User talk:Be..anyone

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Hi, this is my talk page; I've archived some old stuff manually: 2014, 2015. If you want to discuss an issue on a specific page please use its talk page, because the chances to get an uninvolved third opinion here about something you or I did are lousy.
Feel free to add a comment to a section indented with an additional colon below an existing signature. You can start a ==new topic== with the new section button, or do it yourself at the bottom. Please sign your text with ~~~~ or similar.

File:Blu ray 3d (logo).svg[edit]

Hi, when you upload files from local Wikipedia, your must add the original upload log, (you can use CommonsHelper to generate the log) and the original source. Thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

IIRC I used some wizard in the past for two other transfers, and didn't now because fair use on w: to PD textlogo on c: isn't "normal". I forgot the name of commonshelper and that it doesn't care about license issues. Thanks for fixing the info. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:14, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Deine reverts[edit]

Ich würde es viel mehr schätzen wenn du es erst mal mir mitteilst womit du unzufrieden bist, anstatt meine edits zu revertieren. Fände ich besseren Benutzerstil. sarang사랑 10:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Gestern ging die Galerie noch, heute war sie kaputt, und die letzte Änderung war Dein neues {{Ifimt}} mit diversen Unter- und Nebentemplates. Da ist "zurück auf funktionierende Version" das Mittel der Wahl, ich habe keine Ahnung, wann Du online bist, und ob Du das flicken willst, wirst, oder kannst. Ich habe auch keine Lust, verwirrende Templates zu verstehen, wenn sie nicht funktionieren, der Notflick von {{Valid SVG}} wegen Validator-Crash hat mich mehrere Stunden gekostet. –Be..anyone (talk) 10:33, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Timestamps JFTR, Talk:Ifimt 09:46 vs. 10:07 Ifimt/doc. –Be..anyone (talk) 10:52, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

My talk page[edit]

Please do not post on my talk page. --Timeshifter (talk) 01:43, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

I also prefer that this won't be necessary again. –Be..anyone (talk) 02:00, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Re: Pushing this policy into full effect[edit]

Hi. I think you're misunderstanding the proposal (or I'm misunderstanding your comment). There is absolutely no change to the templates used to tagged for speedy deletion. All those will be left exactly the way it is. Can we discuss here (to not make that thread a mess)? Rehman 05:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Wikipedia-screenshot[edit]

Hello,

I don't know what's going on or if there's any consensus for what you did, but the redirect is not working.

Regards, Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:11, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Well, looks like someone fixed it. Thibaut120094 (talk) 06:41, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Strange, looking at {{Wikimedia-screenshot}} my last edit was and still is 2015-04-03 01:15, and the redirect now also working for you was 02:36. The French version has a 01:43 timestamp on the wikimedia side, and the redirect (=move) from the French wikipedia side was at 2015-04-02 23:35. Chronologically all as it should be, but now that you've said it, no, I did not purge all language versions explicitly, this could be a cache issue, sorry. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:34, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Template:Empty category/doc[edit]

I don’t want an edit war. So please answer me: why is TemplateBox worse than direct TemplateData (except that the description was broken)? I see that much description and links are missing from your version (e.g. a big translation link; many people won’t find (or even search) the way to localize, while if it’s easy to find how to translate, they will translate it). I also don’t find anything “archaic” except TemplateBox was created in 2009. --Tacsipacsi (talk) 19:05, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Tango-Lizenz[edit]

Hallo Be..anyone, du willst doch jetzt nicht jede einzelne Datei (so fast 400) einem Lizenz-Review unterziehen (nur weil in den Dateien der einzelne Author mit der alten Lizenz steht)? Ich verstehe deine Skepsis nicht, der Fall ist doch klar!? Bis später, LG User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  15:20, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

Nein, das fiel mir nur gerade auf, weil ich meine Beobachtungsliste alt nach neu abarbeite. Der Ping kam etwa gleichzeitig mit meinem Dank für die Prüfung von System-users.svg an Thibaut120094, was ich warum auch immer auch beobachte. Vermutlich die beiden einzigen Tangos, beide mit glasklarem PD von oben, und ebenso klarem CC BY-SA 2.0 in den Metadaten. Sollte eigentlich geflickt werden, das ist etwa wie Exif hü und Dateiseite hott. Bockmist für Weiterverwender, die PD runterladen, als PD weiter veröffentlichen, und plötzlich als gewöhnliche CC-copyvio Diebe enttarnt werden. Klein gedruckt "zuunrecht enttarnt" schafft nix weg. –Be..anyone (talk) 15:33, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Alles klar, nichts fur ungut, ich habe noch mal beim System-user geantwortet. Im Prinzip müssen dann alle alten Versionen durch die Revision "tango-icon-theme-0.8.90" ersetzt werden!? User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  17:38, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Wenn das nicht manuell war, hast Du scheinbar ein gutes Entmüllungswerkzeug. Die Autorennamen waren in beiden von mir betrachteten Fällen gut, also auf der "Tango-Leute-Seite" gelistet. –Be..anyone (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Wie meinst du das? Tatsächlich stehen auch noch in 230 Dateien ein Author (und ich kann jetzt gar nicht sagen wieviele Dateien es genau sind, allein "Jakub Steiner" hat 188). Du meinst alle Authoren müssen in der Datei erhalten bleiben und/oder auf der Dateibeschreibungsseite gelistet werden? Und ja ich verwende ein Tool, es heißt "SVG Cleaner" ^^ (aber wie gesagt verstehe ich grad nicht den Zusammenhang den du meinst). Bis später, schön Abend noch. User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  17:59, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Müssen muss da gar nix, ich habe keine Ahnung, was Du da wie im Detail machst. Aber die Autoreninfo wäre bei Aufwand unter fünf Minuten erhaltenswert, andernfalls nicht.:-)Be..anyone (talk) 18:04, 20 April 2015 (UTC)
Hej, also die OptimierungsTools sind schon ziemlich anpassbar. Ich habe mal ein Bsp. hochgeladen. Neuerdings kann Inkscape tatsächlich seine alten Ellipsen und Circles in entsp. echte native SVG-Opjekte wandeln (daher es geht keine Information verloren). Das kannst du beim Abspeichern in Inkscape unter "Optimiertes SVG" einstellen (Metadata behalten). VG User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  06:38, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
PS: Die Genauigkeit habe ich auf 5 gestellt (normal 4, ab und zu verwende ich auch 3 und selten 2). Trotzdem sieht man einen Unterschied bei dem Bsp. (wenn man ganz genau hinschaut). Das liegt daran das die Pfade ebenfalls "gestretcht" waren (also eigtl. ein Fehler im Original, die tatsähclich nicht selten vorkommen). Vgl. dazu SMirC-wasntI.svg (den Mund).
PPS: Wenn gewünscht könnte ich per AWB alle Autoren der Dateien aus den Metadaten eintragen!? User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  06:44, 24 April 2015 (UTC) User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  06:47, 24 April 2015 (UTC)
Vergiss bitte, dass ich das erwähnt habe, Du hast jetzt schon mehr als 5 Minuten dafür verbraucht. Wenn ich Erbsen zählen will, darf ich, aber ich kann nicht andere damit nerven.:-)Be..anyone (talk) 15:50, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Please do not editwar[edit]

Hi, I have contested your changes to Template:Shortcut and Commons:Screenshots. Unless you consider my reverts vandalistic or otherwise against policy, you should not reinstate your changes without prior consensus. Doing so is considered editwarring, therefore I am hereby asking you to revert yourself immediately.    FDMS  4    18:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I consider edits with an appropriate summary, which are no spam/vandalism or obvioius error, as constructive or—assuming some kind of good faith—potentially constructive, while I consider reverts of such edits demanding a discussion in the summary as destructive and against policy. Start a discussion on the relevant talk page when you revert constructive edits. If you fail to do this it is a bad case of WP:OWN, or here COM:OWN. Crying "edit war" by the side which would violate 3RR first is a poor argument. –Be..anyone (talk) 06:20, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
A discussion about a proposed change should start with a proposal to change – as I'm not the one who proposes to make said change I don't think it would be appropriate if I started the discussion.    FDMS  4    17:06, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Re: File:Classic smiley.svg[edit]

Hi! Yes, it's me. I had draw it using CorelDRAW! and proudly it is now used heavily on the Internet. --FML hello 00:40, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Just a note: it is because I did it on PNG when Wikimedia didn't support SVG yet. Someone erased the old picture I had uploaded before and uploaded this SVG version. --FML hello 00:43, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
And yes, the licensing is a little confusing. I can't remember why this is like this, but I'm pretty sure I published it originally in public domain, so actually you can apply any license over it, it is public domain anyway. If you want to fix that, feel free. --FML hello 00:45, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I've updated {{igen|U|v|+}} to {{igen|D|v|+}} for corelDraw instead of Unknown, but I don't think that wikidata uses the "tool" info for COM:MRD yet. I'm not going to touch your license, it's your subpage, you're alive and kicking, you can fix it as you see fit. Not necessarily in this decade.:-)Be..anyone (talk) 07:08, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

TUSC[edit]

Hallo Be..anyone. Nachdem die Diskussion archiviert wurde, halt hier. Magst du unter User talk:Magog the Ogre#Problem with Creation of a TUSC Account vorbeischauen und es nochmals versuchen? --Leyo 09:07, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for info, but as the user put it, I cannot be "arsed" to test this tool, I was only curious what the apparently obsolete documentation tried to say. –Be..anyone (talk) 06:53, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

File:Ussr-userbox.png[edit]

You can speedy it.