User talk:Bourgeois.A

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Bourgeois.A!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 09:24, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

M (266)Chevalement du puits Simon II..jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! M (266)Chevalement du puits Simon II..jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:PR4-06-2012.jpg[edit]

Salut,

ton image d'une araignée parait bien interessant mais les collègues aiment toujours avoir une identification de l'espèce (en latin)... que je ne suis pas capable de donner. Pourrais tu? -- Aisano (talk) 21:49, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Salut, ce n'est pas un caprice des collègues, mais une règle. Tes photos sont visuellement très jolies, mais n'ont aucune chance de passer en QI si elles ne sont pas décrites correctement ni, a fortiori, catégorisées, comme c'est le cas de trois sur quatre.... Pour obtenir de vrais succès, je te conseille vivement la lecture des règles, c'est utile et te permettra de progresser.
bien cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 21:58, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Merci, je comprend, mais je ne m'y connais pas trop en insecte et araignée... Je vais essayer de chercher.Cordialement,Bourgeois.A (talk) 22:08, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

C'est mieux là ?Bourgeois.A (talk) 22:19, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

+http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PR1-06-2012.jpg +http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PR2-06-2012.jpg

Bonsoir et merci, si mon conseil t'as servi, tant mieux. -- Aisano (talk) 23:00, 23 June
C'est sûr que c'est mieux (si c'est juste !!). Un petit effort sur tes noms de fichier (ils doivent avoir un sens, PR1-06-2012 n'en a pas, encore une règle...) et ça sera parfait !
Je me suis autorisé quelques corrections orthographiques sur ta page de wikipédia, pardon pour l'indiscrétion...--Jebulon (talk) 23:07, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

 

Merci des conseils et de la correction, j'ai fait les dernières modifs nécessaires. Bonne continuation ! Bourgeois.A (talk) 05:24, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Marguerite Leucanthemum vulgare-06-2012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marguerite Leucanthemum vulgare-06-2012.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Images remarquables[edit]

Bonjour,

Vous devriez lire Commons:Guide des images et Commons:Featured picture candidates avant de proposer des images. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:15, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

J'essaie juste d'aider. En fait, la qualité des images n'est pas si mauvaise. Avec un peu de soin dans la présentation et de persévérance, ça devrait le faire :
  1. Mettez un nom qui veut dire quelque chose : File:M (237).jpg
  2. Ajoutez la géolocalisation [1].
  3. Faites une description complète de l'image. N'oubliez pas la description quand vous nominez une image.
Cordialement, Yann (talk) 07:30, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puits-Arthur-06-2012 152.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puits-Arthur-06-2012 152.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

SET en VI[edit]

Tu as deux options : soit l'historique du site, soit l’état du site aujourd'hui. Voire, si tu peux le faire, faire les photos avant/après ce qui serait le plus juste. Ne te presse pas choisi 4 images qui te semblent le mieux à même de décrire ton sujet et on fera un scope en fonction de ton choix. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:15, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Je préfère parler de l'état su site aujourd'hui. Voilà quelques photos possibles :

Ton avis ? Elle ont toutes été prisent par moi, le même jour. PS : Merci de m'aider !

Le choix est recevable, à condition que toutes les images aient un géocodage (ce n'est pas encore le cas)
le scope pourrait être : Puits Arthur de Buyer Magny-Danigon, France.
(Dans les légendes de tes photos "Magny-Danigon" devrait apparaître tu peux même faire un lien Magny-Danigon)
Donne un titre à ton SET et du lance la procédure.
Je ne te garanti pas le succès, Thomas Bresson à fait également de bonnes images du site. Mais il faut se lancer ce sera toujours pour toi une expérience nouvelle. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Memorial of the disaster of 16 December 1950.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial of the disaster of 16 December 1950.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

VI[edit]

Bien. Les images se placent en fin de liste dans VI, j'y ai remédie. Il faut que dans le scope il y ai une categorie; tant pour le monument aux morts que pour le SET. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

OK pour le SET j'ai pris la liberté de modifier le scope en le rattachant a la catégorie, inspire t'en pour ton monument aux morts... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:09, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Unidentified Apoidea on Centaurea jacea 06-2012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unidentified Apoidea on Centaurea jacea 06-2012.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Memorial of the disaster of 16 December 1950.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Memorial of the disaster of 16 December 1950 in the gallery of Fourchie Collieries Ronchamp in Haute-Saône (eastern France)..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Inscription-puits de l'Etançon.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inscription-puits de l'Etançon.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puits-Arthur-06-2012 010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puits-Arthur-06-2012 010.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Image "Cité minière des Epoisses"[edit]

Bonjour,

Je me suis permis d'apporter quelques petits changements à votre belle photo de la cité minière des Epoisses. J'ai enlevé la vague tache dans le ciel en haut vers la gauche, et surtout j'ai redressé le léger effet de perspective qui faisait "pencher" les lignes verticales. J'ai utilisé pour cela le programme Photoshop Elements. Je n'ai pas enregistré ces modifications par dessus votre fichier originel, qui est donc resté inchangé, mais j'ai simplement chargé un nouveau fichier en ajoutant le mot "edit" au nom. Libre à vous de proposer éventuellement le nouveau fichier comme candidat QI. Malheureusement, je ne pourrai pas voter "pour": étant moi-même maintenant un peu partie concernée, ce ne serait pas sportif. Cordialement, MJJR (talk) 15:43, 29 July 2012 (UTC).

Merci pour votre intervention, je vais re-proposé l'image ce soire je pense. Bonne continuation, Bourgeois.A (talk) 16:19, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Set Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Arthur de Buyer coal mine ruins.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Arthur de Buyer coal mine ruins.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

--MrPanyGoff 20:37, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Photo houillères de Ronchamp[edit]

J'ai regardé votre photo des houillères de Ronchamp et tout me semble en ordre: la tache de lumière dans le bas a disparu. Mais le problème que vous mentionnez ne m'est pas inconnu. J'ai éprouvé exactement la même chose il y a quelque temps. Apparemment, lorsqu'on apporte un changement à une image que se trouve déjà un certain temps sur Commons (quelques mois ou quelques années), le changement ne s'affiche pas immédiatement. Ce qui donne l'impression (erronée) que le changement n'a pas été enregistré. Alors on essaye de nouveau et encore, comme vous l'avez fait. Je me demande si de tels changements ne doivent pas être avalisés par un administrateur de Commons avant d'être visibles. De toute façon, en de tels cas il suffit de patienter quelques heures ou quelques jours, et généralement tout s'arrange. Cordialemant -- MJJR (talk) 20:43, 21 November 2012 (UTC).

Merci pour l'info. Cordialement. Bourgeois.A (talk) 20:45, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 22:47, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

D'accord. Merci. Bourgeois.A (talk) 22:54, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sony NEX-5N with 18-55.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony NEX-5N with 18-55.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sony NEX-5N and E-mount lens camera.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony NEX-5N and E-mount lens camera.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sony NEX-5N with pencake 16.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony NEX-5N with pencake 16.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tes nominations en "Image de Valeur"[edit]

Salut Bourgeois.A
Je viens de voir tes nominations en "candidats aux images de valeur".
Je voudrais te faire deux observations, l'une sur la forme, l'autre sur le fond.
Sur la forme: contrairement à la page FPC, les nominations s'ajoutent à la fin de la liste, et ne se placent pas au dessus... C'est différent, ne me demande pas pourquoi, mais c'est comme ça. Donc il faudrait que tu les retires de là où tu les as mises.
Sur le fond: tu as choisi à chaque fois le même nom de domaine (le "scope"). Or, par définition puisque c'est le but de cette page, il ne peut y avoir qu'une seule image d'un même domaine qui puisse être distinguée. Donc ça n'est pas possible, comment veux-tu que nous choisissions quel photo de cet appareil "a la plus grande valeur dans "Commons" ?
Tu as alors deux possibilités. La première, c'est de "réduire" le domaine (scope) de chaque image, en ajoutant par exemple pour chacune la nature de l'objectif monté sur l'appareil. Je ne suis pas sûr que ce soit accepté: on ne peut pas "distinguer" comme VI chaque appareil photo du marché, chacun avec chaque objectif du marché, on n'en finirait plus ! Le "scope" doit être, selon la règle, ni trop large, ni trop étroit.
L'autre possibilité, c'est de proposer un "set", c'est à dire de mettre ensemble tes images, et de proposer la série complète d'un seul coup (va voir en bas de page, tu auras des exemples). Là, à mon avis, c'est parfait. Comme tes photos sont très bonnes, il n'y aura aucune discussion et ton "set" sera aisément promu (s'il est complet). En plus, c'est plus difficile, et donc plus prestigieux, d'être récompensé pour un "set". Pour exemple, je dois tourner autour de 160 VI, mais je n'ai que neuf sets promus...
J'espère que je suis clair dans mes explications. Si tu as besoin d'aide, n'hésite pas à me demander.
Enfin, j'ai très envie de m'acheter cet appareil depuis un moment déjà, comme complément de mon "Reflex" SONY α 550. Si tu en es le propriétaire, que peux-tu m'en dire ?Clin
Merci et à bientôt,--Jebulon (talk) 18:41, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
PS: s'agissant de photos dites "de studio" (il faut le préciser dans la description), pas besoin de géocode.--Jebulon (talk) 18:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
re salut.
De bonnes âmes compétentes se chargent désormais de faire fonctionner les "sets" de façon manuelle, et donc ça marche de nouveau.
Merci pour tes conseils, j'hésite avec le RX100...--Jebulon (talk) 21:44, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
Bon ben encore merci! Tu as mis le doigt sur mes hésitations. Maintenant, je suis tellement habitué à l'écran mobile que j'aurais de la peine à m'en passer. Je ne joue jamais en automatique, donc les menus ne me font pas peur...--Jebulon (talk) 22:19, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puits Arthur 19-02-2013 (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puits Arthur 19-02-2013 (3).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puits Arthur 19-02-2013 (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puits Arthur 19-02-2013 (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

VIS Promotion[edit]

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Sony NEX-5N.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Sony NEX-5N.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Charbonnage du Hasard 58.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charbonnage du Hasard 58.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Puits Notre-Dame pluie.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puits Notre-Dame pluie.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-Château de Belfort 15.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Château de Belfort 15.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-Château de Belfort 17.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Château de Belfort 17.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-Château de Belfort 11.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Château de Belfort 11.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-Fort de la Miotte 06.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Fort de la Miotte 06.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Vue sur Cheratte.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vue sur Cheratte.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Charbonnage du Hasard 46.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charbonnage du Hasard 46.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Galerie 780 - 2013 05.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Galerie 780 - 2013 05.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-Château de Belfort 18.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Château de Belfort 18.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-Château de Belfort 14 - crop.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Château de Belfort 14 - crop.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fonçage Robert-2013 07.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fonçage Robert-2013 07.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hameau de La Houillère 14.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hameau de La Houillère 14.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hameau de La Houillère 13.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hameau de La Houillère 13.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fonçage Robert-2013 09.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fonçage Robert-2013 09.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-Château de Belfort 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Château de Belfort 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-Fort de la Miotte 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Fort de la Miotte 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-Fort de la Miotte 07.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Fort de la Miotte 07.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-Fort de la Miotte 08.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Fort de la Miotte 08.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sony 18-55 E.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony 18-55 E.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tamron 18-200 E.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tamron 18-200 E.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014 - Puits Arthur - 30.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 - Puits Arthur - 30.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-Fort de la Miotte 13 - Crop.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-Fort de la Miotte 13 - Crop.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014 - Puits Arthur - 30 - Crop.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014 - Puits Arthur - 30 - Crop.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Demandes de suppression[edit]

Bonjour, S'il-vous-plaît, n'oubliez pas de laisser une note sur la page de l'utilisateur concerné lorsque vous faites des demandes de suppression, en suivant les instructions affichées dans le modèle. Par ailleurs, êtes-vous certain que l'utilisateur Jamy0254C n'est pas Jean-Michel Castro? Si oui, il serait quand même utile de fournir, avec le modèle de demande de suppression, un lien ou un minimum d'explications pour étayer l'accusation que l'utilisateur aurait menti sur son identité. Si non, ce pourrait être sympa de lui laisser un délai pour réagir avant de supprimer. -- Asclepias (talk) 22:50, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Nouveau modèle utilisateur[edit]

Salut.

J'ai créé un nouveau modèle utilisateur : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:User_info2

Je l'ai utilisé sur ma page utilisateur.

Cordialement. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:54, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: merci ! Bourgeois.A (talk) 21:32, 17 December 2014 (UTC)