User talk:CLI

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

User talk:CLI/Archiwum 2010 User talk:CLI/Archiwum 2011 User talk:CLI/Archiwum 2012

Contents

File:You Can Dance Poland Studio.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


Copyright status: File:Marek Ząbczyk - U podnóża Gór Świętokrzyskich Nagroda Panoramio 2 2011 r..jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marek Ząbczyk - U podnóża Gór Świętokrzyskich Nagroda Panoramio 2 2011 r..jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 09:02, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Marek Ząbczyk - UFO nagroda Canon 2011 r..jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marek Ząbczyk - UFO nagroda Canon 2011 r..jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 09:04, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Orneta, ratusz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orneta, ratusz.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Marek Ząbczyk - portret.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marek Ząbczyk - portret.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 10:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Marek Ząbczyk - Na parapecie.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marek Ząbczyk - Na parapecie.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 10:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Marek Ząbczyk - Jest taki samotny dom.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marek Ząbczyk - Jest taki samotny dom.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 10:47, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Marek Ząbczyk - portret.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marek Ząbczyk - portret.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 15:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Marek Ząbczyk - Na parapecie.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marek Ząbczyk - Na parapecie.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 15:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Marek Ząbczyk - Jest taki samotny dom.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Marek Ząbczyk - Jest taki samotny dom.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Lymantria (talk) 15:34, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:V Bitwa o Mławę, CLI 01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:V Bitwa o Mławę, CLI 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Plushy (talk) 17:05, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:57, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Beatty (Nevada), Main Street.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beatty (Nevada), Main Street.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

UEFA Euro 2012, Warsaw, Fanzone 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UEFA Euro 2012, Warsaw, Fanzone 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hoover Dam, 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoover Dam, 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ramsowo, kościół, modlitwa.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ramsowo, kościół, modlitwa.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Orneta, kamienica Plac Wolności 37.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Orneta, kamienica Plac Wolności 37.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Utah, State Route 9, near Canyon Overlook trailhead.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utah, State Route 9, near Canyon Overlook trailhead.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sułowo, kościół 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sułowo, kościół 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Szestno, kościół 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Szestno, kościół 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File tagging File:Wikimaraton Wójcik Śmierska obrys.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wikimaraton Wójcik Śmierska obrys.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Masur (talk) 08:04, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Ponadto nalezy uregulować wykorzystanie tych logo w "stopce" plakatu. Znaki "towarowe" Foundation Wikimedia podlegają pewnym restrykcjom, chociażby potrzeba uzyskać zgodę na ich stosowanie oraz napewno wtedy nie można ich objąć wolną licencją. Także logo Wikiradia (o ilę mogę odczytać) podlega zapewne jakimś regulacjom. Osoba tworząca pracę pochodną (tu: plakat) powinna to wszystko uwzględnić, a plik powinien być czytelnie opisany. Masur (talk) 08:06, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
    • Czy autorka plakatu przesłała zgodę do systemu OTRS? Bo na jej www nie widzę, może źle patrze, informacji o tym na jakiej licencji jest udostępniony plakat. Masur (talk) 18:16, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Rose id[edit]

Hi CLI,

I saw your rose yesterday evening and I wasn't able to identify it. But there's a special page on French Wikipedia ("Quelle est cette plante ?" I. e. "What sort of plant is this ?") where very nice specialists always help. Maybe you can try to use it : I'm not a botanist at all but I shot lot of flowers last summer and I was really helped a lot on this page. The link is : [[1]]. It's a French page, but I think you can ask your question(s) in English. Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 17:14, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Krosno, kościół Franciszkanów studnia.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krosno, kościół Franciszkanów studnia.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Warszawa, otwarcie Mostu Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa, otwarcie Mostu Marii Skłodowskiej-Curie 19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wysoka Dąbrowa 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wysoka Dąbrowa 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Warszawa, Pałac Prezydencki, protest ACTA 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warszawa, Pałac Prezydencki, protest ACTA 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Three Rivers (California), Western Holiday Lodge, flower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Three Rivers (California), Western Holiday Lodge, flower.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porterville, Co Rd J22, Chevrolet CK.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porterville, Co Rd J22, Chevrolet CK.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Górowo Iławeckie, kościół NSPJ zewnątrz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Górowo Iławeckie, kościół NSPJ zewnątrz.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bachórzec, kapliczka.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bachórzec, kapliczka.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bachórz, 014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bachórz, 014.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Utah State Route 9, 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Utah State Route 9, 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bandrów Narodowy - Cemetery 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bandrów Narodowy - Cemetery 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rally Piaseczno 2012, OS Gąski, nr 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rally Piaseczno 2012, OS Gąski, nr 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Las Vegas, Caesars Palace 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Vegas, Caesars Palace 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bystre - cemetery 004.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bystre - cemetery 004.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bóbrka, Muzeum Przemysłu, 005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bóbrka, Muzeum Przemysłu, 005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dukla - Military museum 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dukla - Military museum 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Chołowice, cerkiew 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chołowice, cerkiew 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bandrów Narodowy - Horses.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bandrów Narodowy - Horses.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bandrów Narodowy - House 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bandrów Narodowy - House 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Warszawa Babice, CTLS D-MAKT.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Flight Design CTLS cockpit .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dźwiniacz Górny - Field 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dźwiniacz Górny - Field 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dźwiniacz Górny - Field 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dźwiniacz Górny - Field 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bachórz, 019.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bachórz, 019.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grabownica Starzeńska, 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grabownica Starzeńska, 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Czaszyn - Old church 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Czaszyn - Old church 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hoszów - Church 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoszów - Church 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Iwonicz-Zdrój, kościół ołtarz 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iwonicz-Zdrój, kościół ołtarz 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dudyńce - Church 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dudyńce - Church 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dukla - Military museum 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dukla - Military museum 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Chyrzyna, prom.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chyrzyna, prom.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rally Piaseczno 2012, OS Lesznowola, nr 11 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rally Piaseczno 2012, OS Lesznowola, nr 11 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Las Vegas, Platinum Hotel 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Vegas, Platinum Hotel 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dudyńce - church 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dudyńce - church 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bażanówka, 003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bażanówka, 003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jasienica Rosielna, kościół 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jasienica Rosielna, kościół 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dudyńce - church 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dudyńce - church 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Iwonicz-Zdrój, Stary Pałac 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iwonicz-Zdrój, Stary Pałac 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lollencja[edit]

Cześć. Obserwuję stronę Lollencji od jakiegoś czasu. Wciąż są zgłoszenia dotyczące błędnych nazw, zwłaszcza drewnianych kościołów. Jak jesteś pewny według innych źródeł to zmieniaj i przenoś. Czasem mam wrażenie, że to było celowe, bo żeby tak pomieszać!? Miałem zamiar przejrzeć jej pliki z tego okresu kiedy dodawała te kościoły, ale jeszcze się za to nie wziąłem. Poza tym strasznie mozolna praca, bo jak nie zna się budynku, to bardzo trudno wyszukać, że opis jest zły. PS. Ona ostatnio coś dodała prawie pół roku temu, więc nie sądzę, żeby Ci odpowiedziała. Pozdrawiam, Blackfish (talk) 18:56, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Las Vegas, pool near Bally's.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Vegas, pool near Bally's.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jasionów, cmentarz kaplica 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jasionów, cmentarz kaplica 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jałowe - Church 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jałowe - Church 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

WZT Wisła.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WZT Wisła.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jasionów, kościół 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jasionów, kościół 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jasionów, kościół dzwonnica 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jasionów, kościół dzwonnica 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Iwonicz-Zdrój, Pod Jodłą 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iwonicz-Zdrój, Pod Jodłą 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jasienica Rosielna, 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jasienica Rosielna, 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Belgrade, Old Palace park 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belgrade, Old Palace park 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Jaśliska - Cemetery 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaśliska - Cemetery 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Końskie, 006.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Końskie, 006.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Korczyna, kapliczka JS Pelczara 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korczyna, kapliczka JS Pelczara 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Korczyna, Sercanki kapliczka.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korczyna, Sercanki kapliczka.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rally Piaseczno 2012, OS Gąski, nr 04 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rally Piaseczno 2012, OS Gąski, nr 04 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jurowce - church 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jurowce - church 7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Krasice, cerkiew.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krasice, cerkiew.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kostarowce - school 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kostarowce - school 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kostarowce - church 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kostarowce - church 4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kiełczawa - cemetery 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiełczawa - cemetery 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

UEFA Euro 2012, Warsaw, Fanzone 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! UEFA Euro 2012, Warsaw, Fanzone 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sony 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sony 70-300mm F4.5-5.6 G SSM.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Las Vegas, Flamingo Rd and Hotel Rio Dr intersection.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Las Vegas, Flamingo Rd and Hotel Rio Dr intersection.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hoover Dam, Police Chevrolet Tachoe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hoover Dam, Police Chevrolet Tachoe.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jurowce - church 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jurowce - church 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Krosno, kościół św. Trójcy dzwonnica 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krosno, kościół św. Trójcy dzwonnica 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Arizona State Route 64, parking near Rd 6140, Toyota.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arizona State Route 64, parking near Rd 6140, Toyota.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Arizona, U.S. Route 89 near Page.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arizona, U.S. Route 89 near Page.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Krosno, cmenatrz żołnierzy radzieckich 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krosno, cmenatrz żołnierzy radzieckich 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Krasiczyn, most nad Sanem.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krasiczyn, most nad Sanem.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Krosno, lotnisko pomnik 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krosno, lotnisko pomnik 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Krasiczyn, zamek kaplica ołtarz 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krasiczyn, zamek kaplica ołtarz 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Carnal, Robert Gajewski, Proxima, RNZ II.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC)


File:Carnal, Proxima, RNZ II.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 06:38, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ursynalia 2013, Dead by April 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ursynalia 2013, Dead by April 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Płock, Orlen, budynek biurowy.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Płock, Orlen, budynek biurowy.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ursynalia 2013, Dead by April 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ursynalia 2013, Dead by April 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:16QAM Constelation.svg[edit]

Na "Zgłoś błąd" od maja br. "wisi" to. Czy mógłbyś to sprawdzić i ew. poprawić. Z góry dziękuję i pozdrawiam, Blackfish (talk) 13:04, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wikiekspedycja 2013, CLI 21.07.webm[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wikiekspedycja 2013, CLI 21.07.webm. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 15:38, 11 September 2013 (UTC)


Hi Adam,

Thanks for your reply acknowledging that you have a deal with Sony in exchange of equipment. Wikipedia tries to raise money every year to keep itself ads-free (probably you've seen their recurrent fund raising campaign) and for instance, I donate some money because I want to see it ads free so it is contradictory that now I am seeing Sony links in the pictures that do not even generate revenue to this project.

What do you think about this? By all means keep contributing but, would you consider removing the links to Sony from your pictures?

Thank you, Jorge.

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 exhibition at Warszawa Centralna railway station[edit]

Hi, your files showing WLM images are derivative works. The exhibited and displayed original works need credits (author, licences, URI/intenret address of the license legalcode, and titles if given at the description pages). Please add these credits to avoid deletion requests. Thank you. --Martina talk 18:16, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Prośba o pomoc[edit]

Chciałbym usunąć dwie kategorie, ze względu na ich nieprawidłowe nazwy. Tylko nie mam pojęcia jak to zrobić. Czy jest jakiś szablon lub strona aby takowe usunąć? Pzdr. Kapsuglan (talk) 19:48, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

File:AmigaOne X1000 03.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:AmigaOne X1000 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Re-edition of the Photowikimeetup in Wikimania 2014[edit]

Hello CLI! in the case that you are also visiting this year's Wikimania in London, you may be interested in attending the new edition of the photowikimeetup that took place in Hong Kong last year, and where you listed up. As the preparation is not yet settled, you are more than welcomed to take part in the discussion here. All the best, Poco2 17:41, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Górowo Iławeckie, Cerkiew PKŚ, tablica.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Górowo Iławeckie, Cerkiew PKŚ, tablica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Eleassar (t/p) 18:25, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

File:MT Ecto-1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MT Ecto-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gazebo (talk) 06:29, 25 July 2014 (UTC)

Cmentarz w Trześniowie[edit]

Cześć. Widzę, że publikowałeś zdjęcia z tego cmentarza tu Category:Cemetery in Trześniów. Czy wykonałeś tam może też zdjęcia grobowca rodziny Grodzickich? Podobno jest to monumentalny grobowiec na tym cmentarzu. Być może masz takie zdjęcie a nie opublikowałeś go. Przydało by się artykułu: Stanisław Grodzicki. Lowdown (talk) 13:01, 4 November 2014 (UTC)