User talk:Coyau/3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Welcome to commons Coyau. What better way than starting off with a Quality Image promotion could there be? :-) --QICbot (talk) 12:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


Contents

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bassin des Morts gelé, 2012-02-11, mouette rieuse 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bassin des Morts gelé, 2012-02-11, mouette rieuse 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Théâtre de la Renaissance[edit]

Salut Coyau,
Une de tes images va certainement remporter le label VI pour le scope "Théâtre de la Renaissance" - je suis verte, j'enrage ! Je plaisante, je t'écris juste pour t'inviter à retailler cette photo, comme cela a été suggéré durant la revue... @+, --Myrabella (talk) 19:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Provins[edit]

Je suis très intéressée par aller à Provins le 24, merci de l'info et de l'invit' ! --Myrabella (talk) 20:51, 8 March 2012 (UTC)


Over corrected ?[edit]

Oui tu as raison, ça n'allait pas. J'ai importé une nouvelle version. Peux-tu me dire si ça convient désormais ? Merci.--Jebulon (talk) 22:01, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

J'avais un problème avec les verticales vers les bords en haut. J'ai appris ça à la dure : on voit beaucoup mieux les parallèles que les perpendiculaires, et les bords de la photo sont terriblement droits. les parallèles. Les gouttières et les pilastres avaient l'air de s'écarter en montant, mais c'est bon maintenant. Je vais de ce pas promote cette photo. --Coyau (talk) 22:19, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Merci ! C'est vrai que les verticales étaient dures à gérer, surtout que tout le façade est incurvée, et que j'ai trouvé la correction difficile à faire. C'est d'ailleurs une autre prise qui a servi, je n'ai pas réussi à recorriger entièrement la première. Celà dit, l'intérieur de cette église, c'est de la folie baroque à l'état pur ! à voir absolument (photos sans trépied impossibles, j'ai essayé un peu la chaire, en appui sur un banc, mais c'était difficile...)--Jebulon (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Gare de Belfort-Montbéliard TGV.jpg[edit]

Bonjour bonjour Smile

Il semblerait que ce fichier risque de passer à la trappe assez vite (tag de suppression rapide, et en effet niveau COM:FOP en France ça coince vu comment la gare a été prise bien de face). Je me demandais s'il était possible de transférer l'image sur WP-FR à l'aide de ton super bot, du moins si toutefois l'image est éligible, en tant qu'oeuvre architecturale récente? Si cela est possible ce serait super^^ dans tous les cas merci beaucoup! Bonne soirée et bon week end! Jeriby (talk) 19:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

C'est fait. Bon week-end à toi aussi. --Coyau (talk) 06:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Merci beaucoup pour ton intervention Clin Jeriby (talk) 19:59, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Bojour, je travaille la pluspart du temps sur le wikipedia allemande, j´ai crée aussi l´article sur la gare de Belfort-Montbéliard TGV. Est-ce-qu´il serait possible d´utiliser ce fichier sur la WP allemande?? Comme je suis plutôt nouveau, je sais pas si c´est possible. Merci d´avance et bien à vous. --Hoff1980 (talk) 12:34, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour,
Je ne connais pas les règles de Wikipédia en allemand, il faudrait se renseigner là-bas. Et puis je n'ai les droits que pour faire les transferts vers Wikipédia en français.
Cordialement, --Coyau (talk) 12:45, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Pierre-Jules Cavelier 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Pierre-Jules Cavelier 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Pierre-Jules Cavelier 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Pierre-Jules Cavelier 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Pierre-Jules Cavelier 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Pierre-Jules Cavelier 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

/* Valued Image Promotion */[edit]

Bonjour Coyau,
Merci à toi ! Je reconnais bien volontiers ma défaite :-) 17:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)~

Théâtre de la Renaissance.jpg
An image you created has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Théâtre de la Renaissance, Paris (exterior) .

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Beauvisage 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Beauvisage 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Galezowski Tamberlick 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Galezowski Tamberlick 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Galezowski Tamberlick 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Galezowski Tamberlick 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Pierre de Lucy Fossarieu 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Pierre de Lucy Fossarieu 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Gourlot 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Gourlot 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Dominique Vivant Denon 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Dominique Vivant Denon 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Gourlot 16.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Gourlot 16.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 04.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Père-Lachaise - Division 4 - Dantan 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Vincenzo Bellini 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Vincenzo Bellini 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Cherubini 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Cherubini 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Thury & Poubelle 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Thury & Poubelle 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rue de Turenne (Paris), numéro 64, porte.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue de Turenne (Paris), numéro 64, porte.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Étienne-Gaspard Robert 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 8 - Étienne-Gaspard Robert 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Galezowski Tamberlick 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Galezowski Tamberlick 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rue des Tournelles (Paris), numéro 18, porte.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Tournelles (Paris), numéro 18, porte.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris, caserne Château-Landon 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, caserne Château-Landon 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris, caserne Château-Landon 15.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, caserne Château-Landon 15.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris, caserne Château-Landon 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, caserne Château-Landon 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris, caserne Château-Landon 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, caserne Château-Landon 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Tugnot de la Noye 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Tugnot de la Noye 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris, caserne Château-Landon 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, caserne Château-Landon 14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tu fais ta chochotte ! Une photo n'est pas "nécessaire", mais celle-là, elle a fait "tilt", c'est comme ça ! Félicitations!--Jebulon (talk) 14:06, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fontaine Dejean 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine Dejean 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pistes cyclables[edit]

Bonjour Coyau. Quelle hiérarchisation adopter entre Category:Bikeways in France, Category:Cycling infrastructure in France, et Category:Rail trails in France ? La Category:Ligne Bordeaux-Bénauge - La Sauvetat-du-Dropt est déjà dans Bikeways in France. Je te laisse mettre de l'ordre, j'avoue que je suis un peu perdu... Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 17:10, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

A mon avis, les anciennes voies ferrées converties en pistes cyclables sont des Rail trails et des Bikeways (et des Voies Vertes), les Bikeways devant être dans Cycling infrastructure. Jack ma (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Bien vu. À chaque fois que je veux ranger une photo je passe un quart d'heure à chercher des catégories qui n'existent pas. Du coup, je m'énerve et je mets n'importe quoi (enfin, presque).
J'ai mis un peu d'ordre : tout est dans cycling infrastructure, j'ai fait des trucs pas département et par ville. À partir de là, en fonction de ce qu'on a par département/ville, on peut diviser en bandes/pistes cyclables, garage à vélo, signalisation, etc. j'ai essayé de mettre un mot compréhensible en français (repris de wp) en haut des catégories … in France quand il me semblait qu'il y avait une confusion possible (le truc qui devrait m'éviter de piquer une crise la prochaine fois).
Au-dessus, il y a cycling, avec les mecs sur des vélos, courses, les marchands de vélo, les musées du vélo, les vendeurs de glace en vélo, et que sais-je.
Pour les voies vertes, ça semble rentrer dans la définition de cycling route‎, et comme ça ressemble furieusement à Rail trails in France, je fusionne les deux catégories. (revert possible si mon initiative n'est pas pertinente)
Comme rail trails est en-dessous de cycling infrastructure, ce n'est peut-être pas la peine de catégoriser en double ?
Ça te semble raisonnable dans l'ensemble ? --Coyau (talk) 18:40, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Oui on marche comme ça, merci d'avance. Il reste un petit hic (copie discussion Pline ci-dessous). Il faut aussi noter que Category:Voie Verte a ses articles spécifiques sur wiki:fr et wiki:en, d'où sans doute la nécessité de ne pas supprimer cette catégorie. Jack ma (talk) 06:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour Pline. Merci pour ton travail de catégorisation des voies vertes. Il reste cepedant une petite incertitude à régler aussi avec Coyau: la redirection de Category:Voie Verte. La question est: une voie verte est-elle dans 100% des cas une ancienne voie ferrée ? Si oui, la redirection est justifiée, sinon, il faut inclure la 1ère dans la 2ème. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Voie verte[edit]

Bonjour Pline. Merci pour ton travail de catégorisation des voies vertes. Il reste cepedant une petite incertitude à régler aussi avec Coyau: la redirection de Category:Voie Verte. La question est: une voie verte est-elle dans 100% des cas une ancienne voie ferrée ? Si oui, la redirection est justifiée, sinon, il faut inclure la 1ère dans la 2ème. Cordialement, Jack ma (talk) 06:57, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Tout ce qui suit ne concerne que le territoire français. Une voie verte est un aménagement cyclable qui répond à un cahier des charges défini par des instances françaises. Une ancienne voie ferrée lorsqu'elle est aménagée donne souvent lieu à l'aménagement d'une voie cyclable mais peut faire place à chemin interdit aux vélos. Si c'est une voie cyclable, elle peut répondre au cahier des charges des voies vertes (le plus souvent) ou non. Le fait que le terme voie verte ne figure pas dans l'intitulé de la piste cyclable ne veut pas dire que la piste en question n'est pas une Voie verte. Site de référence malheureusement pas toujours à jour Pline (talk) 10:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Pour compléter :
  • l'infrastructure d'origine d'un aménagement cyclable (dont les voies vertes) peut être une ancienne voie ferrée, un chemin de halage,...
  • il existe la notion de véloroute, qui est un itinéraire moyenne ou longue distance, qui emprunte des voies vertes, de petites voies routières,... avec un cahier des charges en ce qui concerne le type de route empruntée, la déclivité maximale,... Il existe des véloroutes européennes (l'EuroVelo 6 emprunte en France La "Loire à vélo") et nationales (Tour de Bourgogne,...). La véloroute nationale est une notion pas très pérenne dans la mesure où il est facile de rabouter des départementales pour l'allonger ou la modifier pour répondre à des considérations touristiques/de prestige/électorales. La région met souvent en avant la véloroute qui comprend quelques voies vertes et beaucoup de départementales Pline (talk) 10:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

OK, donc les voies vertes, ça n'est pas des cycling routes. Je mets les voies vertes en sous-catégorie. Ça marche comme ça ? --Coyau (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

AMHA la catégorie "Voie verte" se rattache à "cycle infrastructure type" tandis que la catégorie "Bikeways in France" se rattache à "cycle infrastructure". --Pline (talk) 15:28, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Caserne Verines - Place de la Republique 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Caserne Verines - Place de la Republique 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Boulevard du Temple (Paris), numéro 42, portail 06 grille en fonte.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulevard du Temple (Paris), numéro 42, portail 06 grille en fonte.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kazakhstan[edit]

Je me suis planté dans la géoloc ?--Jebulon (talk) 15:16, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Catégoriser en lot des fichiers récemment importés par un utilisateur[edit]

Bonjour Coyau, Puis-je te demander un conseil technique ? Sais-tu comment catégoriser en un seul coup les imports récents d'un utilisateur ? Je sais faire avec Cat-a-lot, en utilisant la recherche sur le nom d'utilisateur, mais les fichiers importés aujourd'hui ne sont pas encore indexés dans la base et je préférerai ne pas le faire à la main. Je suis preneuse d'un conseil pratique. La galerie de cet utilisateur est là : Special:ListFiles/Allot_rené, la catégorie où les envoyer est Category:Ateliers Allot Frères (après, on affinera). Merci par avance ! --Myrabella (talk) 21:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done J'ai récupéré le journal d'import et je l'ai mis dans le robot (puis j'ai décatégorisé le mégalithe). --Coyau (talk) 22:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
Super, merci. And good night ! --Myrabella (talk) 23:06, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rue Scarron (Paris), côté nord, détail 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Scarron (Paris), côté nord, détail 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rue Marcel-Gromaire (Paris), côté nord, détail 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Marcel-Gromaire (Paris), côté nord, détail 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Boulevard Beaumarchais (Paris), plaque.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulevard Beaumarchais (Paris), plaque.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 34.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 34.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 25.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 25.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

A Quality Image Barnstar for you[edit]

Quality Image Barnstar.svg The Quality Image Barnstar
For your more than 200 Quality Images and your sense of nice detail. Congratulations, dear Coyau ! --Myrabella (talk) 08:06, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Panoramics[edit]

Hi! I think the category panoramics only for truly panorama picrures. For Commons' visitors, some pictures like this one or this one aren't panoramas.--Paris 16 (talk) 13:20, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

OK. That solution is better. I agree with you.--Paris 16 (talk) 13:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Viaduc disparu[edit]

Bonjour. En passant ce matin sur la page QI candidates, je constate que votre image "Viaduc de la rue de l'Aqueduc" n'apparaît pas : seule la légende est visible. Même chose sur la page du fichier lui-même (File:Viaduc de la rue de l'Aqueduc (Paris) 02.jpg). Peut-être y a-t-il eu un problème au moment du téléversement ? -- Bien cordialement. JLPC (talk) 08:31, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Tout s'est bien passé, le fichier a l'air de fonctionner c'est juste MediaWiki qui ne génère pas d'aperçu. Je n'y peux rien. --Coyau (talk) 11:29, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Viaduc en QI[edit]

Ton viaduc ne s'affiche pas c'est moi qui ai un problème ou ta photo? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

En fait j'ai la réponse sur le Message précédent :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:50, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
C'est pas la première fois que MediaWiki refuse d'afficher correctement une image. C'est dommage, parce que dans l'absolu on sait afficher des images depuis des décennies. --Coyau (talk) 14:42, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Viaduc de la rue de l'Aqueduc (Paris) 02.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

Il semble qu'il y a un probleme avec cette image. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 07:02, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Ouais. J'abandonne, d'ailleurs. --Coyau (talk) 14:37, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

via que duc ?[edit]

Si je n'avais pas lu les trois messages précédents, je dirais bien que... Mais bon, j'ai lu les messages précédents.
Et si tu essayais un photo d'un aqueduc, rue du Viaduc ?...
ok, je sors....--Jebulon (talk) 16:04, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Bonne idée, ça. :D --Coyau (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Viaduc de la rue de l'Aqueduc (Paris) 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viaduc de la rue de l'Aqueduc (Paris) 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris Est, aiguillage 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Est, aiguillage 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris Est, caddie sur un quai.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Est, caddie sur un quai.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris Est, isolateurs 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Est, isolateurs 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Boulevard Richard-Lenoir (Paris), poubelle 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulevard Richard-Lenoir (Paris), poubelle 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris, averse 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris, averse 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Camion-nacelle place Saint-Michel (Paris) 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camion-nacelle place Saint-Michel (Paris) 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Boulevard Saint-Martin (Paris), arceaux à vélo 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulevard Saint-Martin (Paris), arceaux à vélo 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-06-19 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-06-19 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paris Est, signalisation 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Est, signalisation 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris Est, signalisation 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Est, signalisation 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paris Est, signalisation 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paris Est, signalisation 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Place T10 (Paris), pignon école.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place T10 (Paris), pignon école.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Provins - église Sainte-Croix - portail occidental, vaisseau central 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provins - église Sainte-Croix - portail occidental, vaisseau central 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 18.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 18.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Provins - Hôtel-Dieu 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provins - Hôtel-Dieu 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 23.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 23.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 19 - Louis Mazet 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 19 - Louis Mazet 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 21.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 21.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Product images[edit]

I saw your recent FP lens nomination. Well it might not be an FP but I don't think the "boring product photos" criticism is fair. As an educational resource, WP needs photos of "things". It is hard to get the "wow" vote for them but they are useful nonetheless. I got my photo of an File:Electric steam iron.jpg to FP on en.wp but don't know if it is "wow" enough for Commons. What I do know is that Category:Electric irons is dire. If Commons was overloaded with fantastic images of irons or lenses or other everyday objects, then I could see that FP might get bored of them. So I encourage you to keep taking and uploading high quality pictures of everyday things. Colin (talk) 21:15, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Don't worry, I'm not leaving Commons and I'm not quitting taking photos of things and stuffs. --Coyau (talk) 22:01, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Armand Joseph Bruat 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Armand Joseph Bruat 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Error in file "Place T10 (Paris), pignon école.jpg"[edit]

On my computer and on my web browser (Firefox 14.0.1), the file Place T10 (Paris), pignon école.jpg "cannot be displayed because it contains errors". Please don't remove the template {{Broken file}} I put in it just because it can be displayed on your computer. It doesn't work on my computer so there is clearly something wrong with it or something that prevents it from working properly. It doesn't matter if it is the file that causes the error or if it is my system that is incompatible with it; the two are equally bad and people who want to use the image on any Wikimedia site should be aware of that fact that not all web browsers can display it. I have restored the template again and please let it be there. —Kri (talk) 17:48, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

The problem is obviously on your computer and you should fix it, not blame a file which by the way is correctly displayed by Firefox 14.0.1. --Coyau (talk) 22:02, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stanley dynagrip 5 m × 19 mm 33-684 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanley dynagrip 5 m × 19 mm 33-684 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magnusson ruban 8 m 25 mm 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magnusson ruban 8 m 25 mm 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 27 - Théodore Joseph Napoléon Jacques 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canon EF-S 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 II 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 36 - Lavalette 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 36 - Lavalette 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 65 - Auguste Burdeau 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 65 - Auguste Burdeau 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 18 - Joseph Fourier 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 18 - Joseph Fourier 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cafetière et soliflore[edit]

Bonjour Coyau. Deux problèmes, pour ce qui me concerne, au sujet de tes deux dernières photos. a/ La cafetière : je n'arrivais pas, hier soir, à voir si elle est totalement nette ou non (ni à me décider sur une sorte de reflet, très léger, qu'on aperçoit sur la facette la plus proche du bec verseur). Mêmes impressions ce matin, malgré ton utilisation de f:22. b/ Le soliflore : me semble plus net mais quelques poussières apparaissent sur le fond et un trait noir sur le bord supérieur de la photo. J'ai mis des notes sur le fichier. -- Tout cela en toute modestie : je suis incapable de mettre en œuvre un éclairage tel que le tien et tu peux juger, au jour le jour, de la bonne ou mauvaise qualité de mes productions... -- Pour ce qui est des deux objets dont tu as déposé les photos depuis hier, je ne sais pas quelle technique tu utilises. Je te livre une suggestion (que m'a transmise Archaodontausaurus) : le logiciel (gratuit) Combine ZP, qui fonctionne sous Windows seulement, et qui permet de résoudre certains problèmes de macro ou de photo rapprochée. Le principe est théoriquement simple : prendre (avec un pied) trois vues successives du même objet avec trois mises au point différentes (premier plan, deuxième puis arrière-plan). Le logiciel "empile" ensuite les trois et te livre une photo entièrement nette. -- J'ai commencé les essais, obtenu quelques résultats partiels mais encore nettement insuffisants. Je te signale l'existence du procédé, pour le cas où cela pourrait t'aider car tu as l'air beaucoup plus à l'aise que moi dans le domaine de la photo de type studio. -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 08:10, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Bonjour,
Déjà, merci pour les commentaires. J'ai enlevé les poussières sur le soliflore. Pour la cafetière, je la trouve nette, mais le principe des QI c'est de s'en remettre au jugement des autres, donc tu as raison de t'interroger, et j'ai peut-être tort (tiens, un mauvais argument : ici, à f/22, je ne trouve pas de problème flagrant de profondeur de champs — c'est un mauvais argument) ; le problème que j'y vois c'est qu'elle est blanc sur blanc, donc les passages ne sont pas contrastés du coup on ne voit pas tout ce qu'on aurait pu voir si le fond avait été noir.
Pour le côté technique, j'ai utilisé le mini studio photo que Wikimédia France vient d'acheter, c'est une boîte blanche avec plein de lumière à l'intérieur ( on voit les reflets des lampes sur les émaux) dans laquelle on met les trucs qu'on photographie par un trou (dont on voit le reflet dans la cafetière sur la facette la plus proche du bec verseur). J'en suis encore à l'essayer, donc c'est utile d'avoir des retours. Je post-traite la première série conséquente que j'ai fait avec (encore quelques cafetières, et d'autres trucs éclectiques). Je note Combine ZP, peut-être pour la prochaine série.
Bien cordialement. --Coyau (talk) 14:01, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Alphand 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Alphand 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 39 - Murat 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 39 - Murat 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 58 - Sépulture de famille 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 58 - Sépulture de famille 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Soliflore en émail de Longwy 268.2 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soliflore en émail de Longwy 268.2 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Château de Versailles, cour de marbre, buste d'empereur romain, Vdse 110 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Château de Versailles, cour de marbre, buste d'empereur romain, Vdse 110 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Osselets métalliques 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osselets métalliques 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 65 - Auguste Burdeau 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 65 - Auguste Burdeau 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cafetière à percolation en faïence crème 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière à percolation en faïence crème 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Couperet à débiter les lapins 08.jpg[edit]

Pourquoi que les lapins ? Pov' bêtes !
Si j'ai envie de débiter des côtelettes avec, moi ?
Je crois que c'est ça, qu'on appelle une "feuille" de boucher. (si j'en crois Google images).--Jebulon (talk) 16:24, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

J'ai toujours vu ce truc à un clou du mur de la cuisine, il paraît que ça servait à débiter les lapins (quand on avait encore des lapins, ça veut dire que ça commence à dater un peu), et c'est bon, le lapin.
Sur le fond, j'en sais rien, fr:Feuille de boucher ressemble pas mal à fr:Couperet (ustensile) (visiblement ça sert à quelqu'un à écraser de l'ail), si tu veux changer la description ne te gène pas. --Coyau (talk) 16:42, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Non non, moi aussi j'aime bien le lapin. Aux pruneaux, notamment. J'ai su faire.--Jebulon (talk) 23:44, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
Au fait, on fait comment pour utiliser le mini studio ? ça m'intéresse, ça !--Jebulon (talk) 23:45, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
J'imagine ! Je vais le rapporter en début de semaine aux locaux de Wikimédia France, après il faut voir avec eux (il m'a semblé comprendre que pas mal de monde était intéressé), mais c'est pas compliqué (convention de prêt). Il y a ici un tableau qui dit où est le studio. --Coyau (talk) 00:08, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
Je sais où sont les locaux de WM France et compte tenu de la situation, des lieux, et de mon standing personnel, j'estime que j'ai bien du mérite ! ;))) Je leur ai prêté récemment une caméra et mon trépied, suite à un appel de User:Serein sur le mail de l'association, d'où deux expéditions ethnographiques vers le fameux Lawomatic. Mais je ne savais pas qu'ils avaient fait cette acquisition, je l'ai découvert grâce aux bandeaux de tes photos. D'ailleurs, je ne savais même pas que ce genre de trucs existait, ça me parait particulièrement pas con, comme objet à avoir pour un groupe de gens qui font des photos. Dommage que ça ne soit dispo qu'à Paris, je connais quelques Toulousains qui ne cracheraient pas dessus...--Jebulon (talk) 08:59, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 21.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 21.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bialetti moka mini express 1 tazza 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bialetti moka mini express 1 tazza 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Mignon 2 tazze 14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Couperet à débiter les lapins 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Couperet à débiter les lapins 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Osselets métalliques 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Osselets métalliques 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cafetière Nova Express Export 4 tasses 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Nova Express Export 4 tasses 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cafetière Nova Express Export 4 tasses 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Nova Express Export 4 tasses 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cafetière Nova Express Export 4 tasses 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Nova Express Export 4 tasses 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Presto 2 tasses 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cafetière Vesuviana 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cafetière Vesuviana 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ortie blanche 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ortie blanche 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mortier et pilon en fonte 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mortier et pilon en fonte 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Taartschep Gero Zilmeta 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taartschep Gero Zilmeta 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pince à plats chromée 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pince à plats chromée 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise[edit]

Bonsoir Coyau!
Je sais que tu connais assez bien le cimetière du Père-Lachaise et je veux te faire une question. Je voudrais savoir le nom de la tombe de cette image; est-ce que tu pourrais m'aider? Merci beaucoup!! --Kadellar (talk) 17:46, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Bonsoir Kadellar,
Ça ne me dit rien comme ça, mais le cimetière est grand. Je transmets la question à ~Pyb, qui connaît mieux que moi. --Coyau (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
Je vais regarder dans la semaine. J'ai commencé à affiner la catégorisation hier soir. Malheureusement, je vais devoir supprimer certaines photos. La France ne dispose pas de la liberté de panorama. ~Pyb (talk) 19:06, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Dominique Vivant Denon 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Dominique Vivant Denon 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Dominique Vivant Denon 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 10 - Dominique Vivant Denon 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Apsco Vacuhold pencil sharpener 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apsco Vacuhold pencil sharpener 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aurora electronic calculator DT210 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anti-monte-lait en inox 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anti-monte-lait en inox 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aurora electronic calculator DT210 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Boulevard du Temple (Paris), numéro 42, portail 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulevard du Temple (Paris), numéro 42, portail 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Boulevard du Temple (Paris), numéro 42, portail 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Boulevard du Temple (Paris), numéro 42, portail 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Anti-monte-lait en inox 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anti-monte-lait en inox 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quelle i d ![edit]

Bonjour, Coyau. -- Quelques mots au sujet de ta remarque sur mes roses trémières. Je n'ai pas mis l'id de la plante car elle n'est pas le sujet principal de la photo. Mon but était de montrer en partie un spectacle fréquent à BouRcefranc (!), à savoir les roses trémières devant les cabanes de pêcheur. Ce type de fleurs est depuis longtemps, caractéristique de la côte charentaise... même si la rose trémière gagne, ces temps-ci, l'intérieur des terres ! -- Bravo pour tes anti-monte-lait : ils m'ont rappelé mon enfance. -- Quant à ta calculatrice d'hier soir, je ne vois pas ce qui peut lui être reproché question qualité : je voterai pour en discussion. -- Bien cordialement. --JLPC (talk) 09:28, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aurora electronic calculator DT210 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aurora electronic calculator DT210 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aurora electronic calculator DT210 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aurora electronic calculator DT210 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pot à lait en tôle émaillée 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pot à lait en tôle émaillée 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aurora electronic calculator DT210 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aurora electronic calculator DT210 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 20.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 20.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 30.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la République (Paris), réaménagement, 2012-04-05 30.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 15.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 15.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 24.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place des Vosges, Paris, porte du n° 24.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Delphine, Madame de Staël, Paris, 1803 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Delphine, Madame de Staël, Paris, 1803 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lactaire des épicéas vert 19.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lactaire des épicéas vert 19.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bolet roux 20.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolet roux 20.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bolet roux 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolet roux 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bolet roux 14.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bolet roux 14.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Henri Cernuschi 04.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Henri Cernuschi 04.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 60 - Tetaz Fiorentini 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 60 - Tetaz Fiorentini 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Alphand 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Alphand 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Alphand 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Alphand 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Help: no-FoP Italy[edit]

Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 00:23, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Floquet 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Floquet 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Anatole de la Forge 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 66 - Anatole de la Forge 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 59 - sépulture Derocher 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 59 - sépulture Derocher 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Transfert vers fr. (FoP)[edit]

Les 5 photos suivantes sont utilisées sur fr. et devraient y être transférées :

  • File:Centre commercial de la Toison d'Or - Dijon (13-05-2012) - img1.JPG
  • File:Centre commercial de la Toison d'Or - Dijon (13-05-2012) - img3.JPG
  • File:Centre commercial de la Toison d'Or - Dijon (13-05-2012) - img2.JPG
  • File:Centre commercial de la Toison d'Or - Dijon (13-05-2012) - img4.JPG
  • File:Centre commercial de la Toison d'Or - Dijon (13-05-2012) - img5.JPG

Tu peux t'en charger ? --Dereckson (talk) 17:43, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

✓ Done fait. --Coyau (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Sépulture de famille 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 11 - Sépulture de famille 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 71 - Cléray 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 71 - Cléray 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 71 - Cléray 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 71 - Cléray 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Division 72 - Minal et Durif 10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 72 - Minal et Durif 10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Père-Lachaise - Division 72 - Minal et Durif 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Division 72 - Minal et Durif 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Père-Lachaise - Armand Joseph Bruat 13.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Père-Lachaise - Armand Joseph Bruat 13.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.