User talk:Cillas

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Rosa_'Captain_Hayward'.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 09:54, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.


Hola:

La licencia para esa imagen es: GFDL

Cillas

Image:Rosa moschata.jpg and Image:Rosa bracteata.jpg[edit]

There already were different images with those filenames, so I reverted the images you uploaded. When you upload images you should make sure that you choose image names that arre not already used. You can upload your images with other filenames. /Ö 12:31, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rosa_bracteata_Rjb.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 06:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Jasminum_fruticans_RJB.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 10:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image Tagging Image:Akebia quinata RJB2.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Akebia quinata RJB2.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 09:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Anemone x hybrida White Queen RJB.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Anemone x hybrida White Queen RJB.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 09:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Eucommia_ulmoides_RJB.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 09:59, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image Tagging Image:Loropetalum chinense Ming Dinasty RJB.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Loropetalum chinense Ming Dinasty RJB.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 10:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Papaver orientalis RJB.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Papaver orientalis RJB.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 10:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Romneya coulteri RJB.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Romneya coulteri RJB.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 10:36, 26 September 2007 (UTC)


Estoy dispuesto a corregir los errores si alguien me explica como hacerlo!!! Cillas, 26-9-07, 13,25

Image:Umbellularia_californica_RJB.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. Siebrand 10:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding. Kanonkas(talk) 17:50, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Deletion request[edit]

You made a category Category:Venidium and I just requested that it be deleted because Category:Arctotis fastuosa already exists and Venidium and Arctotis are synonyms. There is a template to paste but none of the reasons expressed in the template choices had anything to do with my request. The category was well within scope and not a copyright violation and not a derivative work. I don't want you to be surprised. I can paste a url that confirms this if it would help your day any. I am not putting you on my watch list either, so let me know if you would like the documentation that caused the deletion request.

The template would have been easier, btw. -- carol (talk) 20:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Mela e quercia.JPG[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Mela_e_quercia.JPG has a quercus in winter behind!--Fontema (talk) 08:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Unidentified_Quercus yes, is ideal, thanks!--Fontema (talk) 09:26, 7 August 2008 (UTC)

prunus persica var. compressa[edit]

perdona, ma yo creo que el "prunus persica var. compressa" puede esser una "undercategory" de el "peaches"

En algunos sitios la ha visto como var. platycarpa. No estoy seguro de cual es la correcta. Lo que es indudable en España es que peach (Prunus persica sensu strictu, melocotón o durazno en español) y paraguaya (var. compressa o platycarpa) son frutas muy distintas tanto en la forma como en el sabor; el resto de la planta, sin embargo, es muy parecido. La mayoría de la gente se sorprende cuando les dice que pertenecen a la misma especie. Puedes responderme en tu idioma o en inglés si quieres. Gracias. --Cillas (talk) 09:33, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Narcissus[edit]

Estimado Alfredo: no te preocupes por utilizar diferentes canales de comunicación conmigo; soy un ser internáutico. Me encantaría que me proporcionaras bibliografía sobre el género, pues soy un simple aficionado que desearía mejorar mis pobres conocimientos. Abusando de tu confianza, aprovecho para hacerte unas preguntas:

  1. Sé que hay híbridos naturales como por ejemplo el N. × koshinomurae, pero ¿sólo aparece el símbolo × en los híbridos naturales, o puede aparecer en los creados por el hombre?
  2. Los cultivares suelen indicarse con el nombre entre comillas, como por ejemplo Narcissus 'Actea', mi duda es si un cultivar sería un híbrido creado por el hombre.
  3. Tengo entendido que hay centenares de híbridos. ¿Conoces si existe algún listado donde aparezcan todos ellos?

Un saludo botánico de --Digigalos (talk) 11:03, 18 November 2008 (UTC) Por cierto, para contestarme basta con que hagas clic en el enlace que pone (talk) en este párrafo.

Image:Rollo de Ayllon.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 08:00, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Cillas!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:43, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Sorting of Category:Zanthoxylum[edit]

Hi Cillas, why did you destroy the sorting of Category:Zanthoxylum? It's common for species to be sorted this way in genus categories. Multichill (talk) 12:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi multichill. I did not destroy anything. I only changed the category of some species categories in order to a better arrangement in the Category:Zanthoxylum page. I think now is right. Don't you agree?--Cillas (talk) 10:12, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
Cillas, please don't hop talk pages. I have a watchlist and I use it. I don't agree, all the species are now at Z. I'll restore the sorting. Multichill (talk) 10:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Schisandra grandiflora Rubra RJB.jpg[edit]

The ID on this plant seems wrong. I thought for a while the name was Schisandra sphenanthera, but it's not. I'll try to find the name. epibase (talk) 20:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, Epibase. I think you are right. The plant seems to be Schisandra rubriflora and not S. grandiflora. I'll change it.--Cillas (talk) 07:10, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Narcissus hispanicus[edit]

Dear Alfredo,

I am consulting you as expert of the genus Narcissus. I have in my garden several "botanic" daffodils, among others Narcissus bulbocodium, Narcissus romieuxii, Narcissus ×medioluteus and the so-called Narcissus hispanicus.

According to the GRIN taxonomy Narcissus hispanicus should now be called Narcissus pseudonarcissus subsp. major. However I have seen that pictures of this taxon have been recently renamed as Narcissus muñozii-garmendiae.

Please help me to clarify this issue.

Best regards, --Réginald (To reply) 17:10, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Dear Reginald,
The group of trumpet daffodils with concolorous yellow perigon that lives in Spain is difficult and I have not a conclusion about all. But I can tell you some things.
1) N. hispanicus Gouan could be N. bicolor var. concolor. It is the only large trumpet daffodil with concolorous perigony that lives in Spain and France as says Gouan.
2) N. muñozii-garmendiae is a good specie with a restricted distribution area. [1]
In [2] you can see a N. muñozii-garmendiae erroneously identified as N. hispanicus by the author. It has been changed of category according to various classifications.
3) Some botanist have used other names for the concolorous trumpet daffodils: N. bujei, N. confusus, N. longispathus, N. major, N. obvallaris, N. portensis, etc. In my opinion some (as N. major) are ambiguous and other (as N. portensis) are superfluous.
4) A have took a quick look at genus Narcissus in GRIN and I have saw many errors. I wouldn't recommend it.
I hope to have help you. Best regards, Cillas (talk) 10:36, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
Thank you, Alfredo. --Réginald (To reply) 13:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Image use[edit]

Hi

We are writing a book on spices and herbs.

The title is “Krydderleksikon med urter og smakstilsetninger” (Encyclopedia of spices and herbs). Print run is 5000 copies and the book will be published in May this year. It will be illustrated with photos of all the plants.

Most of the photos are already provided for but we still miss some picture.

We have found your photo of Drimys winteri on the Internet and we wonder if you kindly will let us use the photo in our book.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Drimys_winteri_RJB.jpg

For more information about us and the book please contact us on: post(a)vegaforlag.no - www.vegaforlag.no

Best regards Gitte

Of course Gitte. You can use my photo in your book.
Best regards.

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Hi!

My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).

I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting some photos in your page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use them in my book.

Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your nickname) and the link of the pictures will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.


The 4 photos which I would use are:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Geranium_macrorrhizum.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cotoneaster_lacteus.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hydrangea_petiolaris_RJB.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lonicera_x_brownii_%27Fuchsioides%27.jpg


Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request…

My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com


Bye,

Edoardo

Edoardo.bit (talk) 09:43, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Edoardo. If you are still interested in my photos, I grant you my permission to use it. Sorry for the delay.--Cillas (talk) 21:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Location?[edit]

Hi Cillas - do you have a photo location for this pic, please? File:Spartium junceum4.jpg - Thanks! MPF (talk) 22:17, 24 June 2012 (UTC)