User talk:Bidgee/Archive2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Quality Image Promotion

Litoria caerulea - Darwin NT.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Litoria caerulea - Darwin NT.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Willow-leaved Hakea.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hakea salicifolia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Evaporation Pan.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Evaporation Pan.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Estuary mouth.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Estuary mouth.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion

Litoria dahlii.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Litoria dahlii.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Car photos

Hi Bidgee. I noticed that you have been taking some great car photos. I though I was the only user that actually took photographs of non-police cars in Australia. It is great to see that I am not alone. I would encourage you to continue to take photos of both police and "normal" vehicles so we can continue to illustrate Wikipedia articles. My only concern is that you upload photos without knowing the full details of the car. Below are a number of web sources that could make your job much, much easier:

  • Red Book: contains detailed model information (including make and models along with model designations like VE and VZ for the Holden Commodore, and BA, BF and FG for the Ford Falcon).
  • CarPoint: a used-car site that contains many images, thus making it very easy to indentify models. OSX (talk) 04:51, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

Westpac

What does the last line of THIS page tell you, then? Ingolfson (talk) 11:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Better forum

See http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Administrators%27_noticeboard/User_problems#CarolSpears_.28talk_.E2.80.A2_contribs.29

Cool heads eventually prevail. --SB_Johnny | talk 10:16, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Category:Northern Territory

Protected for now. What exactly is going on here? Finn Rindahl (talk) 06:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the diff's - I'm reading up a bit but I must admit I'm a bit confused still. I hope protecting that category is enough for now, as you have seen the overall issue of communication etc. has been discussed by other admins, and I'm not very eager to step into this myself. As SBJohnny writes above, cool heads eventually prevail. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 06:59, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:Cumulus_clouds_from_the_air1.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Cumulus_clouds_from_the_air1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bidgee (talk) 01:50, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

If you want to delete a duplicate image, please use {{duplicate}} or {{bad name}}. Please ignore this message if it does not apply. Thanks. Walter Siegmund (talk) 05:40, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Acacia pictures

Hi. Why not make a picture of the whole tree with an inset of flower/leaf detail? That would surely be very valuable? Lycaon (talk) 10:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Acacia dealbata 08.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
leaf/flowers of Acacia cardiophylla.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Hay images

They are now both been uploaded again. Thanks once again for your help. Cheers, Mattinbgn/talk 10:56, 24 August 2008 (UTC)