User talk:CherryX

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, CherryX!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Archiv

Datumstempel[edit]

Hallo CherryX, könntest du in Zukunft bei Fotos für Commons/Wikipedia nicht den Datumstempel bei deiner Kamera abschalten? So richtig schön sieht dieses Wasserzeichen nicht aus ;-). --Túrelio (talk) 20:29, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey Túrelo, den Datumstempel gibt es nur auf den (ich glaube 7) Fotos, die mit meiner analogen SLR gemacht wurden. Ich habe damals erst nach dem Entwickeln bemerkt, dass dieser wohl aufgezeichnet wurde und erst danach deaktiviert. Gruß --CherryX (talk) 21:42, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

TWK?[edit]

Hallo CherryX, leider bin ich technisch nicht versiert genug um deinen Bearbeitungskommentar zu verstehen, wovon ist das denn die Abkürzung? Viele Grüße, --Edelseider (talk) 11:39, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Edelseider, mit TWK meinte ich die Tonwertkorrektur. Gruß --CherryX (talk) 12:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gastronomie- Eiskarte- Gläser.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gastronomie- Eiskarte- Gläser.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Strasbourg- European Court of Human Rights.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strasbourg- European Court of Human Rights.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dämmerung in Duisburg am Rhein.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dämmerung in Duisburg am Rhein.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

VI[edit]

Welcome to VI. The first steps are difficult but we are together to help each other. Some images are not very suitable and can not be promoted but most certainly would if you change some parameters. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Glacier Peak (aerial view).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Glacier Peak (aerial view).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

File:Thinornis rubricollis - Orford.jpg[edit]

Thinornis rubricollis

You have left a note on File:Thinornis rubricollis - Orford.jpg. Could you elaborate a little? What extra information do you want? John Vandenberg (chat) 23:53, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

There is an irritation, where I set the note. What is it? --CherryX (talk) 12:26, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Looks like a feather to me. Bidgee (talk) 00:12, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
With Fade-Out-effect? Nice. --CherryX (talk) 00:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
It could be an out of focus feather or something. Honestly I'm not really sure. I could probably remove it with photoshop if you think it's a big deal. JJ Harrison (talk) 00:31, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Actually not, but for a featured picture it is (my opinion). --CherryX (talk) 00:35, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Taksim Gezi-Park protests in Chicago, IL.jpg[edit]

Taksim Gezi-Park protests in Chicago

I see this image has been deleted twice already which means you will have to give an explanation why this is not a copy vio to the talkpage of the Admin who deleted the image Fastily. You can find his userpage by clicking on the deleted image. I cannot restore it. I withdrew my DR on the other image. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi Leoboudv, I know that and already did so. Just wrote you your information. Regards, --CherryX (talk) 08:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
OK. Good luck. I am not an Admin and I cannot restore an image. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:09, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
I still know that. I just asked you for the existance of an option, not for the restoring-act. ;-) Regards, --CherryX (talk) 08:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Well I had to send a mail to OTRS. I don't know, how much time this will take, but that was an image for a current event… --CherryX (talk) 08:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Category:2013 Taksim Gezi Park protests in Cologne[edit]

Hi CherryX, danke für deine Bearbeitung, die ich zum Anlass genommen habe, die Informationen in die Bildbeschreibung einzufügen. Als ich Category:2013 Taksim Gezi Park protests in Cologne angelegt hatte, war die Großdemo noch nicht bekannt. Raymond 21:28, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey Raymond, keine Ursache und ich danke dir, dass du das so schnell erledigt hast. Gruß --CherryX (talk) 21:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

COM:QIC[edit]

First of all, check your edits after saving - here is the diff - you had deleted other user's nominations while putting your own ones into the page. So, the edit is already inacceptable for this reason standalone. Further, I haven't count how much images you tried to nominate, probably there were far more than twenty. Apart from the fact that QIC doesn't have enough voluntary reviewers to examine that amount of nominations per user and day, and so most of your noms will remain unassessed anyways. There were several discussions already, it is consensus on QIC (and common sense as well) that a user shouldn't nominate more than a couple of images per day (at least if they don't review as much or more at the same time); all other is being considered as flooding. Thanks --A.Savin 21:16, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the enlightenment. Regards, --CherryX (talk) 07:00, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Düsseldorf Skyline.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thank you![edit]

I am an older editor, and also upload photos with Creative Commons licenses from Flickr to Commons. I edit biographies of musicians. I thank you for removing the watermark from a Neil Young photo on the en.Wikipedia. I do not know how to remove them, even though I have uploaded and placed at least 1,750 photos here. I am hoping that you will look at the articles on Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young. The band photo I uploaded and later someone claimed it was their work!!! I couldn't believe it! Other than that page, each individual member of the band: David Crosby, Stephen Stills, Graham Nash, and Neil Young all still have photos with watermarks on them. I am losing my sight due to glaucoma, so I didn't see the tiny watermarks. If you can help remove the marks, I would be SO grateful! If you can not do it, maybe you know someone who can do it? Thanks for your time reading this note! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 13:47, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Leahtwosaints, don't worry about it, you're welcome. :-) Just post the watermarked pictures here and I'll handle the list from time to time. Regards and have a nice day, CherryX (talk) 14:44, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
OH WOW! How generous of you.. do you also edit the en.wiki? I stink here on Commons, but I'm not bad on the Wikipedia. I just use Commons to upload photos mostly. If it's OK, I'll just add names of files when I can remember them here. Here are some watermarked photos: [1]

[2], [3] [4], I hope it isn't too much right now! --Leahtwosaints (talk) 01:16, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Morsi's ouster celebrations Tahrir 20130707-1.jpg[edit]

Hi CherryX, you have been editing the resolution of this image. Please look at this comment for a short review of license information.Wäre nett von dir, es scheint mir da etwas nicht stimmen zu können. Vielleicht erinnerst du dich ja, ob das Foto tatsächlich aus der angegebenen URL stammte und ob der 7. Juli 2013 dort als Datum angegeben war. Greetings, --Anglo-Araneophilus (talk) 11:45, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Foto Theater Duisburg[edit]

Hallo CherryX! Ich habe dein Foto File:Theater Duisburg (CherryX).jpg ausgetauscht gegen File:Theater Duisburg 2013.jpg. Ich hoffe du bist mit dem Tausch einverstanden. Das neue Foto von mir zeigt das Theater im Kontext des Platzes und der umliegenden Gebäude. Zudem hat es keine stürzenden Linien. Viele Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 17:32, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Tuxyso, ja – vielen Dank; ist alles in Ordnung. Gruß --CherryX (talk) 20:12, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Speicherstadt, Hamburg (CherryX).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Speicherstadt, Hamburg (CherryX).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 16:24, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Own Work, CC-BY-SA-3.0
@Leyo: Alle notwendigen Informationen sind auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite genannt, Mogelzahn hat sie bloß bei einer Bearbeitung im Dezember 2012 (versehentlich) aus dem Beschreibungskasten entfernt (diff). --CherryX (talk) 17:35, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Entfernt habe ich da garnix. Ich habe bloß zwei geschweifte Klammern zuviel gesetzt ;-) --Mogelzahn (talk) 17:47, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Und dadurch die notwendigen Informationen aus dem Beschreibungskasten entfernt, sodass diese darunter in Wiki-Syntax angezeigt wurden. ;-) Gruß --CherryX (talk) 17:48, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
(Nachtrag) Mogelzahn, reicht das (diff) oder muss ich noch etwas weiteres tun? --CherryX (talk) 17:54, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Das reicht so. Ich habe diese Methode als effizienteste Benachrichtigungsart gewählt. Erstaunt hatte mich, dass du den Syntaxfehler da nicht korrigiert hattest. --Leyo 22:10, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Den habe ich gar nicht wahrgenommen; der genannte Edit ist einer von über 800 gewesen innerhalb einer Stunde (ø 4,5s/e) – eine Massenbearbeitung (hist). Gruß --CherryX (talk) 22:44, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Sowas machst du von Hand und nicht mittels VFC, pywikipedia, o.ä.? --Leyo 00:16, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Wahrhaftig eine Augen-zu-und-durch-Arbeit. Für den Pywikipediabot fehlen mir leider die nötigen Kenntnisse; ich habe mich vor etwas länger als einem Jahr zwar mal kurz damit beschäftigt, jedoch konnte ich mit den Anleitungen nichts anfangen. Was ist VFC? Gruß --CherryX (talk) 00:18, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Siehe COM:VFC ;-) --Leyo 01:05, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Danke, ich kämpfe mich da später mal durch. :-) Gruß --CherryX (talk) 08:03, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Fotos aus Bonn[edit]

Hallo CherryX, vielen Dank für deine zahlreichen Fotos von Bonn aus dem September. Ich habe gerade einen Großteil mit Beschreibungen und den passenden Kategorien versehen. Eine kleine Bitte: In den Kategorien Category:Streets in Bonn, Category:Geography of Bonn und Category:Parks in Bonn sind die Bilder kaum an der passenden Stelle. Es ist vergleichsweise aufwendig, im Nachhinein eine große Menge an Bilder umzusortieren. Für die allermeisten der Straßen in Bonn besteht bereits eine eigene Kategorie, das gleiche gilt natürlich für die wichtigsten Gebäude (und falls nicht, lege ich sie gerne an). Ich kümmere mich durchaus gerne um die richtige Kategorisierung von Bildern – insbesondere, wenn das entsprechende Motiv zuvor noch nicht in Commons vorhanden war, wie z.B. die meisten Baudenkmäler im Bonner Zentrum –, doch eine richtige Vorsortierung und zumindest eine minimale Beschreibung des gezeigten Objekts (und sei es nur der Straßenname und der Name der Stadt) ist dafür sehr hilfreich. Gruß--Leit (talk) 19:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Ich nochmal...[edit]

Moin, Habe das nun diskutiert, da es nur das eine Bild ist das betroffen ist. Gelöscht. Schönen Tag noch --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:31, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Thesupermat (talk) 16:48, 31 October 2014 (UTC)