User talk:Caveman80

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search





Information icon.svg

This user is, of their own volition, no longer active on Wikimedia Commons.
This is not indicative of breaking any Wikimedia policies.


català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Հայերեն | italiano | македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | Simple English | shqip | svenska | Türkçe | +/−




Idea behind Cats[edit]

The Idea was a ?Cascade? with pictures for several occasions


  • Category:Same-sex couples (normal people, mostly clothed)
  • Category:Same-sex erotic (the erotic touch, unclothed, in bed ... but not sex)
    • Category:Gay erotic
    • Category:Lesbian erotic
  • Category:Same-sex sexuality (Sex)
    • Category:Gay sex
    • Category:Lesbic sex

  • There was cogitations for substitution of gay and lesbian to Same-sex (male/female) because the wide range of time. In old time there was no concept like gay or lesbian. But only with Bot or somthing.
  • For the future male and female groups for "Same-sex couples". (to beginning there was only a few pictures)
  • I was thinking to set "erotic" and "sex" as subcategory of "couple". Also because there is now "marrige".
  • All categorys were for pictures and art.

  • Category:Same-sex couples
    • Category:Same-sex erotic
      • Category:Same-sex erotic male
      • Category:Same-sex erotic female
    • Category:Same-sex sexuality
      • Category:Same-sex sexuality male
      • Category:Same-sex sexuality female

--Fg68at de:Disk 03:09, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


Point taken... (I'm not a big fan of the terms LGBT or gay myself, but was trying to satisfy both viewpoints (and avoid having to look in 3 different places for pics) by placing identical categories in category "Homosexuality" and category "LGBT". Homosexuality as a category would leave out Homoerotic though, so I guess same-sex is a better solution. I tried to fix the problem with the art categories you mentioned. (Renaming LGBT art to Same-sex art, and also placing it the Art category)

Maybe I went a little overboard in trying to sort out the root category pictures into belonging to more specific categories, but LGBT, Gay, and Homosexuality had become giant dumping grounds for pictures (Sometimes appropriately categorized, sometimes not), and in addition you had to search three different categories (LGBT, Homosexuality, Gay) to look through three different pools of pictures. With the current category scheme, LGBT and Homosexuality both point to the same exact sub-categories, and have a minimum of pictures in each's root category.

I agree that same-sex is the most neutral and accurate label, especially in artworks and in content pre-dating the labels Gay or LGBT.

i'll try to be less like a bull in a china shop in the future -- Caveman80 22:10, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Information icon.svg

This user is, of their own volition, no longer active on Wikimedia Commons.
This is not indicative of breaking any Wikimedia policies.


català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | Հայերեն | italiano | македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | Simple English | shqip | svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Category:Same-sex_art[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Same-sex_art has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Kramer Associates (talk) 20:15, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 12:18, 15 May 2014 (UTC)