User talk:Edge Interactive Publishing Inc.

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Edge Interactive Publishing Inc.!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:12, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Jade Blue Eclipse 1997 JDA118 13 IMG0024.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:51, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

      • Response submitted 3/17/14 File:Janella Coquette maillot YSA825 25 P7185189.JPG [CLEARED 3/18/14]
      • Response submitted 3/17/14 File:Bella Vendetta BAA350 28 PB211431.JPG [CLEARED 3/18/14]
      • Response submitted 3/17/14 File:Bella Vendetta BAA315 45 PB211134.JPG [CLEARED 3/18/14]
      • Response submitted 3/17/14 File:Bella Vendetta BAA310 42 PB211014.JPG [CLEARED 3/19/14]
      • Response submitted 3/18/14 File:Bella Vendetta BAA310 85 PB211061.JPG [RE-SUBMITTED 4/15/14, CLEARED 4/16/14]
      • Response submitted 3/18/14 File:Stoya 2006 BTA67B 03 IMG 0677 1.JPG [RE-SUBMITTED 4/16/14]
      • Response submitted 3/19/14 File:Bella Vendetta BAA315 18 PB211102.JPG [RE-SUBMITTED 4/18/14]
      • Response submitted 3/19/14 File:Stoya 2006 BTA67A 71 DSCF1080.JPG
      • Response submitted 3/19/14 File:Stoya 2006 BTA67A 26 DSCF1029.JPG [CLEARED 3/19/14]
      • Response submitted 3/19/14 File:Jade Blue Eclipse 2000 JDA01280.JPG
      • Response submitted 3/20/14 File:Jade Blue Eclipse 2000 JDA02029.JPG
      • Response submitted 3/20/14 File:Jade Blue Eclipse 2000 JDA02228.JPG
      • Response submitted 3/21/14 File:Jade Blue Eclipse 1997 JDA110-JDA118 (5 pictures)
File:Janella Coquette maillot YSA825 25 P7185189.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 13:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your postings[edit]

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  suomi  français  italiano  日本語  português  русский  українська  +/−
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
Click the "Signature and timestamp"-button to sign your talkpage contributions
As a courtesy to other editors, it is Commons:Signatures policy to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, deletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then automatically be added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.

--SignBot (talk) 16:49, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Unnamed UserName me 18:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]


'm sorry, but attacking all of our uploads, which take hours to prepare, upload, and keyword, just because the complainer doesn't lke or understand nudity or personalities, is the most base of attacks. All of these images have already been vetted for copyright, which we possess, and have educational and artistic merit. The fact that seven years after their posting (in some cases), that an individual seeks to supress sexual information is disturbing, and the fact I am called upon to rebut this nonsense is even more disturbing. Wikimedia is not the only place these anti-sexers are mounting attacks. Among other things, they are making endless claims re DMCA that they have some kind of standing in material they do not, and are violating the spirit of the law. The fact this nudity-attacker wants to censor the rest of the world to their own sexual view of the world has no place in wikimedia.

With regard to these imagr tactically: Bella Vendetta is famous for her tattoos, and the examples shown are top rate. Jade Blue is a famous performance artist who also does sex work. Phoenix Marie pictures from Exxxotica 2010 already exist in Wikimedia and these complement those. Stoya is a famous adult actress. The Janella Cage and Laurie Pascal bikini images are examples of contemporary swimsuits.

Given the hundreds of images in wikimedia that depict nudity of men and women, photographs and paintings, it would be a sad day indeed if wikimedia becomes so woke and politically correct that it seeks to cancel information about people's sexual interests, behaviors, and proclivities. We have enough of this in the culture already.

If this user doesn't want to see nudity then they shouldn't go hunting for it, and they have no business trying to repress images and information about sex, sexual practices, sexual personalities, and nudity of the human body.

I find this request to be extremely offensive, especially because of its broad scope and targeting. How many other libraries is this person targeting? I am a frequent a user of wikimedia's contributions especially in the areas of nudity including painting, actresses and porn stars and value those contributions! I am contributor in at least three different categories, a financial donor, and independent artist and photographer. This individual may not be interested in nudity or ideas about sex and arousal but many people are and they need good honest information. More importantly, these are images that have been placed into the public domain so that they can be reused and shared by anybody. I gather this person is against sharing this kind of knowledge.

I look at this person's name and wonder if it is real or some kind of dark humor. Pronounce it out loud and you will see what I mean. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Edge Interactive Publishing Inc. (talk • contribs) 20:06, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stoya 2006 BTA67A 71 DSCF1080.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Grandmaster Huon (talk) 18:44, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]