User talk:Church of emacs

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Please sign your posts with --~~~~. Thanks!

deprecated function in your monobook.js[edit]

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 650709f119a10444442b01acb7776a4d[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


Image:Free-Software-Song-Notes.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Free-Software-Song-Notes.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

83.194.95.239 00:07, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Church of emacs!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:44, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:DefectiveByDesign logo.png[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:DefectiveByDesign logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:DefectiveByDesign logo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Stifle (talk) 10:39, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

I emailed the DBD campaign team --Church of emacs (talk) 11:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Regarding questions about File:Volcanic_ash_cloud_bergen_norway.jpg[edit]

I have answered your questions for my uploaded file on my talk page. --stiaand 19:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC +2)

File mover[edit]

The functionality of the template {{rename}} has recently changed. You might need to clear your cache to see the changes. If successful you should then be able to use the new "Quick adding" link in the template to instruct CommonsDelinker to replace the old name with the new name in all wikis. Please use that every time you rename a file. If further questions arise, feel free to write on my talk page --DieBuche (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Manifiestocoruña.jpg[edit]

Why was this file deleted? I took the photograph by myself and it was written in the permissions.--Dagane (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Hi. See this page for a discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Manifiestocoruña.jpg. Basically, my point is that the text is copyrighted, and if you take a picture and upload it on Wikipedia, the original copyright of the text is still intact and has to be respected. See Commons:Copyright. You may want to contact User talk:Jameslwoodward. Regards, --Church of emacs (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Agelou11.jpg[edit]

Unfortunately what you removed wasn't a "watermark", but a historically- and bibliographically-important series mark, which was on the postcard as originally printed. AnonMoos (talk) 15:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, you are absolutely right. I don't know why I removed the mark back then. Thanks for letting me know and regards, --Church of emacs (talk) 21:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

File:MediaWiki-Purging-URL.png[edit]

Hi Church of emacs. Ist dieses Deutsch-Englisch-Gemisch beabsichtigt? --Leyo 15:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Ähm, ehrlich gesagt nicht. Keine Ahnung, was da passiert ist ;-) --Tobias (talk) 22:49, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Magst du eine rein englische Version drüberladen? --Leyo 23:24, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
Done --Tobias (talk) 14:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Danke! --Leyo 14:35, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-05-16 Kai Schmidt-Eisenlohr 8946.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-05-16 Kai Schmidt-Eisenlohr 8946.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-07-14 Bergrettung Bodenschneid 1054.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-07-14 Bergrettung Bodenschneid 1054.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bausteine beim Festivalsommer[edit]

Hi, lässt Du bei Deinen Festivalbildern absichtlich die Bausteine Persönlichkeitsrechtsbaustein und OTRS-Ticket aus {{Festivalsommer 2013}} weg? Wenn ja, weswegen? Grüße, --Emha (talk) 07:41, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Emha! Ja, ich lasse beide Bausteine weg.
  1. Zum OTRS: Ich wüsste nicht, warum wir ein Ticket bräuchten. Es ist ja aus der Vorlage ersichtlich, dass es sich um ein Foto des Festivalsommer-Projektes handelt und somit aus dem Kontext ablesbar, dass eine Erlaubnis zum Fotografieren besteht. Ich habe außerdem immer gedacht, dass im gegenteiligen Fall ohnehin nur der Fotograf dran wäre (der als solcher die Festivalordnung gebrochen hat), nicht Commons. Bin aber kein Jurist und falls das nicht so ist, bitte ich um Aufklärung :)
    Darüber legt der OTRS-Baustein eher nahe, dass ein Externer die Rechte an dem Bilder hält, was ja nicht der Fall ist. Ich finde den Baustein daher eher unpassend.
  2. Zum Persönlichkeitsrechtsbaustein: Auf allen Festival-Bildern, die ich bislang hochgeladen habe (es kommen ja noch welche), waren Personen der Zeitgeschichte zu sehen, die willentlich (wenigstens konkludent) einer Abbildung zugestimmt haben. Mein Verständnis von dem Baustein ist, dass er bei Bildern einzusetzen ist, die keine Person der Zeitgeschichte sind oder bei denen die Einwilligung zur Veröffentlichung fraglich ist. Also beispielsweise Festivalbesucher.
Im Sinne der Übersichtlichkeit habe ich die Bausteine bei den bisherigen Bildern daher weggelassen. Viele Grüße, --Tobias (talk) 16:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Hallo, zu 1) Nicht jede/r darf auf Festivals (vor allem nicht mit Kameras wie unseren) fotografieren, sondern nur nach Akkreditierung. Diese auch für Außenstehende auf Nachfragen hin zu dokumentieren, dient der OTRS-Baustein. In dem Ticket sind alle Zulassungen gesammelt und ich finde das schon sinnvoll.
Zu 2) Ich würde Dir zustimmen, aber hier habe ich mich nach dem Text auf der Doku des Bausteins gerichtet, der besagt "Per default wird der Baustein eingebunden, weil ja in aller Regel mehr oder weniger "öffentliche" Personen abgebildet sind." Wollen wir deswegen auf der Projektdiskussion nochmal nachfragen? Diskussion dazu gab es hier (2012) und dort (2013). Viele Grüße, --Emha (talk) 10:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)
Emha, ist das hier ggf. ein Kompromiss? File:2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Wayne Wonder 6036.JPG. Siehe den klein gedruckten Text unter dem Festivalsommer-Baustein. --Tobias (talk) 12:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Ja, das ist ein Kompromiss. Die meisten Deiner Festivalbilder haben jedoch diese Kennzeichnung (noch) nicht, weil sie vorher hochgeladen wurden, gelle? Gratulation übrigens zu Deinen beiden QI-Auszeichnungen untendrunter. Ich hatte bisher weniger gnädige "Richter". Beste Grüße, --Emha (talk) 21:06, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Max Herre & Afrob 4613.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Max Herre & Afrob 4613.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-08-23 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - T.O.K. et al. 4054.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-23 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - T.O.K. et al. 4054.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Pentateuch 5438.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Pentateuch 5438.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Richie Spice 5629.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Richie Spice 5629.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Wayne Wonder 6041.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Wayne Wonder 6041.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Protoje 6721.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-25 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Protoje 6721.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Pentateuch 5423.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Pentateuch 5423.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - I-Jahman Levi 6285-cropped.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - I-Jahman Levi 6285-cropped.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dein Autorenhinweis[edit]

Deutsch: Die Autorennennung bitte wie folgt: "Wikipedia / Tobias Klenze" (Link auf Benutzerseite ist optional). Die Lizenz muss ebenfalls genannt und verlinkt werden. Falls dieses Bild zum Beispiel unter der Lizenz CC-BY-SA 3.0 steht, lautet der Hinweis: Bild: Wikipedia / Tobias Klenze / CC-BY-SA 3.0 - Das mit dem Verlinken geht bei Printnachnutzung schwierig :-), außerdem erlauben die CC-Lizenzen ausdrücklich die Angabe der URL der Lizenz in Textform oder aber die Beigabe der Lizenz ohne Link (die URL ist im Lizenztext erstaunlicher Weise nicht enthalten). Das solltest du mal anpassen. sугсго 10:46, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Beginner 5151.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Beginner 5151.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

30C3[edit]

Congratulation for the portraits of the 30C3 speakers -- especially the much-needed one of Sarah Harrison! Keep up the good work and happy new year! Rama (talk) 11:51, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! It's good and motivating to get positive feedback :-). Happy new year, --Tobias (talk) 22:55, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-10-04 Lake Koman, Albania - Landing place at Koman 0933.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-04 Lake Koman, Albania - Landing place at Koman 0933.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-10-03 Fierza Hydroelectric Power Station, Albania 0632.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-03 Fierza Hydroelectric Power Station, Albania 0632.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-10-03 SH5, Albania 0465.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-10-03 SH5, Albania 0465.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Church of emacs,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Danke für die schönen Bilder. Da ich zum ersten Mal Ende August 1982 ins Valbona-Tal kam und mit Det aus RRogami nach Theti gewandert bin, bilde ich mir ein, der erste Individualtourist dort gewesen zu sein. Später erst habe ich verstanden, warum ich praktisch von Hand zu Hand gereicht worden bin. Damit stand ich immer unter dem Schutz der Gastfreundschaft (siehe Canun i Leg Ducagjini). Das Touristenhotel war damals noch intakt, aber von Leuten bewohnt, die mich besser nicht sehen sollten. 1994 war ich noch zweimal dort und habe meinen Führer zu Hause besucht. Tschüss Dieter Schaefer

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-08-23 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Junior Kelly 3686.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-23 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Junior Kelly 3686.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Beginner 5133.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Beginner 5133.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Ska-P 4903.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-08-24 Chiemsee Reggae Summer - Ska-P 4903.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hallo Tobias, das 400er ist schon recht nett...[edit]

ISO 5000
ISO 12800

was mir aufgefallen ist, dass auch bei ISO 1600 das Bildrauschen in Grenzen blieb. Hast du das mit einer Luminanzregelung reduziert? ich hab nämlich selbst eine 6D, ich trau mich fast nie, höher als 800 zu gehen. Eben weil das Rauschen so stark ansteigt. BTW: Hast du mit Raw oder Jpg fotografiert? Aber insgesamt: ein tolles Ergebnis! Muss auch mal damit auf den Fußballplatz gehen! Hast du auch was mit dem 2.0 Konverter gemacht oder hat dir 400mm gereicht?

Und letzte Frage: ab wann ist das Ding wieder in Wien oder brauchst du es noch für ein paar andere Sachen? Gruß aus Wien --Hubertl (talk) 12:25, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Hubertl. Eine Luminanzregelung o.ä. hab ich nicht angefasst – ich habe einfach die Defaults der Kamera verwendet (normale Rauschunterdrückung). Damit bekommt man bis ISO 3200 kaum Rauschen, bis ISO 6400 ist es noch akzeptabel und über ISO 10.000 werden die Bilder selten brauchbar (außer auf kleinen Vorschaubildern). Generell finde ich bei der 6D phänomenal nicht nur wie wenig Rauschen es gibt, sondern auch wie gut die Farben erhalten bleiben, wenn man mit dem ISO nach oben geht. Bei meiner 550D wurden die Farben sehr flau bei höherer Sensorempfindlichkeit. Die Bilder oben sind übrigens mit der 6D, ohne Nachbearbeitung direkt als JPG aus der Kamera gekommen (z.T. leicht gecroppt).
Wenn über ISO 800 keine guten Bilder bekommst, dann ist irgendetwas falsch. Hast du eventuell die Rauschunterdrückung abgestellt?
Das Objektiv hat UPS vor 10 Sekunden abgeholt ;) --Tobias (talk) 14:14, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-11-23 WikiCon 2013 1369.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2013-11-23 WikiCon 2013 1369.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

StagiaireMGIMO (talk) 20:48, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2013-11-23 WikiCon 2013 1371.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2013-11-23 WikiCon 2013 1371.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

StagiaireMGIMO (talk) 20:49, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

Fotos für Jahreskalender 2015[edit]

Wir würden uns freuen, wenn du bis 15. November auf der Planungsseite geeignete von dir gemachte Fotos für den gedruckten Jahreskalender 2015 von Wikimedia Österreich vorschlägst. Liebe Grüße --Raimund Liebert (WMAT) (talk) 18:55, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Hab ich gemacht! Grüße aus Kanada, --Tobias (talk) 23:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014-05-30 Austria - Iceland football match, Viðar Kjartansson 0372.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-05-30 Austria - Iceland football match, Viðar Kjartansson 0372.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

2014-07-29 Padjelantaleden, Sweden 5686.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-07-29 Padjelantaleden, Sweden 5686.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2014-07-26 Padjelantaleden, Sweden 5163.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2014-07-26 Padjelantaleden, Sweden 5163.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

400mm[edit]

lb. CoE, du hast ja im Sept/Oktober mal das 400er aus unserem Pool verwendet. In der Nachschau des Ergebnisses nicht nur von dir sondern auch der Ergebnisse anderer Leute, die dieses Objektiv verwendet haben (inkl. meiner eigenen Erfahrungen damit) stelle ich fest, dass man nicht ganz zufrieden sein kann. Die Bilder sind teilweise im Ergebnis wächsern, auf wirklich großen Entfernungen scheint sich der Stabilisator eher negativ auszuwirken, auch gibt es bei Crop-Kameras chromatische Abbereviationen (was aber auf dich nicht zutrifft - 6D). Diese Probleme scheinen durchgehend zu sein. Unabhängig von der doch vorhandenen guten Qualität. Ähnliche Probleme interessanterweise auch mit dem 70-200er aus unserer Geschäftstelle. Natürlich weiß ich um die unterschiedlichen Verwendungen, je nachdem welche Kamera auf die Linse draufgeschraubt war.

In deinem Fall sind die Ergebnisse der Sportaufnahmen durchaus akzeptabel (sorry, mir gehts jetzt hier um das Ausloten des Machbaren), insgesamt sind ja deine Bilder sehr gut geworden, wenn auch in einigen Situationen durchwachsen. Ich bewundere deinen Einsatz, die Linse wirklich überall raufgeschleppt zu haben...

Wir versuchen gerade, das Problem zu klären und hätten gerne eine wirklich sehr kritische Meinung zu den Ergebnissen von Dir. Ich möchte damit keineswegs jetzt deine Ergebnisse kritisieren, es geht mir darum, herauszufinden, welche Probleme es gibt, wie wir sie lösen können (speziell jetzt in so kritischen Einsätzen wie Sportfotografie). Das Ziel ist, dass wir eine Handlungsanweisung zustandebringen, welche wir denen zur Verfügung stellen wollen, welche sich das Equipment ausborgen. Es muss ja nicht jeder dieselbe Erfahrung machen, noch dazu da keiner der Fotografen etwas davon hat, wenn man diese Erfahrung nicht weitergibt.

Auch wollen wir Anfang nächsten Jahres einmal ein paar Tests unter ähnlichen, wenn nicht gleichen Bedingungen mit unterschiedlichem Gerät machen. Ich habe nämlich zumindest das 400er im Verdacht, dass es längst kalibriert werden sollte. Vielleicht bringt das dann eine Verbesserung.

Ich habe in letzter Zeit eine lange Reihe von Bildern analysiert und festgestellt, dass zB das 300er-Nikon-Objektiv von uns bessere Ergebnisse erzielt. Natürlich sind die Umstände nicht vergleichbar, umso wichtiger ist es, dass man diese - wie eben durch deine Kritik - aber vergleichbar und vermittelbar macht. --Hubertl (talk) 12:35, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Hubertl. Ich habe andere Erfahrungen mit dem Objektiv gemacht, m.E. ist es das mit Abstand schärfste Objektiv dass ich bisher verwenden durfte... mit einer solchen Qualität, dass eher der 20-Megapixel-Sensor der 6D der begrenzende Faktor sein dürfte. Warum meine Sport-Bilder trotzdem nicht so dolle sind? Nunja, viele sind sehr, sehr stark gecroppt. Teilweise auf ein Zehntel der Bildfläche. Da macht sich dann schon das Rauschen bemerkbar (ISO 800) oder die nicht ganz exakte Fokussierung (was aber eher an der 6D und meinen Fähigkeiten liegen dürfte als am Objektiv).
Schau mal diese Bilder an, findest du die unscharf? Z.B. File:2014-06-06 Tierpark Hellabrunn 1446.jpg.
Zu chromatischen Aberration kann ich nichts sagen, die werden von meiner 6D automatisch korrigiert. LG aus Kanada, --Tobias (talk) 18:51, 7 December 2014 (UTC)