User talk:Bjung

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bjung!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

File:Arlon-stmartin1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:55, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Moving a lot of files from lb-wiki[edit]

Hi! You have moved a lot of files from lb-wiki to Commons and your work looks really good. I'm also moving a lot of files (with my bot). If you have some time and want to help you could look at Category:Files moved from lb.wikipedia to Commons requiring review. I start with own work and will do some of the cleanup with my bot after the transfer. --MGA73 (talk) 18:59, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Ok. I'll have that category in mind (and in my bookmarks) in the future. Good work requires time. — Bjung (talk) 23:26, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Yes it does. And I think it is perfect that you take your time and do high quality edits :-) --MGA73 (talk) 17:11, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

Interwiki links and categories[edit]

Hi. Interwiki links are put above categories because categories are changed using a script (which at least before put them at the bottom), while interwiki links are changed manually. --AVRS (talk) 11:02, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

your question: why not use the interwikis menu?"[edit]

Hi, as I understand that interwiki menus on Commons are supposed to contain categories, not articles.

Such I use {{On Wikipedia}} which is described as: For linking to multiple Wikipedia articles. This should not be used in place of or in duplication of interwiki links (in the sidebar). In categories, take the local Wikipedia's equivalent categories for the sidebar, and the related main articles for this box. --Jwh (talk) 21:03, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

be.wikimediaA.org[edit]

Bonjour Bjung êtes vous intéressé? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 11:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Category:Parc_attractif_Reine_Fabiola[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Parc_attractif_Reine_Fabiola has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Dinosaur918 (talk) 20:45, 22 March 2014 (UTC)