User talk:Botaurus-stellaris/Archiv 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

      Archiv      



Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Cropped image versions

Hello!

Please do not crop images by yourself if you do not have the adequate software to this optimally. Just use User:Cropbot, our bot that does the best cropped versions. This bot is easy to handle and it produces best quality. Thanks for your support! Regards, High Contrast (talk) 00:53, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Landesflagge Vorpommern.png

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Landesflagge Vorpommern.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Landesflagge Vorpommern.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--JDavid (talk) 16:27, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

  • You have chosen {{PD-Flag-Germany}}, but also You are sign as the author of the file. Could you give any source of German Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (corporation governed by public law) in official works that could provide that license? Also you have change some opinion here. So are you an author of the file or not? Is it only your oppinion that this file should be marked with license {{PD-Flag-Germany}}? Thank You for answer. Cheers. JDavid (talk) 16:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Jeśli masz jakiekolwiek inne problemy ...--Botaurus (talk) 21:01, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
Do you speak English or Polish? Do you understand English? Do I have to speak German? (Muss ich deutsch sprechen?) You have stated that author of files: File:Landesflagge Vorpommern.png and File:Flag of Westernpommerania.png is the Landtag of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern or other Körperschaft. Please give the Law Act that makes those flags as symbols of a German Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (corporation governed by public law). This could provide the license {{PD-Flag-Germany}}. Thank You. JDavid (talk) 22:28, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi JDavid, I started a discussion in de:Portal_Diskussion:Mecklenburg-Vorpommern#mögliche_Löschung_von_File:Landesflagge_Vorpommern.png_auf_Commons. In [1] you can read at point 3, that the additional use of the traditional colours and flags is allowed in both parts (Mecklenburg and Vorpommern) of the state Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Is that what you are looking for? Greets, Niteshift (talk) 22:51, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Beschreibung Niobe

Sie habe das Historische Originalbeschreibung von Niobe redigert: +Schonerbark. Is that what you meant to do, or should you add the info in {{de}}, after the {{BArch-description}} template:

Deutsch: Segelschulschiff "Niobe", als Schonerbark geriggt.

(Excuse my German, seems it is not quite useful.) --LPfi (talk) 12:24, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

You mean barquentine (Schonerbark) or {{BArch-description}} template? --Botaurus (talk) 15:42, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
The problem was that you edited the original description. The added info is of course welcome, but should be put elsewhere (if not from the original source). I see you moved it in that file description. The ship is rigged as an en:jackass-barque, not an en:barquentine, but the German word Schonerbark may very well cover both rig types (seems so from the de:Schonerbark article). --LPfi (talk) 17:09, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Maybee so. --Botaurus (talk) 17:47, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

SLQ ships

While compiling Commons:State Library of Queensland/Reports/2, I saw that you have uploaded some images of ships from the State Library of Queensland, and corrected some subjects.[2] I have started a special batch of uploads so that you don't need to upload them. Commons_talk:State_Library_of_Queensland#ships_batch --John Vandenberg (chat) 14:00, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Your pictures have a bad name with StateLibQld (number) at the beginning and are often wrongly categorized. --Botaurus (talk) 17:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
The prefix in the name is so the images can easily be matched with the library asset numbers. Our software can handle the images be renamed, provided the redirect is left behind.
The categorisation comes from Commons:State Library of Queensland/Subjects; see also Category talk:Ships by name. The community has chosen these categories, and they are sometimes they are wrong because the library subject headings are not detailed enough. For buildings, the assumption that the building is in Queensland is nearly always right. Assumptions about ships are less likely to be correct. If you have any ideas on how to make the bot smarter, let me know, or add them to Commons:State Library of Queensland/Todo.
John Vandenberg (chat) 19:07, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Re: Showing method of attack with boomerang - NMA-13594.jpg

Yes. You uploaded that image (18:43, 26 February 2011) with the name "Showing method of attack with boomerang - NMA-13594.jpg". After that you requested renaming with the following comment: "false name of the pic". So I did it. Regards. mickit 07:29, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

File:SagalassosTheater5232.jpg

Hallo Botaurus, danke für Deine Unterstützung beim Hochladen. Ich hatte es gestern versucht und war an "Bryans upload tool" verzweifelt. Da ich keine Zeit mehr hatte, verschob ich das Ganze auf heute, und sehe nun, dass Du das schon für mich erledigt hast. Spitze! Grüße --Kpisimon (talk) 09:15, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

:) --Botaurus (talk) 15:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

sorry

Sorry for [3]. The bot is using a w:cache that is three days old. It may do a few bad reverts if someone has modified the page in the last three days. I am watching the bot to see any bad reverts, but I may miss some. John Vandenberg (chat) 05:30, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

:) --Botaurus (talk) 15:03, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Anzahl der Bilder

Hallo Botarus, wie kommt es, dass man als angemeldeter Benutzer auf Commons mehr Bilder sehen kann als unangemeldet. Hier im Fall Rudolf Bodmer. 38 zu 23. Browser sind Firefox und Windows xp. -- Frila (talk) 21:42, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Das kann ich mir nicht erklären; ich benutze ebenfalls Firefox, jedoch mit Windows 7, und sehe auch nach Löschung aller Catches im unangemeldeten Modus immer 38 Bilder (auch mit dem InternetExplorer übrigens). mfG --Botaurus (talk) 20:37, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:USSPortsmouth(1896).jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:USSPortsmouth(1896).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:44, 23 April 2011 (UTC)


Category:Marquees

Category discussion notification Category:Marquees has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

--Jmabel ! talk 15:41, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I can not say anything about this topic? However, LEO and Google Translator translate the German word "Festzelt" (literally: party tent) with "Marquee". Therefore, I have linked on marquees whith tents. --Botaurus (talk) 16:07, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Drosophila

(See below for an English version)

Sehr geehrte Botaurus,

Es tut mir leid, dass ich nur ein bisschen Deutsche spreche. So wurde ich nach diesem schlechten Deutsch auch dasselbe auf Englisch schreiben. Ich bin ein Doktorand in der Physik (Biophysik). Ich hätte gerne Ihr foto von Drosophila in meinen Dissertationen zu beneutzen: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drosophila-melanogaster-Nauener-Stadtwald-03-VII-2007-12.jpg

Wie ich es verstehe, Sie haben es in die Gemeinfreiheit übergeben. Aber, ich hätte gerne Ihren Namen, dass Ich kann das Foto um Ihnen Kredit/Attribut/Referenz. Ich hätte gerne auch, um sicherzustellen, dass Sie dieses Foto besitzen

Mit freundlichen Grüßen,

Douglas Staple


Dear Botarus,

Sorry for my poor German. I'm a Ph.D. student in physics (biophysics) and I would like to use your photo of Drosophila in my thesis: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drosophila-melanogaster-Nauener-Stadtwald-03-VII-2007-12.jpg

I understand that you have released this photo into the public domain. However, I would like your name so that I can credit the photo to you. I'd also like to verify that this photo belongs to you.

Thank you very much,

Douglas Staple

--D. B. Staple (talk) 12:56, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

I sent an e-mail. --Botaurus (talk) 21:02, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Danke auch

hierfür! Herzliche Grüße, --4028mdk09 (talk) 18:08, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

(: --Botaurus (talk) 18:40, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

{{portrait of}}

Thanks for your translations on {{portrait of/syntax}}, I am just not sure of what you meant with "please check syntax for female de". Otherwise you may want to translation {{portrait of/labels}} (I have just fixed a syntax error that broke the template)--Zolo (talk) 02:31, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

It is already done. After the last attempt of mine it was right. The problem was only a half clip „{“. greetings --Botaurus (talk) 03:22, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Burgwälle, Turmhügel und du weißt schon :-)

Hallo Botaurus.. Es existieren hier in den Commons eine Reihe von Kategorien über Burgwälle in MV, die oft nur nach Gemeinde, nicht jedoch in den Burgwall-Kategoriebaum eingeordnet sind. Möglich wäre auch, dass sich Bilder in Kats befinden, die noch gar nicht angelegt sind. Wie du aus leidvoller Erfahrung weißt, bin ich damit überfordert. Vielleicht könntest du mal.. :-). Als Arbeitsliste kann evtl. dies dienen. Sei dem Neueinsteiger wegen der Kategorisierung aber bitte nicht böse. Danke und Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 12:57, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Ich hatte schon mal angefangen zu kategorisieren. Der Hochlader der Bilder war aber viel schneller und ist leider ein bisschen Beratungsresisten. Ich hatte Ihn angeschrieben und Ihm geraten, einfach die Formate bzw. Inhalte der von mir bereits angelegten Kategorien zu übernehmen, was er jedoch anscheinend nicht begriffen hat. Kann auch sein, daß es an dem Wizard-Tool zum Hochladen, das er benutzt, liegt. Der Neueinsteiger ist so neu nicht. Früher war er hier schon mal unter dem Namen Dolenzia unterwegs. Ich bin auch ein bisschen sauer über die vielen Kinderzeichnungen von Burgwallanlagen, die er hier einstellt. Die zeichnet er nur nach persöhnlicher Annahme oder Wunschvorstellung, ohne jede haltbare Quelle. Das gleiche gilt auch für seine Wiki-artikel. Deshalb habe ich mich seit Längerem aus diesem Thema rausgehalten. Gruß --Botaurus (talk) 13:51, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Shamrock pictures

Hello. First of all thanks for the massive contributions on 19C shipping, you are finding resources everywhere!! And nice to find the new pictures of Shamrock, but I am positive that both this one and this one are actually white paints, so they must be of Shamrock III (1903, white hull) instead of Shamrock I (1899, green hull). The bow also seems to be straighter and attest that it is indeed Shamrock III. What do you think? signed:Nuttyrave (talk) 10:55, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

You probably right. The curvature of the bow (stem) is another. If it is so, you should rename the images. Then the date is wrong in any case. Can you suggest how they should be called. Maybe you should sort the vessels in their own categories. greetings --Botaurus (talk) 14:25, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Botaurus-stellaris,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:38, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Technique list

Guten Morgen Botaurus, könntest du bitte diesen Edit überprüfen? Er macht für mich keinen Sinn: Doppelung von "cast iron" sowie "copper engraving" und entfernen von "cedar panel". Danke. Raymond 05:54, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis. Die Doppelung habe ich korrigiert. --Botaurus (talk) 10:27, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Your assistance please...

You trimmed six categories from File:A German pilot boat during Hanse sail 2009 -n.jpg. I uploaded about three dozen images, from flickr, that the flickr uploader took during "hanse sail 2009". I didn't know whether those categories were valid or not, as I don't read German. Do you think it likely they weren't valid on any of those images? I'll trust your judgment, and remove them from the other 35, if you say that is appropriate.

Cheers! Geo Swan (talk) 00:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Most images were a little bit unfortunate classified. Many geographic duplication. And even the Russian sailing replic with Category:Steamships and Category:Schutzstaffel!! here. I have assigned the ships to their ship category. The pilot boat - I think, its every day in Rostock. greetings --Botaurus (talk) 03:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

LGBT cat

Hallo Botaurus, ich habe dein Speedy erstmal revertiert, Begründung in der edit summary, wenngleich ich durchaus am Nutzen dieser cat zweifle. Der angemessene Ort wäre aber Commons:Categories for discussion. --Túrelio (talk) 08:03, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Túrelio, diese ganzen LGBT Kategorien können m.E. nur genutzt werden, wenn die betroffenen Personen auch aktiv schwule Literatur, Film oder Fotografie geschaffen haben bzw. wenn Politiker zu solchen Themen politisch aktiv waren oder sind. Deren jeweilige persönliche Präferenz hier darstellen zu wollen ist völlig unangemessen und meist auch unbewiesen. Ich habe den halben Bundestag aus der Kategorie LGBT politicians from Germany geschmissen. In deren de-wiki Artikeln steht auch oft nichts weiter drin, als das sie in einer Lebensgemeinschaft leben. Manche Politiker wurden auch von IPs in solche Kategorien einsortiert. Da weiß man die Beweggründe nicht.
Ich habe mir diesen LGBT Artikel auf dewiki mal durchgelesen. Das sind vier verschiedene Dinge in der Abkürzung, deren Gemeinsamkeit nur auf einer gewissen Abgrenzung zum Rest der „Heteronormalität“ beruhen soll. Mich wunder ja, daß bei der neuerlichen Mode, hier alles bis ins Kleinste zu kategorisieren, diese vier Elemente noch nicht auseinandergenommen wurden. Naja - Leute aus der griechischen oder römischen Antike als LGBT Personen zu bezeichnen, finde ich schon sehr eigenartig genauso wie spätmittelalterliche Herrführer oder Ritter als LGBT-military-people usw. Ich werde die Category:LGBT people by name dann mal bei Commons:Categories for discussion einstellen (am liebsten alle diese Cats). Aber auf ellenlange Diskussionen habe ich eigentlich keine Lust. mfG. Botaurus (talk) 14:17, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Wenn du dich damit so systematisch beschäftigst, wie deine lange Antwort nahelegt, dann räum da von mir aus ruhig gründlich auf. Bedenke aber, dass eine Kategorisierung auf Commons bei weitem nicht die Bedeutung hat wie auf Wikipedia (d.h., dort wäre eine falsche Einstufung für den Betreffenden potentiell kritischer als hier). Hinzu kommt mein Eindruck, dass die LGBT-Szene/"Aktivisten" selbst stark dazu neigt, ihr LGBT-"Sein" herauszustellen. --Túrelio (talk) 14:55, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Nein nicht systematisch. Da habe ich genug andere Themen. Diese Cats in ihrer Fülle habe ich gestern erst entdeckt und ich werde mich nicht tiefergehend damit beschäftigen. Ich war einfach nur entsetzt über die Verunglimpfung von Leuten (Quellen braucht man hier für sowas ja leider nicht). Du hast vermutlich recht mit der Annahme über die Kategoriebetreiber. Rosa Listen gibt es übrigens in der enwiki. Mit dem Argument von deren Existenz wurde der antike Knabenliebhaber Hadrianus‎ jetzt wider zu einer LGBT von Spanien gemacht. Sowas ist einfach unkorrekt. In dewiki gibts sowas zum Glück nicht. Botaurus (talk) 17:14, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Stop deleting Category:LGBT people without discussion

If you feel this category should be deleted for real, then you have to discuss with the rest of us before. I openeed a discussion here, where you can go and make your point of view clear: Commons:Categories for discussion/2011/12/Category:LGBT people --User:G.dallorto (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Trả lời

Không vấn đề gì, rất vui vì giúp được bạn. Và chúc mừng năm mới! PRENN (talk) 09:49, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Cảm ơn, Chúc mừng năm mới! --Botaurus (talk) 10:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Permanent_calendar_greg.svg

Hi Botaurus, ich habe soeben an Turelio meine Antwort formuliert, wenn Du bitte dort nachlesen möchtest !? Übrigens war es genau so, wie du schreibst. Der Lero hat in bestem Glauben die GNU-Lizenz eingegeben; ich habe die mögl. Folgen lange Zeit nicht überblickt. Frdl Grüße --LenderKarl (talk) 14:56, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Auf so vielen verschiedenen Seiten zu diskutieren hat wenig Sinn. Du zerstückelst das Thema und für Beteiligte ist nichts Nachvollziehbar. Grüße --Botaurus (talk) 03:28, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
...es gibt leider bei wikipedia einige nicht-perfekte Leute; Du willst mir sicher mitteilen, ich solle in Zukunft meinen Kommentar direkt auf der Diskussionsseite einbringen !? Danke, wieder was gelernt. Freundl. Grüße --LenderKarl (talk) 15:16, 5 January 2012 (UTC)