User talk:Esquilo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

SUL[edit]

Hi Kemikungen. Have you ever considered to merge your accounts? --Leyo 09:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

What are the benefits? /Kemikungen (talk) 09:36, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Do you already know meta:Help:Unified login/sv? --Leyo 09:59, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
No, but I only have two accounts: Användare:Kemikungen on Swedish Wikipedia and User:Kemikungen on Wikimedia Commons. /Kemikungen (talk) 10:03, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Currently, there is no “hard” prove that both accounts belong to the same user. Merging accounts would change this for example. --Leyo 10:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

The factual accuracy of the chemical structure File:Cinnamyl-alcohol-3D-balls.png is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Cinnamyl-alcohol-3D-balls.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Files in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Ephemeronium (talk) 12:56, 30 October 2010 (UTC)


A new image with the missing hydrogen atom uploaded. Thanks for the notice. /Kemikungen (talk) 19:36, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks...[edit]

for cleaning up File:SMS Konig.jpg. Just thought I'd let you know I appreciate your efforts. Keep up the good work! Parsecboy (talk) 18:23, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, Parsecboy! /Kemikungen (talk) 21:16, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

File:AD-6 Skyraider.jpg[edit]

Hi, you upleaded the nice Skyraider photo from English Wikipedia. However, it would be better, if you give your files a different name than on en:wiki, because otherwise the local wikipedia will still use the file uploaded there and not the one from Commons. Also, since we have now 54 photos of AD-6 aircraft, a name like "AD-6s of VA-42 in 1955" or so would be helpful to differ between the photos. Thank you and Cheers Cobatfor (talk) 16:42, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Since bots are uploading files from enwp with the same name, I decided to stick to that scheme. /Kemikungen (talk) 05:40, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Gulnade svartvita bilder[edit]

Hej, Ser att du fixat till en del gamla svartvita bilder på ett bra sätt. Kanske har du även möjlighet att se över våra bilder av Yngve Larsson? Flera av dem lider av liknande problem. Allt gott! /Urbourbo (talk) 13:57, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Det är väl bara File:Klass 5c.jpg, File:Stettin yl 1.jpg och File:Stettin yl 2.jpg som lider av gulsot? Det borde gå lätt att ordna. /Kemikungen (talk) 14:09, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Trevligt! Ja, och kanske File:Skogskyrkogarden 1940.jpg och File:Mullberget biblioteket crop.jpg? Lite osäker. Såg dessutom en bild som väl verkar ha perspektivproblem: File:Sibyllegatan 16-6.jpg? Hade varit idealt med någon form av åtgärdsmallar & dito -kategorier för dessa typ av problem... Allt gott! /Urbourbo (talk) 14:13, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Skogskyrkogarden 1940 är nog för liten och för dålig kvalitet för att det ska löna sig att göra något åt den, men de andra kan jag kika på. /Kemikungen (talk) 14:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
Roligt, stort tack! :) /Urbourbo (talk) 14:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Här ett till tips på en bild som väl behöver något gjort med perspektivet? Jämför hur det väl borde se ut här. Allt gott! /Urbourbo (talk) 21:09, 4 February 2011 (UTC)

Vi kan väl prova med den där? Fast jag tycker nog att bilden från 2007 är bättre. Perspektivet blir mer naturligt när bilden är tagen på längre håll. T.ex. så ser man ju taket. /Kemikungen (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
OK poäng. Dock borde vi i så fall kanske beskära den. Allt gott, /Urbourbo (talk) 23:10, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 5ce712522cf37d6720e9dfd37a5d2109[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Sepiabilder[edit]

Hej Kemikungen! Har noterat att Du har gjort om ett antal bilder jag nyligen laddat upp från originalens klassiska "Vecko-journals-sepiaton" till vanlig (och i mitt tycke tråkig) gråskala. Nu vet jag att man ju lika litet "äger" de bilder man laddat upp här på Commons som de texter man skriver på vanliga wp, men jag skulle ändå vilja vädja till Dig att - om Du absolut vill ha gråskalevarianter - hellre ladda upp dessa som kompletterande parallella varianter än att helt ersätta de varmt och vackert sepiatonade originalversionerna. /FredrikT (talk) 17:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Originalen är inte sepiafärgade, utan sepiatonen är en artefakt som beror på ålder. Gulnade fotografier brukar jag regelmässigt konvertera till gråskala, vilket, som du kan se av kommentarerna ovan, brukar vara uppskattat. Jag är tveksam till att sepiafärgen tillför något till bilderna. Den minskar bara bildernas kontrastomfång. Att ladda upp dem under nytt namn innebär en massa merarbete eftersom jag då även blir tvungen att gå in i alla artiklar som använder bilderna och ändra länken. Men om du tycker att de bilder som du har bidragit med borde fortsätta att vara sepiafärgade så ska jag försöka låta bli dem i fortsättningen. /Kemikungen (talk) 18:06, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Jag tackar för det sista beskedet. Vad gäller själva sakfrågan är det faktiskt också så, åtminstone vad gäller bilderna ur Vecko-Journalen, att det definitivt inte handlar om någon åldringsprocess: VJ trycktes under många decennier i just sepia, vilket var ett av tidningens mest klassiska kännemärken (om Du har hört Tage Danielssons monolog "Den gamla Vecko-Journalen" ur Under Dubbelgöken så vet Du att han skämtar nostalgiskt om detta fenomen på åtskilliga ställen där). När det gäller äldre originalfotografier kan det säkert finnas vissa färgförändringar som är åldersrelaterade, men också här är mitt intryck att fotoateljéerna ofta "tintade" fotografierna just för att ge dem envarmare färgton. Denna teori stärks också av att själva den omgivande kartongpaspartoun på dessa bilder ofta är i en matchande färgton. /FredrikT (talk) 18:19, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Att partoun har liknande färgton tycker jag snarare pekar på att de har åldrats och gulnat tillsammans. Hade det varit frågan om avsiktlig sepiatoning med svavel så skulle partoun ha varit märkbart ljusare för att framhäva fotografiets gulbruna ton. /Kemikungen (talk) 18:34, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Som arkivarie som sysslat mycket med gamla fotografier genom åren tillåter jag mig att fortfarande hysa en avvikande mening. Som belysande exempel kan Du ta de ungefärligen jämngamla File:Gustaf Ljunggren.jpg respektive File:Agrell, Sigurd - porträtt - foto Rahmn Lund - AF .jpg. I båda fallen är själva fotografiet sepiatonat, men paspartouterna är helt olika: på den första bilden där bakgrunden är ljus har ateljén valt en ljust gulaktig paspartout medan den senare, genomgående mörkare bilden har fått en i brunt. Vore det verkligen troligt att båda en gång varit "ofärgade" och råkat åldras på perfekt matchande sätt som själva fotopositivet? Slutligen vill jag också anföra File:Bergendal, David - porträtt - AF - litet.jpg som ett exempel på ett jämngammalt fotografi som dock inte alls är sepiatonat utan i helt "svartvit" gråskala - det finns m a o ingen kemiskt "nödvändig" bruntoning av gamla fotografier med åren. (Allt detta är originalfotografier jag själv varit med att skanna och ladda upp) /FredrikT (talk) 18:52, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Gustaf Ljunggren tror jag har varit ofärgat. Det ser ut som att paspartoun har gulnat mer än bilden även om den säkert var gräddvit från början. Agrell däremot är uppenbart färgad med avsikt från början. Hur mycket ett gammalt fotografi gulnar med åren beror på många olika faktorer; Kvaliteten på fotopappret, om det varit utsatt för ljus (inramat) eller legat mörkt (fotoalbum). Även en sådan sak som tobaksrök har missfärgat månget gammalt fotografi. /Kemikungen (talk) 19:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Esquilo!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:39, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Hey! I didn't upload that. User:Kiribati2008 did. I just converted it to greyscale. /Esquilo (talk) 10:45, 20 May 2011 (UTC)
Well you did upload a new version, so it is not unreasonable to assume you know what it is of, and therefore might be able to categorize it. If you do, please add a category or two :-) (NB I have nothing to do with running the bot). --Tony Wills (talk) 02:46, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
I have no idea who Ireneusz Iredynski is. I just found the image on Special:NewFiles and noticed it needed some cleanup. /Esquilo (talk) 07:57, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
Fair enough, I think the bot tags recently uploaded files and also recently edited files (on the asumption that if there is activity there is a good chance someone might be there to fix the problem). I suppose in this sort of case you could probably just move the template to the uploaders page, anyway I added a category to the image (he's a Polish writer) :-) --Tony Wills (talk) 21:00, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

HMS Snapphanen[edit]

Hej. Såg att du nyligen ändrat blasoneringen (och bilden) för HMS Snapphanen. Undrar om du har en källa för den nya blasoneringen? Min enda källa (Braunstein, Christian (2006). Heraldiska vapen inom det svenska försvaret = Heraldry of the Armed forces of Sweden Stockholm: Statens Försvarshistoriska Museer. ISBN 91-971584-9-6, s.66) anger nämligen inte att grepen är störtad (men visar däremot en störtad tjuga). Så en bättre källa är alltid välkommen. /Lokal_Profil 18:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)

Ingen särskilt bra källa tyvärr. Jag råkade notera att orienteringen på tjugan/grepen/gaffeln skiljde sig från den som jag har på en minnestavla här hemma. Därför googlade jag lite och hittade påståenden som bekräftade att den skulle vara störtad på några heraldikforum. På min tavla liknar den en tjuga, men jag har också hittat uppgifter om att det ska vara en muskötgaffel (som används som stöd vid skjutning). Vilken sorts gaffel det ska vara och hur många tänder den ska ha lägger jag mig inte i, men jag är rätt övertygad om att den ska vara störtad. /Esquilo (talk) 20:50, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
Da har du nog hittat mitt gamla inlagg dar jag funderade pa om det kanske var en muskotgaffel =). Inga problem, hoppades bara att det fanns en battre kalla nan stans =) /Lokal_Profil 15:03, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hundskärsknuv.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hundskärsknuv.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Marhällan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marhällan.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ängsholmen vid Sollenkroka.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ängsholmen vid Sollenkroka.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Artbestämning[edit]

Hej Esquilo, vet du vilken art denna blomma kan tänkas tillhöra: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-hYQk6Zk0gZs/TljSP7PqXVI/AAAAAAAAAJE/ez8lMl_-qJk/s1600/Blomma1.jpg Jag misstänker att det är någon form av syska men kan inte hitta något liknande på commons. mvh --Vogler (talk) 19:33, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Britneybirthday.jpg[edit]

I got my nomination slightly wrong, sorry. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:33, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Harald Vogel[edit]

Hi, Esquilo, thanx for reworking this picture: file:Harald Vogel.jpg. Very good idea and perfect result! Best wishes, --Wikiwal (talk) 22:18, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Reply to your question[edit]

That category is to help people be able to find photos that were taken by those cameras. I also believe it helps aids search engines in finding images take by that camera as to sort them out. I am not exactly sure though. An administrator might know why those categories exist. --Clarkcj12 (talk) 22:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Esox lucius ZOO 1.jpg[edit]

Hi, Esquilo. I noted that you used the image on the sv:Gädda. I nominated the image as QI. Would you mind to support the nomination ? Sincerely. --Jik jik (talk) 11:28, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Uh, ok. How do I do that? /Esquilo (talk) 09:14, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
The procedure is described in Commons:Quality_images_candidates#How_to_review. The picture itself is to find in Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list in the section dated December 18, 2011. Thanks. --Jik jik (talk) 17:11, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
It's a good picture, but the resolution is a bit to low to qualify as a QI. See Commons:Image guidelines. /Esquilo (talk) 09:26, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
I uploaded the original resolution of the picture. --Jik jik (talk) 10:39, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Anastasios Soulis and Rebecca Scheja.jpg[edit]

Hej, med tanke på att tjejen tittar in i kameran antar jag att bilden är tagen i samband med filmningen, men med tanke på bildbeskrivningen kanske det borde förtydligas, så att den inte raderas för att vara ett screenshot ur en film. /grillo (talk) 10:26, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Det stämmer. Det står också ett förtydligande under licensmallen. Samma sak med File:Johannes Brost.jpg, File:Kjell Bergqvist.jpg och File:Tuva Novotny.jpg.
Finns det någon bättre mall än {{Info}} som man bör använda för sådana förtydliganden? /Esquilo (talk) 10:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
Jag är förstås blind och såg inte den noteringen... Tack för förtydligandet. /grillo (talk) 18:43, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

GeschützDora2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GeschützDora2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kvarnen på Waldemarsudde.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kvarnen på Waldemarsudde.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stridsbåt 90 Polis.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stridsbåt 90 Polis.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Riksdalerskäret.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riksdalerskäret.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stora sjötullen 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stora sjötullen 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lindalen nedre.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindalen nedre.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Björkboda herrgård.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Björkboda herrgård.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Djursholms vattentorn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Djursholms vattentorn.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Riksdagsmän[edit]

Du har kanske redan tänkt på det, men om du ska fotografera riksdagsmännen kan du låna utrustning från Wikimedia Sveriges teknikpool. Det är bara att skriva upp dig och hämta den utrustning du behöver på kontoret.--ArildV (talk) 08:02, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Jag hade tänkt använda min egen Nikon D5100 med ett Nikkor AF-S DX 18-105 f/3.5-5.6G ED VR-objektiv (Puh, vad Nikon har krångliga beteckningar på sina gluggar!). Det är inga större skillnader mellan D5100 och D7000, men gluggen verkar vara bättre (f/2.8 släpper in mer ljus). /ℇsquilo 08:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Jag tror det är värt att använda föreningens objektiv, förutom ljusstyrkan så är skärpan fantastisk (innan jag använde det trodde jag inte det skulle vara så stor skillnad). Inget objektiv jag har fått så skarpa bilder med. Lycka till med fotograferingen hursomhelst!--ArildV (talk) 08:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Hm, jag kan inte redigera http://se.wikimedia.org/wiki/Teknikpool/Lånelista och jag kan inte logga in med mitt vanliga användarnamn/lösenord. /ℇsquilo 19:54, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Du ska kunna det logga in med ett vanligt Wikipediakonto och redigera sidan eftersom den ligger i projektnamnrymden som alla kan redigera. Om du vill kan jag skriva in dig, men det ska fungera för dig att redigera.--ArildV (talk) 20:07, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stenopus Hispidus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stenopus Hispidus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Japansk röding.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Japansk röding.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Clownfisk.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clownfisk.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adéle Weman (Ebba Masalin, 1932).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dalarö Skans4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalarö Skans4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ian Wachtmeister.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ian Wachtmeister.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hovjägarbostället.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hovjägarbostället.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

COM:QIC#November_14,_2012[edit]

For File:Spb 06-2012 Inside the Passage.jpg, a rework is available, please consider to check it out. Thanks - A.Savin 10:19, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Trinks-Triplex.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trinks-Triplex.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Euston station MMB 30 390026 43062 390010 221116.jpg[edit]

Hi. You opposed this image at QI discuss on grounds of CA. I have corrected this, and was wondering if you'd take another look. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:56, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

I can't see any difference at all. /ℇsquilo 15:54, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:17, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Militära skyddsområden med avbildningsförbud[edit]

Hej,

Har du koll var man kan hitta en lista över militära skyddsområden i Skärgården där man inte får fotografera? På väg från Årsta till Utö sist blev jag osäker på om det var tillåtet att fotografera framförallt Äggskären, men också Vitsgarn och Alvsta långholmar (såg ut som det satt skyltar på den senare):--ArildV (talk) 09:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Skyddsområden finns inte längre (avskaffades 2010). Skyddsobjekt finns fortfarande och är utmärkta med sådana här skyltar. Vitsgarn och Alvsta långholmar borde inte vara skyddsobjekt. Det är bara området från Näsudden till Årsta Havsbad som är utmärkt som skyddsobjekt på sjökortet. Avmagnetiseringsanläggningen på Äggskären däremot är ett skyddsobjekt. /ℇsquilo 09:36, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Sedan kan du ju göra som jag gjorde med den här bilden; Vänta tio år med att ladda upp den. Då är brottet preskriberat. ;-) /ℇsquilo 09:46, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
Jag vill verka bekräfta eller dementera att det finns några bilder att spara i 10 år. Tack för svaret!--ArildV (talk) 09:49, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Photos of Cheb relief intarsia[edit]

Hi, I'm writing about very unique technique called Cheb relief intarsia. I'm also collecting photos and informations about all items with it. This technique was very popular in Sweden, and I found some item near to Stockholm. But I'm from Czech republic and this is too far for me. Could you please take a photos of them?

Items are at Hallwylska museet, Skoklosters slott and Ulriksdals castle. In Ulriksdals are many items (kabinets, desks, trik-trak games, etc), but I don't know accession numbers. Could you be so kind and ask somebody from there? If you agree, I will tell you how to photo them. Thank you. Dominikmatus (talk) 14:22, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello Dominikmatus!
I have no idea what 'Cheb relief intarsia' is, but if there is such items att the Hallwyl Palace, maybe you can find them in the category Hallwylska museet. There are lots of items from there photographed during the 2012 photo hunt. /ℇsquilo 14:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
It doesn't matter what it is. I already searched in this category and it's not there. I don't know grants of WM Norway, but you propably could use it. If you can't do that, I will ask someone else. It's not problem :). Dominikmatus (talk) 15:57, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Maeuseturm Bingen Rhein.jpg[edit]

Hi, thanks for your QI review. You found "Sharpening poorly done. Lots of artefacts." Where are these artefacts, could you please mark one or two of them? Thanks in advance -- Arcalino (talk) 11:39, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Finanzbehörde (Hamburg-Neustadt).Fassadendetails.1.ajb.jpg[edit]

Hi Esquilo! Thanks for QI review. You're right, the transformation is corrected now. Rgds --Ajepbah (talk) 11:24, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Adéle Weman (Ebba Masalin, 1932).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Adéle Weman (Ebba Masalin, 1932).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

–⁠moogsi (blah) 19:45, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

date of photographs[edit]

Hello. You're deleting information that I added of when the picture was taken.

I delete the categorization for two resaons.
  1. The categorization is superflourus. Date information exists in both the EXIF-block and in the Information-template.
  2. It is inapropriate usage of the categories. Date categories are for images that are depicting events at a specific date. There is no point in adding photos of buildings etc in such categories. /ℇsquilo 19:21, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Prostitute in Naples, Italy (1920).jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Prostitute in Naples, Italy (1920).jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Prostitute in Naples, Italy (1920).jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 05:26, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Sigma lenses category sorting[edit]

Hello, how do you plan sorting categories in the Sigma lenses category? Maksim Sidorov 10:46, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

The same way as "Taken with Sigma" category; By focal length and aperture. /ℇsquilo 10:48, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Ok, I think, it’ll be better, however grouping all the categories under S letter looks strange for me. Please keep in mind lenses generations, for example, there are 5 generations of the 70-200mm F2.8 lens. Maksim Sidorov 10:55, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Ok. Are they supposed to be sorted by age or by the letter-soup? /ℇsquilo 10:57, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
I sorted they by age. The 17-70mm lens has three generations: F2.8-4.5 DC Macro (2006), F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM‎ (2009) and F2.8-4 DC Macro OS HSM C‎ (2012), and despite the first one has another aperture, there are strictly three generations, one succeeds another. I think, corresponding categories should be listed in the order shown above. Maksim Sidorov 11:04, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:José G. Álvarez 1.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:José G. Álvarez 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 19:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sagalund - Fähuset.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagalund - Fähuset.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sagalund - Bastu.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagalund - Bastu.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sagalund - Brinkkulla stugan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sagalund - Brinkkulla stugan.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Sagalund - Bastu.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Buildings in Kimito island, sauna.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dalsbruk - Kolugnarna.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dalsbruk - Kolugnarna.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ängsö brygga.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ängsö brygga.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Skrapan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skrapan.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lilla Höggarnsbank.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilla Höggarnsbank.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Understen.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Understen lighthouse, SW view..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

File:Båtsportkort.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Båtsportkort.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 21:45, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Märketskallen old.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Märketskallen old.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 17:06, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Årstafältet panorama.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Årstafältet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Järv1.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gulo gulo gulo (Wolverine).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Sturebadet02.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Sturebadet, interior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lerviksudde.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lerviksudde.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Örö.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Örö.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Motopark (talk) 14:26, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Botveskär2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Botveskär2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Västra Kvarnholmen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Västra Kvarnholmen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Örngrund.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Örngrund.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)