User talk:Bryan Derksen/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Archive 1 Archive 2 →

Image:Tetragrammaton scripts.svg is valuable, but unfortunately, it uses a very "soft" curvy "Sans Serif" modern Hebrew font which does not particularly have Biblical connotations for readers of Hebrew (in fact, quite the reverse). I don't think that the SVG can be said to "supersede" Image:Tetragrammaton scripts.png until this is changed... AnonMoos 09:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Done. The great thing about SVG is it's quite easy to edit losslessly, the source is right there. :) Bryan Derksen 18:53, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Climate Cat

Hi! You tagged "my" climate category as to be in a more neutral form. That's not possible, cause the charts are in german language, to be used in German articles only. Currently we are working on translating the whole bunch to en/russ and so on. But the sortware that we use is a bit stubborn, there's no way to put other names/letters into the database. Maybe you have an idea how to change the city/country in an EMF-file?

I don't agree on using SVG, cause the format is not a real standard. I rather wait until it gets more standarized.

Thanks for your information! Let me know if you have any ideas/requests. --Hedwig in Washington 22:13, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Converting the charts to a more language-neutral form wouldn't require that the German-specific versions be touched in any way, it would entail the creation of new images that could be used on other language Wikipedias. I have no idea what an EMF file is or how to edit them, I'm basing this recommendation purely on the PNG "finished products" - I see no reason why the small bits of text can't be excised or translated. As a quick and easy approach, how about simply cropping off everything except the graph itself and leaving the data table to be put in as text wherever it gets used?
As for SVG, I think you're wrong. SVG does have a "real" standard, a quick Googling shows the official specs at http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/. Commons supports the format by rendering PNG versions of it on the server at whatever resolution is used so we don't even have to worry about whether all browsers can interpret it properly yet. But even so, conversion to SVG doesn't require deletion of the PNG originals either - see Commons:Transition to SVG. If you don't like SVG you can continue using the old versions. Bryan Derksen 06:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
Oops. See, that happens when you don't read about everything 24/7 8)) I thought there were still problems with SVG. If I find a good converter, I'll upload SVG. I used ImageMagic (the prog Duesentrieb suggested) but it only converts to 2 colors (back- and foreground) 8-) It's magic how all the color vanishes. So, there's nothing really working out. If you run into any idea/program/whatsoever please drop me a line. --Hedwig in Washington 08:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Will do. In the meantime hang on to those EMF files, it may be that in a few years some new piece of software will be written that handles them perfectly (or maybe Wikipedia will even add native support for them. Unlikely considering it's a Microsoft format, but who knows? :). Bryan Derksen 11:34, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Oscar/Golden Globe

Hi. What about to do the same artwork you created here [1] in here [2] and upload it to Commons? Kid33 06:49, 20 May 2007 (UTC)Kid33

Just whipped one up and put it at Image:Golden Globe icon.svg but for some reason it's not displaying properly yet. Bryan Derksen 02:32, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
There, fixed the problem. Golden Globe icon.svgOscar icon.svg

Great job! Kid33


Image Tagging Image:Foxholememorial_clr.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Foxholememorial_clr.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. howcheng {chat} 18:14, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Broken vector image

Image:StargateGlyph14.svg

Broken Vector Image, just thought i would let you know so you can fix it :-)

barrycarlyon 11:28, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

What's broken about it? it looks fine to me. Bryan Derksen 15:47, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

It wasnt displaying on my screen tho it is now (Troubled Expression) I apologize for wasting your time

barrycarlyon 09:04, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

No problem, took me just a minute to look and post. I've noticed that MediaWiki can sometimes briefly lose track of images, preventing them from loading properly; perhaps that happened here. Bryan Derksen 02:51, 27 June 2007 (UTC)

Dutch COA's

Hello, you will find all Dutch municipality COA's at Category:Coats of arms of municipalities of the Netherlands. Only three of 443 have SVG-versions. I have no software to open SVG-files. By adding tags, nothing will change. Are you able to produce the SVG.versions? Greetings Havang 09:14, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

However, there seem to be a fair number of SVG Flags of municipalities of the Netherlands... AnonMoos 09:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I have the software (I recommend en:Inkscape, it's both good and free) but not the time or artistic skill to do this sort of thing right now. However, the hope is that by tagging these images it'll draw them to the attention of people who do have the inclination to do the conversion work someday. There's no urgency. Bryan Derksen 11:06, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
How much time it takes about to make one SVG-version? Havang 14:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
I wouldn't know, at least not with regards to coat of arms images. I imagine a lot depends on how familiar one is with the software and how complicated the coat of arms image is. Almost all of my SVG work has been in the area of chemical structures, I have a specialized program just for that (BKchem). Bryan Derksen 04:39, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

I have made a inkscape test image; but it doesn't show properly. Image:Coat of Arms of Aa en Hunze.svg. Can you tell me what I did wrong? Havang 11:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Havang, that SVG file doesn't actually contain vector data, just a reference to an external raster image which isn't allowed in Wikimedia Commons SVG files. You'll need to learn how to really use vector-editing tools, which may take some time (since they're quite different from raster-editing tools) -- but on the other hand, if you can develop a relatively simple working method for transforming the already uploaded SVGs of flags of Dutch municipalities into corresponding coat of arms SVGs, then that part of the work could go relatively quickly. The French Wikipedia blason project has a page somewhere listing SVG's of coat of arms elements which can be quickly incorporated into a shield, and you can also look at Category:SVG coat of arms elements... AnonMoos 19:59, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
And just in case I wasn't explicit enough about it above, there's no need to learn how to do all this right now unless you really want to. It won't be particularly harmful if SVG request tags sit on image pages for years without further attention, the idea is that someday when someone comes along who's on a coat-of-arms SVG conversion spree it'll be easy for him to find things to work on. That's how I operate when I'm on one of my chemical structure SVG benders. Bryan Derksen 07:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Is the job in the order of 15 minutes/item (x440=110 hours) or rather 2 hours/item (x440=880h for the Dutch COA's). It is not worth the effort.Havang 10:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate of Image:EN0108821596M Sholem Aleichem crater on Mercury.png

Hi Bryan,

Regarding the image above, I noticed you tagged a similar photo I uploaded with {{duplicate}} and it was subsequently deleted. While it's my own fault for not bringing this discussion to you earlier, I believe the version I uploaded was sharper and thus more useful. As such, I attempted to upload a new version over the image you have in place (thus reducing any confusion and allowing for easy rollback), but a problem arose due to the fact that the version I would like to upload is a .jpg file and the one you have up is a .png.

So, if possible, I'd like you to take a look at this image (found here) and tell me what you think. I'd like to put the superior version up for use, but I'm hoping you can give some advice on how to make the process as seamless as possible. Thanks! --jonny-mt 05:39, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

I've compared them (load both of these in separate browser tabs and flick back and forth: [3] and [4]) and the only visual difference I can see is that the jpeg version is very slightly darker. Given that, I don't agree that the jpeg is superior. It's in a format with lossy compression; any time someone edits it in the future it's going to lose detail and pick up artefacts. The png version is non-lossy and so will provide a more useful source for future editing, and it comes straight from the MESSENGER homepage so has probably had less editing done to it than the nasa.gov version to start with. Bryan Derksen 19:47, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
Ah; I was only trying that with the thumbnails. I see what you mean now. Maybe some darkening could be done to the PNG version to highlight the craters a little better in the future, but it's not exactly pressing. Thanks, and sorry to bug you! --jonny-mt 05:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
No problem. As I understand it, the Wikimedia software uses different algorithms for thumbnailing images in different formats, so the apparent differences between thumbnails of two otherwise identical images would generally be magnified in the process. Bryan Derksen 02:04, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

"duplicate" image of Saturn's moon Rhea

Hi Bryan, you tagged Image:PIA07763_Rhea_full_globe5.jpg as being a duplicate of Image:Rhea_hi-res_PIA07763.jpg. While based on the same NASA original, the former image has been processed to highlight contrast significantly; panels have also been added to the sides. The original is a bit "washed out", and I feel the processed version is more suitable for its intended purpose of displaying Rhea's surface geology in the Wikipedia article. I therefore request it not be deleted. Thanks, WolfmanSF 04:25, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Sure, go ahead and remove the duplicate tag. I've added cross-links between the two to make it easier to keep track in the future. Bryan Derksen 06:12, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


Image:Humanism.svg

Image deletion warning Image:Humanism.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

OsamaK 21:48, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Maps by Peter Minton @ EVS Islands

I have seen you have reverted the copyvio tags. You are right, I was too quick labeling them. But I had found that at http://www.evs-islands.com/, the original web page, they are licensed only for non-commecial use. I have send the author an email to clarify the license, whether it is cc-by or cc-by-nc. I think we can keep them until this is resolved.-- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 commons es 09:30, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Where does it say they're for non-commercial use only? The image's page over on evs-islands.com [5] lists this map as CC-BY just like the Flickr page did (though the version number's been bumped up to 2.5). Bryan Derksen 16:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
It says: "You are free to use them with certain restrictions - 1) Don't sell them."---- Fernando Estel ☆ · 星 commons es 16:49, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
The text leading up to that is "Each of my maps is constructed of numerous layers of information. All of the layers are vector files. I will make these files available upon request. You are free to use them with certain restrictions - 1) Don't sell them..." I think he's referring specifically to the vector files there. He then goes on to say "Images of my maps are yours to download and use, with the above restrictions applicable." But that's directly contradicted by the CC-BY license that the images are released under, so it looks like some sort of dual licensing. Bryan Derksen 18:25, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


Image:Equol.svg

Image deletion warning Image:Equol.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Edgar181 (talk) 11:38, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


Image:Duloxetine.svg

Image deletion warning Image:Duloxetine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Edgar181 (talk) 13:05, 23 July 2008 (UTC)


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:BPMC.svg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:BPMC.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Edgar181 (talk) 17:03, 28 November 2008 (UTC)



File:Rorschach_inkblots.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rorschach_inkblots.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

75.46.34.23 17:56, 18 January 2009 (UTC)


File:Rorschach_inkblots.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rorschach_inkblots.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

69.143.138.224 16:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


File:Rorschach_inkblots.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rorschach_inkblots.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

24.5.76.46 20:43, 19 January 2009 (UTC)


File:Isobutanol.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Isobutanol.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rifleman 82 (talk) 06:22, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

acetyl-CoA

thanks for making that structure. But there are some hydrogens missing. The two amides and also the amino group at the aromatic ring to the right. Can you fix that? Thanks 61.27.60.224 13:30, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Which file are you referring to? The only acetyl-CoA SVG I can find offhand was done by NEUROtiker. Bryan Derksen (talk) 18:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Rorschach_inkblots.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rorschach_inkblots.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sorry but original deletetion requester forgot to put a warning here Tm (talk) 08:44, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


File:Golden_Globe_icon.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Golden_Globe_icon.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 11:59, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


Oscars

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Oscars have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

/Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:09, 5 August 2009 (UTC)


The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Purine.svg is disputed

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Purine.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Sponk (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2010 (UTC)


Your structure is missing a hydrogen atom at position 9 (see Purin2.svg or 7H-Purine.svg. Greetings from Germany, --Sponk (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

how to fix bad font rendering in SVG structural formulas

Hi, some of your SVG structural formulas have bad font rendering. (see gallery). You can fix it using Inkscape: just select the molecule and click Path→Object to path to workaround librsvg bugs with fonts. --Matt (talk) 11:52, 8 August 2010 (UTC)

File tagging File:Flaming_Chalice.svg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flaming_Chalice.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Kelly (talk) 10:40, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Acetic_acid.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Acetic_acid.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

DMacks (talk) 17:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Free-speech-flag.svg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Free-speech-flag.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Nard (Hablemonos)(Let's talk) 23:51, 7 March 2011 (UTC)