User talk:Durova
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Joan of Arc WWI lithograph2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Joan of Arc WWI lithograph2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 10:43, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Nomination
|
|
G'day! I love File:Puck cover2.jpg, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. It's nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Puck cover2.jpg. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
- Thank you very much. :) Durova (talk) 16:25, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
- Honestly, it's a pleasure, and indeed an honour, to be able to nominate such great works. Please, keep up your brilliant work. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 17:22, 25 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Helen KellerA.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Helen KellerA.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 00:03, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Delaware Bay Vinckeboons 14.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Delaware Bay Vinckeboons 14.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 22:30, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Re
I dont like conflicts either, but it really sad, that one of the top image contributors left the project. I just want that somebody clean up these images , 1; 2; 3 4 That's my aim. M.K. (talk) 10:02, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
- Put a few hours into the first of these. It's got a lot of damage. Would there be any chance of getting a higher resolution uncompressed file of the others? It'd take nearly the same amount of work to restore a 10MB TIFF file as a compressed and artifacted JPEG. If we had TIFFs then perhaps these could be considered for valued image or featured picture on some WMF projects. Durova (talk) 00:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit]
I noticed that you said you were in the navy on the POTD talk page. Out of curiosity, what did you do whilst you were serving? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:37, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- Photographer's Mate. ;) Durova (talk) 16:51, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
- I guessed as much. :P Are any of your naval photos here on Commons? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nah, spend more time here with historic stuff. :) Thank you for asking. Durova (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- I'm always interested to learn more about the inhabitants of Commons. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Nah, spend more time here with historic stuff. :) Thank you for asking. Durova (talk) 17:22, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
- I guessed as much. :P Are any of your naval photos here on Commons? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:25, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Black Panther convention2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Black Panther convention2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 23:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Prang's Valentine Cards2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prang's Valentine Cards2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 23:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Nomination
Hi, I have no problem with your comment and re-edit. I prefer not to intervene with user comments while the voting continues. FP status is good but not a life and death Question for me. So I watch and see what happens. I learn from user comments.
Btw.
- If you look at tineye search you can see that my version is not as problematic as you stated. It is one of the best available on web.
- The editings was stated by putting an image link to original.
- I prefer the border cement cropped since I believe it distracts attention from the main subject. It is not part of the "mosaic art" as Takabeg states. It just states that that part was destroyed through history.
- The colors of original is faded and skewed toward cold colors. A bit saturation and warmth may is needed for your version. The skin tone looks too gray and unhealthy for me.
- I agree with your comment on un-even light and appreciate your efforts to correct it. But for me it was a minor issue.
- I will support your version if you do a cropping.
Best Regards, --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 08:34, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Rename/deletion help
Could you please help at User_talk:Juliancolton#Rename_request? I've been through a deletion request, am now trying to get a file renamed, but I just don't know how these processes are "suppoed to work" on Commons. The problem is that there is a file whose name causes it to masquerade as a mainstream English pronunciation file, when in fact it is an Italian who recorded the pronunciation with odd stress and tone that aren't part of English in any country where it's spoken. Wiktionary has millions of words to contend with, so we use standards for naming that I can't see to get across to the person who closed the deletion attempt. --EncycloPetey (talk) 18:22, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Question
Well, actually two of them.
1) Is it worth asking for this to be restored? Or is it too far gone?
2) Are there any websites you'd recommend for someone looking to learn more about image editing/restoration, and perhaps develop some skill in that area?
Yours, Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 22:01, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- It would be possible to restore it, although I'd hesitate to interfere with scientific astronomy unless a really high quality scan were available and comparison files of other satellite images of the same portion of sky. There isn't a whole lot on the Internet about this (except at the level of retouching old family photographs), although you might want to subscribe to my blog. Many of the WMF editors who do this seriously communicate on Skype, which is a very good client for media collaboration. Email me for my Skype ID anytime. :) Durova (talk) 17:42, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Gaucho1868b.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gaucho1868b.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 08:01, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FYI
Few days ago I emailed to Lycaon using Commons email. It was a really short email. I told him that he is one of the most valued Commons contributors and asked him to put everything behind and come back. I also asked him to say "hi" to Estrilda, So far I got no response.--Mbz1 (talk) 17:23, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thank you for the followup, and it's gracious of you to extend the olive branch. Let's hope they're okay. Durova (talk) 17:32, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
- I desperately wish they talked to me. You know how hard I pressed Lycaon to explain to me how I harassed him. There were also some offline efforts to make us to have a conflict resolution, and I still do not know what have I done to him. He has refused to talk to me. Once he blocked me (you probably remember). It was the happiest day during my conflict with him because he talked to me then... I believe people should talk. If the only way to make him to talk to me, is me getting blocked, I do not mind even that (I need a break anyway
), and really I would have agreed for anything, if they came back, and talked to me, or... just came back.--Mbz1 (talk) 04:40, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
- I desperately wish they talked to me. You know how hard I pressed Lycaon to explain to me how I harassed him. There were also some offline efforts to make us to have a conflict resolution, and I still do not know what have I done to him. He has refused to talk to me. Once he blocked me (you probably remember). It was the happiest day during my conflict with him because he talked to me then... I believe people should talk. If the only way to make him to talk to me, is me getting blocked, I do not mind even that (I need a break anyway
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:PalenqueAc.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PalenqueAc.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 00:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Tropenmuseum Royal Tropical Institute Objectnumber 3444-7 Begrafenis bij plantageslaven2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tropenmuseum Royal Tropical Institute Objectnumber 3444-7 Begrafenis bij plantageslaven2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 08:11, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Ottoman heliograph
You are welcome :). We have a couple of user who follow all FPs and nominations in enwiki and commons, and they nominate a lot of images to be promoted. Significant part of them are your work, so it is us to thank you instead. For ottoman heliograph, see tr:Vikipedi:Seçkin resim adayları/Turkish heliograph at Huj2.jpg. Hope to see you at another nomination :) İyivikiler... ho? ni! 14:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] image
I don't see an image at File:Blake Wollstonecraft sketch1.tif, but I would like to :-) Is it just me or is there a problem with the upload? You might also be interested in what I've done with this image; I tried to lift the ink off the page for transcription, feel free to comment on how that could be improved. There are a pile of similar attempts in my recent contribs. Regards, cygnis insignis 21:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
-
- [ec] :I just found the featured version as I continued looking through the category, nice one btw, I suppose the above is related to that. cygnis insignis 22:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- TIFF format is not yet fully compatible with WMF software. We only recently gained the ability to upload that format at all. For now, consider it mainly there for recordkeeping purposes. If a restored file needs further work it's invaluable to have a version available in uncompressed format without histogram changes. The WMF Deutschland is working on a compatibility initiative to improve TIFF support.
- As things stand currently, TIFF files are still downloadable. That makes them useful for re-edits and printing.
- Your work looks very good. This particular material is unusual and it's worthwhile to have both edits available in good resolution. The Library of Congress scanned the version I worked on from William Blake's original sketches. You've worked from a scan of the published version. It's wonderful when access is good enough that this can happen. :) Durova (talk) 22:01, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, I should have uploaded the original as well. The jpg file was taken from the online flippy at the source, for a merely satisfactory result with my limited access, if I wanted to be really thorough I would have grabbed the JP2 zip. The work contains a number of images, some are 'after Blake', so I wasn't putting a lot of effort into seeing them be accessioned correctly. I often need to grab images from files and had go the idea from somewhere that converting to png was a good thing, should I bother with the larger file or just upload as jpg or jp2 versions? Maybe I should be grabbing the tiff files when I think the highest quality is worthwhile. cygnis insignis 22:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- The institutional and scholarly communities are divided about restoration. So one thing that really helps is to always upload an unrestored version and link between restored and unrestored, along with detailed notes about the types of edits that have been performed. For the past several months I've also been uploading "partial restorations", which leaves the histogram and color balance alone while doing everything else. Occasionally another editor has followed with a better edit on that work. It's a practice which helps the wiki approach adapt to media editing. Durova (talk) 22:37, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- The first two sentences should be the universal principle and guideline on this, if it is not already, drawing attention to where I have failed to meet my own standards was a bit silly of me.
My experimentation, for works elsewhere, has tried to separate the page from the ink. Black on white is mostly unproblematic, tweaking the greyscale to roughly match the intent of the publisher, monochrome requires a bit more intervention into colour. I am mostly leaving full colour 'as is' for inclusion in transcriptions, leaving the background colour (the page) of the scan for some 'context' feels right. I'm planning on converting the Tales next year, I will be taking those versions much more seriously than Garnett's reproduction. Thanks for the replies, cygnis insignis 23:44, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- You're right: I should write up a best practices draft for this kind of thing. Getting pulled in a lot of directions. If you have the time, please consider leaving a word for an editor who goes by the username Awadewit at en:wiki. She has written about two dozen featured articles there, including the article that most directly relates to this. She's a doctoral candidate nearing the end of her dissertation and she sometimes uses restored WMF media in the undergraduate courses she teaches. Best regards and do keep in touch. :) Durova (talk) 02:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the recommendation, I will get in touch later. This has been very helpful, thanks for the interest and advice. I will let you know how I go with my tweaking and twiddling. I often find some interesting candidates for restoration, I will let you know about those too :-) Cheers, cygnis insignis 03:18, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- You're right: I should write up a best practices draft for this kind of thing. Getting pulled in a lot of directions. If you have the time, please consider leaving a word for an editor who goes by the username Awadewit at en:wiki. She has written about two dozen featured articles there, including the article that most directly relates to this. She's a doctoral candidate nearing the end of her dissertation and she sometimes uses restored WMF media in the undergraduate courses she teaches. Best regards and do keep in touch. :) Durova (talk) 02:29, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- The first two sentences should be the universal principle and guideline on this, if it is not already, drawing attention to where I have failed to meet my own standards was a bit silly of me.
- The institutional and scholarly communities are divided about restoration. So one thing that really helps is to always upload an unrestored version and link between restored and unrestored, along with detailed notes about the types of edits that have been performed. For the past several months I've also been uploading "partial restorations", which leaves the histogram and color balance alone while doing everything else. Occasionally another editor has followed with a better edit on that work. It's a practice which helps the wiki approach adapt to media editing. Durova (talk) 22:37, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree, I should have uploaded the original as well. The jpg file was taken from the online flippy at the source, for a merely satisfactory result with my limited access, if I wanted to be really thorough I would have grabbed the JP2 zip. The work contains a number of images, some are 'after Blake', so I wasn't putting a lot of effort into seeing them be accessioned correctly. I often need to grab images from files and had go the idea from somewhere that converting to png was a good thing, should I bother with the larger file or just upload as jpg or jp2 versions? Maybe I should be grabbing the tiff files when I think the highest quality is worthwhile. cygnis insignis 22:29, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
hi, thanks for your comment on the picture Inname van Godesberg - Capture and destruction of Godesburg in 1583 (Frans Hogenberg).jpg I'm really not that good with images, and wondered if there was something that could be done for this one to make it acceptable. ? Auntieruth55 (talk) 02:13, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Blog post
Hi! Thank you for the delightful post. I felt proud of our wiki and I hope it will be a good model for developing other wiki's. Recently one important issue on Turkish wiki is to write the articles that are directly related to the SR candidate. Although it is not a criteria at nominations, nominators try to start f.i. "heliograph" article before nominating the heliograph picture. That helps increase # of articles and this may be a good example for others. Your efforts for the growth of small wikis is also admirable. Thank you for that too. Please let me know if I can help somehow. İyivikiler... ho? ni! 09:28, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Tropenmuseum Royal Tropical Institute Objectnumber 3348-19 Huizen aan het water in Coronie, vermo2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tropenmuseum Royal Tropical Institute Objectnumber 3348-19 Huizen aan het water in Coronie, vermo2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 16:03, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Nomination
|
|
G'day! I love File:AlfredPalmerM3tank1942b.jpg, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. It's nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:AlfredPalmerM3tank1942b.jpg. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC) |
I've just started on that restoration, work's been getting in the way. :( Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:46, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Woodbridge isothermal chart3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Woodbridge isothermal chart3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 16:02, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Yiddish WWI poster2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Yiddish WWI poster2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 00:01, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Canvassing :-P
Hey, you and I keep bumping into each other and as I respect your opinion would you mind commenting here? Thanks! Tiptoety talk 06:38, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Can I have rollback please?
Hello Durova! I hope life is treating you well. Would it be possible to give me rollback on Commons? Best, Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:01, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
-
- Thanks very much. Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Lincoln conspirators execution2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lincoln conspirators execution2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
/FPCBot (talk) 16:02, 8 December 2009 (UTC)
[edit] FP Promotion
|
The image File:Amsterdam Centraal Station2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amsterdam Centraal Station2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |