User talk:Donaldytong

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Donaldytong!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Copyright[edit]

Hello Donaldytong,

Thanks for uploading images to Commons! Can I ask you to have a look at the changes I made to the categorisation, so that you can better sort future uploads of yours?

Also, I note that your image copyrights contradict each other! You release your images as public domain, then you release them as GFDL - on the same page! While GFDL can be multi-licensed, if you release them as public domain, that supersedes (and therefore totally obseletes) all other licenses. Please recheck all your images and delete the license you did NOT wish to apply. It would be great if you chose to release all as public domain (as I do for mine).

Also, could we please ask that you provide more info about what is shown in each picture (add a little descriptive text, give date of when and from where it was taken etc...). Please fill that information into a preset table as shown on this upload form (further explanations at top right of that page).

Okay, hope that wasn't too confusing. Any questions, just ask me on my user page. Cheers Ingolfson 12:12, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Elwood Beach and Melbourne Skyline.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:36, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Melbourne skyline.jpg[edit]

I have reuploaded your Image:Melbourne skyline.jpg image with some of the sky cropped out - hope you don't mind. The image happenes to be used in the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melbourne article as well now. Wongm 13:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Camera date/time[edit]

Hi, I have been looking at some of the good images that you uploaded, but on all of them the EXIF information shows you have not set the date/time in your camera (you may have to reset it every time you change the batteries unless you swap over to new batteries very quickly). :-) --Tony Wills 10:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Marking images for deletion[edit]

Hello. Please be sure to use the appropriate template when you nominate an image for speedy deletion. If they are your own images, please use {{badname}} or {{duplicate}} where appropriate, rather than the generic deletion template. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks. --Tom (talk - email) 00:40, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, but your use of {{badname}} and {{duplicate}} is not correct. Please use {{badname|Name of the good named image}} or {{duplicate|Name of the other image}}. Example: If you wish to delete the bad named "Image:Mickey house.jpg", edit the description page and wrote {{badname|Image:Mickey Mouse.jpg}} - not {{badname|Image:Mickey house.jpg}} !
BTW: Similar images will not be deleted here (Image:Breizoz - A French Creperie Resturant at Nelson Place Williamstown.jpg and Image:Williamstown - French Creperie Restaurant.jpg).
Feel free to leave me a note on my talk page if you need help. Have a good evening. --GeorgHHtalk   19:38, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Images[edit]

Hi. I'm not an Admin so I can't delete the images but they should be deleted in the next few days since you have maked the images. Also just a tip, It's best to talk on my Discussion then adding it to my user page. Kepp up the good work! :) Bidgee 15:20, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Changes to this page[edit]

Hi - yes I can explain it. An IP has been removing messages from your talk page (if you take a look at the history). I have reverted those removals - as such two edits will have occurred each time and (I guess) you will get two emails. I have no idea why an IP should remove messages from your talk page but it does happen from time to time & usually someone will revert it. Hope this helps & regards --Herby talk thyme 11:04, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

I'm assuming the message on my talk page is from you so firstly please try and ensure that you login to Commons when you edit - much harder to keep track of things otherwise.
If you have pictures that are duplicates please tag them as such with the {{dupe}} tag. It will then be dealt with by anyone who has the time.
In order to remove a picture from a category just edit the picture to remove the [[Category:Melbourne]] peice. I hope that is clear & helps - thanks --Herby talk thyme 11:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Duplicate images[edit]

Hi - if you have duplicate images then please tag them with the {{dupe}} tag. They will then be dealt with by an admin in due course. I hope this helps - thanks --Herby talk thyme 09:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry[edit]

Sorry to confuse you. I deleted the wrong file. This has now been undone. My deepest apologies. :/ Lewis Collard! (hai thar, wut u doin) 02:08, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Database issue[edit]

Likely to be Commons or Foundation level rather than you. May be worth clearing your browser cache etc but see if the error is still there. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 09:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

If the problem has not gone away I am surprised - usually those sort of issues are quickly resolved.
In Firefox got to "Tools" -> "Options" -> "Privacy". In the "Private data" section at the bottom click on "clear now".
For Opera got to "Tools" -> "Preferences" -> "Advanced". Then click on "history" and where it says "Disk cache" click on "Empty now". I'm afraid I will not use Internet Explorer but I imagine there will be a similar way. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
There are times I hate computers in quite a profound way! Using Firefox now on that image I get no errors at all. So was it Commons (I know I've had some errors on Foundation sites in the past few hours) or something in your settings? Maybe try again and see what you get (it will not hurt to clear your cache in case that is also an issue). Regards --Herby talk thyme 12:58, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

File:St Kilda Rd - Wesley College.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Nikbot (talk)) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Nikbot (talk) 13:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Donaldytong!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:50, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

File without a summary[edit]

Hi Donaldytong, File:Melbourne Immigration Museum.jpg is currently without a summary ({{information}}) and could be listed for deletion at anytime. I thought that I'll inform you of the issue rather then leaving as it was. I hope you have a safe and happy Christmas and New Year. Bidgee (talk) 11:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

File:(SIP) Moon Harbour (Architecture Buildings) 01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 11:55, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Melbourne Yarra River.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melbourne Yarra River.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Irish Nationalist Leader Daniel O'Connell Statue in St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Irish Nationalist Leader Daniel O'Connell Statue in St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St Patrick's Cathedral (Gothic Revival Style).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Patrick's Cathedral (Gothic Revival Style).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Melbourne Grammar School (Chapel).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melbourne Grammar School (Chapel).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

MGS - Memorial Hall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MGS - Memorial Hall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

South Wharf Foot Bridge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Wharf Foot Bridge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St Patrick's Cathedral-Gothic Revival Style (East Side).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Patrick's Cathedral-Gothic Revival Style (East Side).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Melbourne Old Post Office (Shopping Mall Interior).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melbourne Old Post Office (Shopping Mall Interior).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

South Melbourne Townhall.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Melbourne Townhall.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.


Please do not overwrite files[edit]

Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | +/−


Nuvola apps important yellow.svg I noticed that you uploaded a file using the name File:St Patricks Cathedral Entrance Interior.jpg. A file by this name already existed on Commons. Overwriting an existing file should not be done except when making minor, uncontroversial corrections, so the file has been restored to its original version. If the file you attempted to upload is within our project scope and is in the public domain or published under a free license, please upload it again under a different name. Thank you!

For more information, see Commons:Avoid overwriting images with new uploads.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:38, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Alan Gilbert Building, University of Melbourne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alan Gilbert Building, University of Melbourne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

South Melbourne Townhall.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
South Melbourne Town Hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Melbourne Old Post Office (Shopping Mall Interior).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The General Post Office Hall, Melbourne, Interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

John Knox Church in Brighton.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! John Knox Church in Brighton.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Melbourne Luna Park at Dusk.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Melbourne Luna Park at Dusk.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

South Wharf & Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Wharf & Melbourne Convention and Exhibition Centre.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sculpture at Atlantis, the Palm[edit]

I'm not sure if you or someone else put the lobby sculpture photo in this article (it was an unidentified IP), but I believe that it is a copyright violation. Sculptures are copyrighted, and UAE does not have Freedom of panorama. In other words, the photo, I'm sure, is yours, but you do not have the right to use it in Wikipedia. If you think I am mistaken, please include the appropriate reason template on the image page, and I will be happy to return the photo to the Wikipedia article. Donlammers (talk) 12:32, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

(UAE) The Dubai Fountain at Dusk 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! (UAE) The Dubai Fountain at Dusk 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Burj Khalifa.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Burj Khalifa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Liliana-60 (talk) 13:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Buildings in the UAE[edit]

Hi Donaldytong, just wanted to let you know that there is no freedom of panorama in the UAE, so photos of skyscrapers of Dubai, Abu Dhabi, etc. are not allowed on Commons, and your existing images will be nominated for deletion soon. However, you are welcome to upload those photos to the English Wikipedia, which does not care about any country's laws other than the US. In addition, I notice you've put GFDL with migrated CC-BY-SA-3.0 on your images, which doesn't make much sense because migration of the GFDL license happened back in 2009 and is no longer valid. It would be better to just dual-license and then put migration=redundant for the parameter. -- King of ♠ 20:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Stefan4 (talk) 22:44, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Celebrity Solstice in Port Melbourne, Australia Dec 2012 (01).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Celebrity Solstice in Port Melbourne, Australia Dec 2012 (01).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Celebrity Solstice in Port Melbourne, Australia Dec 2012 (02).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Celebrity Solstice in Port Melbourne, Australia Dec 2012 (02).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Celebrity Solstice in Port Melbourne, Australia Dec 2012 (01).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Celebrity Solstice (ship, 2008).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Port Melbourne Beacon Cove.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port Melbourne Beacon Cove.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

COM:OVERWRITE[edit]

Please do not overwrite images. Concerning:

--McZusatz (talk) 15:24, 3 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

St Patrick's Cathedral (Gothic Revival Style).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne (Southwest Facade).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
St Patrick's Cathedral - Gothic Revival Style.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St Patrick's Cathedral, Melbourne exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Daniel Mannix Statue.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Daniel Mannix Statue.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fernand Léger - Grand parade with red background (mosaic) 1958 made.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fernand Léger - Grand parade with red background (mosaic) 1958 made.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Fernand Léger - Grand parade with red background (mosaic) 1958 made.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The grand parade, mosaic by Fernand Léger..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 11:42, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 19:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 22:30, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Hi, I am Benison. Shall I nominate your en:File:Burj Khalifa.jpg for Featured picture in english Wikipedia?? Benison (talk) 06:53, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Benison. Please go ahead. Donaldytong (talk) 07:32, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi again, Now I have nominated the picture but have some copyright issues. Please refer them and also hit a Support on the pic as author.... Benison (talk) 06:35, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Benison for your works. I have done my part as you advised. Donaldytong (talk) 01:47, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Surfers Paradise Dec 2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Surfers Paradise Dec 2013.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Surfers Paradise Dec 2013.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings on the Gold Coast, Australia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

w:File:Burj Khalifa.jpg[edit]

Hello. Could you possibly take a moment and comment at w:Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2014_August_15#File:Burj_Khalifa.jpg? I'm concerned about the source of the image, and an assertion from you one way or another would help to clear this up. If you are in fact the author, could you verify the license stipulated on the image description page? Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 21:03, 15 August 2014 (UTC)