User talk:Dcastor

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Uppskjutet/Höjdskräcken[edit]

Jag är tvungen och fråga om fotot i Göteborgs artikeln.. Är det som jag tror så att du tagit bilden i attraktionen "uppskjutet"? 213.15.70.204 12:15, 22 July 2005 (UTC)

Nej, den är tagen från "Höjdskräcken", men "Uppskjutet" borde ge en snarlik vinkel. /Dcastor 20:38, 23 July 2005 (UTC)


Image:Oskar_Braaten-1.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Oskar_Braaten-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcastor 01:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lerbergets kyrka-1.jpg[edit]

Hejsan David. Jag satt och skrev om Henrik Jais-Nielsen på svenska Wikipedia och ett av de projekt han ritat var Lerbergets kyrka 1982. Men bilden du har tagit är på Höganäs kyrka (ritad av Ivar Tengbom) och inte Lerbergets kyrka. Lerbergets kyrka är en låg byggnad i mörkbrunt tegel, typisk för sin tids kyrkoarkitektur. Jag har bytt plats på bilderna på svWiki, men namnet är fortfarande fel. Jag vet inte hur man byter namn på bilder här så jag tänkte bara skriva till dig så du vet. MVH Jsdo1980 17:19, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Tack för meddelandet. Jag har själv inte besökt någon av kyrkorna utan frågade min vän från trakten efter det att vi flugit över Kullahalvön vilken kyrka det var - det måste ha blivit någon miss i kommunikationen oss emellan. Jag ska försöka få bilden flyttad till rätt namn när helgerna är över. /Dcastor 22:40, 31 December 2007 (UTC)


Image:Lerbergets_kyrka-1.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Lerbergets_kyrka-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcastor 13:25, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


Image:David_Castor.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:David_Castor.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcastor (talk) 17:59, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Category:Eslövs kyrka[edit]

Hi Dcastor, you have categorized this church as "Brick Gothic" but we use this category only for medieval Brick Gothic architecture and this church is obviously "Brick Gothic revival". There is not yet any category covering this topic, I propose to create it soon. chhers --Ceterum censeo capitalismum esse delendum (talk) 17:01, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Ok, I see. Perhaps it would be good with an explanatory note on this on the category page. /Dcastor (talk) 23:32, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Medborgarhuset-1.jpg[edit]

Fint foto!--Ankara (talk) 22:35, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Tackar. /Dcastor (talk) 14:03, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Compliment on Valbourgsbrasa-1[edit]

I came across your photo in [1], and found it stark, evocative and remarkable. The full-size photo, is subtle in other ways. I wonder what the "original" is! (I'm a sometime professional photographer, and this is the first time in Wiki I felt impelled to communicate my appreciation.) Best regards, Piano non troppo [2] (talk) 07:56, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your appreciation. /Dcastor (talk) 13:17, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Lunds domkyrka exterior-2.jpg[edit]

Jag gillar verkligen den bilden! Anar att den inte har nån chans att få utvald status (den visar ju inte hela kyrkan) men ville bara säga det. Majbrasan kanske har en chans? Känner mig dock inte tillräckligt kunnig om fotografi för att våga nominera bilder här. /grillo (talk) 21:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Tack för uppmuntran. Jag gillar ljuset i domkyrkobilden, men den är delvis oskarp. Majbrasan har jag fått en hel del positiv respons för, men det är en väldigt mycket enklare bild att ta. Själv räknar jag den inte bland mina 50 bästa här på Commons ;-) /Dcastor (talk) 20:57, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

Green/yellow[edit]

Hi! I replaced your version of File:Heimaey.JPG because it looks rather washed-out and has very low contrast. I would prefer the original version to your over-brightened one, but thought that version too could use some improvement. I may have put a bit too much contrast into the picture, but your replacement comment puzzles me: "I preffer when the grass looks green". I fail to see what grass in my version (or the original) that is not green. In your version the color borders on yellow and the sky has lost most of it's blue, so I am wondering if you have a very dark setting on your computer screen. /Dcastor (talk) 18:10, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Hello,
Yes perhaps your computer screen and my computer screen have a different rendering of brightness/darkness.
What do you think of File:Heimaey,_vu_du_Nord.jpg, which is inserted next to File:Heimaey.JPG on English Wikipedia's article en:Heimaey ?
On my computer, File:Heimaey,_vu_du_Nord.jpg's grass and sky look good, and I would like File:Heimaey.JPG to look similar : the sky is pale, but people watch the picture in order to see the Island. The sky is not the important part of the picture. And most of the sky is filled with white clouds. Teofilo (talk) 19:35, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
There is a big difference between the two. File:Heimaey,_vu_du_Nord.jpg is sharp and not at all hazy like File:Heimaey.JPG. I am making a new attempt, trying to make a brighter version, but without the haze. /Dcastor (talk) 20:02, 11 June 2009 (UTC)
Your last version is OK for me. Teofilo (talk) 20:28, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lynx lynx-4.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lynx lynx-4.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


File:Jonstorps_kyrka_interior-4.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jonstorps_kyrka_interior-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:42, 6 October 2009 (UTC)


File:Julkrubba.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Julkrubba.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

HEJ[edit]

Hej, får jag ladda upp följande bilder:

Är lite osäker, det står "Fri för publicering" men jag hittar inte licensen och den måste väll va http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.sv . EWR (talk) 20:22, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Hej. Nej, den texten räcker inte eftersom den inte uttryckligen tillåter redigering av bilden. Du kan ju eventuellt försöka att kontakta fotografen om du vill och försöka få bilden släppt under godkänd licens. /Dcastor (talk) 20:29, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

International Photoworkshop[edit]

Hello, motivated by the six Fotoworkshops of the German Wikipedia an international Photoworkshop in the Swedish Nyköping will be launched during the Easter Weekend 2010. Nyköping was chosen since Skavsta Airport is a Ryanair Base and very close to Stockholm. Further information can be found on Commons:Photoworkshop_Nyköping_2010.--Prolineserver (talk) 22:28, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Liam Norberg-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liam Norberg-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thank you mr. Bot, but the image was not nominated by me. I am the photographer who took the picture, and I do not nominate my own photos. Thank anyway for the appreciation and for the notification. /Dcastor (talk) 19:01, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
I have now changed the text of template. /Dcastor (talk) 16:04, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
And I have started to nominate my own pictures after all...  ;) /Dcastor (talk) 21:44, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Used your photo of Earthrace from Wikimedia Commons[edit]

I just put your image of Earthrace in Malmo in the "Peter James Bethune" article on Wikipedia. It's only my second upload. If you have a chance, please check the licensing detail and credits. I'm not sure if I did it correctly. Nice photo! Now I need one of Bethune... Ghostofnemo (talk) 08:48, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi Ghostofnemo. The Wikimedia Commons is the main databse for media used in all Wikimedia projects. The media in this database are directly accesssible from the different Wikipedia projects (I found that the one you are referring to is the English Wikipedia). This means that there is no use in re-uploading media from Commons locally on the English Wikipedia, since the media files on Commons can be directly used fith the File-tag inside Wikipedia. I am changing the tag in en:Peter James Bethune to point at the Commons original so you can see how it works. Here is the edit. /Dcastor (talk) 10:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
Ah, I see! I can just use the Wikimedia Commons file name! Cool, thanks for the tip! Ghostofnemo (talk) 11:02, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

QI oppose[edit]

Thanks for the note on File:Black Moshannon SP Pump House 2.jpg and explaining your oppose. I kind of figured when it had not been promoted in this many days that it was not going to make it, and I appreciate your helpful explanation. Take care, Ruhrfisch (talk) 18:58, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Highbury Clock-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Highbury Clock-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Inre hamnen i Helsingborg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inre hamnen i Helsingborg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Low clearance.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Low clearance.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Recent changes[edit]

Hi, this recent edit of yours specified the license better, thank you, but also removed other useful notes from the image and the deletion discussion template. A deletion discussion template should remain until the discussion is closed. Also, please do not omit major changes to a page from the edit summary in the future. Best Hekerui (talk) 09:53, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

It was an obvious mistake, I am not in the habit of deleting tags (which, with the exception of QI, all were placed there by myself or on my initiative, the deletion nomination included). I don't know why they were lost in my last edit, but thanks for putting them back. /Dcastor (talk) 10:20, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
Yeah, in retrospect it seems weird, since no one deletes his own QI tag, so sorry for the lecture :) Best wishes Hekerui (talk) 10:29, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Begynnelse-4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Begynnelse-4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Begynnelse-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Begynnelse-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Begynnelse-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Begynnelse-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

FP Promotion[edit]

Lynx lynx-4.JPG
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Lynx lynx-4.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lynx lynx-4.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 15:05, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Brompton Oratory-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brompton Oratory-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Saint Martin in the Fields-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin in the Fields-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St Albans, Golders Green-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Albans, Golders Green-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St Albans, Golders Green-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Albans, Golders Green-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Östra Broby kyrka-6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Broby kyrka-6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Östra Broby kyrka-3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Broby kyrka-3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Östra Broby kyrka-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Broby kyrka-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Östra Broby kyrka-2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Broby kyrka-2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ill Verldshistoria[edit]

Tack! Jag saknar bra eller ens hyfsad programvara för dylikt puts. Du är mer än välkommen att putsa på andra skanningar också om du vill. Det kommer att ramla in flera hundra (rena textsidor oräknade) om jag inte tappar sugen. -- Lavallen (talk) 13:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Jag har inte gjort den här typen av puts tidigare, så jag prövade mig fram lite. Jag putsar gärna några till, men jag är rätt säker på att jag tappar sugen långt innan flera hundra.  ;-) /Dcastor (talk) 13:58, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
Gör inget om du tappar sugen. - Det du inte gör, det gör någon annan eller så blir det inte gjort - är inte hela världen det heller... Men din hjälp uppskattas! -- Lavallen (talk) 13:44, 30 May 2010 (UTC) (som är tillbaka efter att min ISP tyckte jag skulle ha ett vitt dygn.)

Technical note on JPEG compression[edit]

Monument of Francisco de Miranda

Hi. I have just made the following modification to your file:

"Recompressed (using XnView, at JPEG quality level 80) from 6.5 MB to 1.2 MB. No loss of quality is detectable even to an inquisitive eye."

If you decide that this change is detrimental, please, revert it.

You may want to check JPEG compression settings in your camera. I find level 80 satisfactory.

Greetings
6birc (talk) 15:22, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree that a higher compression rate is satisfactory for most uses, but keeping as much information as possible makes is good for people who might want to re-edit the picture. /Dcastor (talk) 16:39, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Operaen på Holmen-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Operaen på Holmen-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Victoria and Albert Museum-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Victoria and Albert Museum-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Victoria and Albert Museum-2.jpg[edit]

Såg att du nominerat File:Victoria and Albert Museum-2.jpg för QI. Jag tycker att fotot (som annars ser mycket bra ut) lutar lite åt vänster?--Ankara (talk) 20:16, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Det har du rätt i. Jag var på resa och hade ingen möjlighet att se över det när det var aktuellt. Kanske redigerar och åternominerar jag så småningom. /Dcastor (talk) 09:57, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Lunds domkyrka i maj-1.jpg[edit]

Jag lade upp din excellenta bild av Lunds domkyrka på http://wikitravel.org/sv/Lund -- Inteloutside2 (talk) 13:05, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Trevligt att den kommer till användning. /Dcastor (talk) 09:47, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Could you weigh in here (hidden image author categories)[edit]

Here - you previously noted that you were similarly unhappy about the automatic "hide" on the user categories. Ingolfson (talk) 09:26, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

I totally agree with you on this one. I don't think it will make much difference to discuss it on a user talk page, though. If you start (or come across) a new discussion on the topic in an official spot, please let me know. /Dcastor (talk) 10:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

NT 1526[edit]

Jesus och ?

Vem han i mitten är vet vi ju...

Men de andra två. Jag är inte så hemma på bilder som dessa som jag tror du är. Min gissning är att det är fråga om Maria och aposteln Johannes, och är ganska säker på det. Då utgår jag från att det är bara en enda (inte alltför ung) kvinna, och hon anses ofta vara den mest centrala qwinnan i NT. Och den som var med henne på Golgata var just J, som däremot är mycket ung, vilket åtminstone jag utläser av NT att han var.

Men du ser troligen mer än jag i en bild som denna... -- Lavallen (talk) 17:36, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Jag ser ganska precis det du beskriver och skulle också gissa på jungfru Maria och aposteln Johannes. Men jag är inte expert på symboler i målningar och om det finns någon sådan ledtråd så missar jag den i det här fallet. (Kan man få någon ledning utifrån var i verket bilden är placerad?) /Dcastor (talk) 19:38, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
I en faksimil från 1951 av 1526 års utgåva av NT. Detta är sidan före Förordet. Träsnittet (som jag gissar det är) återkommer i slutet efter felstavningar och register, men före faksimilutgivarens efterskrift. Denna bild ska även finnas före förordet till NT i 1541 års utgåva. Natan Lindqvist återger åtminstone denna bild i sin textkommentar från 1941. -- Lavallen (talk) 08:31, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Ok. Det sammanhanget säger ju just ingenting. Hade bilden funnits i anslutning till något specifikt textstycke kunde man ju eventuellt ha dragit slutsatser utifrån det. /Dcastor (talk) 09:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Man pratar om örnar och kalkar som attribut i artiklarna, men jag ser inget dylikt... -- Lavallen (talk) 11:03, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Terrakottaarmén-6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Terrakottaarmén-6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grattis![edit]

Xi'an bell tower.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Xi'an bell tower.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

V-wolf (talk) 13:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Niklas Piensoho.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Niklas Piensoho.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Samuel Ljungblahd-1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Samuel Ljungblahd-1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

monument[edit]

Hi. Random comment. I was looking through the cat on this subject, File:Trafalgar Square-1.jpg jumped right out. Glancing through this page, I also notice you have a talent for photographing bildings and such. Cheers for making them available! cygnis insignis 03:31, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. It's inspiring to know that the effort is appreciated. /Dcastor (talk) 04:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sanya quarry.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sanya quarry.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kullens fyr 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kullens fyr 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kullens fyr.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kullens fyr.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mushrooms in Scania.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mushrooms in Scania.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:DavidCastor 000230.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Waltham, The Duke of 19:02, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Resonans.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Resonans.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

178.232.124.8 11:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Grattis till priset i Wiki Loves Monuments Sverige![edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Juryn har utsett dina bilder File:Stora Kronohuset.jpg och File:Två vattentorn.jpg till delad andraplats i kategorin Byggnader. Båda bilderna skickas vidare till Europafinalen.

Med vänliga hälsningar

Jan Ainali, Wikimedia Sverige
Jonas Hedberg, Nordiska museet
Lars Lundqvist, Riksantikvarieämbetet
Oj. Tack så mycket. Imponerande snabbt jobbat med bedömningarna. /Dcastor (talk) 22:38, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Dcastor,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:01, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Två vattentorn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Två vattentorn.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Begynnelse-3.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Begynnelse-3.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Jarekt (talk) 16:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Fixed. (The information was there, so there was no cause for deletion. It is now made more obvious, though.) /Dcastor (talk) 19:42, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for fixing this. --Jarekt (talk) 19:55, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Bilder från KMB[edit]

Hej. Jag ser att du nyligen laddat upp en del bilder från Kulturmiljöbild/KMB (t.ex. File:Dalboslätten.jpg). Jag ville dels tipsa om {{Kulturmiljöbild-image}} som är designad för dessa bilder och dels om detta verktyg som fyller i mallen åt dig. Allt du behöver är det 14-siffriga nummret efter "id=" i bildens url. / Lokal_Profil 23:00, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Insåg nyss att bilden inte alls var uppladdad speciellt "nyligen". Jaja, hoppas att tipset kan komma till nytta i framtiden ändå =) /Lokal_Profil 23:05, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Tack för tipsen. /Dcastor (talk) 11:25, 12 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Dcastor,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 01:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank You[edit]

Thank You for Your post and nice comment. I try my best and will try to contribute as many quality pictures as possible. Your photos are also very nice. /Mihael Grmek (talk) 15:20, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

TUSC token c32e3afc17034980c0ccec587d9bb04f[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!



català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | עברית | svenska | +/−

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off!

Dear Dcastor,
During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons.

Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can.

Kind regards,
the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Wiki Loves Public Art logo
Message delivered by odderBot on 13:33, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Tre nya bilder[edit]

Hej!

Jag har laddat upp tre nya bilder som du skulle kunna lägga in i svwps artiklar.

  • Alimemazin APL 20mg.jpeg
  • Nitrazepam Recip 5mg.jpeg ‎
  • Paroxetin 20mg.jpeg

Mvh Obelix (talk) 00:15, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Identification of files[edit]

  • Hi Dcastor,

The identification of my file is in no way associated with their classification in the Commons but a classification system that I use in other area.

Just to be convinced to see a category such as this one.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ancient_Roman_reliefs_in_Rome

Here you can see that my files are not systematically placed at the head of class.

However, you are free to think what you want.

Regards

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the time to explain. I am glad that I was wrong. Good luck with your continued uploads. /Dcastor (talk) 13:50, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Beautiful Crucifixion[edit]

Greetings David Do you know anything about this [3] wonderful artwork in Basilica San Sebastiano on Appia Antica, Roma? I'm assuming it is Medieval Best regards RobertNotafly (talk) 19:21, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry, but I know nothing about it. It seems like you're not the only one assuming it's medieval, tho. /Dcastor (talk) 22:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Many thanks.I'll enquire in Rome (and let you know) Robert aka Notafly (talk) 20:43, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Neptune's fields[edit]

Hi David, just a quick note to say that I used one of your beautiful photos, here. Thanks so much, Drmies (talk) 20:49, 5 April 2014 (UTC)