User talk:Edgar181

Old conversations can be found in archives: 2008 : 2009 : 2010 : 2011 : 2012

nomegestrol acetate

Your diagram for nomogestrol acetate is identical to the structure of megestrol acetate, yet different MW and CAS. In looking at the structure, i noticed a mistake. You show a methyl group attached to Carbon-10, whereas it should be a hydrogen.

Thanks for catching the problem and letting me know. I have now corrected File:nomegestrol acetate.svg, replacing the methyl group with a hydrogen. Ed (Edgar181) 20:18, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

When I make an error, leave me a message (Important, please read)

I don't know enough about some topics, as I am just beginning to edit and don't have that much experience. If I made a mistake, please leave a message on my talk page rather than block me. I am getting very annoyed by this! 76.226.67.70

Instead of continually evading your block as Dy11111 and continuing to make the same kinds of edits that led to your block, you need to request an unblock at w:en:user talk:Dy11111, addressing the reasons for your block. Ed (Edgar181) 14:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Hopane

Please notice the mistake in your structure of Hopane: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hopane.svg#filelinks The isopropyl functional group is on C-21 and not on C-20!

See refs: http://www.chem.qmul.ac.uk/iupac/sectionF/terpenoid/terp25a.html http://webbook.nist.gov/cgi/cbook.cgi?ID=R553565

Yes, you're right. Thanks for catching the problem and letting me know. I have now corrected it. Ed (Edgar181) 14:22, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Unfortunately the image is distorted now. ;-) Best, Jan 17:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

The image displays correctly for me. If the image is distorted on your computer, I think that can be solved by refreshing your browser or clearing your browser's cache. Ed (Edgar181)

Also one of the methyl sterochemistries is not in agreement with that IUPAC Section F ref (I added an annotation tag on it). DMacks (talk) 18:27, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Yup, another error. The sterechemistry of the listing at Chemical Abstracts matches the one in your link, so I have flipped the stereochemistry at that position. Thanks, both of you, for your careful attention. Ed (Edgar181) 19:10, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Looks great now thanks! Hope you're feeling better! DMacks (talk) 22:36, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Could you set an expiry date for my indefinite block

I don't know "User:Dy11111". Can you prove my actions wrong? If you think I know Dy11111, have CheckUser confirm this "sock of Dy11111" thing. El Ectric 201 (talk) 11:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

I might be willing to unblock you if you stopped the repeated childish behavior. But at the very least you need to request an unblock at w:en:user talk:Dy11111, addressing the reasons for your block. Ed (Edgar181) 15:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

I said I DON'T KNOW user:Dy11111!! But they might request an unblock. (talk) 11:03, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

For the record: w:en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dy11111. Ed (Edgar181) 17:11, 12 April 2013 (UTC)