Your closure of of this DR is wrong. The German FOP-regulations do differ between indoors and outdoors. This image must be deleted if this sculpture is located in a building. This must be found out in the DR. But a valid evidence has not been brought. Please act accordingly. --High Contrast (talk) 17:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

My reading of the English-language version of German regulations says nothing about "indoor" versus "outdoor" public place. But I don't speak German. By all means, if you're certain it needs to be deleted, then, please delete it! One does not need to "find out that it's in a building" on the DR. It's obviously in a building. Look at he picture. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 02:10, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
Yes, FOP in Germany does differ between an outdoor or indoor installation. And it is not so clear that this sculpture is inside a building - especially for someone who was never there. Please revert your decission and let me know if I should handle this. --High Contrast (talk) 17:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done --High Contrast (talk) 15:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | português do Brasil | +/−

Dear Bastique, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Dolley Madison[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Dolley Madison has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this <articlefeedback-table-heading-page>, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

2602:306:CD29:AC00:1133:4ED4:B728:26B4 01:06, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Request for file creation[edit]

Hello Bastique, I noticed you are the creator of File:Wikimedia Belgium.svg or a version the logo is derived from. Is it possible for you to create another version of this logo with the same text, but now on the right side of the round logo? Similar to the ones in the section 11 on and according to the Visual identity guidelines. The Visual identity guidelines describe that the distance between the round shape and the text should have the size of the diameter of the red circle. Is it possible for you to create that file for me? Thanks! Romaine (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Hi Romaine. Thanks. As I was an employee of the Wikimedia Foundation at the time, I had more resources at my disposal to create these. Unfortunately, I do not at this time. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:32, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Okay, thanks. Do you know who I can ask instead? Any advice? Greetings - Romaine (talk) 16:52, 27 October 2014 (UTC)


Template:Wtf (yet another deletion debate with no new arguments)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:Wtf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DLindsley (My talk page) 16:31, 15 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Cotton boll nearly ready for harvest.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Cotton boll nearly ready for harvest.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cotton boll nearly ready for harvest.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 11 December 2014 (UTC)