User talk:Eloquence

Archives:

• Commons launch to October 7, 2005
• October 7, 2005 to December 8, 2005
• December 9, 2005 to September 9, 2006
• September 10, 2006 to April 6, 2012

File:Edouard Manet 030.jpg

File:Edouard Manet 030.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:47, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

File talk:Upload Wizard - Tamil.png

Please see File talk:Upload Wizard - Tamil.png --ravidreams (talk) 06:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Kampagnenbearbeiter

Hallo,

da du "Kampagnenbearbeiter" bist (keine Ahnung - was man da alles einstellen kann), kannst du mir vielleicht weiterhelfen. Ich will WLM in diesem Jahr in Wuppertal etwas im Vordergrund stellen (de:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments 2012/Deutschland/Nordrhein-Westfalen/Wuppertal). Als Vorbild diente dabei die Kölner Seite (de:Wikipedia:Wiki Loves Monuments Köln) aus dem vergangenen Jahr.

Kannst du Bitte dazu die Kampagne "wlm-de-nrw-w" anlegen? --Atamari (talk) 13:04, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Bitte... oder gibt es jemand anderen den ich besser ansprechen sollte? --Atamari (talk) 13:20, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Du kannst Dich jetzt auf Special:UploadCampaigns versuchen. Bitte keine von den vorhandenen verändern und schon gar nicht löschen. Viel Spaß. -- Rillke^(q?) 14:44, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Also nach: "Gib einem Hungernden einen Fisch, und er wird einmal satt, lehre ihn Fischen, und er wird nie wieder hungern." Danke. --Atamari (talk) 17:41, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Nunja, ich denke es ist ein Wiki. Und dieser Konfigurationsassistent wurde extra so gestaltet, dass ihn jeder bedienen kann. -- Rillke^(q?) 19:07, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres 008.jpg

File:Jean Auguste Dominique Ingres 008.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

 — billinghurst sDrewth 15:49, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Metrics 9.4.12.theora.ogv

---

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

• Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
• State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
• If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
• Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
• Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 04:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Licences

I've asked a question at User talk:Kaldari#Licences. Perhaps you are able to help as you appear to be knowledgeable on the subject and in a position of some authority. From the discussion at FP over the "GFDL 1.2 only" single licence, there seems to be a large number in favour of removing this "back door" NC licence formulation but also a large number feeling that FP should impose no additional licence requirements over Commons policy. Therefore, what is the chance of Commons policy changing here? If the licence formulation cannot be removed, is there a way of somehow preventing its abuse/use as an approximation for NC? If you can answer on Kaldari's talk page, that would keep any responses together. Thanks, Colin (talk) 10:49, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

User:Rd232 has jumped the gun a little and gone ahead with several proposals wrt GFDL licences at Commons:Village pump/Proposals. My feeling is that any policy-change proposal should be carefully drafted and have Foundation support. Colin (talk) 18:39, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Historically the interpretation of which licenses are sufficiently free for Commons has been left up to the community, and that's where I believe it belongs. The WMF licensing policy specifies that licensing must be compliant with the Definition of Free Cultural Works, but whether specific licenses are or aren't consistent with the Definition for specific purposes is IMO a matter of such ambiguity that it requires ongoing community discussion. The GFDL and similar licenses that are being used for purposes other than the ones they were originally developed for are perfect examples of this dilemma, as they were clearly drafted to support free sharing of information, but nonetheless may not be appropriate in all circumstances.

So I think what RD232 is doing here is fine, but I've pinged the legal folks in case they want to weigh in.--Eloquence (talk) 18:49, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Ok. We're still thrashing out how the proposal is worded. See my attempt here. What do you think of the wording (even if you don't want to commit to an opinion on the proposal itself). Does it cover the bases? Colin (talk) 21:13, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Additionally, can you clarify the point Nilfanion makes that inclusion of a licence on this list of licences binds Commons into accepting it. I think we only need to apply the Definition to our purpose and that list doesn't bind us to anything. Colin (talk) 12:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Your proposed language looks great to me. I don't believe that you're constrained by the wiki page on the freedomdefined.org wiki that characterizes some licenses. The WMF licensing policy explicitly states that a license is permitted if it "meets the terms of the Definition of Free Cultural Works specific to licenses". In other words, it does not confer the power to decide which licenses do and don't meet those terms to an external authority or a separate process. --Eloquence (talk) 23:57, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Katharinenaltar (Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden).jpg

File:Lucas Cranach d.Ä. - Katharinenaltar (Staatliche Kunstsammlungen Dresden).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:46, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Lucas Cranach d. Ä. 026.jpg

File:Lucas Cranach d. Ä. 026.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cranach Digital Archive (talk) 13:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Albin Egger-Lienz 003.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:06, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:53, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

File:Firs Sergejewitsch Shurawljow 001.jpg

File:Firs Sergejewitsch Shurawljow 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Shakko (talk) 11:47, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Reichstag2a.jpg

Yours sincerely, A.Savin 18:34, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Europaparlament Nr 5.jpg

And also:

• File:Europaparlament Nr 7.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:10, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Europaparlament Nr 9.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:30, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Europaparlament Nr 11.jpg

And also:

• File:Europaparlament Nr 2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:35, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Eloquence. You have new messages at Russavia's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Klärung

Hallo Eloquence. Vor genau 8 Jahren hast du dieses File:Michele Marieschi 001.jpg aufgeladen. Das Bild hast du dem Michele Marieschi zugeschrieben. Kann ich dich bitte fragen welche deine Quelle ist / war? Und ist sie anvertraut, ist sie sicher? Denn ich habe hier ein anderes File:Francesco Albotto - View of Campo Santi Giovanni e Paolo - WGA00133.jpg das genau dasselbe Bild wiedergibt, aber es dem Francesco Albotto zuschreibt. Dieses letzte befindet sich sicher in Neapel im Nazional Museum von Capodimonte, zwar nicht ausgestellt sondern in einem Depot, wie hier in einem entsprechendem link bezeugt wird, während kein Werk Marieschi's im Museum Capodimonte vorhanden ist. Ich wäre dir sehr dankbar wenn du mir dies klären könntest, damit ich deinem aufgeladenen File die korrekten Kategorien aufzeichnen kann. Herzlichen Dank und alles Gute, --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2013 (UTC) Post Scriptum: wo wäre dann das Bild von Marieschi ausgestellt / aufbewahrt?