User talk:Boricuaeddie/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Leave new messages at the current talk page.

Esto es un archivo. Por favor no edite esta página. Deje mensajes nuevos en la página de discusión actual.


Cette page est des archives. Ne modifiez pas cette page, s'il vous plaît. Laissez de nouveaux messages ici.

¿Qué hacer con Image:Catrinas 2.jpg?

Hola Eddie, como creo que perteneces al jurado o comité de la foto del año, quería plantearte el problema de Image:Catrinas 2.jpg antes de hacer nada que pueda interferir con el concurso. Si te fijas en la descripción, la foto se ampara en la libertad de panorama. Pero no tengo claro hasta qué punto el interior de un museo sea "visible desde un lugar público", como se indica en la ley citada en COM:FOP#Mexico (bueno, realmente tengo claro que un museo no lo es, ya que si no, podríamos fotografiar la obra de cualquier artista contemporáneo en un museo mexicano y voilà! ya tenemos fotos de su obra libres de derechos), por lo que creo que simplemente, la foto no es compatible con las licencias de commons. ¿Qué opinas? --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:17, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Por eso no he abierto una petición de borrado. No sé qué hacer porque el autor es Tomascastelazo y prefiero no volver a tener nada que ver con él tras un incidente que se saldó con un bloqueo hace unos días. ¿Podrías hablar con él tú? Otra posibilidad podría ser plantear el problema en el Administrators' noticeboard para recabar opiniones. No sé me ocurren más cosas :-( --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 23:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

¿Qué le has hecho? ¿También te ha llamado censor? ¿O miembro de la Inquisición? ;-) --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 23:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Pues no me he fijado en la traducción (o sea, que es buena, porque si me hubiera fijado sería porque algo no me sonaba bien). Enhorabuena. ¿Enterramos los malos rollos que hemos tenido hasta ahora? Por mí está todo olvidado. Un saludo y gracias --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:42, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

RE:Please stop

I didn't consider it vandalism. It is necessary to spread the truth. -IonasFreeman 23:48, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Image:LOGO FATEC.jpg

Hi Boricuaeddi, I undelete Image:LOGO FATEC.jpg because of the correct licensing. If you read Commons:Licensing#Simple_design you will see, that the licence is okay and it's pd. ChristianBier 04:01, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Help

(en-1) you seem to know how it works here, so I did it all right? Noy 14:59, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. is this Image is good? Noy 16:39, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

There is a special template

for this ;) Regards, __ ABF __ ϑ 15:48, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

عفوا :)--OsamaK 17:08, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you very much for the barnstar! :) When I heard that en.WP wanted to transwiki their categories of FP desktop backgrounds, I thought that was a great idea. Looking at what we had for our categories, we were seriously lacking. (I think there was only 13 widescreen ones to start with.) I still got the non-widescreen ones to do, but thankfully there's not as many. ;) It's good to know my work's appreciated. Thanks again! Cheers, Rocket000 20:50, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Request for removal of sysop rights

This message is to confirm my request at Meta for removal of my administrator rights. --Boricuæddie 22:20, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

¿Qué ha pasado, Eddie? ¿Cómo es que te vas de buenas a primeras? --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 23:29, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Sí, pero también has pedido dejar de ser administrador. ¿Tiene algo que ver esto con el infortunado incidente como Tomascastelazo (espero que no)? Un abrazo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 23:42, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

I second Ecemaml's comments. Hope to see you soon. :) - Mtmelendez (Talk) 00:11, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

No, email me? :( . Mønobi 02:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Siento mucho tu decisión. Independientemente de los roces que hayamos podido tener en el pasado, creo que tu labor aquí es muy productiva y necesaria. Y si una cosa te enseña ser administrador de otras wikipedias es que no puedes dejar que incidentes con tipos así te afecten lo más mínimo. Espero verte pronto por aquí y poder votarte de nuevo si decides presentarte. Un abrazo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 10:27, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I must agree with Ecemaml (for the first time? :p) and look forward to seeing you around, but only when you are ready and you want to be. Your work here is great, and you should not be discouraged by what is nothing more than a very inconsequential issue. Being hated comes with the package, I'm sure most admins will vouch for that! I hope your break serves you well, all the best, RedCoat 15:14, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For your support. Espero que tus vacaciones sean algo temporal y pronto vuelvas. Haces un gran trabajo aqui.-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- es- en) 07:46, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Raul_Castro_votes.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Raul_Castro_votes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Belb 21:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Doriath

Hola Eddie, podrías borrar esta imagen "Image:Doriath.svg". He subido otra version ligeramente modificada y con el nombre cambiado como me aconsejaron que hiciera en wikipedia. Le di a subir una nueva versión pero no sabía que al cambiar el nombre se creaba otra, así que ya no sirve la indicada arriba. Gracias y saludos --Vëon Menelion 08:58, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

help me

can you help me a new for Image:Plan eglise belloy en france2.jpg et Image:Eglise belloy porte sud.JPG

and can you tell me what the probleme? Chatsam le 28/01/2008 à 08h37(cet).

Late, but...

If you weren't already aware: Special:Blockip/Ionas68224/[1] giggy (:O) 01:36, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. I only remembered I had blocked him after I heard he got blocked on yet another wiki. It gets rather ridiculous... giggy (:O) 02:43, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
We're both living proof of your last point! giggy (:O) 04:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Welcome back

I restored your administrator status. --EugeneZelenko 15:44, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Glad to see it! --Herby talk thyme 15:51, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Yes, good to see you're back. (And I didn't know you could speak German :p) RedCoat 16:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
Re your last message: Hehe, but I can assure you that's more than me. As much as I would love to learn the language, I never seem to remember any more than "Guten Tag" and "Vielen Dank". I think I would rather stick to Romance Languages :) RedCoat 20:51, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Welcome back! ++Lar: t/c 12:22, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Happy to see you back :) (but maybe I will go for a few weeks) abf /talk to me/ 13:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
A little correction :-) Phrase should be Благодарю Вас. Current one means that I should/must thanks myself :-) --EugeneZelenko 15:48, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Bienvenido :) ---- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- es- en) 23:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Yayz. giggy (:O) 08:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
w00t!! :) - Alison 08:46, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Ufff, he estado un poco ido últimamente, pero me alegro de que estés aquí de nuevo. Un abrazo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 23:39, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Matt Sanchez

Please help me with this issue. There's a photo running that is from my ID and I'd rather it were not being used

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Matt_Sanchez.jpg#Summary

I would like to change the photo and deny permission to the photo. Please advise.

Hey Eddie, just a FYI there is a AN/I thread [2] about this case on Wikipedia, cheers. - Caribbean~H.Q. 03:47, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Re:Wellcome back

Gracias, de verdad que me gustaría, pero lo cierto que tengo muy poco tiempo libre (me paso por aquí mas de lo que debería) y me temo que tener esa responsabilidad me llevaría a pasar aun mas tiempo en Commons. Quizás cuando acabe de escribir mi tesis (en 3-4 meses). Muchas gracias de nuevo por la oferta. ---- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 (Talk: here- es- en) 11:59, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Asturias from the air.jpg

No te molesto más: He subido la foto Image:Asturias from the air.jpg de Flickr, fijándome en todo lo que me has dicho.. Ésta cumple con todo, no? --Astur1 15:48, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Image:Plies.JPG

Hi Eddie, you deleted the above image as a duplicate of Image:Plies.jpg. The uploader is banned on Wikipedia for chronic copyright violations and always tries to disguise his uploads as free images.[3] The image is definitely a copyvio and it should be deleted. Spellcast 09:56, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

hola, no consigo evitar que me borren mis fotos.

hola, he subido muchas veces fotos mías, y siempre me las borran, una vez fuiste tu, pero el resto han sido otros administradores, y no consigo saber el motivo. Las fotos son mías totalmente, y les pongo una licencia abierta, pero siguen borrándomelas, y ya no se que hacer, no entiendo muy bien como funciona wikipedia, y me pierdo, por favor ayúdame a entender que pasa. son Portadamiddlefingers.jpg y Logomiddlefingers.jpg gracias!

esas fotos son mías, tyrd y middlefingers son la misma cosa!

no, esas fotos son mías, no de los middlefingers, yo las he hecho, y se las he dado para que las usen bajo mis condiciones, y por cierto, YO soy los middlefingers, si lees la misma página en la que salen las fotos que me quitáis, el usuario TYRD, yo, es el único miembro principal del grupo middlefingers. He vuelto a subir las fotos con el usuario the middlefingers. No entiendo estas normas que no hacen más que compliar algo que en realidad es sencillo. Tengo muchísimas más fotos y creaciones pero no me atrevo ya a subirlas, llevo meses para intentar subir solo dos. Esto es frustrante.

otra vez?

parece que algún amigo tuyo me ha vuelto a borrar las fotos, no han durado ni media hora, eso si, ni una explicación, violación de licencia... de cual? de la mía?

no se que monstruo es este de wikipedia en el que ni lo mío es mío ni de nadie ni vale para nada.

disfrútenlo, yo renuncio.

Fotos de Puerto Rico en los 1940s

Eddie! Como estas? Mira esta coleccion de fotos en Flickr del fotografo Jack Delano. Todas son de los 1940s y son de alta calidad. Segun las paginas, todas provienen de U.S. Library of Congress. Crees que se puedan traer a Commons? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 20:47, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Ayuda

Hola Eddie, querría hacerte una consulta técnica. ¿Qué debería hacer con esta imagen, que tiene un claro nombre denigratorio? Gracias y un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:36, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

maps

As a fellow admin you should know that 3RR rule does not apply when one side is vandalizing. The other user, Mareklug, keeps repeating my edits are personal for some reason even though I supply sources on Wikipedia. Now when you were elected just like any other admin you probably had to answer some questions, one of them about vandalism. And the first vandalism on how to recognize vandalism is Blanking - Removing all or significant parts of pages' content without any reason, or replacing entire pages with nonsense. Sometimes important verifiable references are deleted with no valid reason(s) given in the summary....The other user removed my edits saying they are personal. That is not a valid summary. He provided no sources. I would like you to look into facts of the situation before throwing the last warning at me without previous discussion. Thank you --Avala 20:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Kosovo_relations.png Kosovo_relations.svg - content of the frozen versions

Por favor, I appreciate that you are intervining to stabilize content, and that you placed identical warnings on two user talk pages (one of them mine), but would you please look at the content of what you left in place protected (i.e. uncorrectable)? As a Spanish speaker, you can read the Chile's Ministry of External Affairs press release, and see, what it means, as well as note, that Fidel Castro's newspaper rant on Javier Solana's person is not the same as offcial position of Cuba, the state, recognizing or not Kosovo's independence. Ditto for Macedonia, which is negotiating with Kosovo border demarcation as we speak (so it is leaning toward recognizing it formally; else, why would it be negotiating with the government in Pristina and not the one in Belgrade?). All these countries have been falsely portrayed on the map as of today by Avala, and this map is used on a variety of Wikimedia projects. Please at least read the objections other editors have raised re: Avila's edits concerning this matter on w:Talk:Diplomatic reaction to the 2008 Kosovo declaration of independence‎. IMHO you should restore status quo ante. Best wishes, --Mareklug talk 20:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Please open the Wikipedia article and look through sources. Fidel Castro has been elected to guide Cuban foreign policy (yes the thing you called rant is his politics) one week after retirement as President, leader etc and Raul vowed to listen to his views. We may like or dislike his approach but we can not blank it because we dislike it. Countries that do not recognize Kosovo have no legal obligation to publish any official statement. They can only explain their position to the media by any high official or representative of the country which can be president, prime minister, minister, ambassador, secretary, leader whatever. Only those who are changing their position are obliged to publish that as an official document which is adopted in prescribed procedure. And Chile which asked for all parties to agree through discussion fits into category of countries which support negotiations. All this can be seen on Wikipedia page and in image legend and making lengthy posts with different claims to confuse other people will not help twist the truth. The only thing that matters is sources on Wikipedia not original research and personal views. May I remind you I was the first to deny inclusion of Indonesia on the orange list which doesn't go well with my description as POV pusher but rather what I claim to be - editor who is making edits based on sources. Your edits are reverted by other users on Wikipedia as well. --Avala 20:26, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
POV-motivated reverts do not necessarily indicate faulty edits on my part! And countries communicate via diplomatic channels, including issuing press releases and notes, even Cuba. Surely we can distinguish between what a politician said and what officially has transpired whn talking about diplomatic recognition! So, inclusion of inappropriate sources and bending evidence (as in the case of Chile and Cuba), albeit equipped with a supscripted reference, is also a form of vandalism. Removal of vandlism is not blanking, but removal of poorly sourced or false information. Since you are an administrator on the Serb Wikipedia, I am appalled that you use these arguments wrongly. And if you only made edits based on sound selection of sources, there'd not be an issue, but you are engaging in questionable, badly sourced changes. I, too, removed Iceland from the list of officially recognizing countries, so on equal footing, you have no claim on me, that I am propagating an anti-Serbia POV. Macedonia should be light blue (intending to recognize), Cuba gray (no position), and Chile khaki (impartial) -- and that reflects the true state of evidence as of today, regardless of doctored sourcing. --Mareklug talk
Article is about international reaction not recognition only. That is why we include parties and entities as well. You keep claiming I misquoted news on Cuba and I asked you to point at words I have falsified but of course you couldn't respond to that because I didn't. If you can point at specific word I changed regarding Castro's position in foreign policy do it, if you can't stop spreading around that I am misquoting. Anyway your latest personal attacks against me have caused several users to stand up against that as part of the official policy of no personal attacks. --Avala 21:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
You sourced Cuba's official position, which does not exist, with a rant by Castro, who may be influential, but whose rant does not constitute Cuban official position. Is this so hard to acknowledge? That's incorrect sourcing. So what, that you quoted Fidel's personal attack on Solana to the letter? You have misquoted in other instances, such as claiming that I called you "mr. Serb." when I called you "Mr. Serb Wikipedia Administrator". In article space, you did misquote Armenian foreign minister , by omitting the word "yet" from his say, and the inconveninet facts he stated immediately afterwards, that the official decision is pending, thereby completely changing the meaning of his utterance, and then using this for your purposes of documenting Armenia as officially not recognizing Kosovo. And on this basis, you altered the article, and the map, not once, but repeatedly.. So you have misquoted. And, honesty would require disclosing, that the two editors standing up on your behalf are the other two of the troika (you included) introducing Serbia-slanting in the Kosovo recognition content. Complaining of shoddy edits made by an experienced user (an admin on another project) is hardly making personal attacks. If anything, it's attacking the whole credibility of giving adminships on Serb Wikipedia, as an outrage, if you want a clarification. Complaining about misleading edits is exactly sanctioned and expected, whenever shoddy edits are made. In this case, they are continually further obfuscated by rejoinders/accusations of "blanking vandalism" and "personal attacks". --Mareklug talk 23:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Guys, please take this fight elsewhere. Thanks! --Boricuæddie 23:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Would you please unblock the Kosovo maps?

Dear Boricuaeddie, sorry to litter your talk page, but would you please unprotect the Kosovo recognition maps, so that, as you say, community can decide, by making requisite changes? I don't have to make any edits for my own part; I am confident the NPOV will win out. But do make it possible for people to correct the maps! Thank you, and that's all from me. --Mareklug talk 23:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

To answer, consensus on 100% of these maps is unlikely ever, but needed undisputed updates are currently an hourly possibility, as countries announce their positions. You protected the maps for stability's sake, yes? Now, please consider actual map use and the community's need to make non-edit war updates. These maps are a dynamic resource, so frequent changes are expected. Also, one of the two parties in that edit war confict has promised to abstain from editing; surely unprotecting makes sense. Should another edit war break out, protection can be reinstated. Let's have a little flexibility. :) Best, --Mareklug talk 00:15, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

question

Since when is blanking sourced edits not considered vandalism? If that is your opinion I suggest you start an initiative for this to be removed from vandalism definition on Wikipedia. Until the official policy is changed it will remain the sole thing all users and admins including me and you shall look at when solving disputes. I also suggest you not to start solving any matter unless you are willing to look into it deeper. No admin should come straight with block warnings. For an example you can see here [4] if any of the information in the table lacks sources and references and try to answer why is so many users reverting blanking done by mareklug? If you are not willing to solve the matter by prescribed step-by-step policy I think you shouldn't have started dealing with it in the first place. It is also not a good idea to block all non admins who are reverting unsourced and unexplained blanking. Thank you for reading. --Avala 23:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I am not accusing you but I am suggesting you to take everything in consideration or not take it at all. This user has called me names and has been blanking edits of various users including mine on Wikipedia which were subsequently reverted. I dislike being thrown into the basket with such users just because it's easier to block all parties involved then to take a look into it. I am quite aware that user mareklug is not a newbie vandal but a rather experienced one who blanks edits he dislikes on false pretenses that he is just removing POV. POV is when someone makes an unsourced edit full of his own personal views which I didn't do. All of my edits were sourced and if I deserve a block for following policies then so be it. --Avala 00:08, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Image:Kosovo relations.svg

Eddie, please reconsider your protection of this image. It documents current events (recognition of Kosovo's independence). Wikipedia cannot allow so many days without important updates just because a couple of users are warring about minor things. Please consider unprotecting the image and eventually warning/blocking the warring users as an alternative but effective method to prevent any disruption. Thanks. Húsönd 01:17, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Necesito una revisión

Necesito saber si Image:Shepherd-c-082-083.jpg tiene correctamente la licencia para cargar otros mapas del mismo atlas de 1911 según la Biblioteca de la Universidad de Texas en Austin, para ponerlos en la Category:Historical Atlas by William R. Shepherd‎, te saluda Shooke 15:46, 6 March 2008 (UTC) Ok, gracias, saludos Shooke 20:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Consulta

He marcado para borrado rápido Image:DesktopBSD 1.6 desktop.jpg, y nesesitaba saber que plantilla existe para indicar que tiene mal la licencia, ya que esa imagen no es libre, porque tiene un logo con licencia creative commons no comercial, la cual no es admitida por ser no libre. Saludos Shooke 17:56, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

More edit warring

I have brought this to your attention, as you have been involved before: Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/Blocks_&_protections#Please_block_users_User:Avala_and_User:Mareklug. Patstuart (talk) 20:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Apoyo para subir imágenes

Hola Boricua,

Disculpa la molestia, estoy creando dos páginas para Wikipedia, una de un maestro de Yoga y la otra de la tecnica de yoga propiamente. Pero necesito subir la foto del maestro del Yoga. Yo soy el webmaster del sitio oficial del centro de yoga, como podrás observar en www.elmaestrodelpresente.com ó en www.sird.com.ni, con base en Managua Nicaragua. La foto que quiero subir es la del index o inicio del website, un señor con luenga barba blanca y fondo celeste. Nosotros somos los creadores y editores de todas las imágenes y fotos que puedes observar en ese Web, a exepción de una que tomé del Office Buda Meditando.

Ya busqué de todas las maneras posibles de cómo subir la foto y nada. Puedes ayudarme a subirla?

Yo me logeé en Wikipedia como Mario camposs, con mi correo personal de hotmail, pero si mandas un correo a la dirección electrónica de info@elmaestrodelpresente.com, verás que te responderé yo mismo.

Agradezco de antemano toda la colaboración prestada al respecto.

att

Mario Campos Salazar Webmaster www.elmaestrodelpresente.com Managua, Nicaragua.

Entonces...

Hola, yo saco las imagenes mayormente de google, y en breve las escaneare de libros, pero ?el material que hay en google no es publico? Entonces ¿De donde lo saco?. Saludos. --Jorgenix 21:29, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

A partir de ahora las voy a bajar escaneadas, espero que eso valga, ¿de donde saco si el autor a muerto hace mas de 70 años? --Jorgenix 16:56, 31 March 2008 (UTC)