User talk:Be..anyone

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Hi, this is my talk page; I've archived some old stuff manually: 2014.  Feel free to add a comment to a section indented with an additional colon below an existing paragraph.  You can start a  ==new topic== with the new section button, or do it yourself at the bottom.  Please sign your text with  ~~~~ or similar.

Merkwürdig[edit]

dass sich da ausgerechnet drei Germans treffen um über Trivialitäten zu diskutieren... Wo JuTa so ein Problem erkannte sehe ich immer noch keines, und IMHO haben seine diesbezüglichen Aktivitäten die Wikipedia nicht wesentlich verschönert. Es ist vielleicht typisch deutsch, dass wir uns alle um mehr Ordnung bemühen? Jedenfalls, danke für deine Hilfe in dieser Angelegenheit -- sarang사랑 15:54, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

League of Legends.png[edit]

I'm still here, yeah. I just wanna ask you a question. If I upload text from the same image it won't be licensed anyway? I mean like simple text logo or something else?--Spillik (talk) 09:59, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Follow-up to a DR: Now I'm lost, I don't recall what text you had on your image. If you want to use the image on Wikipedia upload it there (not here) as "fair use" (it's definitely possible, but no guarantee that it survives there.)
If you want to quote some text in an article on Wikipedia, that's by definition "fair use" (ignoring madness like "I quoted a complete book", of course). You could use w:en:Template:Cite web#Quote in a reference for some statement, example:

This is odd.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://where.you.found.it
|title=title of the web page|date=2014|accessdate=2015-01-01|author=who wrote that
|publisher=LoL.org (or whatever if relevant)|quote=The oddity here is the copyright}}</ref>

Be bold is a policy, if you get it wrong somebody will fix or revert it, no problem. –Be..anyone (talk) 10:30, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
  • The text from this image with brown tracings. --Spillik (talk) 10:36, 31 December 2014 (UTC)
    You can certainly write "League of Legends" whenever it pleases you outside of defamatory contexts.:tongue:Be..anyone (talk) 10:48, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

This edit in removing Category:Christopher Michel was done since the subject is not Christopher Michel. It is supposed to be in Category:Photographs by Christopher Michel and I have now added it here. Alan Liefting (talk) 22:54, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

This AWB thingy lies in edit summaries. Tnx for fixing the cat, I was sure that it's no selfie, but couldn't figure out who was the person and who was the photographer. –Be..anyone (talk) 23:44, 31 December 2014 (UTC)

Are you porting Commons documentation system to Meta and MW?[edit]

Just wondering... it possibly helps me to better understand the issues you are trying to address. -- Rillke(q?) 01:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

I tried to fix Patrick's old m:tdoc (simplified vintage 2010 c:Documentation) using the 2014 c:Documentation, and ended up with something still broken, but better than it was, not more almost all templates tracked in "redefined parameters". I'm not looking at missing modules (= don't know scribunto yet). continued on Template_talk:Documentation/layout… –Be..anyone (talk) 07:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Kuiper belt - Oort cloud numbered.svg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kuiper_belt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Ich habe das beobachtet[edit]

dass Code einen Disput mit Livioandronico hatte. Dieser ging über einige Zeit. Es ist in QI üblich, dass derjenige, der eine Diskussion mit jemanden beginnt, diese - solange sie nicht im Diskussionsabschnitt steht - auch selbst durchführt. Es ist immer unangenehm, wenn hier Überstimmungen vorkommen. Dafür hat man ja die spätere, nachfolgende Option der Diskussion. Aber eben nicht auf der ersten Ebene. Bitte halte dich daran. --Hubertl (talk) 00:28, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Worum geht's? Das Radikalste, was ich auf der QI-Seite in 2015 gemacht habe, war ein ansonsten harmloses {{unsigned}}, was den Bot verwirren wird. –Be..anyone (talk) 05:22, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Es war bei der Nominierung des Kreuzganghof-Brunnens. Code hat dich eh darauf aufmerksam gemacht, aber offenbar nicht angepingt. --Hubertl (talk) 10:57, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Die village pump am 9.1.? Ich habe keine Referenz in einer guten halben Stunde gefunden, auch nicht auf w:it:, also gut genug wie von Livioandronico2013 erklärt, oder ein Fall für "discuss", wenn code was diskutieren will. –Be..anyone (talk) 11:16, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
Non favello il tedesco,dunque non intervengo...--LivioAndronico talk 11:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
No problem, I only wrote that I agreed with your judgement in my promotion.Smile fasdfdsfoiueire.svg But "Kreuzganghof-Brunnen" sounds very good for a German description. –Be..anyone (talk) 14:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Confusing[edit]

Steve Comisar has many educational images from fraud prevention appearances on national television programs. Can these images be used on Wikimedia even if they are published elsewhere on the internet? Is the Wikimedia licensing/copyright policy the same as for Wikipedia? There are a lot of people's photos on Wikimedia that are all over the internet. This is so confusing. How do I get Comisar's photos on Wikimedia? Suggestions? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tauzlynn77 (talk • contribs)

I've never heard of that guy. On the English Wikipedia you can upload small pictures as "fair use" for an article (= page) using this picture as illustration. That's allowed, because your freedom to report something is more important than copyright. On commons (here) "fair use" is not good enough, all media here must be free for (almost) any purpose (incl. commercial use.) For File:Steve_Comisar_Profile_Photo.png here I doubt that it's okay, "photo was taken by me at home" sounds like TV-screenshot or similar (with a copyright by somebody else.) –Be..anyone (talk) 05:07, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Es ist nicht die feine Art[edit]

einen Kollegen zu overrulen, wenn er gerade eine kleine Änderung anfragt, der Fotograf aber noch nicht reagiert hat. Ich hab deine Pro-Entscheidung auf Discuss gestellt. Eigentlich unnötigerweise, denn das hätte mit einer kleinen Änderung durch X-RAY erledigt sein können. Es gibt viele Bilder, welche noch niemand angegriffen hat. Viel Raum für deine Entscheidungen.--Hubertl (talk) 16:24, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Bearbeitungsgeschichte: promo (edit conflict, only support) File:Dülmen,_Lüdinghauser_Tor_--_2014_--_2881.jpg. "Wer zuerst schiesst, blockiert alle anderen" kann auch nicht gut sein. –Be..anyone (talk) 16:35, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
Es hat niemand geschossen, es war eine konstruktive Anfrage an x-Ray, die üblicherweise und auf freundlichem Weg ohne Bewertung abgehandelt wird. Das erspart dann in Folge einen 8-tägigen unnötigen Diskussionsprozess. Ziemlich sinnlose Aktion von dir, völlig undurchsichtig und völlig jenseits dessen, was der übliche, ständig genau in dieser Art durchgeführte Vorgang ist. Wie ich bereits schrieb: Es gibt ausreichend zu tun, aber misch dich nicht in bereits bestehende Beurteilungsprozesse ein. Wenn X-Ray die schiefen Bereiche geklärt hat, dann wird Dnalor - so wie bereits beschrieben - die Sache positiv bewerten. Wenn du die Regeln/Abläufe nicht durchschaust, frag einfach auf der Disku.--Hubertl (talk) 23:14, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
BTW: was bitte, meinst du mit:spent days for this POV? Das versteht keiner und deshalb auch mein Eingreifen!--Hubertl (talk) 23:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
In der Kategorie, Bilder von diesem Tor mit diesem Blickwinkel über drei Tage. Wenn ich mehrere Minuten lang ein Bild beschnüffelt habe, und es gut finde, werde ich das auch weiterhin sofort so sagen, bevor ich vergesse, wann und wo das war, und nicht auf vollkommen sinnfreie {{not done}} o.ä. warten. –Be..anyone (talk) 23:55, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Blu ray 3d (logo).svg[edit]

Hi, when you upload files from local Wikipedia, your must add the original upload log, (you can use CommonsHelper to generate the log) and the original source. Thanks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 02:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

IIRC I used some wizard in the past for two other transfers, and didn't now because fair use on w: to PD textlogo on c: isn't "normal". I forgot the name of commonshelper and that it doesn't care about license issues. Thanks for fixing the info. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:14, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Scallop diagram vote?[edit]

Hi, I noticed your Oppose vote to my nomination of my scallop diagram for featured picture (Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Scallop Diagram2.svg). The image now passes validation, and I have discussed the usage of numbers and language neutrality in the nomination discussion. Today is the image's last day for consideration— if you and one other voter switch your votes to support, the image will pass! Without these things, it looks likely to fail. Having addressed the validation issue, do you think you'd be willing to switch your vote before time runs out?? I hope so! Thank you! KDS4444 (talk) 10:37, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Your SVG is already legendary, it crashed the validator if called with the "show source" parameter, also when it was still Invalid. I'm at modem speed at the moment, Chrome refused to download the SVG, some Microsoft Download Manager, well, managed this.Smile fasdfdsfoiueire.svgBe..anyone (talk) 12:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)