User talk:Chen-Pan Liao

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Chen-Pan Liao!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hello, Chen-Pan Liao!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:


2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:28, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Spider silk diagram[edit]

Hello Chen-Pan Liao! I am editing the English Wikipedia article on Spider Silk. Your image is very beautiful, but is slightly wrong. Do you still have the vector source file?

What needs to be done: The strings between the beta sheet blocks are good, but need to be changed slightly. They should come in at the ends of the beta sheets, parallel to the zig-zag lines (from the left and the right). This is shown on the diagram already. They should not come to the sides of the beta sheets (top and bottom of the beta sheet blocks in your diagram). This does not happen in the paper you cite, and is not current understanding of the model in the scientific literature.

If you still have the image source file please could you change it?

If you do not have the file or are too busy I will change the image in one week. I will change it to how I describe above.

你好! 我正在阅读Wikipedia关于Spider silk的文章。你画的蜘蛛丝的结构图非常漂亮,但是有一点小问题,希望你能够修改一下,如果你还有原始的可编辑矢量图。 我现在描述一下这个问题: 你的结构很简单明了,其中两种基本结构是晶体和无定形区。这里的晶体结构叫做β-sheet,是由蜘蛛丝蛋白分子的片段折叠而成的,所以每个β-sheet只有一个头一个尾。经典的比较公认的蜘蛛丝结构是反平行β-sheet,也就是从一角开始,遇到丙氨酸就可以转角180度,如此反复,就形成这个结晶结构。你可以去掉每个晶体中多余的线头只留一头一尾吗?还有就是,这个结构可能很明了,但是并不代表最新的科学研究,也不能够解释很多复杂现象,但作为wikipedia的科普文章,服务大家的科学兴趣是足够了。我的初衷是希望这篇Spider silk的文章更加科学,更加准确。


best wishes

vincentsarego (do I have to make a separate account for the Commons?) 14:58, 17 June 2011 (UTC)

致vincentsarego。非常謝謝您的指教。為了方便將來的討論,我已把我們的對話放在File talk:Structure of spider silk thread.svg,請將來在該處繼續討論,以利將來對其它對該圖有興趣的維基人會有所幫助。Apan (talk) 19:53, 17 June 2011 (UTC)


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:20, 11 November 2011 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

P-value in statistical significance testing[edit]

P-value in statistical significance testing.svg

Hi there, I noticed that you have updated the image in the article on p-value. Thank you very much for the effort. However, I also noticed a few spelling errors: in the paragraph inside the box, "bypothesis" should be "hypothesis", "commiting" should be "committing", and "rerult" should be "result". In the labeling of the figure, there is "more likely ovservation" which should be "more likely observation". Lastly, I would be very grateful if you could modify the caption of figure to be: "A p-value (shaded green area) is the probability of an observed (or more extreme) result assuming that the null hypothesis is true." Cheers, (Manoguru (talk) 13:12, 23 November 2014 (UTC))

Hi Manoguru, many thanks for your advices. I've corrected these typos and updated this figure on wikipedia commons. Apan (talk) 21:47, 23 November 2014 (UTC)