User talk:Dnalor 01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dnalor 01!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 11:25, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stiftskirche Rein - Fassade, Bernhard von Clairvaux.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stiftskirche Rein - Fassade, Bernhard von Clairvaux.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pfarrkirche Ilz 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Ilz 3.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schulkreuz Akademisches Gymnasium Graz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schulkreuz Akademisches Gymnasium Graz.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grazer Synagoge - Innenraum.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grazer Synagoge - Innenraum.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

KZ Auschwitz-Birkenau, Bahngleise der Entladerampe, Blumen zum Gedenken.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KZ Auschwitz-Birkenau, Bahngleise der Entladerampe, Blumen zum Gedenken.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Veitsch - Pfarrkirche St. Vitus, Außenansicht 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Veitsch - Pfarrkirche St. Vitus, Außenansicht 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bitte![edit]

Danke Dnalor für deine vielen Dankes, eines hätte gereicht, auch keines. Ich markiere die Bilder mit dieser Kategorie weg, sonst verliere ich den Überblick. Es hat nicht viel mit dem Bild zu tun, Kategorien und id sollten passen. Bei dir ist das soweit ich das jetzt im Kopf habe, idR OK. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:37, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kodak Retina (Typ 117), 1934.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kodak Retina (Typ 117), 1934.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Maria Fischer, Gestapo-Bild, in Privatbesitz des Autors.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Maria Fischer, Gestapo-Bild, in Privatbesitz des Autors.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

77.184.50.248 07:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Symbol keep vote.svg Keep Acording to de:Lichtbild it becomes PD 50 years after publication or after creation.--Sanandros (talk) 15:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


Kept: INeverCry 17:31, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seiko Grand Quartz 9940-8010 (Twinquartz), 1979.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seiko Grand Quartz 9940-8010 (Twinquartz), 1979.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Swatch Swiss Autoquarz, 1998.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swatch Swiss Autoquarz, 1998.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bulova Ambassador Automatic.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bulova Ambassador Automatic.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Der Sündenfall (die Schlange reicht Eva die Frucht vom Baum der Erkenntnis).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Der Sündenfall (die Schlange reicht Eva die Frucht vom Baum der Erkenntnis).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puch 250 R, Baujahr 1935, 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puch 250 R, Baujahr 1935, 2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Seiko King Diashock 25 Jewels, 2. Modell 1967.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seiko King Diashock 25 Jewels, 2. Modell 1967.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Puch 250 R, Baujahr 1935, 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puch 250 R, Baujahr 1935, 1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tissot Handaufzug, 1958.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tissot Handaufzug, 1958.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kopf Erzherzog Karls. II am Kenotaph.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kopf Erzherzog Karls. II am Kenotaph.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Omega Genève Handaufzug, Cal. 613.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Omega Genève Handaufzug, Cal. 613.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Seiko LCD Solar Alarm Chronograph A156-5000, 1978.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seiko LCD Solar Alarm Chronograph A156-5000, 1978.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bau-Inschrift Taubenkobel, Graz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bau-Inschrift Taubenkobel, Graz.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

WLM 2014[edit]

Hallo Dnalor 01, du hast unlängst Bilder von denkmalgeschützten Objekten hochgeladen. Sie sind nicht für WLM 2014 nominiert. Ist das Absicht oder ein Versehen / Übersehen. Hier gibt es Genaueres. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 15:42, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Herzi Pinki, vielen herzlichen Dank für deinen Hinweis, ich habe es ehrlich gesagt völlig übersehen/nicht beachtet, so sehr war ich mit dem Hochladen, Korrigieren (z.B. Bischofsbilder Bischofskapelle Basilika Seckau, da fehlen noch mehr als 20, die ich alle fotografiert habe) etc. beschäftigt! Ich war letzte Woche in Seckau und habe eine große Anzahl an Aufnahmen gemacht, die ich erst sichten, ordnen etc. muss. Ich werde mir die Angelegenheit gerne in den nächsten Tagen anschauen! Danke nochmals, ich weiß nur nicht, welche Bilder ich nominieren könnte, denn es gibt ja mittlerweile nicht wenige von mir gemachte Aufnahmen hier! Hast Du Tipps? Mittlerweile wurden ja doch einige Bilder von mir QI, wie Du sicher gesehen hast. LG --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 17:52, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Du kannst alle Bilder, die du im September (nur im September) hochgeladen hast oder noch hochladen wirst, an WLM teilnehmen lassen. Wenn du über die Denkmallisten hochladest, dann geht das vollautomatisch. Sonst musst du den Baustein {{Wiki Loves Monuments 2014|at}} in die Bilder einbinden. Es geht um Klasse, aber auch um Masse, also keine falsche Bescheidenheit. Bei tausenden Fotos die da kommen, ohnehin eine Glückssache. Bereits hochgeladenes findest du hier. Das einige deiner Bilder inzwischen QI sind, habe ich mitbekommen, Glückwunsch und Dank für deine Nominierung meiner Bilder. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
Vielen Dank, Herzi Pinki, ganz kenne ich mich aber leider noch immer nicht aus... Ich habe es jetzt einmal bei einem QI, das ich im September hochgeladen habe, probiert, indem ich die entsprechenden Bausteine (von einem von Dir bei WLM hochgeladenen Bild übernommen) in die Datei-Infos eingegeben habe: Bild Bau-Inschrift Taubenkobel. Ich kann mich bzw. das Bild jetzt aber nicht hier finden. Hab ich da was falsch verstanden/gemacht, müsste ich das Bild einfach nochmals entsprechend der WLM-Anleitungsseite hochladen? Dies sollte, denke ich, zumindest bei allen neuen Bildern, die ich noch hochladen werde, der Fall sein, stimmts? Bitte vielmals um "dodelsichere" Anleitung/Antworten, ich lerne gerne dazu! ;-) LG --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 08:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Es gibt Tonnen Anleitungen, die wichtigste habe ich verlinkt. Ich gehe davon aus dass du sie gelesen hast. Du hast, btw. (fast) alles richtig gemacht. Der Update der hochgeladenen Bilder in dem verlinkten Tool erfolgt nicht sofort, es kann schon mal ein paar Minuten (Stunden) dauern. Aber ich sehe dein Bild bereits. Leider wurde es nicht erstmals im September 2014 hochgeladen und ist daher vermutlich nicht teilnahmeberechtigt (Die Bilder müssen jedoch im September 2014 hochgeladen werden). Da aber das erstmals so nicht in den Bedingungen steht, lass es mal wie es ist. Du hast ja zumindest eine Version davon im September hochgeladen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 08:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Okay vielen Dank, ich sehe es jetzt auch schon. Ich weiß, dass ich es schon früher erstmals hochgeladen habe, aber eine korrigierte Version eben erst jetzt im September. Und es war auch gleichzeitig ein Versuch, ob ich soweit alles richtig gemacht habe! Ich probiere es gleich mal mit weiteren, jetzt wirklich im September erstmals hochgeladenen Bildern! Danke, dass Du mir immer wieder "auf die Sprünge" hilfst! LG --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 08:31, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Omega Handaufzug, Cal. 267, 1957 58.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Omega Handaufzug, Cal. 267, 1957 58.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tissot Twotimer.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tissot Twotimer.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Maria-Krönungsaltar, Predella, Wochentagsseite.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Maria-Krönungsaltar, Predella, Wochentagsseite.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Grabinschrift der Seckauer Bischöfe Martin Brenner und Jakob I. Eberlein.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Bischofskapelle, Grabinschrift der Seckauer Bischöfe Martin Brenner und Jakob I. Eberlein.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Seckau-Fotos mit D7100[edit]

Sehr geehrter Herr Fischer! Habe Ihre Seckau-Fotos auf der QIC-Seite gesehen und möchte Ihnen dazu basierend auf meinen eigenen Erfahrungen mit der D7100 und Architekturfotografie folgendes Feedback geben:

  • Ich empfehle bei D7100 maximal ISO 800, um das Rauschen in Grenzen zu halten.
  • Die kurze Belichtungszeit der Außenaufnahmen von 1/1600 s für statische Aufnahmen mit einer 18mm Brennweite ist völlig übertrieben. Ein Wert 1/(10*Brennweite) Sekunden, in diesem Fall also 1/180 s wäre, speziell mit Stabilisator, absolut ausreichend, um Verwacklung zu vermeiden.
  • Meine Standard-Einstellung auf der D7100 ist Zeitautomatik (A) mit vorgegebener Blende (meist 8) und ISO-Auto (begrenzt auf ISO 800) - damit wählt die Kamera eine Belichtungszeit, die für die jeweilige Brennweite verwacklungssicher ist.
  • Bei File:Benediktinerabtei Seckau, Äußerer Klosterhof 1.jpg wurden im Review Perspektivprobleme angemerkt. Konkret sind das die stürzenden Linien bei den Arkaden links im Bild. Bei Architekturaufnahmen ist dieser Effekt meist nicht zu vermeiden, muss aber unbedingt nachträglich korrigiert werden, so dass vertikale Linien tatsächlich vertikal dargestellt sind, sonst hat das Bild keine Chance auf eine Einstufung als Qualitätsbild. Ich verwende dafür (und für andere Nachbearbeitung wie Rauschreduktion etc.) Adobe Lightroom, basierend auf den orignial NEF-Dateien. Es gibt aber auch Freeware-Software, die JPEG-Bilder entsprechend entzerren.

Ich muss mich daher leider der Meinung von Hrn. Savin anschließen, aber von der Bildkomposition gefallen mir die Fotos sehr gut. Mit freundlichem Gruß --Uoaei1 (talk) 13:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Sehr geehrter Uoaei1, ich danke vielmals für die ausführlichen Informationen und die geäußerte Kritik. Ich weiß über die Probleme Bescheid, dennoch habe ich die Bilder auf die QIC-Seite gestellt, weil ich mir dachte, einen Versuch wäre es wert, sie sind ja, wie Sie sagten, von der Bildkomposition her sicher okay. Ich hatte die Kamera vor der Verwendung in Seckau verliehen und nicht bzw. zu spät gemerkt, dass die ISO-Einstellungen entgegen meiner sonstigen Verwendung der Kamera verändert und nicht auf meine Einstellung zurückgestellt worden waren. Ich verwende sonst maximal ISO 400. Nochmals vielen Dank für Ihre Mühe, man lernt wirklich nie aus! ;-) LG --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 13:20, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bucht von Calvi, Blick von Notre-Dame de La Serra.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bucht von Calvi, Blick von Notre-Dame de La Serra.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 6.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 6.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Congratulations and many thanks that you have contributed to WLM with new quality pictures. Kind regards from --Regiomontanus (talk) 19:26, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much for your friendly congratulations! With best regards --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 07:48, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kopf Erzherzog Karls. II am Kenotaph, 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kopf Erzherzog Karls. II am Kenotaph, 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Gnadenkapelle, Gotisches Glasfenster 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kenotaph 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilika Seckau, Habsburger Mausoleum, Kenotaph 7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

VW Karmann-Ghia Cabrio Typ 14 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VW Karmann-Ghia Cabrio Typ 14 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

VW Karmann-Ghia Typ 34.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! VW Karmann-Ghia Typ 34.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Volkswagen 1300, 1974 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volkswagen 1300, 1974 7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Volkswagen 1300, 1974 8.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Volkswagen 1300, 1974 8.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Uhren[edit]

Hallo! ich habe deine Einstellungen wirklich nicht verstanden. Für solche Bilder braucht man kein 1/2000 Verschlusszeit, die Uhr wird ja nicht weglaufen. Damit bist du gezwungen ISO hochzuschrauben und die Blende auf 5.6 runterzusetzen. Wenn die Verschlusszeit bei 100 mmm bei 1/250 (vielleicht sogar 1/125) wäre, erwarte ich noch keinen Wackel und du hast damit die Chance die Blende auf f/11 und ISO auf 800 einzustellen für die gleiche Belichtung. Das Ergebnis würde dann viel besser aussehen. Wenn du auch noch ISO auf 100 runtersetzst (und damit die Belichtungszeit verlängerst, evtl. mit Hilfe von eine Stütze) dann wäre kein Rauschen da. Abgesehen davon ist der Rahmen viel zu eng (und bei einem Bild hast du sogar die Uhr leicht abgeschnitten) und es gab auch Chromatische Aberration (grüne Halos). Sag Bescheid, wenn ich dir irgendwie helfen kann. Viele Grüsse, Poco2 10:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Danke für Deine wichtigen Hinweise, aber ich habe bereits unter dem obigen Abschnitt [1] erklärt, warum mir dies leider auch bei den Uhren-Bildern "passiert" ist. Ich habe deshalb auch alle 4 Nominierungen zurückgezogen ... Danke jedenfalls vielmals für Dein Hilfe-Angebot, ich werde bei Bedarf darauf zurückkommen! Man lernt wirklich nie aus! LG --Dn@lor_01 (talk) 10:50, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche San Nicolao, San Nicolao, Haute Corse, Korsika.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Nicolao, San Nicolao, Haute Corse, Korsika.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanisches Kapitell 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanisches Kapitell 2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanisches Kapitell 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanisches Kapitell 1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanische Skulptur.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche San Michele de Murato, Korsika - Romanische Skulptur.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Corsica Ferries Mega Express Two.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corsica Ferries Mega Express Two.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feuerhimmel 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerhimmel 2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feuerhimmel 4.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerhimmel 4.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Feuerhimmel 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerhimmel 3.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.