User talk:Cranach Digital Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Cranach Digital Archive!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 09:10, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Deletion requests[edit]

Please read before continuing: Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag and the clear position of the Wikimedia Foundation which you can find there: To put it plainly, WMF's position has always been that faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain, and that claims to the contrary represent an assault on the very concept of a public domain. If museums and galleries not only claim copyright on reproductions, but also control the access to the ability to reproduce pictures (by prohibiting photos, etc.), important historical works that are legally in the public domain can be made inaccessible to the public except through gatekeepers. WMF has made it clear that in the absence of even a strong legal complaint, we don't think it's a good idea to dignify such claims of copyright on public domain works. And, if we ever were seriously legally challenged, we would have a good internal debate about whether we'd fight such a case, and build publicity around it. This is neither a policy change (at least from WMF's point of view), nor is it a change that has implications for other Commons policies. So, PLEASE stop your deletion requests. If you need a German translation, I will be happy to provide one. --Concord (talk) 14:24, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Oder nochmal im Klartext: das angebliche Urheberrecht besteht nicht (weder nach US-Recht noch nach deutschen Recht nach herrschender Meinung), die Vorwürfe sind verleumderisch, die Bemühung des Urheberrechts ist missbräuchlich (w:de:Schutzrechtsberühmung, bekannt als "Copyfraud"). --FA2010 (talk) 12:34, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Blocked[edit]

Blocked Indefinitely
This user has been blocked indefinitely. See block log. Commons consensus prohibits company or organizational usernames

català | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | हिन्दी | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | 中文(繁體)‎ | Zazaki | +/−

Feel free to open a new account in a personal name, either your real name or a pseudonym.

This block does not affect this page -- your talk page -- so that if you have questions, you may ask them here.
.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 11 December 2012 (UTC)