User talk:EMAD KAYYAM

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Dear Editor kindly I hope you restore my files and images Thank you mush Emad


N:B

N:B


Dear Wikimedia editor

Kindly I understand and try not to exceed any term or regulation of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia and I read carefully the letter of James Walles about the future of Wikipedia and how its will become a temple in the human mind. Actually I hope you understand that Wikimedia commons and my talk page is a store for image and information and all what I am trying is to give the information in a proper way that is app[licable with wikimedia terms and conditions and I hope you let me edit my page in my talk page Thank you mush

Emad


N:B

N:B



Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, EMAD KAYYAM!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 18:05, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, EMAD KAYYAM!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Your comment on Commons_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Redirects[edit]

Hi I saw your comment on Commons_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#Redirects and was wondering whether you need some help? :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 10:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

I will try (I am not an expert though) and provide a little guidance, a lot of this you probably know. It is worth following the links that I provide to ensure that you understand the details, and hence why some of your files will probably get deleted.
  • As you have probably noticed wikipedia are not interested in original research but only in material that is published elsewhere, for instance in news or technical literature. They probably won't accept any articles based directly on your own research unless it is given some support by other researchers. It is also best if the articles are written by someone else so that it is seen as neutral. You could of course correct any factual errors.
  • This corner of the wikimedia websites[1], wikimedia Commons, only deals with the photographs/videos/sound-recording etc. Our emphasis is a bit different from wikipedia itself. Photographs etc, by their very nature, are often the work of one person. In some ways each photograph or diagram is original research. It is up to the other wikimedia websites to decide whether the material is correct and useful before they use it, we just store the files for them.
  • Generally Commons will accept material if it is for an educational purpose (not for advertising, and not just original artwork (unless you are a notable artist) AND it has a valid free license. Your images (that I have looked at) do appear to have appropriate free licenses eg cc-by-sa. But they may not all be valid because you have combined together other peoples work. That is, you have not drawn all the diagrams, nor taken all the photographs yourself, so you have to be very careful that each component of your images also has a free license. It is very important that you understand about derivative works.
That's probably enough for now. Let me know whether you understand all of that and feel free to ask questions or ask for clarification :-). --Tony Wills (talk) 10:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

--EMAD KAYYAM (talk) 11:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC) Hello Tony…Kindly first I would like to thank you indeed for your generous help, secondly I hope I post this comment in the correct way ( I click on the talk next to your user name "Tony" then I press the add button next to the edit button! Hope I am correct, third in this stage just I hope to re-correct my photos and their license as they all have contain original ideas and original observations and very unique view in scientific fields, and a number of them I draw by my self and the others I re-design, compare and add modifications to present my point of view but very important to notice that the original figures I use are in the public domain and has a free license and secondly I did notify in the description area below each photo or figure "from where I bring the original figure and I attribute the original figure to the copy right holder".

I hope if some body makes some review to my figures and send me some hints "photo by photo" to re-correct it to the best practice in Wikipedia.

Finally I would like to mention that I am not going to write any thing about my self or publish any thing about my research but in the same time hope if some body studies my case as I publish all my work before in a scientific peer review journals and have many scientific letters which favorably impressed by my work from many notable scientists hoping if he write a stub article in a neutral way which can educate the people and teach them this kind of methodology that presented in the figures and the information which could be gained from them.

Thanks a lot, EMAD KAYYAM

(I post also my response in this part of my talk page directly below your letter, "is this correct)


--EMAD KAYYAM (talk) 11:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Yes that looks fine :-)
Looking at your uploads, starting from the beginning

---

By this point you may be detecting a repeated theme here :-). Just because the original diagrams are old, or used in a lot of places, it does not make them public domain. You need to demonstrate that they are old enough to be public domain. Even if you have published your comparative diagrams and the publisher has not complained about the copyright (perhaps it was justified on 'fair use' grounds), that doesn't mean that we can accept them.
Perhaps a bit of background: The idea of "creative commons" is to have a body of works that anybody can use, sort of "common property". They can use them exactly in the ways you are using those original diagrams - that is: publish them, combine them, edit them, anything they like. But they need to be able to do this without any possibility of having a lawyer tap them on the shoulder ten years later and demand compensation. So Wikimedia Commons is very strict about providing evidence that claims of public domain truly are public domain.

---


In conclusion: If you are claiming the original diagrams, that your diagrams are based on, are in the public domain, then you need to show where they came from. Who drew them and/or where they were first published. If they were from very, very old text books, where the author is long dead (dead at least 70 years), you may be fine. But you need to say where each part came from so that it can be verified. One other point that will probably come up is whether any of these images really are within our project scope. Are any wikimedia projects ever liable to use them? I wish you luck, but be prepared to have all these images challenged shortly. Probably best to stop uploading any more until these questions are sorted out. :-) --Tony Wills 23:16, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Travel through Time by Riding the Sound. By Dr. emad kayyam.pdf[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Status[edit]

I've had a look at a few of your images, and I see most are very comprehensive :-). I have reformatted the data a little as described above, and added source links for original diagrams where I could find them. Following is a list of your images, with notes about what needs fixing.

File:Lacrimal Duct & Red Sea- A Visual Metaphor, By Emad Kayyam.jpg
File:Atmospheric Model of the Eyeball Earth 3 Dr. EMAD KAYYAM.JPG, top image - which year was it publish in Cunningham's Manual?
Time travel pdf
Atmospheric model-3, what is the source of the upper image?
Fuel Bundle, X mark.svg left image is copyright McGraw-Hill, need OTRS email. Right image need www.aecl.ca permission OTRS
Muscle Plane, what is the source of both images?
Kayyam Mt Tamalpais-2 OK
Kayyam Mt Tamalpais OK
Atmospheric Model-2 X mark.svg Appears to be based on img.medscape.com, if so need their permission OTRS
Emad Kayyam-2 photographer?
Kayyam & colleague photographer?
Earth Analogy
Atmospheric Model X mark.svg Need to get permission from www.sitesatlas.com to use left image (map) OTRS
Navigation System-2 X mark.svg Need to get permission from www.helpsavetheclimate.com to use lower image OTRS
Navigation System X mark.svg Need permission from Nick Anthony Fiorenza to publish your modified version of his image (upper image) OTRS
Cochlea & Galaxy ✓ Done
Inverted Planetarium X mark.svg Need confirmation of Eyeball image from source OTRS
Time travel ✓ Done
Eye Movement, what is the source of both scanned images?
Earth Ball & Motions, for the right image, need to show that the source is public domain, when and where was "Clinical Orbitology" published?
Earth Ball, X mark.svg For the right-hand image, that version of Gray's Anatomy (1995) is still in copyright
Stonehenge, X mark.svg what is the source of the two scanned images?
Emad Kayyam, Did you photograph yourself?
  • Even those labeled ✓ Done still need a little more minor cleaning up, eg categories.

--EMAD KAYYAM 13:02, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you mush, you really did a wonderful and comprehensive review for my figures, I appreciate mush your hints and comments and I will start re-correcting them soon. Also I would like to mention some important notes 1- I will stop uploading any photos or figures until I reach the optimum criteria that Wikimedia Common looking for in the uploading images and photos and until you state for me that I have passed all the required qualifications to my previous already uploaded figures and photos.

2- Some figure I draw them by my self I swear (i.e. the ground track of the sun, the geometry of the two eye balls…etc)

3- Some original figures (which I used in my work) are in the public domain and I see other wikipedians use them before me in there articles ((i.e. File:Similarity Relation between Human Eye Ball & the Planet Earth Ball in Shape & Tilt. Designed and Prepared By Dr. Emad Kayyam.png)) the Earth here is used before in a wikipedea article (Earth tilt) and the eye ball is from Grays Anatomy " a figure of more than 90 years (1913) "

4- many original figures I used in my images are in the public domain also I see them in a wikipeda articles for example the Earth ball in ((File:The Eye Ball & the Earth ball- A Model for Inverted Planetarium. Released by Dr Emad Kayyam.jpg))

Finaly the ""Common: Drivative work"" gueid lines state that: Many creative works are a derivative work of something.

It also says that ""As opposed to an exact copy or minor variation of a work (e.g. the same book with a different title), which does not create a new copyright, a derivative work creates a new copyright on all original aspects of the new version.""

Thank you mush and hope you give me some time to re-correct my images, since I need to study more copy-right –tags, templets,…I need to understand better what is a drevative work and also to review the images one –by –one and the most important question is how could I convince you as an editor that there is some origanilty and creativity in the resulting idea, consept and theme of any of my figures.

Thank you mush EMAD KAYYAM N: B Kindly I hope you give 5-6 days since I need to study many subjects regarding uploading figures in Wikipedia

N: B Kindly I copy and paste this letter in your User talk also, thanks mush

--EMAD KAYYAM 13:02, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your point by point reply :-)
I should point out that I will not be the one making decisions about whether to keep any of the images. Anyone can nominate them for deletion, any administrator can delete them immediately if they are obvious copyright violations. Other processes usually allow at least 7 days. If anything is deleted anyone can ask for an undeletion request where the decision can be discussed.
I will provide my thoughts on each of your points:
1) A good strategy, it will save a lot of extra work :-)
2) Great! :-)
3) That is really good, if they are used in other articles, we can link to those images (NB: some may of course have been recently deleted if there were problems with them)
4) Yes, if we can show they are really PD there is no problem. Just show me where they are from.
Derivative works: Here is my understanding - if I take a photograph of someone elses copyrighted work, I own the rights to the photograph, no one else can use my photograph without my permission but I can not publish my photograph, without asking the original copyright holder first. Similarly if I am combining other works together, I may own the copyright to the creative element (the particular composition), and people can not copy that. But I still need permission of anyone who still owns copyright of the original works, before I can publish it. Also it may be decided that my creative input does not reach the threshold of originality (ie too simple) to really give me any new rights.
So the phrase you mentioned "derivative work creates a new copyright on all original aspects of the new version", means only that you own the copyright on the parts of the new work which are completely original. But that also means that you do not own the copyright on the parts of your work that are not original. So you do not have full control of the new work unless you are given permission to use any previous copyrighted elements of it. --Tony Wills (talk) 23:08, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

--EMAD KAYYAM (talk) 10:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again for your comments and highlighting; I will start making the re-correction process for the images. Kindly would you please tell me if there is any template or tag to protect my images from being deleted in this stage? Or can you as a senior editor or as an administrator in Wikipedia having a higher authority to protect them at least for some days until I finish the copy right process and reformatting the description section. Your kind assistance is highly appreciated.

Thanks a lot,

EMAD KAYYAM

--EMAD KAYYAM (talk) 10:36, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no way of protecting them, and even when all the source details are correct there may be other questions. The best protection for them is simply adding more source information. Even if there is no source available on the internet, just cite the book that they came out of. I expect everyone can see that you are working in good faith so if you are making rapid progress then probably no one will bother you just yet. And as I said, if they are deleted they can be rapidly restored once information is provided. But I fear that for some of them you will not be able to get permission, and you will have to find alternatives for your comparisons. Good luck :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 11:48, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Sorry that I have taken so long to have another look at these. Your additions have been useful, but as I expected it is difficult to get permission to use a lot of those images. I have put X mark.svg next to images that I expect you will not be able to get permission from. --Tony Wills (talk) 12:45, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Atlantis_imagined_being_in_the_Atlantic_Ocean_and_fitting_with_Dr._Emad_Kayyam_observations_and_view_of_similarities_with_the_nasal_cavities_and_sinuses_in_the_human_face.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Atlantis_imagined_being_in_the_Atlantic_Ocean_and_fitting_with_Dr._Emad_Kayyam_observations_and_view_of_similarities_with_the_nasal_cavities_and_sinuses_in_the_human_face.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Cholo Aleman (talk) 21:56, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Stonehenge_Code_by_Dr._Emad_Kayyam.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stonehenge_Code_by_Dr._Emad_Kayyam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

99of9 (talk) 01:09, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Jordanian Doctor Discovers the Mystery Behind Stonehenge Circle.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:30, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Emad Kayyam Dream Work 2.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:30, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Article- Emad Kayyam Atmospheric Model of the Eye ball Earth.Pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:31, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:The Eye ball and the Earth ball - Model for Inverted Planetarium. By Dr. Emad Kayyam.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:36, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Accessory - Brief in Arabic about Emad Kayyam Multidisciplinary Research.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, User:EMAD KAYYAM, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:38, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

The article about you whether on your user page or this talk page is not within the scope of this project. It would be within the scope of Wikipedia if it meets the guidelines there. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 15:50, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
Please not that Commons is a "store for images" NOT for text so any biographies or .pdf files that are simply text will be deleted as they are outside our scope. Thanks --Herby talk thyme 16:02, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:عماد قيّام.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:52, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Emad Kayyam-Jordanski-Lekarz-o-Stonehenge42-News.pdf[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Emad Kayyam-Jordanski-Lekarz-o-Stonehenge42-News.pdf has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Herby talk thyme 16:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Travel through Time by Riding the Sound. By Dr. emad kayyam.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:13, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Archive of Scientists Opinions in Dr. Emad kayyam Work.pdf.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:14, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:A Brief in Arabic for Similarity Relation between the Anatomical Human Eye Ball and the Planet Earth Ball and its Role in Stonehenge Circa Interpretation. By Dr. Emad Kayyam.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Unity of Stars - SciFi Story - By Dr. Emad Kayyam.Pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:15, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Recommendation letter - Dr. Emad Kayyam.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Human Eye Solar Earth Analogy as a Stonehenge Code. By Dr. Emad Kayyam.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Article - The Universe and the human body. By Emad Kayyam.pdf, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

Herby talk thyme 15:17, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Herby talk thyme 15:23, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Logo of Kayyam2010 You Tube channel By Doctor Emad Kayyam.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Kayyam2010 You Tube channel By Doctor Emad Kayyam.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Logo of Kayyam2010 You Tube channel By Doctor Emad Kayyam.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Motopark (talk) 01:21, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission[edit]

Only text only logos are allowed in Commons without OTRS-permission Motopark (talk) 01:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Emad Kayyam View of Similarity Relation between Energy Productions in Mitochondrial Cell & Fission Chain Reaction.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Emad Kayyam View of Similarity Relation between Energy Productions in Mitochondrial Cell & Fission Chain Reaction.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Motopark (talk) 01:23, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Emad Kayyam View of Human Hepatic Lobule Design Nuclear Reactor Core Simulation – Plate 3.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Emad Kayyam View of Human Hepatic Lobule Design Nuclear Reactor Core Simulation – Plate 3.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Motopark (talk) 01:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Emad Kayyam View of Human Hepatic Lobule Design Nuclear Reactor Core Simulation Pate 2.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Emad Kayyam View of Human Hepatic Lobule Design Nuclear Reactor Core Simulation Pate 2.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Motopark (talk) 01:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Emad Kayyam View of Human Hepatic Lobule Design Nuclear Reactor Core Simulation Plate 1.JPG[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Emad Kayyam View of Human Hepatic Lobule Design Nuclear Reactor Core Simulation Plate 1.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Motopark (talk) 01:25, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Emad Kayyam Certificate from the Academy of Scientific Research & Technology - Egypt.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Emad Kayyam Certificate from the Academy of Scientific Research & Technology - Egypt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Motopark (talk) 03:04, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Sri Lankan Elephant Family Art Work – By Emad Kayyam.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sri Lankan Elephant Family Art Work – By Emad Kayyam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Yeti 15:33, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Human Eye Solar Earth Analogy as a Stonehenge Code. By Dr Emad Kayyam.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Human Eye Solar Earth Analogy as a Stonehenge Code. By Dr Emad Kayyam.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 07:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Similarity Relation between Human Eye Ball & the Planet Earth Ball in Shape & Tilt. Designed and Prepared By Dr. Emad Kayyam.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Similarity Relation between Human Eye Ball & the Planet Earth Ball in Shape & Tilt. Designed and Prepared By Dr. Emad Kayyam.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 07:51, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Emad Kayyam Atmospheric Model of Eyeball Earth.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Emad Kayyam Atmospheric Model of Eyeball Earth.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 07:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Fuel Bundle in CANDU Nuclear Reactor & a Cross Section in the Liver Lobule - By Dr Emad Kayyam.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fuel Bundle in CANDU Nuclear Reactor & a Cross Section in the Liver Lobule - By Dr Emad Kayyam.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 07:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Atmospheric Model of the Eyeball Earth BY Dr Emad Kayyam.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Atmospheric Model of the Eyeball Earth BY Dr Emad Kayyam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 07:55, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

File:.The Eye ball Navigation System-type2. Released by Dr. EMAD KAYYAM; Created after re-prepared and modified from the original figured images described below.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:.The Eye ball Navigation System-type2. Released by Dr. EMAD KAYYAM; Created after re-prepared and modified from the original figured images described below.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 07:56, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

File:The Eye Ball Navigation System. Released by Dr Emad Kayyam.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:The Eye Ball Navigation System. Released by Dr Emad Kayyam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 07:57, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | Türkçe | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Commons-emblem-hand.svg Hello EMAD KAYYAM.

It has come to my/someone else's attention that you have uploaded several files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. Continuing to upload copyright violations will result in your account being blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yann (talk) 07:59, 26 January 2014 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Yeti 20:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello Sir...

I carefully read your letter along with other letter from other Wikimedia Instructor and administrator I received before telling me that you delete my work because it has a copy right violation.

Kindly if you please check the last ten items (for example) I upload to Wikimedia Commons you will find that they are an artwork painting I entirely draw by my self and I upload by my self so they are obviously an (entirely my own work as I read in the upload page software).

I read the Wikimedia instructions and I am a person who is work hard to contribute to the wikimedia and you will not find a person like me in my country nation that has this intention to contribute and help, only have to live up to all human society all around the world and has a strong motive to work hard to develop humanitarian issue and contribute to the renaissance of science and art as mush as I can.

I work hard and all what is I am uploading are my paintings art work and my pure thoughts and new views of ideas and novel insights of my own thoughts production.

Kindly please don’t delete my work. I respect you and I hope you see how mush time I spend to work on this, I have sacrificed my time at the expense of my work and my livelihood and daily living pension in order to work this ideas, Novel insights, new views idea, my own Art work paintings, and I hope that it will benefit people in all Countries.

However I respect your view and promise Free man promise and pledge not to Upload ,and publish more Work , until you and other administrator in wikimeda & Distinguished colleagues in wikimedia commons give me a permission for that.

Thank you very much & great gratitude


Emad Kayyam

--EMAD KAYYAM (talk) 13:04, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

For discussion about these images, please visit:

The Yeti 07:49, 29 January 2014 (UTC)