User talk:David Shankbone

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

File:Eliza Dushku 2012 Shankbone.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 02:37, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Bradley Manning[edit]

So I'm sitting here reading Private by Denver Nicks, the first major biography of Bradley Manning, and I spot an image that I want to use in the article about him. Guess who took it? :) (Clue: one of the nicest, smartest, most talented people on Wikimedia.) It's an Occupy Wall Street image taken in New York on September 17, 2011, and it shows two men holding a sheet or similar with Bradley Manning on one side and the words "in prison for telling the truth" on the other, with a picture of a helicopter on the top left of the sheet. I can't find it in the Manning demonstrations category. Can you think of the one I mean?

I hope things are good with you -- it's ages since I heard from you, but I've just looked through some of your photographs and I'm really glad to see the talent still shining through them. So I hope that means you're well. All the best to you, SlimVirgin (talk) 02:40, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

It's a photograph of these men holding this sign if that helps, though it's not that particular photograph. Denver Nicks attributes it to you, and says it's on the Commons. Somewhere. :) SlimVirgin (talk) 09:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Actually, before you go to any trouble, cancel the above; I've seen a couple of others I can use instead. Sorry to disturb! SlimVirgin (talk) 15:20, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Slim! Actually, that image was deleted. At the end of last year there was some copyright paranoia surrounding my OWS pictures so ones like that were deleted. I got a little fed up when this one was nominated for deletion because of some faint logos. I worried that copyright paranoia was going to lead to the deletion of Tribeca/Time 100 photos and took some time off from contributing. You can still find that shot here on Flickr.
Things are really good for me - no major complaints, except I could always use more money ;-) I went to Puerto Rico last month, which was the first non-family, non-business, non-wedding trip I've been on in a long time. Kayaking, hiking, scuba-diving and the beach gave me a much-needed re-charge. Last Thursday I went to a reception at the Museum of New York for the opening of the exhibition "Activist New York" about the history of social activism in NYC from religious persecution to women's suffrage to bike lanes. My photo of these protesters at the so-called 'Ground Zero Mosque' is part of the exhibit. That was an exciting first for me.
How are you?! You are one of the top people I always hope will write to tell me they'll be in New York so we can grab dinner and a drink. Do you have plans to go to Wikimania in D.C.? --David Shankbone (talk) 17:17, 6 May 2012 (UTC)
Hey you, so nice to hear from you! Sorry to see copyright paranoia still causing problems (they wanted a release from the people holding the sign??). But very glad to hear you're enjoying yourself, and I would love to come to NY to see you. I think I will email you my news rather than posting it here. :)
I was thinking of you just the other day actually. There is a gender gap mailing list, run by the Foundation, and -- long story -- but someone recently suggested finding people to take non-sexual, non-sexist photographs of women (or if sexual not in a horrible way). The idea being to use them instead of some of the more denigrating ones we find on Wikipedia. I only glanced at the email (and there was briefly talk of payment for the photographer), but I'll look at it more closely and forward to you in case you'd be interested. SlimVirgin (talk) 17:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Lisa Lopes 2012 Shankbone.JPG[edit]

Is this Lisa Lopes or Leila Lopes? StAnselm (talk) 06:32, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Leila - I uploaded under the wrong name unfortunately. --David Shankbone (talk) 06:59, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Jon Bon Jovi at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival 3.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jon Bon Jovi at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JasminBJ (talk) 02:26, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments[edit]

Hi David, I entered in the Wiki Loves Monuments contest and entered the Cleveland West Pierhead Lighthouse picture and wanted to say thank you for voting on my picture. I am an amateur photographer and have only been doing it more seriously for about a year, so it was good to see professionals' views on the picture. Mtbangert (talk) 21:39, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

It was a beautiful shot - the timing perfect. Keep at it, you've got real talent. --David Shankbone (talk) 00:14, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Smile[edit]

Militant Gay Atheist Hugs Rally to Restore Sanity.jpg
Rally to Restore Sanity Tea baggers 2010 Shankbone.jpg

Hello DS. A message in regards to the picture File:Rally to Restore Sanity Photo 2010 Shankbone.jpg I believe the smiley-hitler may be a political statement. Please see the book cover of Liberal Fascism: The Secret History of the American Left. It would make sense to see the smiley-hitler as an anti-protest at that particular protest rally; and, the author of the book, Jonah Goldberg[1], was a guest on the Jon Stewart show, who was a co-host of the rally. I can't think of any other reason that image would appear at that rally. There is no way to verify it for certain, unless you have any additional information since you were there. A google search of 'smiley hitler' overwhelmingly ties back to Goldberg. I think we should be careful how the image is tagged, used and its context, so as not to be dupes spreading a seemingly joke picture that is actually an offensive political message (ie. liberals = fascists) and/or marketing a book / ideology of Goldberg.. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 08:36, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

I understand your concern, but I don't really think that was the situation. More likely, this person was using the Hitler smiley as a parody, an ironic reference to Godwin's Law and the conservative movement at the time. Here are a few other photos that illustrate that there was a lot of parody at the rally, and Category:Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear is full of examples. I get where you are coming from, but I think your concern is unwarranted. --David Shankbone (talk) 02:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Orhan Pamuk Shankbone 2009 NYC.jpg[edit]

Hi David,

I noticed that Cemallamec (talk · contribs) uploaded from FickR a duplicate of your File:Orhan Pamuk Shankbone 2009 NYC.jpg which has a greater resolution. In think that in these cases the lower resolution should be tagged with {{duplicate}} to be deleted, but since you are the uploader it doesn't sound right your upload being the deleted one. However, as you have posted in FlickR with the CC-by-2.0 license, the newer and better resolution upload of Cemallamec (talk · contribs) is also valid.

Any ideas?

Regards; and thnak's for you great uploads. --Stegop (talk) 02:59, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't really care one way or the other. Someone can easily upload the higher resolution over the lower resolution, but it's not a big deal just to do it separately. I always prefer my stuff to be in my contribution history, and I think duplicate uploads (which is happening a lot) create unnecessary work. For some reason Pamuk was one of the few subjects for whom I uploaded low-resolution - can't remember why. --David Shankbone (talk) 02:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Ray Kelly 2009 portrait.jpg[edit]

David, thank you for uploading this picture of Raymond Kelly. I have used it in en:List of Charvet customers and fr:Charvet Place Vendôme to illustrate Kelly's affection for the brand, as the pattern of the tie he is wearing has been attributed to Charvet in a book on ties. Would you have by any chance another version of the same picture where the tie would be less cropped and - if yes - could you upload it ? Cheers, — Racconish Tk 11:07, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

I took a look at the disk, and unfortunately a lot of the unused files are still in the .orf format, and I don't currently have a file converter. The 2009 Vanity Fair photos are problematic in general, and I think I so struggled that I used my long lens just for head shots. It's probable that this bad photo was the best I took of Kelly that night. I think I recall a photographer next to me knew him, shouted something out to him, and he came over to talk to the guy - never cool at a carpet event. It's really hard to photograph someone when they are having a conversation - I think that's the reason for the strange angle and his face contortions. --David Shankbone (talk) 02:40, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for checking anyway. Cheers, — Racconish Tk 08:43, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Tips on gaining access?[edit]

So, watching this, I have to wonder: how, without working for a professional press organization, have you gained more than routine access at events? I've taken a ton of photos for the Commons, including plenty of famous people (see User:Jmabel#And some people for examples), but have continued to have to do this with no more access than would be available to a random private individual. Any tips? - Jmabel ! talk 18:03, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Become an accredited reporter for Wikinews, and become a photojournalist. Contact local organizations and ask to cover their events with press credentials. If there is a press club in your vicinity, join it and introduce yourself at member functions. From those people, ask how to further your creative commons photojournalism project. Contact the local professional sports teams and ask for press photo pass. If possible, have the Wikimedia Foundation assist you in your attempts. A lot of gaining access is coming up with an idea and executing it with the only pitfall is that somebody might say "No" but who cares? If you have 10 ideas for events/sports teams/politicians you'd like to cover, if you only get one then that's a win. Press club journalists love to help folks like us, in my experience. Good luck! --David Shankbone (talk) 02:46, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
As for public events, contact the venue before the event happens and you might be able to come up with an arrangement. I photographed public author events at Barnes & Noble Union Square, but I had an arrangement with them and had press access. That meant the author would be asked to stop and pose for me by the event organizer (a B&N employee) so my shots wouldn't just be from the audience (see Category:RZA what that can look like. Public events can be great if you try to work the venue - if you help them gain some exposure through the event by photographing a notable person there, it's a win for them. It's also a win for the subject, since you are giving exposure to the work they are promoting. With such a win-win-win, you are bound to be able to work something out with a venue (and it's worth pointing out the positives to them - some people take persuading). --David Shankbone (talk) 02:52, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
So Wikinews (which I've never dealt with) can issue some sort of credential? Because, to the best of my knowledge, Wikipedia (which I've been involved with for just shy of a decade) and Commons (which I've been involved with from shortly after its inception) do not. Do you know, would there be an expectation of my getting heavily involved in WikiNews, beyond continuing to take photos? Because, to be quite honest, I don't have time to take on one more really major project, I'd just like to be more effective on the ones I'm already doing. - Jmabel ! talk 04:36, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
That's a good question. When I first went on to Wikinews to do just that (2006, I think) they said they wouldn't unless I became very involved in the project, and they were unreceptive to the idea of a "photojournalist" who wasn't a focused content contributor. I think (hope) they've grown since then, but it's possible that they haven't. I feel that the WMF ought to--via Wikinews or some other way--create a photography accreditation. They used to be lukewarm about that idea, but when I was at Wikimania last summer I brought it up with some WMF folks and they liked it. I wish I had time to get that ball rolling. Try Wikinews - maybe write Brian McNeil a note before making any requests on-site.
If that doesn't happen, I would make the effort yourself. The best way I found is to create a Wikipedia User page with your real name and make it look as professional as possible. Use it to highlight your work and the breadth of your experience. When you contact venues or people, tell them that you photograph for Wikipedia and send them the link. Use Wikipedia b/c nobody knows what Commons is, so you'll have more doors open if you use the Wikipedia name, which I came to see as just a way to describe the umbrella of WMF websites that might make use of the work. Trying to explain how they all work together confuses people. The idea of all of that is to make the gatekeeper feel comfortable with you, that you are the real deal, they know what you're doing (and for whom) and that when you are standing in front of a particular celebrity and they are posing for you, that you're not going to pie them (or worse). Poke around with contacting people/venues or whatever and don't be shy. Hope that helps. --David Shankbone (talk) 04:52, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Unlicenced image[edit]

Initially I noticed that File:Fred Durst at the 2008 Tribeca Film Festival.JPG was unlicenced but someone has restored after I posted here. Would you like to add a copyright tag to the image? It is being used quite a bit so I am sure you will want it to be kept. I don't want to assume which licence you would use. Thanks. Ww2censor (talk) 22:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Here are more but you actually removed the tag {{cc-by-3.0}} shortly after uploading them, probably in error:
+ File:Jon Bon Jovi at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival 2 140x190.jpg and
+ File:Jon Bon Jovi at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival 2.jpg
+ File:Justin Theroux at the 2008 Tribeca Film Festival.JPG
+ File:Sigourney Weaver at the 2008 Tribeca Film Festival.JPG
+ File:Ratso Sloman at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival.jpg
+ File:Richie Sambora and Jon Bon Jovi at 2009 Tribeca.jpg
+ File:Miss Guy and Debbie Harry at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival.jpg
+ File:Lenora Tanenbaum BBF 2010 Shankbone.jpg
I'm finding them in Category:Media without a license: needs history check. Ww2censor (talk) 22:40, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
✓ Done I've reinstated the licence for all the one I found per your email confirmation. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 18:52, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Thank you so much for all this help - much appreciated. My standard license is 3.0 attribution if another one pops up. --David Shankbone (talk) 23:56, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Fire Island Community categories[edit]

I just created two categories for communities on Fire Island, and established one that was created by somebody else, but was originally a redlink. I know you've added quite a few Fire Island image, so you should pick out the ones you took, and add them to any community, assuming that the images are appropriate for these communities. --DanTD (talk) 16:30, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Will do! Thanks for alerting me Dan. --David Shankbone (talk) 05:54, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Need your help[edit]

Hi David, so here's a thing right up your street on two counts.

We have a dispute on the English Wikipedia about the (in my view) over-representation of images of female porn stars in List of vegetarians. See the RfC here.

I would like to remove them and replace them with images of women in the professions, academia, mainstream actresses, etc., and if editors want the porn industry to be represented, they should find a male image instead. One has responded that there are no known free images of male porn stars who are vegetarians. So I thought of you! Have you taken any images of male porn stars who are also vegetarians? :) SlimVirgin (talk) 21:21, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Gah! Slim - just seeing this years later! I would love to have taken part in the conversation, but I would never dare put you in the position of being accused of canvassing - haha. On the serious side, contrary to popular belief I have very, very few photos of porn stars and pornography (Google would confirm) but the ones I do have, my cursory check did not find any vegetarianism ;-) That said, I find that you are having to litigate this ridiculous - it's so inappropriate that you even have to argue this. Sigh. Is it really devolving that much? --David Shankbone (talk) 05:59, 18 May 2013 (UTC) PS - E-mail me next time, and e-mail me to know how things are going - I still hope to take you to [an awesome] dinner when you come to NYC next. --David Shankbone (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Karen Young at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Karen Young at the 2009 Tribeca Film Festival.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

E-Kartoffel (talk) 14:59, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Jimmy McMillan Rent Too Damn High Car SUV 2013 Shankbone.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jimmy McMillan Rent Too Damn High Car SUV 2013 Shankbone.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

russavia (talk) 05:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your input needed on a DR of one of your pics[edit]

Hello David, someone uploaded a pic from your blog and it got promptly tagged as speedy delete. I converted it to a regular Deletion Request. You can probably clear this up in a few seconds. Thanks. --Dschwen (talk) 22:00, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Alex Kapranos by Robert Hardy.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Alex Kapranos by Robert Hardy.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Alex Kapranos by Robert Hardy.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Verified copyright release is done through the OTRS-system. Please follow instructions in the template above to verify the CC-license Vera (talk) 16:36, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, this was uploaded during the early heady days before we took copyright issues seriously. I received the file from Alex, have the e-mail, but knowing now what few of us knew then, it needs to come from Rob Hardy through OTRS. I guess I could try to contact Alex and ask if he could get Rob to do so. It's a good photo. --David Shankbone (talk) 01:18, 26 September 2013 (UTC)
Do tell Alex that I really like the last album, especially the bonus disc, which I've been playing quite a lot in the past few weeks. - Vera (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Donatella Versace David Shankbone 2010 NYC.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Donatella Versace David Shankbone 2010 NYC.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 21:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Donatella Versace David Shankbone 2010 NYC.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Donatella Versace David Shankbone 2010 NYC.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Natuur12 (talk) 21:30, 29 January 2014 (UTC)