User talk:Epibase

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Old talk

Hibiscus[edit]

Thanks. -- Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 08:36, 19 February 2010 (UTC)


Category:Echinopsis eyriesii[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Echinopsis eyriesii has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

-- Common Good (talk) 20:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Rhipsalis cereuscula1EATON.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rhipsalis cereuscula1EATON.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Rhipsalis cereuscula1EATON.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Cheers, JackLee talk 17:11, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Merremia peltata[edit]

Can you contact me about a higher res copy of this image Ringpicker (talk) 08:30, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus1MT.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus1MT.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Ariocarpus kotschoubeyanus1MT.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Denniss (talk) 02:43, 30 October 2011 (UTC)


Category:Clarkia rubicunda subsp. blasdalei[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Clarkia rubicunda subsp. blasdalei has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 19:50, 15 November 2011 (UTC)


Category:Lilium ×testaceum[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Lilium ×testaceum has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:35, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Passiflora violacea1622406860.jpg[edit]

Critically evaluate Flickr licenses File:Passiflora violacea1622406860.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.

Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. See Commons:Questionable Flickr images for a list of known bad Flickr users.


Deutsch | English | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | norsk bokmål | português | português do Brasil | slovenščina | svenska | русский | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 14:48, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Ipomoea bignonioides Bot. Mag. 53.2645.jpg[edit]

Hello !

I think you made a mistake about this file (perhaps a wrong copy-paste from File:Dyssochroma viridiflora (as Solandra viridiflora) Bot. Mag. 45.1948.jpg). Can you confirm that it is Ipomoea bignonioides ? and change the description and category ? TED 19:01, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

I have corrected the name and category for this file. Tell me if I made a mistake. TED 22:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

AUTHORIZATION FOR PUBLICATION[edit]

Hi!

My name is Edoardo Bit, I am an architect and also a “young researcher” of the University of Ferarra (Italy).

I am writing a book on the “green walls technologies” and I have found very interesting some photos in your page. So, I would kindly ask you if I can use them in my book.

Obviously, if you gently decide to grant me the permission, your name (or your nickname) and the link of the pictures will be correctly cited in the credits of my publication.


The photos which I would use are:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clematis_montana_Rubens_508957761.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Clematis_viticella3UME.jpg


Thank you very much! I hope you will attend my request…

My e-mail is: edoardo.bit@gmail.com


Bye,

Edoardo

wrong copyright info[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Aronia_arbutifolia2475275707.jpg

this is marked as non comercial (on flickr), so not cc_by_sa — Preceding unsigned comment added by BubikolRamios (talk • contribs) 8:26, 6 March 2013‎ (UTC)

The copyright information is not wrong. The file was offered by the copyright holder under {{cc-by-sa-2.0}} on Flickr on the date that it was uploaded to Commons. The copyright holder has since chosen to stop distributing under that license from Flickr, which is his prerogative, but as Creative Commons licenses are perpetual, that in no way affects Wikimedia Commons' ability to continue to host it under the original license. LX (talk, contribs) 17:49, 6 March 2013 (UTC)