User talk:Diti/Archive/2009/February

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This page is an archive of past discussions on User talk:Diti during the month of February 2009. Please avoid edits on this page, no longer watched.
List of archives:
Diti/Archive/2008/December Diti/Archive/2008/November Diti/Archive/2009/April
Diti/Archive/2009/August Diti/Archive/2009/December Diti/Archive/2009/February
Diti/Archive/2009/January Diti/Archive/2009/July Diti/Archive/2009/June
Diti/Archive/2009/March Diti/Archive/2009/May Diti/Archive/2009/November
Diti/Archive/2009/October Diti/Archive/2009/September Diti/Archive/2010/April
Diti/Archive/2010/August Diti/Archive/2010/February Diti/Archive/2010/January
Diti/Archive/2010/March Diti/Archive/2010/May Diti/Archive/2011/July
Diti/Archive/2011/May


Note[edit]

Initial message: You reviewed a copyvio ;), posted by Diti (d · c).

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that you reviewed a Flickr picture, quickly after its upload, as being licensed under a {{cc-by-2.0}} license whereas commercial use was prohibited. I just noticed it because I wanted to support it on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Safety Belt.jpg. Don't worry though, I did worse than that (who said “IRC consensus”? :) Diti the penguin 18:20, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

When I reviewed it, it was a {{cc-by-2.0}}, I noticed Ford recently changed their flickr license for all of their images. I think there is a tag we are supposed to use to show this on the image since they cannot revoke the cc license. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:2008FordSportTrac.jpg. Just because they messed up in releasing it under a free license, doesn't mean we are required to delete it. MBisanz talk 18:42, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. What's the result of this deletion request (that I didn't see) then? Because, here is the problem: “you cannot stop someone, who has obtained your work under a Creative Commons license, from using the work according to that license”. Yet, this picture was obtained with a non-commercial clause (see the watermark), so, perhaps the image you reviewed was a former version of this file which included a CC-by watermark, but the version I deleted was obtained while it had a NC license. That's why I deleted it. Diti the penguin 18:55, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Note: the same statement applies to File:2008FordSportTrac.jpg. The way the image was obtained is determinant for the deletion request, and what I see as a first version is a non-commercial image. Can I close the DR and delete the file using that reason? Diti the penguin 19:03, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
All the images have always had the NC watermark, but Ford for some period of time had additionally released it under cc-by-2.0 via the Flickr release license. There was a conversation somewhere about this already, and I restarted a conversation at teh Village Pump in the hope that someone else will remember what was decided. MBisanz talk 19:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I created Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Ford Motor Company. Diti the penguin 21:19, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Stanford Aerial.jpg[edit]

Dear Dimitri, can you please check this image, i think something is wrong with image license, Image description says it is originaly from USGS website and flickr user just does the Aerial Tagging and zBoard, when i follow the provided link to original image source I got HTTP Error 404 , so i couldn't confirm the specified license.   ■ MMXXtalk  13:39, 5 February 2009 (UTC)

Les votes de Noritaka666[edit]

Son edit count : http://toolserver.org/~vvv/sulutil.php?rights=1&user=Noritaka666 --P@d@w@ne 11:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Euh… ok j'ai rien dit, ses votes sont valides. Mes excuses :) . Diti the penguin 11:59, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

bonsoir[edit]

Merci pour le déblocage bien reçu Coloniale (talk) 19:59, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Comment fait on pour archiver sur ma page de discussion merci Coloniale (talk) 20:12, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
J'utilise personnellement les outils que la communauté anglaise a à offrir sur ce point, c'est-à-dire un bot d'archivage, MiszaBot (talk · contribs). Si tu lis l'anglais, les instructions sont sur en:User:MiszaBot/Archive HowTo. Sinon… je veux bien t'aider à mettre ça en place :) . Diti the penguin 21:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Template de nomination QI[edit]

Salut, est-ce qu'il y a une raison précise pour laquelle tu as fait cette modif ? S'il n'y en a pas, je suggère qu'on la reverte, parce que les numéros de paramètres gênent QICbot (dans son implémentation actuelle) lorsqu'il génère d'autres templates (QICpromoted, notamment) avec un nombre de paramètres différents. Du coup, les nominateurs reçoivent des templates buggés sur leur page de discussion. --Eusebius (talk) 13:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

Salut, j'ai remarqué (mais je n'ai pas de diff exact pour donner des exemples, mon nombre de contributions est un peu chargé pour faire une recherche) que les votants signant avec une signature contenant le symbole « = » faisaient planter le modèle et empêchaient les autres personnes à voter. Que préconiserais-tu ? On enlève cette modification, ou on contacte Dschwen (talk · contribs) ? Diti the penguin 18:32, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour Diti[edit]

Pas de probléme pour votre aide concernant l'archivage, pour importer des insignes militaires comme celle-ci 4e régiment d'infanterie marine.jpg pouvez vous m'aider bien cordialement Coloniale (talk) 10:09, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

Suite peux tu voir si la licence puis les explications sur cette image sont elles bonnesPhoto du colonel Brébant en 1959.jpg. Bien cordialement Coloniale (talk) 10:51, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
Désolé pour l'attente, j'avais des problèmes sentimentaux à régler en premier lieu avant de m'intéresser à ton cas :) . En tant que « lecteur », j'ai mis un certain temps à le (re)comprendre : Fantassin 72 = Coloniale ? Je me souviens que c'est le cas, mais un individu classique croira que ces pseudos désignent deux personnes différentes (je te suggérerais d'utiliser cette manière de nommer l'auteur : « Fantassin 72 (Coloniale) ») ; as-tu déjà jeté un œil à la fusion des comptes ? Pour File:4e régiment d'infanterie marine.jpg, qui est le photographe ? Qu'elle est l'autre personne ? Merci d'avance pour tes précisions. Diti the penguin 22:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

lol[edit]

--Lilyu (talk) 10:07, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Bonjour Diti[edit]

Pour la photo 4e régiment d'infanterie marine.jpg qui est le photographe ? Qu'elle est l'autre personne ? l'insigne m'appartient j'ai servi plusieurs année dans le régiment j'ai scanné l'insigne, pour la personne Paris75000 elle m'avait aidée pour la mettre sur commons le 5 mai 2007, j'ai mis "Auteur :fabricant Drago, rue Olivier Métra, Paris. Scan=nom Paris75000 & fr:Utilisateur:fantassin 72 (Coloniale)" voilà . Pour ( as-tu déjà jeté un œil à la fusion des comptes ? )✓ Done. Sa marche toujours pour l'archivage de ma page de discussion. Merci Coloniale (talk) 05:22, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Pour la question :Idem .J'oubliais : ce n'est pas à nous de poster sur ta page Wikipédia FR pour des problèmes ayant trait à Commons. Je te conseilles d'aller dans tes préférences et activer la notification par e-mail si quelqu'un poste sur ta page de discussion, ça t'évitera les ennuis. Tu pourras m'aider car je ne sais pas comment faire. Coloniale (talk) 05:27, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
En me mêlent de se qui me regarde pas effectivement. Pour les œuvres dérivées, je ne crois pas insignes militaires de la France sont un problème, étant donné les autres fichiers dans cette catégorie (mais INAL), mais je suppose que la bonne foi pour Coloniale (talk • contribs) 's de la demande seul héritier. Je suis colectionneur d'insignes militaires voir si dessus :(pucelle) où Catégorie:Médaille en fair use pour le reste concernant mon aïeul je suis le dernier des héritiers; actuellement je me bats avec le maire du Mans pour lui attribuer une rue à son nom comme à Guimgamp, j'appartiens à l'amicale du 117e Régiment d'infanterie "voir article source bibliographie, les photos de l'amicale je suis en photo , où sur ma page d'utilisateur fantassin 72" j'ai créé le 48e régiment d'infanterie avec l'aide du lieutenant colonel Dubois ancien chef de corps du régiment et puis l'aide de l'association de recherches et d'études sur la vie des Bretons dans la Grande Guerre, président monsieur Prigent.j (association bretagne 1914-1918), puis bien d'autres. je fais celà pour le devoir de mémoire. Article qui m'avait été transmis si dessous.

Le Souvenir français

Salut Fantassin 72!
Juste un petit bonjour - nous nous sommes croisés sur quelques articles ... Vu ton parcours, tes antécédents, etc., je pense que tu devrais rejoindre les troupes du souvenir français. Le devoir de mémoire. Respect. Seawind Parloir Bibliothèque 4 février 2009 à 18:04 (CET)

Bonne annee a toi aussi, ici nous venons de feter la nouvelle annee du buffle!--Seawind Parloir Bibliothèque 5 février 2009 à 09:33 (CET)
  • J'essaye de me justifier de ma bonne fois, merci de votre confiance amicalementColoniale (talk) 05:31, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Pour info.Il ne faut oublier que les insignes qui sont sur le site Category:Military insignia of France devraient porter cette information fabricant "Drago, rue Olivier Métra, Paris". Depuis 1945, il est exigé qu'avant d'être frappé, tout projet d'insigne, assorti de l'explication de tous les éléments de sa composition, soit présenté au service de la symbolique pour homologation, en l'occurence au service historique de la défense (SHD), une division propre à chaque armée veille à l'application des règles héraldiques et à la concordance du symbolisme avec l'historique et la mission des unités, et attribue un numéro d'homologation à l'insigne.Service Historique de la Défense - Direction de la mémoire du patrimione et des archives, département de l'armée concernée (gendarmerie, terre, air, mer) avenue de Paris, 94306 Vincennes cedex.
Coloniale (talk) 12:33, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

User:Coloniale[edit]

Hi Diti,

I was indirectly informed of your unblocking of this user through a message on my English Wikipedia talk page. As I'm not really active here anymore, I don't intend to formally object to your actions. However, to make sure that you have all the information, I do feel obliged to point out this link. (Also see the RFCU, deleted contributions of the accounts involved and related deletion discussions.)

I'd also like to offer the following advice, which you may feel free to disregard (and please pardon me for imposing). For a case like this, it would seem reasonable to expect the user to demonstrate a very clear understanding that their previous actions were wrong, a clear understanding of why they were wrong, and a credible affirmation that the pattern will not continue.

However, I cannot seem to find such a statement. Indeed, the images uploaded by the user after the block was removed look rather familiar, and the user seems very unsure about basic copyright principles, instead resorting to guesswork.

Consequently, the source and licensing information for the newly uploaded files seems dubious. Does the user claim to be the legitimate copyright holder of the design of the military decorations as well as derivative photographs? Is the user the sole heir to their grandfather, who supposedly took File:Photo du colonel Brébant en 1959.jpg, and is an unsubstantiated claim to that effect for a user with this background?

My apologies again for imposing, and sorry about the lengthy comment. Best regards, LX (talk, contribs) 19:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for the time you took explaining the issue. The unblock followed a request by a French sysop, Padawane (talk · contribs). Right before his unblock, I changed the warning messages so they could be autotranslated and gave him a clear statement that any latter problematic upload would be his last before the definitive and ineluctable block. He replied “thanks for unblocking, I got it”. I, of course, have read the administrators' noticeboard before unblocking him. The issue now is that (what you call “guesswork”) the user is afraid of being blocked if his uploads are too problematic (copyright is hard to learn ;). For the derivative works, I don't believe military insignia of France are a problem, given the other files within this category (but INAL); however, I only assumed good faith for Coloniale (talk · contribs)'s claim of being the sole heir. I will ask someone more experienced, thank you for your message. Diti the penguin 23:50, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Teeworlds logo.png[edit]

Hi. Why do you think the logo is non-free? (I haven’t played the game and do not know if the logo is in the game) --AVRS (talk) 16:25, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

I discovered this game thanks to this file, it's like Worms but online and in real-time, and is a lot of fun. ;) The logo is non-free because, as you had the idea, the logo is not part of the game, thus it is not licensed with the provided free software license. I think it is logical, since creators want their rights to always remain on the names, and such (trademarks). Diti the penguin 17:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello Diti. I restore the image before reading this.
Anyway, nowhere we can read the logo is not a part of the game (for example Yo Francky's logo is explicitely out of the CC-BY-SA license of the game); I dont find any Teeworlds trademark; then while we dont have source, we don't need to delete thing too fast (i mean there are more chance to be free, than to by unfree).
And sure we can request the author about the real logo status. ~ bayo or talk 23:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)