User talk:Dharmadhyaksha

Archives 1

hi

just one link running for all image Perumalism Chat 09:08, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

hi

source changed

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Raageshwari.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

• Note: Although the image is taken outdoors, it is just like any studio image. Hence i feel that geo-coding is not necessary. There are way to many good images in this category, many taken by professional photographers and released by the subject herself to Commons. I chose this one as it is a good calm image. Other suggestions are also welcome. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:58, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment Difficult choice. Not geocoded. What not choosing File:Raageshwari.jpg which is used on the English WP page? It would be easy to geocode, as the place of this performance is certainly known. Yann (talk) 06:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Do we need geo coding for such studio photographs? This will look good in infoboxes when cropped. Isnt it? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:03, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

 Support I am not sure there a consensus about that. Finally I decided to support this one. Seeing the style of the picture, it is probably a staging, so the location is not really important. Yann (talk) 08:02, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 16:34, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

corrected the image source

File:Kapoor PCA12.jpg pass it Perumalism Chat 09:10, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Still incorrect. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 09:02, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

i think the image is from other website Perumalism Chat 15:48, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Never mind! There are tonnes of Kareena's image. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 17:17, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you very much for your very swift action on the Clem Attlee Court photo. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 09:48, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The Amarnath Linga.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 13:27, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. --Ikar.us (talk) 18:24, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Affiches voor Bollywood-films op de voorgevel van Bioscoop Manggarai TMnr 20018017.jpg

File:COLLECTIE TROPENMUSEUM Affiches voor Bollywood-films op de voorgevel van Bioscoop Manggarai TMnr 20018017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Multichill (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

• Hi Dharmadhyaksha, I just wanted to express how disappointed I am with this deletion policy. If you encountered any deletion of Tropenmuseum upload, let me know.--Rochelimit (talk) 09:30, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, what? I don't get it. What policy is disappointing? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 10:16, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi sorry for the very late reply, I just read the message. It's about the Freedom of Panorama in Indonesia actually. Because of the current ugly situation of the Indonesian Freedom of Panorama law many of the historic pictures of Indonesia was deleted from Wikipedia, including pictures that was earlier donated by Tropenmuseum. To make it worse, many of the users who ask for the deletion are users that doesn't know anything about the real situation of law in Indonesia, nor even know anything about Indonesia. So I was actually disappointed by this, so just saying. Really sorry if I wasted your time.--Rochelimit (talk) 21:07, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

indian currency

Please delete the uploads of Indian currency.palagiri (talk) 05:09, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Vote ...

Hello Dharmadhyaksha. I followed your comment and added coordinates. I renamed the category because I just knew this morning it was not the good name of the animal but I didn't found sub-categories of this species in Commons. It's my first nomination demand so I don't control the way to do it. Now the cat is renamed do you think I need to ask for renaming the file during the review of after ? I thank you for your comment. If you have a little time to reconsider your review and may be give me some advice ... Thanks again. Have a good day. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 16:46, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Welcome to VICs. I did notice that this is your first nomination. Hence i dropped that note about geocode and sub-category. Or else i don't know anything about birds and bees. Good that you could find the right classification. I am sure other members who know more about it would comments on it. At times it might get slow and take time, but don't be disappointed with that. Have a nice day! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:58, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for all Dharmadhyaksha. I could be a little disappoited but I know it's very difficult to get a VI. I take that with philosophy . It was a trail, I'm patient I won't give up and try an other time with an other picture when weather will give me more sunlight ... Have a good day too. --Llann .\m/ ^{(Lie 2 me ...)} 23:26, 21 February 2013 (UTC).

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Yann's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Yann (talk) 07:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Shinde Chhatri, exterior

Hi,

There is a special technique for this kind of photography or there is not enough space between the subject and the photographer. Requires two images width, which merges to have a large place on both sides of the building for perspective correction can be done by following there. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for this tip. But i am not a professional photographer. I am just a point-n-shoot photographer. But i will try this method sometime for sure, sticking two images in this manner. Thanks! §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:01, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

If you have any problems call me. We are together, to learn.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Images

Hi, i uploaded these images [1],[2] and [3].Are they ok or missed something.Thanx---zeeyanketu ^{talk to me} 11:58, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aga Khan Palace, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Good with "exterior" in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Aah! Thanks for the scope change. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 06:51, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception Church, Goa (exterior in daylight).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:33, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:09, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Scope

Hello, I changed the scope of Valued image candidates/Djebel Serj vue panoramique.jpg. Regards, --— Habib M'HENNI ^[Message] 13:08, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Laxmi Niwas Palace exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Too bad the quality is a bit low. But this is the best picture we have at the moment. For buildings that can be visited, do not forget to add "exterior" to the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:31, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 07:41, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Mahota Lake

Please see Category talk:Maota Lake --Vssun (talk) 07:35, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mausoleum of Sher Shah Suri, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:47, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

New reply at...

...my talk page! --Tito Dutta (Send me a message) 13:12, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Monuments and memorials to Rani Lakshmibai.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support : you're right, imo. --JLPC (talk) 18:34, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:23, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tomb of Adham Khan, (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Comment Problem aberration perspective, which affected the recognition of the building. Can be corrected. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:58, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Corrected by taking another snap, you mean? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 14:39, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

No this photograph can be corrected. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:55, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

How? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:11, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Like that --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Too yellowish, isn't it (compared with other pictures)? Best available view, though—and good collaborative work. --Myrabella (talk) 21:30, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Done --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 13:03, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jejuri temple, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support Very useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:39, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 13:07, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. Francis Xavier's Cathedral, Bangalore, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:42, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 03:20, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Parineeti Chopra display picture

Hello Dharadhyaksha, well I'm trying to get Chopra to GA. I need a good quality display picture (as other pics of her on wiki commons are not up to the mark). Would you please, upload these below provided pics from Bollywood Hungama. I would be grateful to you. Thank you.

1. http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/celebritymicro/images/id/85811/category/parties/type/view/imageid/1557722/
2. http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/celebritymicro/images/id/85811/category/parties/type/view/imageid/1629273/

First one cropped up to her left hand (which is down). And, second above BH tag.Pks1142 (talk) 19:14, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

 Done §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Huma Qureshi pictures

Hey! I'm working on Huma Qureshi. But, there not much pictures (on wikimedia). Please, upload the below given picture. (in vertical upright form not wallpaper).

1. http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/celebritymicro/images/id/91375/category/parties/type/view/imageid/1659827/
2. http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/celebritymicro/images/id/91375/category/parties/type/view/imageid/1572618/

Thanks.Pks1142 (talk) 09:43, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

This time give it a try yourself. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Please, Dharm try to understand as I can't upload these pictures. If you don't want to upload then say it directly. I'll manage. But, it would be great, if you could upload.Pks1142 (talk) 17:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

It would be great if you learn how to upload yourself. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 07:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mahmud Gawan Madrasa.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 00:41, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:2005 Liberian election map.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:2005 Liberian election map.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:2005 Liberian election map.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Dharmadhyaksha. You have new messages at Dey.sandip's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

File:Shree-swami-samartha-of-akkalkot.jpg

Sir, As 'Original upload log', file 'Shree-swami-samartha-of-akkalkot.jpg' originally uploaded by user Ashvidia (en:User:Ashvidia) at english wiki dated 2006-05-16 13:23:12 (so many time ago then claimed blog date !) So I does not think that this file is copied from mentioned blog. It`s my point of view only. admin have right to delete it if I am wrong. thanks.--Ashok modhvadia (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Your message on my talk page about the old indian photograph

Hi Dharmadhyaksha !

Thanks for kind message.

I'm not a "specialist" of photographs restoration (the great specialist of pictures -not only photographs- restoration is User:Adam Cuerden, without doubt), but as I was at home due to a disease this winter, I could not take own photographs anymore.

Therefore, I've began a "hunt" on the net, for old pictures, even since health is back, fortunately.

As some of them where really damaged, I tried to correct them, and... it was successful enough.

Now it is something like a kind of hobby... And the weather is very bad over Paris since months, so I'm waiting for spring for new own photographs !

Archaeodontosaurus is right about the flaws of this picture, but they all are correctible IMO (tilt, spots, strong magenta color at left etc...).

It takes time, but it is easy to improve, even with a free software like GIMP I use.

I suggest you to begin the job (correct the tilt, play with the level tools, clone out the spots etc...). The best is to open the file at a very high resolution (400% or more).

Is it a "FP worthy" picture ? Frankly I don't know. The best you have to do is to nominate it ! Then, you will know !

All the best, --Jebulon (talk) 15:54, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Soulsteer Magazine April Issue Cover, April 2013.jpg

Why you deleted that? Its totally my work Shobhit Gosain (talk) 17:03, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Laldauraza banares333.jpg

File:Laldauraza banares333.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rahul Bott (talk) 11:53, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Wattana.jpg

Dear, sir. I understand about your reason. However, File:Wattana.jpg in Thai's wikipedia has already used at least 4 articles (:http://th.wikipedia.org/wiki/ไฟล์:Wattana.jpg) but File:Wattana.jpg has no article used both thai and others wikipedia. So, It's better if we changes this file name in commons. However, If it can not rename file, it should be delete from commons. Because this file may be major use in Thai's wikipedia more than others. Thank you --ScorpianPK (talk) 15:03, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello! I don't under Thai language. But i guess the subject is a Minister and has been member of parliament multiple number of times. In such case, other non-thai wikipedias can surely have articles on him. There is no reason that he will be restricted only for Thai Wikipedia. Its just that no one has started it yet. Maybe you could start one on English Wikipedia. Also, Commons is a common source for all images. We do not delete images for this reason. Even if it is not used anywhere in any wikipedia, as long as the subject qualifies our scope, we will host it here. I would suggest you to in fact transfer the other image too over here, if it fits our all licensing rules, under a different name. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 05:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your helpful advice --ScorpianPK (talk) 18:00, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Mumtaz at Laila Khan's engagement.jpg

Hi, I'm asking you since you uploaded the pic. Do you have any idea who is the other lady in this pic? Because, we already have an extracted image File:Mumtaz.jpg and perhaps don't require this anymore if the other person is not notable. In addition to being a problem about personality rights, it might also be about Commons being used as a private album. May be I am wrong. That's why I've not yet marked it for deletion. Will wait for your comments. Regards, Rahul Bott (talk) 05:46, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the moves!

Thank you for taking care of the moving requests I submitted. ^_^ What should I do about the other four, File:Skyscapers Rotterdam.jpg, File:Raccons in a tree.jpg, File:Maxim Ivaders Must Die Tour Philidelphia May 19 2009.jpg, and File:Conferderate artillery emplacements.jpg‎, all of which have apparently been renamed in the past ("Looks like this image was renamed already. Please remove the rename template."), but whose file names still contain misspellings?—DocWatson42 (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Rajju Bhaiya talking to Krant.jpg

Dear Dharmadhyaksha Ji! Kindly see [this page]. Mr Sitush has some doubt about my integrity. May be his personal opinion. I do not deny for that. Every body has got the freedom to write here. But personally attacking any user is not good. I have uploaded another better file on wikicommons today titled File:Krantji & Rajju Bhaiya.jpg which is a different photo of the same persons viz. I & Prof.Rajendra Singh (Rajju Bhaiya). Kindly see this file also and then suggest me what to do in future. Whether I should upload here any more file or not? You can see my User talk page for how many times I have been harassed here. Excuse me for the trouble if you feel so. Krantmlverma (talk) 08:01, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Bollywood Hungama uploads

After about a month I am trying to download image from BH and I am getting server message 'you don't have permission'. If you and other users are able to download images like this then BH has certainly done something to my IP. But why would they when I had stopped image uploads about a month ago? Confused. Neo. (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2013 (UTC)