- Hi, this is my talk page; there are yet no archives. Feel free to add a comment to a section indented with an additional colon below an existing paragraph. You can start a ==new section== with the add topic button, or do it yourself at the bottom. Please sign your text with ~~~~ or similar.
From lion d'Or contributer- Mlane
Thank you for taking the time to explain.
JPEG is certainly easier for me to do. The instructions were to stay in JPEG, if it was photographs, but otherwise PNG. My results didn't look like photos in my mind, so I reasoned that must mean to do PNG. On my screens (laptop and iPhone) they both look the same. I'll follow your advice. Thank you.
As to the original: I'm not sure if that is the original. I went back to the the Inn and took another picture, since I wasn't sure I kept the first one. I'll have to revisit the new uploaded image again, as I had so many versions. I'm not sure what I did.
As to size, I certainly understand the concept, and agree, why double the download. However, the execution may take me a little time to work out.
As to the filtered image, after looking at the filtered image, I'm surprised I was pleased with it. My memory is that out of curiosity, I used a total of 3 or 4 filters from the smart phone, and possibly 2 in Photoshop, non of which I remembered. I think it was the first time I had done something like that, and I was shocked that it worked. Simple pleasures.
- Okay, but I'll refuse to discuss one topic on more than two talk pages… ;-) –Be..anyone (talk) 14:07, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
HIV Image deletion
You have opposed the deletion of the image used on the HIV page by claiming that the image is in fact encyclopedic even though it does not have a reliable source. How do you reconcile this obvious contradiction? Please read the discussion on the HIV talk page and reconsider your decision.DavoDavoDavo (talk) 05:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)