User talk:Elisardojm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Image Tagging Image:Ramón María Aller Ulloa.jpeg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ramón María Aller Ulloa.jpeg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 09:12, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Benvida[edit]

Galego: Benvido/a a Commons, Elisardojm!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png Titorial Primeiros pasos

No titorial primeiros pasos e nas preguntas frecuentes pode atopar moita información de axuda logo de rexistrase. Explícase como configurar a interface (por exemplo, elixir a lingua), como cargar ficheiros e os puntos básicos da política de licenzas. Non necesita coñecementos técnicos para contribuír aquí. Anímese a contribuír aquí e presupoña boa fe con respecto ás intencións dos outros colaboradores. Isto é un wiki - é realmente fácil contribuír.

Icon apps query.svg Onde atopar axuda

Hai máis información dispoñible no Portal da comunidade. Pode pórse en contacto co resto dos usuarios galegofalantes na Taberna ou cos usuarios internacionais no canal de IRC #wikimedia-commons. Tamén pode contactar cos administradores na súa páxina de discusión. Se ten algunha pregunta específica sobre o copyright, formúlea en Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Recomendacións
  • Poña as caixas Babel na súa páxina de usuario para que outros coñezan que linguas fala
  • Todos os ficheiros que vostede cargue poden consultarse na Galería persoal
  • Por favor engada a súa sinatura nas páxinas de discusión escribindo ~~~~
  • Use a ferramenta CommonSense para atopar as categorías correctas para os seus ficheiros (así tamén outras persoas poderan dar con eles!)
  • Para enlazar cara unha páxina de imaxe, escriba isto: [[:Image:Foo.svg]]; o resultado é este: Image:Foo.svg
  • Se vostede está publicando imaxes procedentes doutro proxecto, asegúrese de utilizar CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Cometeu un erro?
  • Quere renomear ou mover un ficheiro? Só ten que carregar o ficheiro outra vez e o antigo marcalo con isto: {{bad name|Nome correcto}}
  • Para ampliar información lea directrices de borrado (en inglés)
(P.S. Por favor pode responder a esta mensaxe no espazo común para que saibamos que ten a información que precisa?)

--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 17:42, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Re:Boas, pregunta[edit]

Ola de novo. En Commons:Licenzas indícase (está inda sen traducir ese anaco) que non están permitidos en Commons os símbolos e os logos con copyright, e non se poden empregar nin en gl.wp (Wikipedia galega) nin en es.wp, por mor da lexislación vixente. Agora ben, se reparas nas imaxes presentes nas subcategorías de Category:Vehicles by brand, podes facerte unha idea da fronteira entre o que é esa prohibición e o que é a liberdade de panorama, observa por exemplo Image:Opel Zafira 08-7-2005 silver vl.jpg, o logotipo está presente, pero non é o centro de atención, é dicir, a finalidade da imaxe non é o logotipo. Se precisas máis datos podería intentar informarme. Aproveito para darche as grazas pola túa inestimable colaboración. Un cordial saúdo--Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 11:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)

TUSC token 066e8af0d832a3d91c84cb9ccb674604[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Si soy yo!!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Elisardojm!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:50, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

File:A Baña, concello 01-01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 01:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)


File:Val do Dubra concello 01-02.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 23:56, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Poster_Wikipedia10_Culleredo.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Poster_Wikipedia10_Culleredo.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 00:02, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Wikitarta WP10 Culleredo.JPG[edit]

Cool! *g* Elya made this design for me as I left Cologne to Berlin in fall 2009. The Design because of Wikipedia (ofcourse) an an ancient greek cup, because I'm writing about such themes. It's interesting to see, that the design lived on ;). Marcus Cyron (talk) 06:39, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Ramón María Aller Ulloa.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ramón María Aller Ulloa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Xabier Cid (talk) 14:15, 28 March 2011 (UTC)


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Lista de categorías en galego, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

FASTILY (TALK) 01:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope[edit]

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, Categorías raíz de Commons en galego, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote.

If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

FASTILY (TALK) 01:30, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Re:Derechos de autor de facsímiles[edit]

Hola Elisardojm, creía que había dejado un mensaje sobre el asunto este, pero por lo visto no terminé de guardar los cambios. Como es un tema complejo y no tengo formación en Derecho tampoco sé decirte algo más concreto a lo que ya sabes sobre la postura de la Fundación. Creo entonces que sería mejor que preguntaras a algún abogado ¿quizás Marctaltor sepa del tema? Un saludo. Lobo (howl?) 04:05, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Más de eso apenas puedo concretarte que la postura de la Fundación viene sustentada si no recuerdo mal por el caso Corel de la legislación estadounidense y que, hasta donde yo sé siendo lego en la materia, no conozco jurisprudencia al respecto en España.Lobo (howl?) 04:33, 24 May 2011 (UTC) PD:Aquí se menciona justo el asunto, que en España las fotografías de reproducción fiel están sujetas a la protección local del copyright:
“ In some jurisdictions, notably that of England and Wales, Spain and the Nordic countries, arguments have been presented that faithful reproduction photographs are entitled to local copyright protection, either because local law considers them 'original' or because it allows a special type of "simple photograph" copyright.”
Y te amplío más información sobre un caso similar en Reino Unido, de la National Portrait Gallery contra Wikimedia: User:Dcoetzee/NPG_legal_threat User:Dcoetzee/NPG_legal_threat/Coverage. Por esto mismo creo que si quieres asegurarte no hay más remedio que consultar algún experto en Derecho de España... Por cierto ¿Wikimedia España no tiene ningún tipo de asistencia jurídica por parte de la Fundación o alguna vía similar? Lobo (howl?) 05:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Re: File:Licensing tutorial gl.svg[edit]

Please let me know when you finished your work with the file.   ■ MMXX  talk  11:36, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: File:Desembocadura do río Lagareiros. Praia de Boca do Río - Carnota - Galiza 25 Abr 09.jpg[edit]

Ola Elisardojm. Sei facer o que dis ou iso creo, pero a imaxe non é miña, subina eu desde Flickr: Se reparas no autor, este é Ramon Piñeiro.

Fixen algo semellante cos cables desta imaxe, quedou así, pero cando o fondo é o ceo resulta fácil.

Os programas ideais son Adobe Photoshop e Gimp (este último gratuíto). Son programas moi complexos. Algo tamén se pode facer con Adobe lightroom, pero malamente. Se tes algún deses programas, pódoche dar unhas curtas indicacións para lograr eliminar un pequeno obxecto da imaxe. Consiste en copiar pequenos anacos próximos encima ata facelo desaparecer. Pode levar tempo ter un bo resultado. A ferramenta a usar débese chamar algo así como clonar; con todo, hai outros sistemas que, para min, resultan máis complexos.

Saúdos--Miguel Bugallo 20:33, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Non sei como non entendín á primeira. A verdade é que non lembraba que lle quitei a marca de auga a moitas fotos.
Estaba pensando en facer e enviarche un PDF coa explicación, menos mal que encontrei unha páxina que explica cómo se fai.
Quizais che chegue só con isto:
  1. Carga a imaxe
  2. Activa o botón "clonar", o cal ten un carimbo ("cuño") como imaxe (isto non se di na explicación). Se te pos sobre os botóns, aparece un texto aclaratorio do uso dos botóns.
  3. Para marcar o cacho de foto que queres copiar noutro sitio, fai click sobre a imaxe mantendo premida a tecla control (eu uso Mac, se non funcionase con control, proba con alt).
  4. Inmediatamente calca no sitio da imaxe que queres que desapareza e arrastra mantendo premido o botón esquerdo se desexas estender a clonación.
Con todo recoméndoche que lle botes unha ollada á ligazón anterior pois explica moitos detalles e posibles variacións da ferramenta, ademais de dar algún consello.
Se non te aclaras, faimo saber. Apertas--Miguel Bugallo 10:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
Por certo, o marco retireino case sempre recortando a imaxe. Para o mesmo, co primeiro botón, o de seleccionar (un rectángulo) seleccionas a parte da imaxe que queres salvar. Despois vas a Menú "imagen" e seleccionas "recortar a la selección".--Miguel Bugallo 11:13, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Mondoñedo[edit]

Consulta--. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:03, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Percorrido_Cidade_da_Cultura.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Percorrido_Cidade_da_Cultura.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

. HombreDHojalata.talk 19:06, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Elisardo, as cartografías de Google, Tele Atlas, etc, está protexida por copyright.
Non te extrañaba que non se empregen masivamente nos milleiros de artigos referentes a xeografía (países, concellos, lugares, parroquias...) das wikipedias?
Unha aperta e a seguir--. HombreDHojalata.talk 10:52, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Anúncio[edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 Caro Elisardojm, já estamos na recta final do Wiki Loves Monuments 2011!

A partir de hoje, a organização do Wiki Loves Monuments alargou o âmbito do concurso de cerca 5000 monumentos (classificados/protegidos) para cerca de 30000, fruto da parceria com o SIPA - Sistema de Informação para o Património Arquitectónico. A densidade de monumentos perto de si agora é bastante superior, pelo que recomendamos que saia de casa sempre com a máquina pois é bem possível cruzar-se com vários imóveis válidos para o concurso. Procure na lista quais calham em caminho!

Para mais informações, regulamento e ferramentas de ajuda, consulte o site oficial em http://www.wikilovesmonuments.org.pt

Wikimedia Portugal.svg
Messagem enviada em 09:27, 27 September 2011 (UTC) usando Lucia Bot, se tem alguma dúvida por favor contacte um dos organizadores.

Translating templates for thank you and survey of WLM 2011[edit]

Hello Elisardojm, Please see http://etherpad.wikimedia.org/WLM-thankyou-survey From this page on we started to translate every template and survey. Greetings - Romaine (talk) 23:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

See: User_talk:Romaine#Translation_of_thanks_message - Romaine (talk) 23:52, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Elisardojm,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:17, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Lingua/nacionalidade[edit]

Elisardo, penso eu que non hai que mudar Category:Galician poets por Category:Poets from Galicia (Spain). Poden ser complementarias. Ou non. A primeira fai referencia a lingua e a segunda ó lugar. Pode haber poetas que escriban en galego que non sexan galegos, igual que hai poetas galegos que escriben so en castelán, ou en inglés ... non?

Olla Category:Poets by language.

Do mesmo xeito hai, por exemplo, Category:Writers by country‎ e Category:Writers by language etc.

Unha aperta. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:50, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Plano castro de Viladonga.jpg[edit]

✓OK --. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:19, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Re:Uso externo dunha imaxe túa[edit]

Gracias. Es un caso estraño. La página parece del escultor. Es increíble que ni los escultores respeten los derechos de autoría. Le he dejado una nota, pero... hay tantas fotos mías en Internet que no respetan la licencia que tendría que crear una empresa para seguirlas y denunciarlas. Gracias de todos modos--Miguel Bugallo 18:19, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Xesús/Roger/Kirita[edit]

Tal como declarou na Galipedia, Xesús Constela, Roger222 e gl:Usuario:Kirita22 son a mesma persoa. Se ve que a ese administrador de Commons lle resultaron sospeitosas e non se cree a autoría propia, tendo en conta que subiu unhas portadas de libros, e iso na maioría dos casos das publicacións modernas non se pode facer...

Digo eu que sería por iso.

De todas maneiras, a solución é que Xesús/Roger/Kirita mande unha autorización a Commons:OTRS. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 17:32, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Marquei File:Entrega Garcia barros 2008.jpg como copyvio. Se o usuario subira a imaxe orixinal constarían os dados EXIF. Parece claro que o que fixo foi collela da páxina do xornal [1]. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:24, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
Se comprobas o historial de File:As humanas Proporcións - Xesús Constela Doce.JPG verás que eu xa fixera antes o mesmo ca ti (a imaxe foi sacada de aquí).
Se ve que outros usuarios consideran que o deseñador da portada non engadiu elementos orixinais dabondo para engadirlle dereitos propios de obra derivada, so algún pequeno elemento (o texto do título e o logo de Galaxia nunha resolución moi baixa, que podería considerarse de minimis). E pensándoo, creo que teñen razón. Por min debe quedar.--. HombreDHojalata.talk 01:03, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Firma/sinatura de Lois[edit]

E logo? Firma e sinatura son dúas palabras galegas sinónimas. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:52, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

SIGPAC[edit]

Ola Elisardo.

Sorprendeume que subiras esta imaxe!

Penso que é unha violación de copyright.

En que te baseas para poñer que es o autor e que a licenzas con CC-BY-SA?--. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:03, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Pois atopei que se deu permiso a través de OTRS. Olla este ficheiro: File:VistaAereaCozuelosDeFuenduenia.png
Iso abre un universo de posibilidades!
E o máis sorprendente é que en Commons so atopo unhas 40 imaxes procedentes do SIGPAC. Creei unha categoría nova para ilas metendo: Category:SIGPAC.
Saudiños. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:35, 20 December 2011 (UTC)
Sen dúbida. Hai que divulgar o tema. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 12:10, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Manconman02.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:59, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

[2]![edit]

Na Galipedia dicimos que é un musico galego. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 20:19, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

P1120438 Cerceda mural homenaxe mineiría detalle.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1120438 Cerceda mural homenaxe mineiría detalle.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Liberdade de panorama?[edit]

Ola Elisardo.

A lo menos hai 13 fotos en Category:Ramón Conde, que cargaches ti, que penso que habería que borrar. A obra orixinal ten copyright, o autor non morreu fai máis de 80 anos, a obra non está permanentemente expostas na vía pública...

E mellor que marques ti mesmo para borrado, non si? --. HombreDHojalata.talk 21:01, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Xa sabes que non hai problema. De todas, deixoche a referencia que penso que é a principal neste caso. Estívena revpasando de novo e metendo nun cadriño para tela a man na miña páxina de usuario:


Ley 5/1998, de 6 de marzo, de incorporación al Derecho español de la Directiva 96/9/CE, del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 11 de marzo de 1996, sobre la protección jurídica de las bases de datos.:


Artículo 35. Utilización de las obras con ocasión de informaciones de actualidad y de las situadas en vías públicas.
...
2. Las obras situadas permanentemente en parques, calles, plazas u otras vías públicas pueden ser reproducidas, distribuidas y comunicadas libremente por medio de pinturas, dibujos, fotografías y procedimientos audiovisuales.
...

--. HombreDHojalata.talk 08:53, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Xa tes as da emigración en Category:Ramón Conde, son todas as que comezan por File:Ramón Conde 2010...
Como vai o das feitas en interiores???--. HombreDHojalata.talk 13:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
En que quedou isto? As marcamos para borrado, ou?--. HombreDHojalata.talk 09:24, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
Bo traballo. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:55, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Template:Technique[edit]

Outra cousa.

Na mensaxe seguinte a túa na míña páxina de conversa, verás que User:Zolo encargoume o modelo que traduce as técnicas. Metínme a facer o {{Technique/gl}}, pero faiseme grande. Podes meterlle man cando teñas tempo? --. HombreDHojalata.talk 22:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Obre Paderne.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 12:56, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Contribucións de Ostiudo[edit]

As contribucións de Ostiudo son un pouco "desastrosas". Carga varias versións dos svg con nomes diferentes. E ultimamente volve cargar, tamén, versións en png das fotografías que xa subira en jpg. Tentei falar con el e non hai maneira. Douno por imposible. En calquera caso, non te preocupes, só marca para borrar imaxes repetidas. Os administradores tampouco as borrarían se non fora así. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 09:18, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Sean Ogirri (Lugo).jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:37, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Corredores de maratón?![edit]

Foi un erro tremendo. A que lle quería engadir era a category:Praza Pública que creei. Non sei como puido suceder. Grazas por dáreste conta! --. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:42, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ramón Piñeiro Siro López.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ramón Piñeiro Siro López.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ramón Piñeiro Siro López.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:43, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Ramón Piñeiro Siro López.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ramón Piñeiro Siro López.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Benoit Rochon (talk) 19:50, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

P1130832 Pol Mosteiro praza Galicia placa altimétrica concello.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1130832 Pol Mosteiro praza Galicia placa altimétrica concello.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Feito mover ficheiros[edit]

Feito.

Sería moi bo para a comunidade que ti, Elisardo, tiveras dereitos de movedor en Wikimedia Commons. Podes solicitalo en Commons:Requests_for_rights#Filemover (exemplo: Commons:Requests_for_rights/Approved/Filemover/2011#HombreDHojalata). Antes familiarízate co contido de Commons:File renaming.

Eu, por traballo, estarei lonxe de Galicia, e dos proxectos, durante meses. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 15:56, 26 September 2012 (UTC)


Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Elisardojm, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | +/−

INeverCry 23:29, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Pisa o freo[edit]

Perfect!! e que quería metelo eu pero non estaba seguro como facelo...Perdóa, pero e que estou a igualar categorías de todolos monumentos de Galicia (Por agora da Provincia de Pontevedra...)

1º Category:Sculptures in the province of Pontevedra (que xa estaba escomenzado)

2º Creando novas Categorías das esculturas en cada concello (que unhas tiñan e outras non...e pretendo que haxan en todas. Segun voy revisando fotos, vou categorizando)

3º Estou a engadir [escultores galegos] as fotos de monumentos, que quizais por descoñecemento, a xente non sabe de que son... sobre todo se son galegos...

La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:27, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Témome que non, para que sirve? (ou pásame un link onde atopala, descargala...)La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok, probarei... graciasLa fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:50, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Moito maís rapido, onde vai parar... La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:57, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
¿Por que esta imagen tiene ese mensaje? "Hace falta corroborar las categorías de esta imagen". Yo le cambié la categoría (estaba mal)de Esculturas de Pontevedra (City) por Esculturas de O Grove... La fabrica de nubes (talk) 11:39, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok

Categoría César Lombera[edit]

¿Qué acontece coa Categoría Cesara Lombera? ¿Por que aparece esa mensaxe de que as fotos non son de Dominio Publico se todas teñen as súas licencias? Andiven a pasar fotos a esa Categoría, pero que eu lembre, ó principio non estaba a mensaxe... pero tampouco vin cal foi a imaxe que fixo saltar a mensaxe... La fabrica de nubes (talk) 15:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Ok. E que ademais todas as fotos están sacadas na rúa... non o entendo. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:25, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Imaxes de concellos[edit]

Tes razón trabuqueime, e que o lugar é San Roque de Crespos, pero sí, a igrexa debería levar o nome da parroquia... Pois que sexa Igrexa de San Xoán de Crespos.JPG entón. ¿Como se fai ou que permisos hai que ter para cambiar os nomes das fotos?

Saquei, saquei, trouxen tres igrexas e tres centros de saúde... O teño en conta pero o outro día estaba medio nubrado e fíxoseme de noite antes... (e iso que era bo día xa que era domingo, había fútbol e non había ninguén pola rúa) Por certo, ¿hai algún problema con que saia xente o matrículas de coches?

Gracias. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 09:07, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Renoméao ti xa,antes de que se nos esqueza... Eu son un humilde Usuario Autoconfirmado e non tenho competencias...
Pódense pixelar ou por borrosas as caras das persoas? Eu utilizaría o Photoshop, ¿pode ser con este programa? La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:42, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Ok. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 11:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Pontedeva[edit]

No artígo de Pontedeva non hai escudo, pero atopei este File:Escudo Pontedeva.jpg no Commons, pero hai unha mensaxe de que non está vectorizada...¿o poño de todos xeitos? La fabrica de nubes (talk) 10:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Feito. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 11:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Imágenes de Praza Pública[edit]

Hola Elisardo, muy buenas las imágenes que subes de Praza Pública. Sólo te pido que incluyas la plantilla {{LicenseReview}} para que un administrador verifique la licencia es correcta (de hecho podías pedir permisos de revisor y atestiguar tú mismo la revisión :-)) Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:24, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Hola, Elisardo, no veo ningún problema en revisar lo que uno mismo ha subido. No encuentro ninguna contraindicación y, en todo caso, el método se basa en la confianza. Esto es, pensamos que un revisor no lo es para evadir al sistema. Ten en cuenta que no se trata de imágenes tuyas, sino de imágenes con licencias asignadas por otros. En tu petición, sin embargo, yo trataría de argumentar por qué serías un buen revisor, aludiendo a tu experiencia, tanto aquí como en la gestión de imágenes en galipedia, así como en la frecuencia con la que subes material de medios ajenos (como Praza Pública, por poner un ejemplo). Creo que es eso lo que puede justificar que se te conceda el flag. Un cordial saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 16:04, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Respecto a Praza Pública yo creo que es una fuente problemática. Mira lo que ha pasado con la imagen de Vanesa Veiga. Es que, aunque no creo que la imagen sea de foroatletismo, en foroatletismo aparece con una (c). Ten cuidado con ello (te recomiendo el Search by Image de Google y que te instales un EXIF Viewer en tu navegador, para verificar que las imágenes no tienen información EXIF indicando su origen real). Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 16:11, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Tienes razón. Es una mejora muy moderna de la que no era consciente. Por cierto, he nominado para borrado esto. La image de Juana de Ibarbourou fue borrada y, según eso, habría que borrar también el collage. Supongo que con sustituir su imagen sería suficiente, pero no sé quién podría ser lo suficientemente representativo. Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 09:29, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Renomear Ficheiro[edit]

¿Poderíasme cambialo nome deste ficheiro, polo de Centro de Saúde de San Xoán de Río.JPG?. Gracias. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 16:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

OK. Gracias. La fabrica de nubes (talk) 20:36, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

File:4fb3e0f2d870f-20061112231142-prestige7 Praza Pública.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:4fb3e0f2d870f-20061112231142-prestige7 Praza Pública.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 12:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

File:507c435f25d02-collageprestige Praza Pública.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:507c435f25d02-collageprestige Praza Pública.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Martin H. (talk) 12:58, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

De nada[edit]

Encantado de seguir colaborando con la galipedia. A tu disposición --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 21:22, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Vanessa-veiga-maratc3b3n-castellc3b3n-praza-publica.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Vanessa-veiga-maratc3b3n-castellc3b3n-praza-publica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Morning (talk) 15:28, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Mariló Candedo-Praza Pública-2012.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Mariló Candedo-Praza Pública-2012.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Mariló Candedo-Praza Pública-2012.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 21:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Reviewer[edit]

If you use the helper-the scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-

Hi Elisardojm, thanks for your application to be an image reviewer. The application has been removed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can review all kind of image licenses on Commons. Please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

You can also add {{user reviewer}} or {{user trusted}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons!--Morning (talk) 09:54, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Outra imaxe de Ortigueira[edit]

Paseo Eusebio Dávila, Ortigueira.jpg

Boas Elisardo, estiven lendo sobre como cargar unha imaxe de flickr e fixen unha proba con este ficheiro que achego. Penso que fixen todo ben, bótalle unha ollada (amais penso que podes facer tamén o flickreview). As coordenadas metinas a man, como se introducen a partir de flickr? Saúdos, --Xosé Antonio (talk) 22:32, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

File:505f40a26f082-lapelu2-Praza Pública.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:57, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:50a5157d2ce48-Fernando Cortizo-Praza Pública.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:50a5157d2ce48-Fernando Cortizo-Praza Pública.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:50a5157d2ce48-Fernando Cortizo-Praza Pública.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ralgistalk 17:16, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Hola, Elisardojm: Lamento que no hayas podido encontrar la fuente de esta fotografía. Sin embargo, gracias por tus otras contribuciones. Si alguna vez necesitas ayuda, no dudes en pedírmela. --Ralgistalk 15:22, 26 November 2012 (UTC)

Poto copyviada[edit]

Boas, Elisardo. Acabo de ver que algúen en Commons pensa que unha foto que eu subín é copyvio. Podes averiguarme algo sobre o tema? eu non controlo moi ben o que pasa por Commons, sobre todo despois que de borren a foto. Se sabes algo dimo na miña páxina da Galipedia. Gracias. Xoacas (talk) 22:24, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

P1160048 paisaxe, Trabada.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1160048 paisaxe, Trabada.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

AELG upload done[edit]

I've finished the upload. Duplicates weren't uploaded. See Commons:Batch uploading/AELG for source. Cheers.Smallman12q (talk) 21:24, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

I've added the author link. See User_talk:Smallman12q#AELG_photo.27s_upload.Smallman12q (talk) 03:13, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Demesa-Praza Publica-Prestige.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Demesa-Praza Publica-Prestige.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 11:31, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: Foto borrada de Praza Pública[edit]

Hola Elisardo, la verdad es que se me había pasado tu mensaje... Perdona. Creo que, lamentablemente, está bien borrado. Verás, coincidirás conmigo en que la imagen de la televisión está protegida por el copyright. Desde ese punto de vista, para ver si se considera obra derivada, lo que hay que considerar es Commons:De minimis. Ahí exponen criterios para el análisis. En este caso aplica claramente Copyrighted work X is the central part of the subject (eg it is the reason for taking the photo). Removing it would make the derivative work useless. Por lo tanto, claramente es una obra derivada e infringía los derechos de autor del propietario de los derechos (porque una cosa es que pongan la tele fuera para que los periodistas puedan verlo y otra es que cedan los derechos de dicha emisión, algo que debe hacerse de forma explícita). Un saludo y perdona por la tardanza --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 08:59, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Nada, dame la tabarra todo lo que necesites. Yo creo que lo importante es que le eches un vistazo a Commons:De minimis. Es muy clarificador. --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 11:42, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Barreiro[edit]

Lo estándar es pedir que se autorice. He "plantilleado" la imagen. Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 20:18, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

A mandar[edit]

Pues eso :-P --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 10:42, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: preguntillas[edit]

He pedido fuentes para todas las imágenes. Cuando tengamos veremos qué hacer. Un abrazo y gracias --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 23:39, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Limpiado :-)[edit]

Hola Elisardo, he borrado algunas y para otras he abierto una consulta de borrado: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Nemigo y Commons:Deletion requests/File:Distribuidor Hempel Culleredo 34naiazwGL.jpg. Un saludo y a tu disposición --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:04, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Roberto Vidal Bolaño[edit]

Tomo nota, aunque sabe un poco mal hacerlo si ya hay alguien que hizo un retrato. ¿Sabes si se pueden encontrar registros en vídeo del autor? Eso va muy bien a los ilustradores para no captar sólo de fotos. E igual estaría bien hacer un conjunto de "escritores/as gallegos" para dar coherencia al encargo. Solemos hacer un pack de 7 de los que elijen 5. Y claro, que no sean autores vivos ni haya posibilidad de conseguir fotos libres de forma clara y a medio término. --Dvdgmz (talk) 12:22, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Sí, me parece bien.
Ahora estaba viendo y el retrato que hay enlaza a un Flickr que ahora es privado. Un poco raro. --Dvdgmz (talk) 12:30, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Re: Duda sobre foto[edit]

Pues no sé qué decirte. Está muy en el borde, en mi opinión. Mi sugerencia sería que la subieses y yo preguntaría en el café de copyright a ver qué opinan otros usuarios. Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 23:50, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Hola Elisardo, tarde como de costumbre. Por una parte, he subido una versión recortada de la imagen. Respecto a los interiores, mi entendimiento es que dependería de si el acceso es público (sin pagar) o no. En una iglesia, en general, el acceso es público, si bien en otros sitios posiblemente no lo es. No tengo más datos sobre el tema, aunque puedo estudiar un poco mejor la legislación relativa a la libertad de panorama. Te cuento --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 23:12, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Les puse a todas un aviso de que no tenían fuente, pero Rastrojo no fue tan benévolo ;-) --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 09:05, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Sakkola coat of arms licensing[edit]

Hi. It seems you added a {{PD-Coa-Finland}} license template here. Why? Do you positively know it is PD? --Jmk (talk) 10:57, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Ekb collage.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ekb collage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SL (talk) 13:55, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Solo para que supieras...[edit]

... que dejo el proyecto. Estoy a tu disposición (vía correo electrónico) para lo que quieras. Un abrazo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:58, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Re: Imagen de LAR[edit]

Ya te respondo yo que no, además en enlace de la fuente está roto o en la lista negra, porque Commons no me deja escribirtlo, ni copiarlo y pegarlo, y si lo abrocon el navegador me sale el error 404. En suma, no se puede comprobar. Dorieo (talk) 03:15, 5 May 2013 (UTC) PD: Tienes un mensaje mío en flickr y otro en la lista de socios. En un rato en tercero en la lista. Lo digo por si te aburres. ;P

Si quieres que se borre yo sé solicitarlo. He metido la pata muchas veces. Dorieo (talk) 03:18, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

File:A Nosa Terra, 1916.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:A Nosa Terra, 1916.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

–⁠moogsi (blah) 22:18, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

RE:Benvido![edit]

Igualmente ;). Saúdos! --JaviP96 16:35, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Renomear[edit]

Ola Elisardo, poderías renomear esta imaxe? Ao mellor cando leas isto xa o renomearon, pero se non faino ti, por certo, esa imaxe non tería dereitos de autor, ata onde alcanza este tipo de fotos? Saúdos! --JaviP96 09:07, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Tamén tiña pensado crear o logo do BNG, en substitución deste, que claramente ten copyright, ti que dis?. --JaviP96 09:29, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Haber hai que facer un novo logo, xa que o actual, ademais de ser idéntico, está claro que se colleu dunha web, fareino entón sen a bandeira, para evitar problemas, ou valería facr algo similar a esto, non sei que sería mellor, o que si, subireino como dis en SVG. Saúdos! --JaviP96 16:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Tahoces-comision-industria-Xunta-Praza Publica.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tahoces-comision-industria-Xunta-Praza Publica.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 17:09, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Template:AELG[edit]

Eli. Bótalle un ollo a isto: Template talk:AELG/layout. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 14:33, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Tytärsaari.vaakuna.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tytärsaari.vaakuna.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jafeluv (talk) 10:42, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi again, I also nominated Metsäpirtti.vaakuna.jpg for the same reason. You can view the DR here. Cheers, Jafeluv (talk) 21:11, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Kuolemajarvi.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kuolemajarvi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jafeluv (talk) 09:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Kanneljarven vaakuna.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kanneljarven vaakuna.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jafeluv (talk) 06:33, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Río Corgo chegando ó río Sarela.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Río Corgo chegando ó río Sarela.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 22:03, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Río Corgo baixo a Ponte Mantible.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Río Corgo baixo a Ponte Mantible.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 22:04, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Manuel murguia.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Manuel murguia.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. Thank you.

JuTa 20:09, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Re: Flickr[edit]

Ya lo he leído en la lista y te he contestado en ella. Tranquilo que estaré con "las manos quietas". Gracias -- Dorieo (homerízate) 07:51, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Escudo de Lugo: problema de texto[edit]

En https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Escudo_de_Lugo_2.svg está escrito "filmiter" por "firmiter".— Preceding unsigned comment added by Cesarsalgado (talk • contribs) 18 de outubro de 2013 ás 18:57‎ (UTC)

Re:More files from 20minutos[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Elisardojm. You have new messages at Gunnex's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Elisardojm,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Isla de Ons vista desde Fedorentos de la isla Onza.JPG[edit]

Hola: lo que pasa es que está mal escrito debe ser "Isla de Ons. Vista desde Fedorentos de la isla Onza" Un saludo Txo (discusión) Mi discusión en castellano 22:46, 17 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Elisardojm,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File:PBB Protein CRH image.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PBB Protein CRH image.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 09:37, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Situacion Oza-Cesuras.png[edit]

Por que moviches a imaxe File:Situacion Oza-Cesuras.png argumentando que o solicitou o subidor da foto, se eu non solicitei nada? --Vivaelcelta {talk  · contributions} 16:04, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Odin[edit]

I know I get really obsessive about crops; it's something I don't like doing in the first place, so if I'm going to, I get incredibly careful about it. I'll see what I can do about a borderless version, though I was somewhat hoping I could get away without one on this one, as it's the one with the border in the best shape and centering that I've seen. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:25, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Eliminar marcas[edit]

Hola Elisardojm. Gracias por tu comentario. Siempre anima! No siempre estoy segura de haberlo hecho bien. Yo utilizo Gimp (Un Programario libre que puedes bajarte de la red) porque es sencillo i es con el que aprendí. Básicamente con las herramientas de clonado y saneamiento y con el pincel Circle Fuzzy (17). Pero supongo que todos son bastante parecidos y teniendo en cuenta que tú eres gallega y yo catalana i vivimos un poco lejos, lo único que se me ocurre es que me incluyas dos imágenes de la galipedia aquí en mi página i las hagamos paralelas. Yo te digo como las he hecho y te incluyo unes imágenes del proceso y tú lo haces. Cualquier pregunta me la dices y lo arreglamos, pero si se te ocurre otra idea mejor me lo dices y listo. Un abrazo. :) Por cierto no tengo idea de cómo incluirte las imágenes en esta página o en la tuya. Hay alguna manera de enviar el proceso por correo normal? --Edithsme (talk) 18:44, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Hola. Como siempre no tengo idea de donde debo contestarte si aquí o en mi página. He consultado con la Multimèdia catalana i me han dicho que no hay problema para realizar el proceso, pero por mi parte sí que lo hay porque primero tendré que aprender a subir todo esto. Así que tendrás que darme un tiempo hasta que me familiarice con el idioma WIKI. Cuando esté preparada para subirlo te aviso. De todas maneras me gustaría que me indicaras dos imágenes con las que hacer las pruebas. Un abrazo y un poco de paciencia, un día se me iluminara la bombilla i todo se volverá más sencillo. Un abrazo. :)--Edithsme (talk) 17:48, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Jcb (talk) 18:41, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Festival de la Luz[edit]

Yes, I have seen, it's ok; I didn't know. Bye :) -- Syrio posso aiutare? 08:39, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Sugerencias[edit]

He promovido tu foto, es buena. Aún así, está en el límite para ser QI. El motivo fundamental son los árboles del fondo. Las zonas oscuras de los árboles, más en el lado derecho de la imagen, son bruscas. Parece como si fuese excesivamente acentuada la nitidez, y el contraste. Tú sabrás a que se debe. Te lo digo solamente para que procures evitarlo y porque en futuras imágenes puedes tener dificultades.

Por otro lado, los colores medios de la foto (los que no son claros ni oscuros) resultan un tanto oscuros. Mi monitor es algo oscuro, por lo que no me atrevo a poner la mano en el fuego, pero...

Ánimo, y propón más. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 13:12, 2 August 2014 (UTC)

Non me parece que a foto sexa doadamente mellorable se non a traballaches. Non sei que cámara tes, pois non hai datos Exif na foto (aparecen ó final da páxina de cada foto, repara nas miñas); supoño que unha compacta, xa que ten boa profundidade de campo e non terías conseguido esa profundidade con outra cámara en modo automático, pero quizais me confunda.
A camara que tes fai boas fotografías, a nitidez do primeiro plano é excelente. Procura non comprimir as imaxes (quizais por iso note cousas raras nas árbores). Utiliza a resolución máis alta da cámara e non comprimas as fotos nadiña inda que pesen moito.
Antes de retocar as imaxes, tes -penso eu- que ter algúns conceptos claros de fotografía de maneira que poidas aproveitar o que a cámara che ofrece. Sabendo que cámara tes eu podo doadamente localizr as características da mesma e, se non é moi pequena ou antiga, darche recomendacións para o seu uso. Unha vez que comprendas esas recomendacións básicas (son poucas), pódoche explicar como traballar as fotos. Se queres seguir ese proceso, envíame un correo coa marca e tipo de cámara que empregas. Abonda con que teña, ademais da opción automática, a opción AV e TV para poder mellorar as fotos. Se só ten opcións automáticas, poderiamos pasar case xa ós programas de edición e revelado.
Gimp non é o programa adecuado. Photoshop tampouco. O ideal é Adobe Photoshop Lightroom. Xa falaremos se o desexas--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 00:00, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
A ver se respondo con poucas palabras, para que no se che faga tedioso o texto.
É mellor que fagas as fotos cos 20 mp da cámara para presentarlas a QI, non con 10. Canto más grandes máis grandes sexan as imaxes, más imperfecciones se permiten, xeralmente. Non é igual, por exemplo, que unha foto de 20 mp teña un lixeiro problema de nitidez a que o teña unha de 10 mp ou menos. A calidade que dá a cámara facendo fotos de 20 ou de 10 mp é a mesma: Nas de 10 mp non usa a metade do sensor para captar as imaxes.
Se as pos ó 100% non as comprimes, pero tes que mirar se na mesma zona do menú da cámara en que escolles o tamaño da foto, hai a opción de que o arquivo pese menos ou a opción de maior calidade (HQ) ou menor calidade (creo só ter visto e usado unha compacta que non ten esa opción e creo que era sony). Se a calidade é maior, caben menos fotos na tarxeta; esa é a opción preferible. Se non escolles esa, a cámara está comprimindo. Iso provoca que necesites máis tarxetas para facer o mesmo.
Ollo co Gimp e con Photoshop e ollo co jpg. A túa cámara non ten opción RAW, só jpg. Se algún día cambias de cámara mira que teña opción RAW.
  • A opción RAW é como un negativo (sen ser negativo) que hai que revelar; ten moi pouca comprensión e despois de revelala (facer cambios) hai que exportar a imaxe a JPG. Non se perde calidade.
  • Cada vez que gardas unha imaxe JPG con cambios, en cambio, perdes calidade na foto (aínda que non a comprimas) porque JPG é un formato comprimido. O recomendable é gardar a imaxe orixinal e traballar sobre ela se desexas facelo unha segunda vez.
  • Ó ser JPG un formato comprimido, aínda coa máxima calidade que dea a cámara, é menos sensible ós cambios que se queiran realizar có formato RAW.
  • Con Lightroom non perdes o orixinal. Para traballar unha foto tes que importala, cada vez que fas un cambio, lightroom automaticamente garda o cambio, Para obter a imaxe final tes que exportar e cerar unha nova foto nunha, xeralmente, nova carpeta. En lightroom non se gardan as fotos, unicamente se garda o lugar en que están os orixinais e os cambios realizados. Por mor diso, a perda de calidade usando este programa é mínima. O problema é que lightroom é de pago, custa uns 120 € (70 para profesores). Eu non podo usar a versión 5 porque non corre en MACs antigos nin no Windows Vista. Na páxina de Adobe Lightroom 5 tes unha versión de proba por un mes.--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 07:49, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Uxes, Arteixo.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uxes, Arteixo.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Oops about Ebola[edit]

Sorry about overwriting your changes to File:Ebola Outbreak 2014.svg. I hope I've restored all your changes. Glrx (talk) 01:54, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Yikes! I've overwritten you again. We've been editing two minutes apart. What did I miss? Glrx (talk) 17:24, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

Ago. Thanks for your help. I'm sorry I've made something so simple so difficult. Glrx (talk) 23:00, 6 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Paulo Carlos López Praza Publica.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paulo Carlos López Praza Publica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Natuur12 (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Lirio de monte, monte Pindo.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Lirio de monte, monte Pindo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 23:16, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cruceiro Xermade 15.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cruceiro Xermade 15.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oficina Abanca Coruña-praza Obelisco.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oficina Abanca Coruña-praza Obelisco.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Re: Imágenes de Reganosa[edit]

Claras violaciones. He solicitado su borrado. Gracias y un saludo --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 07:39, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Borrado de imágenes[edit]

Hola!

Estaba cotilleando por el mundo y he visto que le preguntabas a @Discasto: qué hay que hacer para marcar para borrado una imagen. Como veo que no te ha respondido le ahorro trabajo:

  • Borrado rápido: {{Speedy deletion}} o {{Speedy}} como por ejemplo {{speedy|no me gusta porque es fea}}.
  • Para los casos de Violacion de copyright: {{Copyvio}}
  • para consultas de borrado: {{Delete}}. Recomiendo leer los pasos.

Para vagos como yo tienes en "Preferencias > Accesorios > Herramientas de mantenimiento > AjaxQuickDelete " que te ahorrará mucho trabajo.

PD para Discasto: RFA ya! Carayo.

Saludiños. Alan (talk) 20:51, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Ya me parecía muy de novato tu pregunta... Face-grin.svg
Según mi inglés de Bilbao (es decir, de una calidad de la hostia) podría ser algo así como {{delete|Indoor taken photo. Not valid as FoP in Spain}}. Alan (talk) 22:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Borradas las 2. He hecho un "cierre rápido" ya que claramente violan las Leyes españolas y la consiguiente política de este proyecto (COM:FOP). Un saludo. Alan (talk) 14:21, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Perdón, Elisardo. Se me pasó responderte y últimamente estoy muy, pero que muy liado en la vida real :-( --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Escudo de Padrón[edit]

Non te preocupes Elisardojm, entendo que o escudo ten uns dereitos de autor. Penso que é o escudo que deberia ter o artigo pero si non pode ser, non pode ser. Eu intenteino.

Unha aperta e gracias por interesarte. --Dodro (talk) 17:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

O escudo oficial de Padrón é o que usa Padrón en tódolos seus documentos oficiais (iso é o que significa oficial), ten moita máis historia e úsase dende fai moitos anos, que por exemplo o que creou a Xunta moitos outros concellos, que non o tiñan.
Na páxina web do concello; mencionase no apartado Pazo do Bispo de Quito: "Moi preto da praza de Macías está a casa consistorial, levantada no século XVIII e que presume de escudo granítico da vila"; que non é outro máis que este:
Padrón, 01-01c concello.JPG
Na páxina web oficial do concello tamén se di; no apartado Ruta de la Traslatio: PLACA NÚMERO 2. Escudo barroco siglo XVIII "Combinación del escudo de la Villa (traslatio del cuerpo del Apóstol Santiago) con los del reino Castellano-Leonés (castillos y leones) y el del reino de Galicia (hostia)"; que é este outro:
Escudo de armas coa imaxe do apóstolo Santiago navegando. Padrón. Galiza.jpg
As diferenzas son claras; no escudo da vila só se representa a Traslatio xacobea.
Un saudiño e disculpame pero non me vou pronunciar máis neste asunto
A seguir así, entendo o esforzo e a complexidade da vosa labor --Dodro (talk) 18:51, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
Ola!, recibín un correo electrónico confirmandome que dende o concello de padrón mandaron un escrito asinado polo alcalde a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org no que incluen o logo oficial. Non sei si será suficiente con iso ou teran que facer algo máis.--Dodro (talk) 10:24, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Subcategorías[edit]

Hola Elisardo, lo que hice fue meter todas las categorías de cada uno de los 94 paradores en la misma, es decir aquella que engloba a todos ellos. Me parecía lo más adecuado (no veía mucha utilidad, por ejemplo, que en un futuro hubiera una categoría autonómica con solo uno o dos paradores), pero si crees que es mejor como estaba, sin problema. Eso si, voy a trasladar las categorías de Galicia y Cataluña porque el nombre de Paradores Nacionales ya no existe. Un saludo. --Rodelar (talk) 01:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Perdona[edit]

Hola Elisardo, te tengo abandonado :-(

Sé que tenía una consulta pendiente tuya. Por lo que he podido ver, el asunto es que el original es tan simple que no es posible acreditar copyright sobre él. Es mi modesta opinión. Un abrazo --Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 12:12, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

praza.gal[edit]

Hi,

praza.gal content is licensed under the {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} license (per [3]), not {{cc-by-sa-4.0}}. Please be careful. Thanks for your contributions! Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:37, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

Watermark[edit]

Ola Eli.

Grazas por retirarlle a marca de auga a (1). Podes facer o mesmo con (2)?

Graciñas. --. HombreDHojalata.talk 11:30, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Non te preocupes. Xa fas de máis. Parabéns, por certo, por todo o teu traballo. . HombreDHojalata.talk 08:04, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Amancio Ortega.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Amancio Ortega.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Discasto talk | contr. | es.wiki analysis 22:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

OTRS permissions queues[edit]

Hello Elisardojm. You are receiving this message as a license reviewer. As you know, OTRS processes a large amount of tickets relating to image releases (called "permissions"). As a license reviewer, you may have the skills necessary to contribute to this team. If you are interested in learning more about OTRS or to volunteer please visit Meta-Wiki. Tell your friends! Thank you. Rjd0060 18:36, 1 March 2015 (UTC)