User talk:Diego Grez

Your post is not here? Check the archive. File:Loughner_family_home.JPG   File:Loughner_family_home.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC) File:EnWiki_redirect_-_Pichilemo.png   File:EnWiki_redirect_-_Pichilemo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Teofilo (talk) 14:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC) File:Wikipedia's_server_down.png   File:Wikipedia's_server_down.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Teofilo (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC) File:Bullying_en_IRFE,_7°_Básico_B,_2007.ogg   File:Bullying_en_IRFE,_7°_Básico_B,_2007.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Wknight94 talk 02:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC) Tsunami images Hi Diego- I am one of the editors who has repeatedly removed some of your images from the 2011 Tohoku tsunami page over the last few weeks. However today I had the pleasure of looking through your related commons gallery and I found a great image which I added to the tsunami page. I want to explain to you a little bit of why certain of your uploaded images had such problems, and why others are very valuable additions to wp. First of all I want to to thank you because real people out in the world taking pictures with the express intent of uploading them, is exactly what wp needs more of. For whatever reason there is a certain bias against images on wp and its very important for the image editors to assert themselves when necessary. I got started with pics on WP the same way, by trying to find images that no one else was uploading or seemed to care about. This is why I want you to keep editing and uploading, but to have a better understanding of what images meet the manual of style guidelines for use in the encyclopedia. The number one issue the first few pics you tried to add, was they were NOT UNIQUE enough- a grainy images of waves in a dark ocean, is not a good portrayal of a tsunami let alone a specific tsunami. Similarly, while the image of police on the beach was more unique, its still something that happens on a regular basis (like baywatch lol). The GOAL of images in WP, is to add value to the text, without needing to read the caption. Again this is a goal and not what actually happens, but the motivation is the same. If you have to use a lot of words to explain how the picture is related to the page, then its probably not a good choice. The objective is to see the image and get added meaning from the VISUAL effect separate from the text. Neither of those first two images really met such a standard, and believe me your images are not the only ones that have been removed form the 2011 tsunami pages for such reasons. However your image of boats moved into the streets to avoid the tsunami, is the pic I added back to the page, because its VERY unique and has a high degree of visual effect. You do not see a large group of boats lined up in a city street, very often if at all. You don't need much text to explain the image either. So its a much better choice in comparison to the MOS. So please keep doing what you do, but try to find those pictures which "are worth 1000 words" to use the old cliche- find unique and striking images which add new value to the wp project. Thanks again. 66.220.113.98 18:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC) File:Samsung N145 Plus.jpg Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. Fair use laws vary from country to country, and uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules. Also, fair use is only applicable in a few limited contexts. The use of a media file in one context may be considered fair use, while the use of the same file in another context may constitute copyright violation. In particular, fair use does not extend to the collection and distribution of media files in a media database such as Commons. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions. Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally to projects which allow this.   --guerreritoboy (talk) 01:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC) File:Icon-windows_os.svg   File:Icon-windows_os.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! 95.24.249.250 16:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC) File:Facundo Rojas Ramírez - 2010.jpg   File:Facundo Rojas Ramírez - 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Superzerocool (talk) 13:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC) File:Renán Ávalos.jpg Notice of Impending Speedy Deletion File:Renán Ávalos.jpg is considered fulfilling the Wikimedia Commons criteria for speedy-deletion and has been marked on its image description page for the following reason: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Daniel Herrera - Chilean miner.jpg You can ask questions about Commons policies and guidelines in Commons:Helpdesk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. You find all your uploads in your upload log.   And File:Juan Aguilar with President Piñera.jpg as well.—LX (talk, contribs) 14:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC) Category:Images by Diego Grez‎ I hope you are aware that you can not revoke a pd-self and replace it with a cc-by or cc-by-sa license? You have to revert such edits or at least you have to add the pd-self back to the file descriptions. I saw that you made many of such edits. Therefore Im here to inform you and ask you to act, I will not discuss this. If you need a discussion please go to COM:VP/C. --Martin H. (talk) 10:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC) File:Wikinews images new look.png   File:Wikinews images new look.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! 84.61.133.39 13:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC) Notification about possible deletion   Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Affected: File:Don Francisco.png Martin H. (talk) 18:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)