User talk:Küñall/archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, MisterWiki!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

TUSC token 75169d7b5f7ed4289c4a3dc9b7fb91be[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Malbork zamek zblizenie.jpg[edit]

I cannot remember (or find out) who asked me about this image few weeks ago, but if it was you, the watermark is used by the author on all his images. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:08, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

No, I didn't asked you about it, but I will work removing the watermarks, they can't be used. --MisterWiki (talk) 20:23, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Translate to Spanish[edit]

Hi! Here are a list of some things I've noticed that need translations from English to Spanish. This is from a private list I made and it has been awhile since I actually looked at the links, so they might have had translations. If I recall correctly, these were some of the easiest things that needed to be translate. If you don't get to do them all, that's okay. Thanks for all your work!

Killiondude (talk) 08:20, 25 December 2009 (UTC)


Blocked[edit]

You were blocked becuase

  • You were sockpuppeting (this account and User:LoveModernTallking) to evade block as Diegogrez.
  • You also were uploading images with false claims, with bogus credits and using false justifications (chilean law 17336 nowhere states gov works fall into PD) and webpage you give as source gives a clear (C) notice . -- Drini 23:27, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Request reason: "Please look at my rationale at en:User talk:Diego Grez. Also, I've sent the permission to Drini to use Pichilemu.cl images. My apologies about uploading copyrighted content earlier with User:Diegogrez. Thank you."
Decline reason: "With this kind of history I'm not convinced about anything you claim. I'd suggest you slow down and think about what you're doing and how it affects others, rather than trying to rush. --O (висчвын) 03:19, 07 January 2010 (GMT)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | +/−

As I posted yesterday on meta:

For the record.
He uploaded images from pichilemu.cl, which clearly states © Ilustre Municipalidad de Pichilemu 2008.
I asked him to justify the PD tag and he said that under Chilean law , Goverment works fall into PD.
I asked him which article on the law mentioned it and he replied "I don't even remember, you go read it"
I went to check the law and there was no trace of such statement.
When I confronted him he said "ok, but on such website, only text is copyrighted, not images".
Again, I asked him for proof and he answered "I will ask tomorrow for a confirmation".
Therefore, he's been uploading files under false license claims. Given he's sockpuppeting and evading a block given for uploading copyvios, I proceeded to delete the image.
He may get a permission if he asks tomorrow, but the 'fact is that he uploaded without permission, lied about the justification, lied again when confronted and besides evading a block for copyvios. es:Drini 02:00, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Reasons for this block are not the same as enwiki ones, so the rationale arguing unblock there won't apply here. -- Drini 16:23, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

See also

Again, he was blocked more than a year ago due to issues like this. He's using sockpuppets to avoid block [checkuser proved] and yet he continues uploading with false claims and copyvios (and when confronted his answer after getting cornered is "I will get permission").

-- Drini 16:45, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


Today he sent me an email claiming http://pastebin.com/pastebin.php?dl=f462413e5 is a proof that he got a PD release that allowed him to upload. Given the trail of false claims, I wouldn't put much weigh on a pastebin for enough proof. -- Drini 17:39, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Also, even if you get the permission /now/ you were still using a sockpuppet to upload files with false license claims. -- Drini 19:01, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

I just want to go in the right way. This sockpuppet was used to upload fair images of my own. I know I uploaded images from a fan website, and they got deleted, but the most (or all) of the images I uploaded are completely mine, and their copyright belongs to me. I published them here in a way to be useful. I know I previously uploaded copyvios in my old account, but I was too young and my actions were sometimes stupid, and I deserve a second opportunity. --MisterWiki (talk) 19:21, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

all the images I deleted and linked ABOVE the gallery were copyvios. I asked you to explain yesterday and you instead talked rudely and lied.
The others (your personals) I know you own the copyright, but I believe many of them are out of Project Scope.
And there's still the issue of avoiding your block with a sockpuppet. -- Drini 19:33, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

I didn't uploaded this image http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Roberto_Matta.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 , and http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:MisterWiki%27s_studios.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1 is a derivative work, not a copyvio. --MisterWiki (talk) 19:36, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Also, I don't want my old accounts back. I just want to continue with this one. I don't want to cause problems anymore. You can do it, and I know you can watch the things I do meanwhile. Thanks. --MisterWiki (talk) 19:37, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I fxed the log. You didn't upload the Matta one therefore it's not listed on the urls above. But it's still a copyvio so I deleted it.
I deleted the Studios one since you didn't credit autorship but if you can help me finding it, I will restore it. -- Drini 19:53, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
This is the source: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:WikinewsHQ.jpg --MisterWiki (talk) 20:20, 6 January 2010 (UTC)


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Request reason: "Sorry. I know I have done idiotic things in the past, but I will not do that again. I know I have sockpuppeted but I don't deserve this block. I have permission for pichilemu.cl photos. Give me another chance, I'm not gonna let you down. If I upload another copyvio, block me forever if you want, but give me a chance."
Decline reason: "Closing request made the day after the previous one was declined. There aren't any esentially different arguments than the previous one and this new one has been open for a whole week without any sysop reviewing it again -- Drini 15:20, 13 January 2010 (UTC)."

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | +/−

You've had plenty of chances under several accounts. Why this time is different? you always promise, so "I promise" is meaningless. Also, your unblock was reviewed just yesterday (and the new plea is essentially the same declined earlier), please don't abuse the unblock template system. -- Drini 20:31, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token f3981b281d2e82bd15e934a1e6be3a44[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File tagging File:Bullying_en_IRFE,_7°_Básico_B,_2007.ogg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bullying_en_IRFE,_7°_Básico_B,_2007.ogg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

High Contrast (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Test edit[edit]

Testing for IRC. --MisterWiki (talk) 19:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Unblocking[edit]

I have talked with Drini, and I think the following agreement amply deals with the issues:

  1. . You need to upload only things that clearly have good licences: Either you took them yourself, or the website releases them in no uncertain terms (or you've run them by Commons talk:Licensing and got the go ahead). This restriction lasts 3 months, though I'd suggest to any other admins that, barring egregious behaviour related to this, a reasonable number of warnings should be given before any blocks.

There are also two bits of advice:

  1. . Try to keep to encyclopedic or newsworthy images. This is subjective, of course, but be reasonable.
  2. . While the whole point of Commons is to allow usage in many wikis, make sure that your image is really useful before spreading it widely. Using COM:VIC would be an excellent way to judge how useful images you want to spread about are, before getting carried away.

If you agree to this, or wish to discuss modifications, reply here =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:30, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

I accept them completely. --Diego Grez (talk) 23:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
Then you are unblocked. So far as I'm aware, you aren't involved at all with historic media - and that's a copyright minefield, so a little caution is best there until you're fairly experienced - so I haven't added an exception there. If you do go there, I'll happily help out with copyright advice. In any case, remember: When in doubt, ask first =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:35, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

Also, just to be clear, I'm happy for the restrictions to be loosened or even removed early in light of good upload behaviour and suggestions at Commons talk:Licensing by you. This sort of thing is meant to help you get back in without any further problems; if you want it re-reviewed in the light of your work here, I'm happy for me or another admin to do so. =) Give it a month first, though; need a decent sample to review =) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:52, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 8349079a180d7717c6b5cc4d4e274842[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:UC campeón interamericano.JPG[edit]

original picture: http://www.flickr.com/photos/14292732@N05/4546231832/
license flickr: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/deed.es
original video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0209wEBsH0#
license video: "Se permite el uso bajo Licencia Creative Commons 2.0 Atribución a Marcelo Ríos en Wikimedia Commons y Cristián Berríos en Flickr.com"
link license video: (video information) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o0209wEBsH0#
Why you deleted the picture? Marcelo Ríos 12 April 2010 (UTC)

It is a copyvio. Your YouTube video was taken from TV and is impossible that it is yours... --Diego Grez (previously MisterWiki) let's talk 23:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Given your comment while removing the note above I like to give you a little more help: Commons:Free media resources/Map lists that source, but it clearly says, that it only GFDL relief maps with map Layers (except the labeling layer and the contour layer). The site http://www.maps-for-free.com/ offers Maps view (not free), Satellite view (not free), Terrain view (not free), Relief view (free, GFDL), OSM (free, Open Street map). You can use the Relief view with all layers except the labeling and the contour layer. You can not use the map, satellite or terrain view. Feel free to remove this note once you read it. Thanks, --Martin H. (talk) 16:41, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Ah. OK. /me slaps himself. --Diego Grez (previously MisterWiki) let's talk 16:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)


pleas stop...[edit]

.... to make first a regular deletion request and than an speedy deletion request - that is counter productive. This person "Cristian berrios" may be not notable, but he is obviously not a fake. Perhaps you have to have some trust in the wisdom of the crouds. Cholo Aleman (talk) 17:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Hey. I'm just doing my job reverting and taking out the vandalism and disruption he provoked, now that he won't come back. --Diego Grez (previously MisterWiki) let's talk 20:37, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Posted to my english wikipedia page FYI...[edit]

FYI [1] I am not involved just wanted to give you the heads up. I have not looked into the situation. RP459 (talk) 17:22, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Hmm. That guy never stops. Thanks for reporting me that IP. I have reported it to stewards. --Diego Grez return fire 17:28, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Patroller ![edit]

Hi Diego Grez !

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller ! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As might know already, the patrolling functionality has been enabled for all edits, no longer just for page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edit made by anonymous users on Commons.

We could use you help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by checking an Anonymous edits checklist and patrol a day-part. There is a short video tutorial which addresses some things you may not know.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage, my talkpage or on IRC. –Krinkletalk 02:04, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! :D I'll have a look again on some of these :P --Diego Grez let's talk 02:05, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Ehrenfeld Gedenktafel Edelweißpiraten.jpg[edit]

You've reverted a correction of an IP in File:Ehrenfeld Gedenktafel Edelweißpiraten.jpg. If I am not completely tired and exhausted of the censorship project discussion I'd think that this correction was indeed a correction. It is the transscription of the text on the image (see the image). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:43, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I didn't notice that. Sorry. --Diego Grez return fire 02:56, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

... for you last undo action. :) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 01:25, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

 :-) --Diego Grez return fire 01:26, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

I've regranted Patroller rights for now. It does seem as though you are working towards resolving the issues with your accounts and the work you have done here seems ok. I would urge you to get the issue of previous accounts dealt with though. If you do not resolve the situation on Meta maybe you could cross link/redirect previous accounts where you can. This would prevent misunderstandings in the future. To me the travelling account is fine however you should cross link it so that it is obvious it is you. I'll review rollback in due course - regards --Herby talk thyme 13:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you ! :D --Diego Grez return fire 15:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Pardonnable French[edit]

Why did you do this revert? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Wait. A minute. --Diego Grez return fire 18:27, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Hmm. Seems ok. --Diego Grez return fire 18:28, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

File talk:0069-Turm Port de Sóller.JPG[edit]

Hi Diego, I've suspended your speedy on File talk:0069-Turm Port de Sóller.JPG as it looked to be an accusation of a copyviolation to me and deserved to be further investigated.KTo288 (talk) 05:20, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Sure. --Diego Grez return fire 17:25, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

References[edit]

References are needed because they provide source of spelling for people suspecting misspelling in some cases such as Ϝ & Λ in:

Please do not remove them, especially because people have short memory. Names are searchable inside UnicodeData.txt. 83.10.103.143 17:45, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Rollback revoked[edit]

Hello,

I just revoked your rollback because you used it more than once in cases where it isn't allowed:

  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Flag_of_Miercurea-Ciuc.gif&diff=prev&oldid=39692204 you use rollback, and after that you do a edit to make a comment. Undo with Comment should be done.
  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Twinkling_Eiffel_Tower_at_Midnight_May_2008.jpg&diff=next&oldid=39400784 you rollback a deletion request without any comment.
  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Weeping_Parisian_from_NARA_Ww2-81.jpg&diff=next&oldid=39678384
  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Pedelec.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=39678279 you rollback without checking talkpage

And I could continue.

I don't think it wise to keep your rollback, so I revoked it. Huib talk 18:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

This is example how thy rollback destroys legitimate edits:

  1. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greek_alphabet&action=historysubmit&diff=39677357&oldid=39395098
  2. http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category%3AGreek_letters&action=historysubmit&diff=39677436&oldid=39395699

83.10.103.143 19:04, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

@IP that's not rollback.
I rollbacked the deletion request because it was already kept before. I thought it was unnecessary, and looked like vandalism. I didn't rollbacked anything on [2], and is undo!, not rollback. I did the first one because it was easier than look at the diff, /me was lazy that time, but the other ones are certainly ok. As Blurpeace said, "I'm not fucking up". --Diego Grez return fire 22:59, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Using rollback on a Deletion request is so wrong that only that is already enough to revoke. Huib talk 17:47, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

File mover[edit]

The functionality of the template {{rename}} has recently changed. You might need to clear your cache to see the changes. If successful you should then be able to use the new "Quick adding" link in the template to instruct CommonsDelinker to replace the old name with the new name in all wikis. Please use that every time you rename a file. If further questions arise, feel free to write on my talk page --DieBuche (talk) 10:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Mythological paintings[edit]

Hello, why did you delete my rename request for this category? Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 17:23, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Look at the talk page! :) Well, there is no consensus to move the category (at the moment). The move template stayed there for more than 14 days, that is the time to take a decision. There is a oppose vote, and I just closed the request as not done. --Diego Grez return fire 17:27, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
ok, no problem. Next time I will post a message on the village pump asking for people to vote. That probably means I will again request a name change for this category some time in the future. Is that ok? Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 19:33, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay :) But there's no real need, it is supposed that consensus needs to be achieved in the talk page, something that didn't happened. --Diego Grez return fire 20:26, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Re[edit]

ok. --Memo18 (talk) 20:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia-logo-v2.svg[edit]

Hi Diego Grez!

I created an optimized version of the graphic linked above. It’s only 161 KB and valid SVG 1.1. If you’re interested I could send you the graphic or you could unlock the file and I’ll upload the updated version then.

Kindest regards, Richard

File:Wikipedia Rollback.svg and File:Wikipedia Reviewer.svg and maybe others?[edit]

When you updated these to include the new logo, you adjusted the size/surrounding white-space which changes how they display everywhere (and alters the proportions for the reviewer logo). Any chance you could correct that? Cheers! VernoWhitney (talk) 18:33, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Sure. Diego Grez return fire 18:40, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done Diego Grez return fire 19:01, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Outstanding. Thanks! VernoWhitney (talk) 19:02, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Your opposition[edit]

Greetings. You didn't really provide much details in your opposition to that indef. I'm curious if you really believe that Ottava will not simply to continue to behave badly, cause disruption, and be blocked over and over again... and if so, why you believe that? I'm not trying to put the screws to you— if I come to believe my lengthening to to indefinite was not _necessary_ to prevent further bad behaviour I will gladly undo it myself. Thanks for your thoughts. --Gmaxwell (talk) 23:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi Gmaxwell, sorry for not being clear. I think Ottava gets overheated from time to time and the block should be short, in my opinion, to let him clean up his mind. Diego Grez return fire 23:53, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Have you seen any evidence of his mind clearing? I have never seen an example of him apologizing for, or saying he regretted an action which resulted in him being blocked. I don't believe that he has ever actually taken a break during a temporary block, instead temporary blocks have simply caused him to spend all his time complaining about the people who blocked him. I don't think blocks are working. --Gmaxwell (talk) 23:58, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
Hmm, well, firstly, I shall not have involved on that discussion, secondly, I will remove my opposition and let things go. Diego Grez return fire 00:05, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
OKAY. I'm always interested in hearing your thoughts. Thanks for your consideration. --Gmaxwell (talk) 00:10, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Your Wikiversity Talk Page[edit]

Diego, are you aware that your Wikiversity talk page is protected? Moulton 11:46, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Inclusión en Template:Documentation[edit]

Hola, me disculpas por hablar español, ya tengo una forma sencilla, podrías observar si puede funcionar:

{{LangSwitch
|en={{documentation/en|1={{{1}}}|heading={{{heading}}}}}
|es={{documentation/es|1={{{1}}}|heading={{{heading}}}}}
}}

No quiero ser malo con usted, he probado en la zonas de pruebas y sale correctamente, ¿podría usarlo en esta plantilla? Si no fue así, avísame, gracias--Diego Sanguinetti (talk) 23:12, 16 July 2010 (UTC) P.D. Aquí una prueba, donde se puede cambiar según el idioma elegido:

Documentation icon Documentationviewedithistorypurge

This documentation is transcluded from Template:en.

Esta bien, pero ¿cómo lo revisarían si está correctamente adecuado para su funcionamiento? Espero que esto funcione. Saludos--Diego Sanguinetti (talk) 17:36, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Hola, es una lástima que no funcionó, porque lo revirtieron. Podrías avisar para que sea cierto a esos malos revisores; porque es un problema que exista el egoísmo inglés, disculpa por decirlo, es que no tiene sentido hacer de nuevo.--Diego Sanguinetti (talk) 18:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Hi[edit]

See: http://www.macaubus.org/special.htm

File:IEs4Linux_logo.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:IEs4Linux_logo.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Svgalbertian (talk) 19:23, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Küñall!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:40, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

File:IEs4Linux_logo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:IEs4Linux_logo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Svgalbertian (talk) 03:01, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Mentorship[edit]

See Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Would anyone object.... ZooFari 18:41, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Watermark[edit]

Dziękuję za uwagę. Na nowych zdjęciach nie wstawiam i nie zamierzam wstawiać. Topory (talk) 11:52, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

English: Thank you for your attention. For new photos not intercede and do not intend to insert. (Automatic translation) Topory (talk) 11:53, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

iTunes logos[edit]

Thanks for the heads-up about the copyright involving the iTunes logo, but being that the image in question is using for nonprofit educational purposes (I wasn't the original creator of it, by the way, I just changed the wrong "iTunes X" to the correct "iTunes 10") to show how the icons evolved over time, and so I don't feel it needs to be deleted. Besides, the current icon is already being used on the iTunes article on Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ITunes_Logo.png Ramblagir (talk) 11:05, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes, the icon on Wikipedia, as you can see below the description is copyrighted. That means, you can't use a free license on them, and subsequently upload them to Commons. Next time, upload these icons as Fair Use on Wikipedia, not here. Diego Grez return fire 13:49, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Map_of_Pichilemu_(Spanish).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Map_of_Pichilemu_(Spanish).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Esteban (talk) 04:28, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Your tagging as copyvio[edit]

Please be more careful than this. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

  • It's a copyright violations, a derivative work of the Flash animation in the La Tercera newspaper. Diego Grez return fire 17:25, 29 September 2010 (UTC)
    • As it says with emphasis in {{speedydelete}}, tagging as a copyvio is for obvious cases. This is by no means an obvious case, I fail to see any infringement. The information is free. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 17:39, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: File:MSJ.en.svg copyright violation allegation[edit]

I visited the La Tercera site and looked at the images there. There is absolutely nothing there that looks like the Wikimedia image. Moreover, the La Tercera site doesn't use any SVG images as far as I can determine. Please explain why you think the Wikimedia image is a copyright violation. Be specific. Quicksilver@ 00:15, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Rescue_of_Chilean_miners_-_Rescue_worker_Patricio_Sepúlveda_inside_capsule.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rescue_of_Chilean_miners_-_Rescue_worker_Patricio_Sepúlveda_inside_capsule.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Aude (talk | contribs) 20:21, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Daniel_Herrera_-_Chilean_miner.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Daniel_Herrera_-_Chilean_miner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Aude (talk | contribs) 20:24, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Victor_Segovia_-_Chilean_miner.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Victor_Segovia_-_Chilean_miner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Aude (talk | contribs) 20:33, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Franklin_Lobos.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Franklin_Lobos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-Aude (talk | contribs) 20:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

File:31 Minutos.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:31 Minutos.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Superzerocool (talk) 12:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Loughner_family_home.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Loughner_family_home.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:50, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

File:EnWiki_redirect_-_Pichilemo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:EnWiki_redirect_-_Pichilemo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 14:21, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia's_server_down.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wikipedia's_server_down.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Bullying_en_IRFE,_7°_Básico_B,_2007.ogg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bullying_en_IRFE,_7°_Básico_B,_2007.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wknight94 talk 02:02, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Tsunami images[edit]

Hi Diego- I am one of the editors who has repeatedly removed some of your images from the 2011 Tohoku tsunami page over the last few weeks. However today I had the pleasure of looking through your related commons gallery and I found a great image which I added to the tsunami page.

I want to explain to you a little bit of why certain of your uploaded images had such problems, and why others are very valuable additions to wp. First of all I want to to thank you because real people out in the world taking pictures with the express intent of uploading them, is exactly what wp needs more of. For whatever reason there is a certain bias against images on wp and its very important for the image editors to assert themselves when necessary. I got started with pics on WP the same way, by trying to find images that no one else was uploading or seemed to care about.

This is why I want you to keep editing and uploading, but to have a better understanding of what images meet the manual of style guidelines for use in the encyclopedia. The number one issue the first few pics you tried to add, was they were NOT UNIQUE enough- a grainy images of waves in a dark ocean, is not a good portrayal of a tsunami let alone a specific tsunami. Similarly, while the image of police on the beach was more unique, its still something that happens on a regular basis (like baywatch lol).

The GOAL of images in WP, is to add value to the text, without needing to read the caption. Again this is a goal and not what actually happens, but the motivation is the same. If you have to use a lot of words to explain how the picture is related to the page, then its probably not a good choice. The objective is to see the image and get added meaning from the VISUAL effect separate from the text. Neither of those first two images really met such a standard, and believe me your images are not the only ones that have been removed form the 2011 tsunami pages for such reasons.

However your image of boats moved into the streets to avoid the tsunami, is the pic I added back to the page, because its VERY unique and has a high degree of visual effect. You do not see a large group of boats lined up in a city street, very often if at all. You don't need much text to explain the image either. So its a much better choice in comparison to the MOS.

So please keep doing what you do, but try to find those pictures which "are worth 1000 words" to use the old cliche- find unique and striking images which add new value to the wp project. Thanks again. 66.220.113.98 18:32, 26 April 2011 (UTC)


File:Samsung N145 Plus.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use content. Fair use laws vary from country to country, and uses that are acceptable under US law, for example, may not be acceptable in many other countries with more restrictive rules.

Also, fair use is only applicable in a few limited contexts. The use of a media file in one context may be considered fair use, while the use of the same file in another context may constitute copyright violation. In particular, fair use does not extend to the collection and distribution of media files in a media database such as Commons. Therefore, Commons cannot legally rely on fair use provisions.

Non-free content that may be used with reference to fair use may be uploaded locally to projects which allow this.


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português do Brasil | русский | svenska | 中文 | +/−

--guerreritoboy (talk) 01:42, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Icon-windows_os.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Icon-windows_os.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

95.24.249.250 16:58, 7 August 2011 (UTC)


File:Facundo Rojas Ramírez - 2010.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Facundo Rojas Ramírez - 2010.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Superzerocool (talk) 13:00, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Renán Ávalos.jpg[edit]

Notice of Impending Speedy Deletion File:Renán Ávalos.jpg is considered fulfilling the Wikimedia Commons criteria for speedy-deletion and has been marked on its image description page for the following reason:

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Daniel Herrera - Chilean miner.jpg You can ask questions about Commons policies and guidelines in Commons:Helpdesk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. You find all your uploads in your upload log.


Deutsch | English | español | português | +/−

And File:Juan Aguilar with President Piñera.jpg as well.LX (talk, contribs) 14:49, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:Images by Diego Grez‎[edit]

I hope you are aware that you can not revoke a pd-self and replace it with a cc-by or cc-by-sa license? You have to revert such edits or at least you have to add the pd-self back to the file descriptions. I saw that you made many of such edits. Therefore Im here to inform you and ask you to act, I will not discuss this. If you need a discussion please go to COM:VP/C. --Martin H. (talk) 10:52, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Wikinews images new look.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wikinews images new look.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.133.39 13:13, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Martin H. (talk) 18:00, 16 March 2013 (UTC)


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Küñall!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 14:19, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


File tagging File:Jean Philippe Cretton.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jean Philippe Cretton.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Vanja / Вања (talk) 10:26, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

File:I. Municipalidad de Pichilemu (1987).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:I. Municipalidad de Pichilemu (1987).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hchc2009 (talk) 18:42, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Cristina Barra.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cristina Barra.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Diannaa (talk) 23:38, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Evelyn Matthei[edit]