User talk:Benoit Rochon

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Filigreed Commons Logo.png Discussion page
Wikipedia-logo-v2-no-text.svg
Wikipédia (fr)
Wikimedia-logo.svg
GLAM-Wiki
Wikisource-logo.svg
Wikisource (fr)
Wikimedia Community Logo.svg
META-Wiki
Commons-logo.svg
Commons
Wikimedia-logo.svg
Wikimedia Canada
Presentation Contributions Attribution Notes Discussions

Contents

Wiki Loves Monuments[edit]

Bonjour. Would you be interested in helping organize a potential Canadian component of the 2012 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments? Given your experience with "Wikipedia Takes Montreal", your expertise would be very valuable. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 16:02, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I've responded to your emails, but your last email makes it seem like you did not get my reply. Just want to confirm you received my latest reply. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 02:04, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
I, SarahStierch, hereby award you, Antaya, with the Photographer's Barnstar for your wonderful photographs and speedy uploads during GLAMcamp DC! Your images really help to document the event and will surely be used in future documentation about it. Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 04:23, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

^^^ YES, what she said!!! Very nice collection! I am intrigued, by the way, but the .mov files you apparently tried to upload…do you have videos in a format that doesn't work here? Maybe you could send them to me offline…? -Pete F (talk) 03:45, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Techman224Talk 23:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Activité Papillons en Liberté - Jardin botanique de Montréal.ogv[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Activité Papillons en Liberté - Jardin botanique de Montréal.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Pristurus (talk) 13:15, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Motd 2012-03-19[edit]

Hello Benoit, your video is now listed as Motd for the commons main page. I am hopeful to see more of your films on commons in future. Greetings from Germany, --Pristurus (talk) 22:09, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Merci pour organiser Wiki Love Monuments Canada! Il semble que beaucoup de travail! InverseHypercube 02:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

please do not delete the photo[edit]

since the article in Spanish Wikipedia jessie need the truth is that there are items that do not have pictures.--CampRocks305 04:18, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Sorry all the images on Commons are under free licence, like Licencias Creative Commons for instance. Jessie is copyrights of Disney. I'm sorry, but I had to delete couple of your images because of copy violation. Please read Sobre las licencias before uploading on Commons. Thank you, and sorry again. Benoit Rochon (talk) 04:32, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
  • why not upload them yourself and me an my deleted photos created by such securities and other deleted but not put anything here that are good for eliminating all but do not realize that such images are needed in Spanish Wikipedia

Fotos de Juan Martín Del Potro[edit]

Hola.

He visto que todas las fotos que subí me las marcaste como que viola los derechos de autor.

Me podrías enseñar a como subir fotos que no me las bloqueen. Porque la explicación que me da Commons.

Podrías, por favor?

Porque hay fotos de Del Potro pero hasta el 2010. Faltan en el 2011 y el 2012. Y yo quiero subir pero me las bloquean.

Saludos. Franco120199 (talk) 05:56, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Benoit Rochon, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons!--Morning Sunshine (talk) 02:21, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

tagging for speedy deletion[edit]

Hi Benoit,
thanks for detecting and tagging so many copyvios. However, the way you tag them, is somewhat suboptimal and produces additional work for the deletion admin. Per this diff I assume that you manually add "Copyvio|Notification of copyright violation|source=http://...". If that is correct, then please try to use the "copyvio" entry from the Toolbox (the third box in the left column on image pages). This way, the uploader is notified automatically and the copyvio-source-URL is put at such a place in the message template, that it is automatically pasted into the relevant field, when the deleting admin clicks on the waste-bin icon. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 15:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Copyright violations[edit]

Hello!

Thanks for your work against copyright violations on Commons.

But please do not use the copyviotag like this {{Copyvio|Notification of copyright violation|source=xyz}} but use this one instead {{Copyvio|xyz}}. Thank you in advance. Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 09:05, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Since 2 days, I'm using the "Quick Delete" gadget. Benoit Rochon (talk) 11:48, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Hi Benoit. Okay? Could you help me? I published my picture in a frame that is in my house.

And he is on the list to be deleted. What happened?

thank you

Celso Novoselementos (talk) 23:18, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Fait[edit]

Category:Image provenant de Wikipédia prend Québec. Fait. Letartean (talk) 19:38, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller![edit]

Hi Benoit Rochon,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.


English | മലയാളം | +/−


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Benoit Rochon, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

-- RE rillke questions? 16:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Marin Soljacic.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marin Soljacic.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Marin Soljacic.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

JuTa 15:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Evidence[edit]

These pictures are of me.

1 File tagging File:Sudarat & Nadech Kugimiya.jpg 2 File tagging File:Barry Nadech 01.JPG 3 File tagging File:Barry Nadech 04.JPG 4 File tagging File:Barry Nadech 05.JPG 5 File tagging File:Barry Nadech 03.JPG 6 File tagging File:Barry Nadech 02.JPG

My E-mail in commons : noon.tp2006@sanook.com My Facebook : Noonlucky NY (noon.tp2006@sanook.com) Evidence : http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.247503225352295.37020.100002778596163&type=3 http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.201365626632722.29558.100002778596163&type=3]

I'm noonlucky. I apply this account to upload the pictures I take photoshoot. The article I wrote on Wikipedia. I will follow the rules of everything. But I can not use the old account is blocked. I want to open a new account. I develop my fault. It will certainly create problems in the past. I do not have malicious intent. I promise to take a picture of yourself only. And do not copy it.

Please add to my facebook for see my pictures. :)

200px


--Soluckypictures (talk) 07:08, 29 July 2012 (UTC) I am the owner of the copyright. I take a picture from my hand.

File:My Evidence.jpg ... I PrtSc SysRq in my computer .. I'don't copyright Do you understand me before. You are mistaken. Why don't answer me. I own the rights. I use the same account with my old account got blocked noonlucky. --Soluckypictures (talk) 13:20, 29 July 2012 (UTC) I know that serious with piracy, but I confirm that my picture is. I take a picture of yourself no need to license from photographer, because I was the photographer. You remove the banner go up, I deleted it as I am not of others, no one has these files unless I am alone. --Soluckypictures (talk) 13:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Hi Benoit Rochon reason for remove banner because I am a photographer with my image. I need to request permission? I permission to myself? your banner it affects Wikimedia.

Martin H. said. "I not count them as non-free." The label is intended for obtaining permission from someone else, but I'm the owner of the image. I must be approve. Not ask permission from anyone else Because this image unless I'm nobody owns it.

Can you see Category:Actors_from_Thailand and Previously, Martin H. he was examined the images I've uploaded. The rest was no problem at all. --Soluckypictures (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

OMG I'm sorry I come from thailand the man is star in Thailand. And I am a woman. I'm not an actor.I did not excel in English. I have to translate the program google + bing. lol

Meaning may be something wrong with what I want to say, so I can undo the changes? I can remove banner okay? --Soluckypictures (talk) 11:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

No problem, because I am a Thai people I do not use English. I want translate from the Web site to communicate with you difficult. me too, Sorry for the confusion. But File:Nadech shooting for magazine.jpeg This file upload by Sry85. He is photographer for thai star, and administrator in Wikipedia Thai version. He is not my accounts. --Soluckypictures (talk) 11:57, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

I forgot at Barry Nadech Book Fair1.jpg, Barry Nadech Book Fair2.jpg and Nadech Kugimiya at Bangkok International Book Fair 2012.jpg too.

I uploaded from Noonlucky's account My old account, now blocked, Can you remove banner --Soluckypictures (talk) 12:48, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Wikimania 2012 - 15 - Danny and Lisa.JPG[edit]

D. asked for deletion of that image. I hope you do not mind. --Jarekt (talk) 17:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)


Congratulations, Dear Administrator![edit]

Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | +/−


An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

Benoit Rochon, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and Commons:Deletion requests), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons on irc.freenode.net. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

Welcome aboard. --99of9 (talk) 13:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Copyrights 2[edit]

How can i ask a photography permission  ???

WLMCA[edit]

Salut. I left a message over at the talk page for WLMCA. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:20, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

You earned this[edit]

Barnstar of Diligence.png The Barnstar of Diligence
Your tireless efforts towards the Wiki Loves Monuments has not gone unnoticed. Thank you for slogging through many photos to ensure accurate tagging. -Robthepiper (talk) 08:34, 23 September 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Benoit Rochon,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 21:34, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Help: no-FoP Italy[edit]

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:51, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

"Pas besoin de mettre {{HPC}} en doublon"[edit]

Salut, Benoit. I noticed you consolidated a couple of the recent HPC tags that Fralambert had recently added to some image descriptions. Multichill chnaged the HPC template in October so that it is now intended to be used "en doublon" (he also had a bot convert all instances of consolidated usage to multiple tags). If HPC is used in the old {{HPC|7642|10620}} format, the image or category is added to Category:Historic Places in Canada templates with deprecated parameters. I left two messages on Multichill's talk page in October asking him why he made the change, and he responded to neither. I never reverted it, however, because ultimately Multichill's change will make it easier to add the actual designations to the template, as per the old discussion on the talk page (which I never got around to acting on). Silver lining, I suppose. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 14:04, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Demande de suppression : File:Tino Rossi photo avant guerre.JPG - 13 janvier 2013[edit]

Bonjour à vous,

SVP, pourriez-vous supprimer de Wikimedia Commons l'image référencée dans le cadre ? Je l'ai remplacée par une autre, insérée dans le texte sur Tino Rossi. Merci de votre aide et bien cordialement. --Simonet63 (talk) 14:24, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Demande de déblocage[edit]

J’ai découvert avec une certaine stupéfaction, pour ne pas dire une stupéfaction certaine, que j’ai été bloqué un mois (pas moins !) et sans aucun avertissement par le dénommé Dereckson qui n’a pas supporté que je corrige récemment une faute stupide mais très répandue - « en Avignon » au lieu de « à Avignon » - faute tellement répandue qu’il se trouve même des gens pour croire que « en Avignon » est la seule tournure correcte.

Il justifie mon blocage par des reproches qui m’ont été adressés en 2010 sur Wikipédia en français. Sans doute faudrait-il lui rappeler que nous sommes en 2013. De plus, depuis 2010, j’ai tenu compte des critiques de l’époque, ce qui explique qu’il n’y en a plus eu depuis.

Il affirme que ma ma page de discussion sur Wikipedia en français comporte plusieurs plaintes à propos de ce en Avignon / à Avignon. Il lui aurait suffi de lire attentivement les « plaintes » pour constater que ce n’étaient pas des plaintes mais des interrogations sur le motif de la correction ; qu’après explication mes interlocuteurs avaient admis que j’avais raison ; que si effectivement, il y a eu un litige avec un autre utilisateur, c’est parce que j’avais corrigé plusieurs « en Avignon » corrects (car cette tournure n’est pas forcément incorrecte) et qu’après discussion, nous étions tombés d’accord.

Il me reproche mon pseudo : attaque ad hominem.

Je me serais engagé dans une guerre d’édition : ([e.g. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Promo_008.jpg&action=history]). Si Dereckson avait lu l’historique de l’article, il aurait constaté qu’au contraire, quand je me suis rendu compte que cela tournait à la guerre d’édition, j’y ai mis fin en donnant des explications complètes, à la fois sur la page de discussion de l’article en cause, et sur la page de discussion de mon interlocuteur, explications qui ont fait que celui-ci a cessé de « corriger » mes corrections.

Sur ma manière de répondre, voir ci-dessus.

Je ne prendrais pas en compte les conseils qui me sont donnés. Dereckson peut-il citer les conseils qui m’ont été donnés ? Hormis le message d’accueil, le message de Dereckson, suite au blocage, est le premier que je reçois !

Enfin, j’inonderais les pages de discussion avec des arguments « sans aucun sens ». Je vous suggère donc de lire une seule d’entre elles (toutes les autres sont identiques) afin de vous faire votre propre idée sur ces « non-sense arguments ».

Pour toutes ces raison, et devant l’inanité des motifs de mon blocage, je demande mon déblocage. Mon adresse IP actuelle est 84.246.217.25 et mon identifiant de blocage est 117876. (La procédure veut que l’on précise ces indications dans toutes les requêtes de déblocage.) Je vous remercie par avance.

User:Orthomaniaque

Message adressé aux administrateurs dont la langue maternelle est le français.

PS : Sur la page d’explication qui s’ouvre lorsque l’on veut modifier un article, la procédure de demande de déblocage est indiquée : il faut s’adresser à un administrateur. Et là, surprise : un utilisateur bloqué ne pouvant modifier une page de discussion, il ne peut donc pas demander son déblocage ! C’est pourquoi j’adresse ma demande sous IP, depuis mon téléphone.

Pour le cas où Dereckson, piquerait une nouvelle crise en voyant une nouvelle correction de faute d’orthographe effectuée par moi, pouvez-vous m’indiquer comment il faut s’y prendre pour demander un déblocage ?


Demande de déblocage puis de suppression de compte[edit]

Bonjour,

Suite à une requête en suppression d'une image que je pense être une image de presse usurpée, j'ai été prise à parti puis, vu que je persistais à douter de la sincérité de cette image, j'ai été bloquée. Mon adresse IP, indiquée dans la procédure de déblocage est la suivante : 83.204.212.105 ; mon IP actuelle : 90.84.144.134 (non indiquée dans la procédure puisque si je me connecte avec, elle sera automatiquement bloquée) ; enfin, mon identifiant de blocage est 124381. J'écris actuellement depuis une connexion mobile. A défaut je ne pourrais vous adresser aucun message puisque tout m'est devenu interdit...

Je vous indique que mon petit ami (Holen-mor), se connectant donc forcément depuis le même ordinateur que moi, a aussi été bloqué au motif de faux-nez et vandalisme.

J'estime qu'il est inconcevable d'être traitée ainsi et muselée de la sorte au moindre désaccord. Je pense également qu'il est inadmissible que des fichiers douteux soient légitimés par l'opération de copineries, comme c'est ici le cas. Pour cette raison je ne peux ni ne veux continuer à cautionner des agissements délinquants, et il est hors de question que mes contributions continuent à demeurer sur un site qui méconnait autant les droits liés aux images.

Aussi je vous demande gracieusement :

1 - de débloquer mon compte afin que je puisse ouvrir les requêtes en suppression sur mes fichiers téléversés ; à défaut de procéder vous-mêmes et sans délais à ces suppressions.
2 - de supprimer définitivement mon compte tout en veillant à ce que celui-ci ne puisse être recréé ; ma volonté est de disparaite totalement de ce site qui enfreint sciemment les lois.

A titre subsidiaire, j'estime également être en mesure de solliciter des sanctions exemplaires à l'encontre des administrateurs m'ayant abusivement bloquée pour mieux me faire taire. Ceci d'autant que je ne me suis pas rendue coupable de vandalisme. Le vandalisme tenant plutôt dans l'obstination à défaire, clore et dénaturer systématiquement mes interventions, requêtes et arguments. Néanmoins cette demande demeure facultative, puisque subsidiaire... Au fond, la roue tourne toujours et la vérité finit forcément par éclater un jour. Donc je ne m'en fait pas trop pour l'avenir des concernés.

Merci.

AtomicGagou 12:44, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


@Benoit Rochon, you'll find some background information at COM:AN/U and COM:CU. --Túrelio (talk) 10:59, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Problème compte global sur Commons[edit]

Coucou, un nouveau m'a demandé ça au sujet de son compte global. Aurais-tu une réponse, parce que moi je reste sans voix. Merci beaucoup. --Mathieudu68 (talk) 14:06, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

You have mail[edit]

Hi Benoit; please check your @wikimedia.ca e-mail, there's an important and urgent message waiting for you there. odder (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Supprimer une photo[edit]

Coucou Benoit,

Un nouveau me demande sur WP comment supprimer une photo, et en particulier celle appelée Sylvestre.jpg, et qui ressemble à 60px.

En fait, le chanteur resprésenté dessus avait donné son accord pour mettre la photo sur Commons, mais a finalement changé de décision. Comment dois-je m'y prendre ?

Mathieudu68 (talk) 08:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Jeunes musiciens du monde Kalkeri2.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jeunes musiciens du monde Kalkeri2.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Jeunes musiciens du monde Kalkeri2.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Denniss (talk) 16:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Debian.png[edit]

Hello Benoit, could you please delete this file page, I need it to move a file I rename a little too quickly. Thank you.--MainFrame (talk) 14:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Already ✓ Done by High Contrast.--MainFrame (talk) 15:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Asterix.svg[edit]

Hello Benoit Rochon, why did you delete this logo? It's just the svg-version of File:LogoAsterix.jpg and very similar to File:AsterixDeutsch.svg. Or is this font copyrighted? Regards, --Brackenheim (talk) 17:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

I think "Astérix" logo this is copyrighted, that's why another user tagged has RfD. On WP-fr we can use logos, but I don't think this can stay on Commons. I'll ask someone and come back to you. Sincerely. Benoit Rochon (talk) 16:07, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Bonjour Benoit Rochon, j'ai mis un bandeau de suppression sur File:LogoAsterix.jpg mais un autre contributeur m'a révoqué, avec comme résumé de modification ; « correct license », mais selon moi cette image de même que l'autre logo seraient à supprimer pour violation de copyright, le logo d'Astérix n'ai reproduisable par un logiciel de traitement de texte. Cordialement. FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 01:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

File:AntonineMaillet.jpg[edit]

Hello!,

File:AntonineMaillet.jpg, which you uploaded from the collection of Library and Archives Canada, is tagged for speedy deletion. You can see Category:Images from Library and Archives Canada, the letter from LAC and Commons:Deletion requests/Library and Archives Canada non-PD images for details. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:01, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Normalisation de {{HPC|xx|xx|xx}}[edit]

Salut, Benoit. Further to my note a few months ago, Multichill changed HPC several months ago so as to discourage people from using the template in the {{HPC|xx|xx|xx}} format. If you use that format, it places the image in Category:Historic Places in Canada templates with deprecated parameters. He then has his bot edit almost all of the images and categories using HPC to use the template "en doublon", so to speak. At the time, I asked him why he made the change, but he never had the courtesy to respond. In any event, it is a blessing in disguise, since it makes it much easier to amend the template to allow users to indicate the type of designation (as discussed last year at Template talk:Historic Places in Canada), which I plan to do this upcoming weekend. But first I needed to empty out the remaining 100 or so entries in Category:Historic Places in Canada templates with deprecated parameters, which I did this past weekend. Hope that helps. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 20:15, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Cavalia Odysseo - Big Top Grand Chapiteau Blanc.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cavalia Odysseo - Big Top Grand Chapiteau Blanc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Stefan4 (talk) 22:55, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Shatin City One Station Akira Yoshida Art cats[edit]

Bonjour Benoit, (desole, je n'ai pas d'accents sur mon clavier)
J'ai remarque hier que tu avais supprime les images suivantes:

Je ne comprends pas la raison de la suppression. J'ai pose la question sur la Village pump, ou l'on m'a oriente vers Commons:Undeletion requests, ou l'on me recommande de commencer par voir avec l'administrateur ayant effectue la suppression. Ce que je fais donc.
Ces photos montrent des statues d'un artiste japonais a priori encore en vie. Ces statues sont des oeuvres 3D situees de facon permanentes depuis mars 2011 dans une station de metro de Hong Kong. Elles sont decrites sur le site du MTR, l'operateur local du metro. Elles ont ete installees dans le cadre d'un programme demarre en 1998, et dans le cadre duquel 44 oeuvres d'art ont a ce jour ete installees de facon permanente dans des stations de metro. Je pense que ces statues sont couvertes par le freedom of panorama de Hong Kong (permanently displayed 3D artworks in public places in Hong Kong), et par consequent satisfont aux criteres d'inclusion dans Commons. Pourrais-tu me donner ton avis a ce sujet ? Y a-t-il un point qui m'echappe ? Merci ! Millevache (talk) 21:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Re-bonjour Benoit,
Merci pour ton message. A dire vrai, je ne suis pas non plus un specialiste des licences. Je suis juste interesse par le sujet et ai appris essentiellement via Commons et des articles externes parlant de Wikipedia. Pour autant que je sache, le terme "freedom of panorama" est trompeur car il ne se limite pas au panorama, mais des photos "plein pot" d'oeuvres d'art sont acceptables, par exemple en Allemagne. Si le sujet t'interesse, tu peux lire la un post de blog interessant. Ce que je propose : je vais amener le sujet a Commons:Undeletion requests, cela devrait permettre a plusieurs personnes de s'exprimer, et pourra au passage eclairer ma comprehension de la FoP, en particulier sur les sujets lies a Hong Kong. Je vais aussi en informer User:Nightingale. Merci encore. Millevache (talk) 21:22, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

File:BonnieBernsteinHeadshot.png[edit]

Hey there! I'm working on verifying authorization for the above linked work. Hoping you can restore the file in order to expedite the process. I appreciate your help. If you have questions, please feel free to drop me a line. Best regards, Cindamuse (talk) 11:45, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

  • Restored by a colleague. Hope all is well! Cindamuse (talk) 19:29, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Deleted files[edit]

Hello. You deleted some files uploaded by Qcumber: File:Eduard Stavytskyi.jpg, File:Kaletnik free.jpg, File:Oleksandr Kemenyash.jpg, File:Fagot.jpg, File:Prytula comm.jpg, File:Konkov.jpg, File:Ihor Yavorsky.jpg. I think all these files were OK because they are screenshots of Youtube video published under CC-BY licence. I had mentioned it in the talk page of these files. At first glance, these images looks like copyvio (I also thought so), but I think they can be accepted, since they are derivative works of CC-BY videos. Best regards, BrightRaven (talk) 08:39, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Sur la page de la vidéo restaurée, quand je clique sur "Plus" dans l'onglet "À propos de". Je vois la mention "Licence : Licence de paternité Creative Commons (réutilisation autorisée)" et en cliquant sur le lien j'arrive à cette page, ce qui me semble bien correspondre au cas décrit dans le modèle {{Youtube}}. Avant que tu les supprimes, j'avais fait cette vérification pour toutes les vidéos concernées. Cordialement, BrightRaven (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Merci pour la restauration. "Fagot" est apparemment le surnom du chanteur du groupe ukrainien en:TNMK. Il n'y a donc apparemment rien d'offensant dans ce cas. Cordialement, BrightRaven (talk) 16:54, 31 October 2013 (UTC)
Merci également pour la restauration (j'étais un peu surpris de voir autant de fichier supprimés). Juste au cas où, Fagot est le surnom d'un chanteur ukrainien, mais ce mot signifie en ukrainien rien d'autre qu'un instrument musical (fr:Basson) — NickK (talk) 21:43, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

WLM 2013 : Montreal Biosphère, monument?[edit]

See Talk:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2013_winners#Montreal Biosphère (nominated for Canada).--Sinuhe20 (talk) 11:52, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Autorisation Photos[edit]

Bonjour, J'ai créer un article sur un artiste compositeur, et je voulais insérer des photos qu'il m'a gentiment données.J'ai demandé à cette personne d'envoyer un mail avec une license acceptable qui prouve qu'il est le propriétaire des photos. Cela fait plusieurs jours qu'une bannière est sous la photo indiquant : "un courriel contenant les détails de l'autorisation pour utiliser ce fichier a été envoyé sur OTRS ", mais la photo ( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Document_autographe.jpg ) n'est toujours pas autoriser. Est ce normal ? D'autre part, d'autres photos ont été effacées, et pour les remettre à nouveau sur le site, Wikipedia demande d'envoyer une autorisation valide, et d'indiquer l'URL de la photo sur le mail. Problème, les photos ayant été supprimées, il n'y a plus d' URL ! Que faire ? Je vous remercie par avance de votre aide. Cordialement

Patrice SERRE

File:Zingmagazine Issue 23.jpg[edit]

Hello, curious why you deleted this file? I'd like to re-upload, please. Thanks.

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 13:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

TimedText:GibraltarpediA introduction video.ogg.en.srt[edit]

Ciao, since I'm not English, I would need a helping hand to understand and write in English what people have said into this video (like made in TimedText:Monmouthpedia_video_revised.ogv.en.srt) as part of the project GibraltarpediA. In this way, it will translate into all the languages ​​of the world. Now is a temporary transcription without synchronization. Grazie mille — Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:58, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Texte Parc Emilie-Gamelin.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Texte Parc Emilie-Gamelin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:08, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Image BAnQ[edit]

Salut Benoît,

Bravo pour la collaboration éventuelle avec BAnQ. Pour ce qui est de ta question, la réponse est simple: j'ai fait une capture d'écran de la zone de l'image que je voulais reproduire. J'ai croppé un peu et j'ai déposé sur Commons. Tout simplement! Bonne continuation. Bouchecl (talk) 20:06, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Deux images[edit]

Bonsoir,

J'ai importé le mois dernier deux images (1 et 2) qui étaient présentes sur le site Digitaltmuseum. Je pensaient les images étaient libres et je les importés. Plus tard dans la soirée, j'ai eu des doutes et j'ai proposé leurs suppressions mais tout compte fait les images sont libres (CC-BY-SA 3.0 pour la première et dans le domaine public pour la seconde) du coup il est inutile de les supprimer. Désolé de te déranger pour mes bêtises. Cordialement--Shev123 (talk) 21:51, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Pour la première image (le dossard), je m'étais rendu trop tard que la licence s'appliquait au texte en effet. Du coup, j'ai contacté le musée, un certain Sebatian Kuhn m'a répondu que c'était ok à condition de citer le musée (dois-je faire un autorisation OTRS, j'en ai jamais fait ou alors faire modifier les infos présentes sur le site Digitaltmuseum?). En fait pour la deuxième image, j'avais également confondu la licence du texte et celle de l'image mais vu que l'image est beaucoup plus ancienne, elle me semble également dans le domaine public. Merci pour tout. Cordialement--Shev123 (talk) 16:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
En fait, pour le dossard j'ai demandé au détenteur des droits de la téléverser avec son compte vu qu'il en un. Merci pour tes conseils concernant les demandes OTRS, j'ai pas mal d'institutions à contacter et mes mails actuels étaient assez confus.--Shev123 (talk) 15:23, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Restauration d'une image[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai téléversé une image sur Commons le mois dernier et cette image a été supprimée (j'ai probablement mis une mauvaise licence CC0 à la place de domaine public). En effet, cette image est dans le domaine public et du coup il n'y a d'autorisation ORTS à obtenir. Cordialement, Merci--Shev123 (talk) 20:30, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour, Shev123. C'est fait, l'image a été restaurée. Cordialement, Benoit Rochon (talk) 09:10, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Un grand merci!--Shev123 (talk) 11:13, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:BAnQ Projet Conrad poirier.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:BAnQ Projet Conrad poirier.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:28, 5 July 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Quebec-Canada.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Quebec-Canada.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:36, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

Photos Émission JAM[edit]

Salut,

Je ne vois aucune demande de republication sur la file permissions-commons-fr. Le courriel le plus ancien remonte au 25 juillet. Elfix 16:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Giant iPhone Fido.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Giant iPhone Fido.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 11:45, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Projet Poirier, bandeau de statut aux États-Unis[edit]

Bonjour, Répondu sur ma page. -- Asclepias (talk) 02:26, 18 October 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mardi cest Wiki BAnQ.png[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mardi cest Wiki BAnQ.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 12:14, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mardi cest Wiki.png[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mardi cest Wiki.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 12:15, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Maximus Johnity Ongkili World Economic Forum 2013.jpg[edit]

You deleted this file due to a non-commercial licence at Flickr, however this file was licensed cc-by-sa at the time it was uploaded to Commons, as confirmed by the licence review (the World Economic Forum changed their licences around March 2013, see Commons:Village pump/Archive/2013/03#Bad news). Please could this image be restored per {{Flickr-change-of-license}}, together with File:Maximus Johnity Ongkili World Economic Forum 2013 crop.jpg which was a derivative of this image. January (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

The license is still CC-by-sa, this is not challenged. However, the license excludes commercial use which is against commons policiy. Is there any proof, that at the time of upload, the commercial use was not excluded? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:11, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
The issue might be, that even the WEF has not considered the individual rights of the photographer Photo Moritz Hager and the swiss-image.ch agency. Or let's say: It is already doubtful, if the presentation in flickr was lawful. The terms of the agency under [1] are very clear on the matter, that they do not allow any alteration of the photos. Also the use of swiss-image.ch pictures is prohibited for any other purpose without written permission from swiss-image.ch or the copyright holder (SI partner, photographer). As far as I understand, we need an OTRS to publish it. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 15:14, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
The issue of whether the photo agency may have a copyright claim has been raised before at Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Maria Bartiromo.jpg but the image was kept, and WEF images (almost all of which were taken by swiss-image.ch photographers) are widely accepted on Commons based on the CC-BY-SA licence at Flickr and {{WEF}}. January (talk) 15:41, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Erm ... the fact that after receiving and removing the "no resale" in 2008 and now adding it again is more an indicatation, that there is indeed a copyright problem. So how about writing them a letter to get OTRS? Shouldn't this discussion be extended to a broader group of copvio experts? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:32, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
As I said at my talk page, if the licence was valid at the time of upload then it remains valid, the licence having been different before or having been changed since does not invalidate it. I have no objection to opening the discussion up to a wider audience, but I certainly don't think any WEF images with a valid licence review should be deleted through the speedy deletion process without discussion. Benoit Rochon, please could you confirm what your decision is on whether to restore the image? January (talk) 20:13, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Friends and Family. Canal Bridge BAnQ P48S1P00395.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Friends and Family. Canal Bridge BAnQ P48S1P00395.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

JuTa 19:51, 13 December 2014 (UTC)