User talk:Benzebuth198

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Benzebuth198!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:12, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Coats of arms crown addition : don't[edit]

Hi. Please don't add crowns to existing coat of arms images, otherwise it breaks Wikipedia/other projects aesthetics where the images are already used, especially in the case of small icons. Just create crowned coats of arms in new files instead. Thanks. — Bjung (talk) 07:18, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

OK I'll create new ones

Attribution[edit]

Hello Benzebuth198. Someone complained that files you uploaded are derivs of other files and that the previous contributors weren't properly attributed (.e.g. [1], [2]). I reverted the edits, because this is not a reason for deletion. I do not know if the files are really derivatives, however I am just reminding you that according to the CC-BY-SA license you have to properly attribute previous contributors in the image information (in the Source/Author field). So if this information is missing, it should be filled in the image descriptions. Regards, and keep up the good svg work :) - Badseed talk 22:41, 11 January 2013 (UTC)


Sorry :(, I become so accustomed to the "CC0" that I didn't take care of the " Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported". I've now attributed the work in source/author. It is ok now ? If not, don't hesitate to tell it to me.--Benzebuth198 (talk) 14:17, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Blason Villers-la-Ville.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:58, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Blason Maison de Schwartzenberg.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Blason Maison de Schwartzenberg.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dereckson (talk) 18:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Coat of arms of Woluwe-Saint-Pierre[edit]

Hi, I'm writing an article about the coat of arms of Woluwe-Saint-Pierre, I've just watched the CoA on commons and in a book I own... In the book the paws of the greyhounds don't overlap the escucheon. Could you please change the CoA so the front paws touch the sides of the escucheon? Compare the arms on the site of the municipality. No need to make the oval shaped escucheon smaller, just move the dogs a bit more to the sides. If you need help, just ask Adelbrecht/Lemmens, Tom or Archmedus, both are well known with the heraldry of the Low Countries. Thank you in advance, Dqfn13 (talk) 10:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, first of all thanks to you to write an article over heraldry (mainly over Belgian heraldry :p). Then, I changed the CoA but I'm not sure it looks better now.It can stay like this for me, but I think it was more "natural" for the dogs to hold the escutheon between their paws. Furthemore, no (heraldic) error was done on the past version. In all cases, good continuation on wiki ! --Benzebuth198 (talk) 14:45, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

PS: Woluwe-Saint-Pierre is in Belgium, not in Low Countries (even if I dont know from where came the Hinnisdael Family, which gave his arms to the municipality), good to know if you wanna write an article over it :p

Low Countries revers to Belgium, Luxembourg and the Netherlands. They use mainly the same rules as they became seperate countries only in 1830 (Belgium) and 1890 (Luxembourg). I must admit, Archmedus is more knowledged about the Netherlands. Dqfn13 (talk) 20:48, 23 August 2014 (UTC)