User talk:Diego Grez

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Huzzah![edit]

Congratulations on recovering your account. :) Green Giant (talk) 10:53, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! I'm glad it finally happened! :P Diego Grez return fire 16:32, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Admin[edit]

Hi Diego. Thanks for your email about being an admin. I don't think that a request for adminship would have much success. I don't see you working in any admin-related fields. You should be more active in DR, UDR, Help desk, copyvios, etc pp. Sorry, but I think you deserve an honest answer from me. Regards, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi Hedwig. Since it was a private e-mail, I'd have preferred you to respond it through the same way. Anyways, thanks for your input, I appreciate that you were honest. Diego Grez return fire 21:02, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
I don't use email much. Talk page is just faster and you don't have to hide that you are interested in doing more serious stuff. There's no shame in that, we all appreciate your concern about this project. Thanks! :) If you want to, I can delete/hide this thread for you. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:22, 7 June 2014 (UTC)
Don't worry ;-) Regards, Diego Grez return fire 22:44, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

File:WindowsME.png[edit]

Actually you're wrong deleting this file. Everything you find in low resolution is considered "fair use". This picture is found on English Wiki. There is a question, why don't all files from all wikis transfer to commons? That way we would not need copy-paste everything. --Munjanes (talk) 20:03, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Because on Commons we don't accept fair use media. Read some policies, like Commons:Fair use. That screenshot is not allowed here. English Wikipedia has its own policies which permit that content. --Diego Grez return fire 20:05, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Chile Ilustrado[edit]

El propio libro Chile Ilustrado de 1872 dice que fué publicado en Valparaíso, para que retiras la categoría?--Alexxxos (talk) 03:36, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Porque fue publicado en París, sale en la portada... --Diego Grez return fire 03:42, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for telling Cat-a-lot to restore images put into Category:Taken with Samsung GT-S7560 back to Category:Taken with Samsung GT-S7560M! Geo Swan (talk) 00:16, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

[1][edit]

This unDR may interest you. Fry1989 eh? 16:59, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

File:¡Aporta culiao! (Institutón 2007).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:¡Aporta culiao! (Institutón 2007).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 00:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Letelier Removido (3047396635).jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Letelier Removido (3047396635).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:La BOMBA (2472889396).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:La BOMBA (2472889396).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Parraguez vs Tejo (2232808257).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Parraguez vs Tejo (2232808257).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Aldo Scapini (1366118155).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aldo Scapini (1366118155).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Agenda Pascualina (2472889560).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Agenda Pascualina (2472889560).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Benito (1332988545).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Benito (1332988545).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warko (talk) 17:45, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

Be polite[edit]

Please, don't be rude, saying "let's not get stupid" [2] it is against the Etiquette in Wikimedia projects. I'm not going to do anything this time, I only expect an apology from you. Best. --Warko (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2015 (UTC)

Warko, you are a smart guy. You know that "let's not get stupid" does not equal "Warko is stupid". Diego Grez return fire 01:52, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Comment[edit]

Please take a look at my last comment. Try to compare the files with the photo of the painting hanging on a wall. Thanks, --Lecen (talk) 04:44, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Steinsplitter (talk) 20:07, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

Padena[edit]

Hey, I ask you a very reasonable explanation about the speedy deletion of that emblem. I didn't had time to defend the file from deletion, and you simply marked it as copyvio withouth any reliable source. I warn you that it's a very disruptive behavior by your part. You should have to nominate the file for deletion, not simply mark it as copyvio. I repeat: I wait a very reasonable explanation for your behaviour. --Sfs90 (talk) 22:09, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

By the way, cropping an image does not make you the copyright holder. I am still the copyright holder to Cretton's photo, and I decide how people should credit me. You are advised not to revert. Diego Grez return fire 23:53, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
(edit conflict with below) Diego, gravitas.
If you are going to warn someone, don't do it on your own talk page. I see some stuff going on here. In particular, you tagged a file for suspected copyvio. The deletion was not your decision, it was an admins. Unless there is some pattern, even if you were wrong, that's normal and not a problem. The person to request undeletion from would not be you, and your reason for your tagging "copyvio suspicion" is obvious. That doesn't mean it's right, that is a much more complicated judgment. If the user wants to know, asking politely would be in order, I'd think. However, more to the point would be asking the admin who deleted. Instead Sfs90 tells you what you should do. And instead of asking for undeletion from the admin or formally at the page for that, he re-uploaded the file.
Not good, because, for one thing, it hides the history.
He might have some grounds for thinking you are harassing him, because you have nominated about seven of his files for deletion. This is not an accusation of harassment, but that some users might take it that way.
I highly recommend you not mix issues. Responding here with regard to the revert warring on File:Jean_Philippe_Cretton_crop.jpg is a Very Bad Idea. You have been revert warring there.
So has he. Neither one of you is using the Talk page, nor specifically discussing the issue, seeking consensus, nor seeking help. And the basic issue I would put in Category:Really stupid stuff to fight over. (On both sides). Ah, I see that's a red link. No wonder so many people don't realize it, the behavior has not been categorized! It's amazing how many people risk being blocked, or actually get blocked, over these things.
So why am I warning you and not him? Because I've known you, for years, and don't want to see you blow it. It doesn't matter if you are right or not. I thought at first that this might be a naive user, re-uploading instead of requesting undeletion, not following deletion policy. He is not. He has almost 3200 edits on Commons and 36,000 edits on es.wiki; he was just blocked there for two days. He has been warned here for copyright violation here and more, including a "final warning." It looks to me like he just cast a retaliatory vote in a DR for your files. I assume he will also see this comment.
Diego, would you like me to intervene here? My goal would be to end the bickering so that both of you can be successful in whatever is legitimate. I'd rather see, if possible, you supporting each other, as you could. Otherwise, one or both of you may end up damaged. --Abd (talk) 02:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Why are you mixing the topics? I'm still waiting a response about your rude attitude deleting a file that isn't a copyvio. You owe me a very reasonable explanation about that. Making false accusations it's something I would not accept. And about your supposed surnames, I said all about that in the edit summary (independent of how many surnames do you have, your username is Diego Grez and that it's all I have to say; the file was uploaded by me [independent that you uploaded the original file], and I recognize that you have the rights about that, but I decide how to credit you, and I decided to credit you under your username; it's not an obligation to credit you under your two surnames [or what? do you also want to state your second name, address, your on-line "newspaper" that doesn't have 98 years, and/or anything else?]). Kind regards :) --Sfs90 (talk) 02:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC) PS: I'm waiting an apologize for your attitude towards the file of Padena emblem. Yu have to recognize that you made a mistake requesting a speedy deletion without any argument.
I'm not giving an answer to an impolite user who deliberately ignores warnings. --Diego Grez return fire 02:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Okay, Diego, he did at least start to address the issues. I'm not (yet) going to, myself, address the actual issues in dispute. I could, I have opinions, but, at this point, my opinions don't matter. What would matter to me is the possibility that the two of you can find a way to cooperate, because if you don't, we all lose. I don't know anything about Sfs90, I do about you. Learning to handle and turn conflict into cooperation is a major wiki skill. Are you interested? --Abd (talk) 02:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
If Diego Grez ignore my requests, well, that says a lot about his attitude... To Abd, I recognize that I made a mistake re-uploading the file instead of asking an undeletion request (I still don't know how to do it exactly because I never had to request an undeletion in the past). Ignoring warnings? Diego, you only undo edits and doesn't contribute to the discussion about that; I state my point right on this talk page and in the edit summaries of the cropped file. I repeat: your rude attitude doesn't contribute at all. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC) PS: Diego, writing edit summaries like "jaaaaaaaaaaaa" (sic), with a clear sarcastic tone, doesn't contribute to the good relations here. Think about that.
Sfs90, if you keep this up, you will be blocked. That is not a warning, because if I were ready to warn you, I would do so on your talk page. You have already done enough, such that if attention is brought to your history, it is likely to happen. I am not saying you are "wrong," and I'm sure you can be a productive contributor, and that you have been already. Diego's attitude cannot get you into trouble, only your attitude can do that. I'd like to help you. If you want help, you will need to start listening more than telling.
You were already warned about re-uploading, so this is what Diego was talking about, and he was offended by how you approached him. You have been offended, as well, perhaps. I have not concluded you are bad or wrong, though you obviously made a mistake. Now, you can sit around being offended, respond as offended, and get yourself blocked. Or you can ask for help, learn to handle conflict, learn about, for example, what to do if your file is deleted, and what I'd really like to see is for Diego to help you, since I believe he knows how. But you will have to change your attitude! Will you consider that?
Would you be more explicit about that? Please say explicitly what's the (supposed) problem with my attitude. I ask this with a very good faith. Diego made several mistakes in the past (you can see them in their history) and I see little recognition about their mistakes. That's why I see little intentions from him to have a change on his attitude. I have all the good disposition to discuss that. He offended me in several occasions in the past and I don't see any remorse by his part. I couldn't trust in Diego Grez intentions if when I said that he's making a mistake, he begins with the sarcastic and offensive comments. It's sad that he doesn't changed his attitude towards the months/years. As you said that you know him more, you should know that. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 04:11, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
It would take me time to cover and explain your "attitude," and it's late, and this is Diego's talk page, he has not consented to further discussion here. I will start with one thing. I told you you could be blocked and you tell me about Diego's attitude. Can you see that there is a problem there? What does his attitude have to do with your behavior? So if you are blocked you can blame him? "He made me do it!" What? Believe me, I've seen this, it's not uncommon. "How could I let him insult me without responding the same way?" You have asked me to explain, so I will, on your talk page. I've also presented an opportunity to Diego here, I hope he takes it. Later. --Abd (talk) 04:21, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
I'm not going to discuss anymore. This is going to nowhere. And don't put words in my mouth; I didn't said or thought any of the things you said, especially the things you put between quotation marks. It's a pity that you are making incorrect assumptions, because my attitude was with the most of the good faiths; if that was misunderstood, my apologies. Regards. --Sfs90 (talk) 04:41, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Sfs90, I put no words in your mouth. Those quotations were not of you but of a hypothetical reason for your behavior. A civil answer would be "No, that's not what I'm thinking." You have now been warned by another for edit warring (as was Diego). Above, you asked me to explain. Do you still want that? If so, ask me on my talk page. In any case, good luck. Diego, if you would like some observations from me, you may ask me on my Talk page, or email me. Good luck to you as well, but I'll tell you one secret of life: we create our good luck. --Abd (talk) 15:16, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not edit war[edit]

Deutsch | English | Français | Italiano | +/−


Nuvola apps important yellow.svg You currently appear to be participating in an edit war (at File:Jean_Philippe_Cretton_crop.jpg). Users are expected to collaborate with others, and once it is known that there is a disagreement should discuss the issues on the relevant talk page rather than repeatedly undoing other users' contributions. If necessary you can ask for more input at Commons:Dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to ask for temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing – even if you are right about the content issue.