User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Thanks for everything that you did on Commons and the support that you gave me! --The Evil IP address (talk) 17:59, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Contents

File:Logo_VIU deleted?[edit]

I don't understand why this file (Logo_VIU) was marked for speedy deletion. It is the logo of the Venice International University and they gave me permission to publish it on the Internet. Please contact me for further information. Thanks. Silvia

Permission to publish it on the Internet is vague term. Please use Commons:Email templates and Commons:OTRS for permissions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

On October 13, I sent an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the written permission to publish the logo under the GNU Free Documentation License (I used the email template above). What should I do next? The file has been deleted and when I tried uploading the file, an administrator told me not to upload the same file again. Can you please help me?

Here it's the text of the email sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby assert that I am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of WORK [ http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:VIU_logo_nero.JPG ].

I agree to publish that work under the free license [ GNU Free Documentation License ].

I acknowledge that I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product, and to modify it according to their needs, as long as they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be attributed to me.

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

October 13, 2010, Silvia Casalini

You should ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to verify permission and restore file. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

SBGN logo deletion[edit]

Hello, the picture containing the logo of the Systems Biology Graphical Notation has been deleted. It was marked for speedy deletion for copyright violation, but wrongly. I noticed it only yesterday and despite my efforts, the logo was deleted. This logo was perfectly fine. The license was correct and the copyright assigned to myself, the coordinator of the Systems Biology Graphical Notation development effort. We would appreciate if the change could be reversed. If there is a problem, please contact-me on my talk page with detailed criticisms, e.g. what is exactly the copyright violation. Thank-you 193.62.198.57 07:46, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

I think will be good idea to use Commons:OTRS for confirmation of ownership/license in such cases. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Boomba picture delation?[edit]

Why the hell was my picture of a boom-ba deleted? It is a picture of my own boom-ba that I own and possess and took personally and the picture was deleted because I lack the license to this picture?

Files without clear license/source should be deleted after week. Actually you had received notification and had time to fix license information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

BSF Logo Deletion?[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:BSF_Logo.gif&action=edit&redlink=1 Could you please refrain from deleting images for which I clearly had permission to upload, if you'd read the image description, which sadly now is gone because of your within one minute deletion, you would have seen I had permission from the original artist and the games creator, I will reupload the file and hope you will pay attention to the image details next time.

The game is freeware, and released under a CC License, the creator of the image, and the developer gave permission for the image to be used in the article, so again I state, please read the image description and details before deleting things. AnotherDutchGuy (talk) 15:48, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Please use Commons:Email templates and Commons:OTRS to document permissions, if such permissions given off-line. Otherwise you should include link to relevant permission into image description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

my deleted images[edit]

Hi!

You have recently deleted some of my images.I forgot to put the licence cc-by-sa-3.0 Could you undelete them?? I had certain problems with commonist!--Quahadi Añtó 18:02, 7 May 2010 (UTC) --Quahadi Añtó 18:02, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done Please let me know if I forgot to undelete some of them.
It'll be great also to add geocoding information to them.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 8 May 2010 (UTC)
Please also fix license in File:Stablo na JI padini Vižanice 1207.jpg. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Plazuela nueva.jpg & File:La plazuela siglo XX.jpg[edit]

Hello, what's wrong with this image (File:Plazuela nueva.jpg and others)? Isn't own enough here? I only doubted the old image, you already deleted. File:La plazuela siglo XX.jpg seems to be old enough (from the lorries), to match PD-Old or PD-100. regards --Herzi Pinki (talk) 17:10, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Uploader should upload File:Plazuela nueva.jpg in full resolution with EXIF information to support claim of authorship
File:La plazuela siglo XX.jpg is definitely not work of uploader. Uploader need to add author/date of creation/source information to support claim of {{PD-old}}/{{PD-old-100}}.
This user upoaded much more problematic files like these.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Preitaart.JPG[edit]

Hi, I've seen you've deleted this file. It was uploaded by an unexperienced user and she forgot some things. I have told her what she had to do to get it all right and I thought she had done it all right: added the cc-by-sa license and some other things that I can't remember but are visible in the history. Why is the file deleted? --Sanderd17 (talk) 11:14, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

License was added by anonymous user, what is hard to verify is it original uploader or not. I restored file, but license should be added properly. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
OK, I see, I've mailed her and she answerred she applied the license, but you couldn't know that of course. I'll mail her again and say that she has to do it while she's logged in. Thanks for helping. --Sanderd17 (talk) 16:16, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Аэропорт ижевск1.jpg[edit]

Автор вроде указал источник - собственная работа. Виктор В (talk) 18:56, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Думаю, что стоіло бы, чтобы участник загрузил фото в полном разрешении, чтобы сомнений в этом не было. Участник загрузил также много изображений с сомнительными лицензиями. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Что касается файлов с "левыми" лицензиями, против их удаления я ничего не имею, здесь всё правильно. Но этот конкретный файл, оформлен верно. В каком формате и разрешении загружать файлы на склад личное дело автора. Если у Вас есть просьбы или предложения о качестве файла, для этого есть страницы обсуждения - User talk:Vivavoxnb. Если файл ворованный, для корректного удаления укажите источник откуда файл был украден, для этого есть шаблон - {{Copyvio}}. Не очень понимаю зачем выставлять на удаление все файлы автора, даже те которые оформлены корректно. --Виктор В (talk) 16:31, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
Я уже оставил на странице обсуждения этого участник подобную просьбу. Не думаю, что в просьбе подтвердить авторство есть что-то плохое. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Need your help[edit]

Hello Eugene!

I have edited this file. I removed almost all categories because of the fact that categories should be placed according to that what can be seen on the photograph. So, it is quite pointless to put the image in categories of buildings that must somewhere on the photograph itself, but they are not recognizable (COM:CAT gives as a guideline to choose proper categories accordingly after what is the main subject on the image). All in all, the uploader disagrees with this facts and I fear he did not understand what the problem is. Can you please contact him here on Commons:Форум. Or do I see this case completely wrong? Greets, High Contrast (talk) 13:43, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm not very familiar with Moscow (especially modern one). I think additional categories were valid. However I don't know how representative their subjects on photo. View is too general, since you could see many objects (may be in 360 degrees if building allow you to do so). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
This is exactly my opinion. --High Contrast (talk) 17:03, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
Actually will be good idea to ask user who added categories to annotate their subject. Just to get chance for "illiterate" :-) persons to understand how significant objects on photo. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Heartagram.png requested for undeletion[edit]

Hi, just to inform you, I made a request for this file at Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Heartagram.png. Regards, /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 13:12, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

File deletions[edit]

Hi, you've recently deleted the following files which I uploaded :

File:article_dauphine_libéré_tonight.jpg File:Article_'Je_me_présente'_poesie_mortelle.jpg File:Article_'touche_à_tout',_98.JPG File:Article_'touche_à_tout',_98.JPG File:'Thomas_Michael_est_devenu_thomas_de_jensac'.jpg File:'Intimisme_ou_paillettes'.JPG

They are newspapers scans, and i clearly mentioned the original newspaper on the page. Is there any license that allow to publish these kind of medias ? Some specific informations to give ? I didn't find any informations about that. The french moderators of wikipedia who seen the page where these files or published didn't complain. Thank you very much for your help TotalRecall (talk) 08:52, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

See Commons:Derivative works. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Добрый день! Не моглибы вы проверить достоверность "Файл:Karach.JPG"? На сайте [1] выложена ссылка на которой территории округов значительно различаются. Azamat (talk) 09:37, 20 May 2010 (UTC)Богупс

Извиняюсь, но наверное я не большой специалист в географии :-( Может будет лучше спросить на форуме русской Википедии? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

SUL Merge[edit]

I'm in the process of merging my SUL with various wikis. There's a be-x-old:Удзельнік:Nazar on Old Belarussian Wiki, where you seem to be a bureaucrat. I could not find a special page for SUL requests there, so I'm trying to contact you here.

I'd like to usurp the name Nazar on Old Belarussian Wikipedia. The name there has no associated contributions, but is unavailable for some reason. Thanks! -- Nazar (talk) 13:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Thanks a lot! Nazar (talk) 16:31, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi[edit]

Hi Eugene and sorry to bug you - active folk are rare at present :(. I think there are a couple of RfAs ready for closing - regards --Herby talk thyme 14:05, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Восточное Мунозеро.jpg[edit]

Dear Admin Zelenko,

On this panoramio image discussion link, the copyright owner gives the links to 3 images to Insider, the Commons uploader. But what is he saying here? Is he saying he licenses all 4 images on a CC BY or CC BY SA license or not? I don't read cyrillic at all. If that is so, I may pass them. If not I will have to fail them. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:58, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : I had failed this image here: File:Брошеный дом в Мунозере.jpg but if I had acted erroneously, please revert my fail mark and pass the image. Its just a pity that the copyright owner forgot to change the actual license from ARR on panoramio. Best regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 10:02, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
    ✓ Done However All rights reserved is on this and photo with permission. I think will be good idea to ask uploader to repeat permission request and ask people on Panoramio to not revoke free licenses. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 22 May 2010 (UTC)
  • Thank you for correcting my error Admin and Bureaucrat Zelenko. I learn today that Babelfish does have a translator from Russian to English. So, I was also able to verify the permission, too. The critical thing is a license is mentioned: either CC BY generic or CC BY SA generic. If not, the picture could never be kept. The Russian uploader, Insider, really did his homework here. Its a pity, there are not more uploaders like him around! Thank you for undoing my errors. I would rather be wrong and learn from my past mistakes, than to learn nothing at all. With best Regards from Vancouver, Canada.

I just wish that someone could tell Insider the importance of changing the license. Most of his images here have the right cc by or cc by sa license but not these 4. But I don't speak Russian sadly. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

FitFinder[edit]

You have removed the screenshot, what was the problem? Your help would be appreciated. Liamfahy1 (talk) 16:01, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

See Commons:Screenshots. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:ACV.png[edit]

Hello Eugene!

This deletion debate runs out of the rudder as all users in this discussion think that arguments like "no reason for delete" or "keep this one as long as there is no better one" or "valued photo we need because there is no other one" would count in deletion debates on Commons. Perhaps you can leave a comment there or close this DR. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 21:33, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Запрос о переименовании двух файлов[edit]

Добрый день!

Прошу вас переименовать 2 файла, загруженных мной:

File:Kurily_Bol'shaya_Kuril'skaya_gryada.svg

File:SCAPIN 667 lq.jpg

Я установил соответствующую пометку 5 дней назад, но файлы до сих пор не переименованы, а мне хотелось бы использовать правильные названия для вставки в Википедию. Andrey Isakov (talk) 10:42, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Большое спасибо! Andrey Isakov (talk) 14:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

New Admin[edit]

Thank you for your welcome and prompt action. I'll try very hard to be moderate in all things, partly (90%) because that's my way and partly (10%) because I know that I'll hear about it if I am not.       Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:56, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Вопрос[edit]

Здравствуйте, Евгений! Разъясните пожалйста насчёт фотографий памятников. Это что, нельзя их фотографировать и размещать в Википедии? Я правильно понял? Но как же тогда те же статьи про памятники. Если можно, ответьте пожалуйста на российской страничке: Участник:Gruszecki. Я бы хотел дополнить некоторые статьи фотографиями, только сделанными, теперь что нельзя будет? Спасибо, жду ответа.Gruszecki (talk) 11:18, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Bot flag[edit]

Hi,

I have a question to You. I'm adding template of converting to SVG for lot of files, so I found a idea to write a extension to firefox, which will save my time doing some work for me. So the question is: Do I need to fill a bot request for something like this?

Thanks in advance for answer.

--Magul (talk) 17:48, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

I think answer depend of edit rate: will you crowd recent changes or not. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:15, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

I guess every edition will be manually accepted by me, so at top I can do maybe 20 edits per minute (I guess now I have sometimes that edit rate, but the idea of extenstion give me less time spending without edits). --Magul (talk) 10:51, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

In this case bot flag is definitely good idea. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 30 May 2010 (UTC)


Photo deleted[edit]

Dear Eugene,

I'm writing you because we are having problems with a photo that has been deleted:

16:35 13 may 2010 CommonsDelinker (discusión | contribuciones) m (2.357 bytes) (Bot: Eliminando "Recida1.jpg". Borrado en Commons por EugeneZelenko. (Missing essential information: source and/or license: since May 5, 2010)) (deshacer) 

We incorrectly put the licence type and now we try to upload again and the following message appears:

"A file of this name has been previously uploaded and subsequently deleted. You should check the deletion log before proceeding to upload it again.

A file identical to this file (File:Recida1.jpg) has previously been deleted. You should check that file's deletion history before proceeding to re-upload it. Please modify the file description below and try again."

We have changed the name of the photo, the description and the licence, but we don’t get to upload it. If you want to visit us, our entry is “RECIDA” in the Wikipedia. Could you help us? Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

Rosario Toril

You could try to check Ignore any warnings in upload form (before upload started). Sorry, I don't remember exact text but after you upload already deleted image (same name or same file) you should see a form with button text something like Ignore this warning and continue upload. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 7 June 2010 (UTC)


Thanks a lot Eugene for your advice. It is works properly. Rosario Toril

Re: deletion reasons[edit]

Hey EugeneZelenko. It's not clear to me what you mean by "deletion reasons", maybe it's an admin thing. Would you mind clarifying? Thanks, ZooFari 03:19, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

When you delete page, you choose reason form drop-down menu. One of reason refer to COM:FLICKR with non-free Flickr license text. Should be implemented in MediaWiki:Deletereason-dropdown, but looks like files handled other way like JavaScript.
Other reason refer to COM:FLICKRW with Flickr washing text.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your response. ZooFari 06:00, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Memorial in memory of the killed on 4 june 1988.jpg[edit]

Dear Admin/Bureaucrat Zelenko,

If you agree with me that this is indeed a monument with no utilitarian purposes (such as an old plane that is adorned with a sculpture...which may be kept), please file a DR and tell the uploader the reason why you did this....that there is no COM:FOP in the former Soviet States. The uploader Lzhl knows all about the licenses, I notice, but he says on his userpage that 1. his English is poor and 2. I don't think he knows about Freedom of Panorama laws sadly. Can you help here please? I believe he speaks Russian like you. Thank You from Vancouver, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:58, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Thank you for your help. I have made a comment in the DR too similar to what I said to you. In short, it cannot be kept. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:03, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Barradas.JPG[edit]

The {{PD-self}} is already there. As in this image too. What else am I supposed to do? Victor Kbça (talk) 17:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Please upload this image in full resolution with EXIF information to support your authorship claim. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

What's EXIF information and why do I need to do all this? Victor Kbça (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

EXIF information is generated by camera and contains camera settings (model, exposure, focus length, etc.). Image you uploaded is of thumbnail size, so it may be taken by somebody else, so to prove you authorship, you could upload original image. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

It was not my camera, man. Actually, is was a cell phone. I don't have it in original size in my computer, and i don't even know if the cell phone owner has... is that really necessary to upload a PHOTO here? God... Victor Kbça (talk) 20:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Anyway, I don't this that subject will disappear. You could take a camera and make new photo (or series of them what even better). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Категории[edit]

Добрый день! Я новый здесь, загрузил 5 фоток. Бот требует уточнить категорию фоток. Я не знаю как это сделать? Все фотки хочу помещать в категорию category "Political people stubs", category "Cavadov Mahir". Помогите пожалуйста!

Во первых у меня вопрос: являетесь ли Вы автором фотографий? Если да, то пожалуйста, загрузите их в полном размере. Если они взяты где-то на просторах Интернета, их придётся удалить.
Для того, чтобы добавить категорию, Вы можете добавить в описание файлов текст [[Category:Politicians of Russia]].
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Дорогой Евгений! Эти фотографии мне предоставил тот, кто на них изображен из своего семейного альбома. Ничьих авторских прав на эти снимки нет и никогда не было. Мне, как новичку очень трудно разобраться в программировании, пожалуйста, помогите мне, установите какие надо метки-категории, чтоб эти фотки никто не удалял. Я несу ответственность за то, что эти снимки - они из семейного альбома! Заранее благодарю.
Последующие такие же фотографии я постараюсь загружать посмотрев на Ваши метки-шаблоны для меня. Italic (talk) 17:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Проблема в том, что авторское право возникает в момент создания произведения (т. е. снимка). Поэтому Вам необходимо получить разрешение от фотографа или от изображённого человека (если это делалось в ателье по найму). Смотрите пример разрешения на Commons:Email templates и отправить его надо в Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Mediacrat (talk · contribs)[edit]

Could you please check this user's images, they mentioned this website as the source, I don't understand Russian but in 'about' page of that website, there is a line that says "Any use of materials or fragments of them in any language is allowed only with written permission of JSC "Publishing YUNIMEDIA""
Thank you.   ■ MMXX  talk  15:11, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

You understood correctly. However there is banner 500 фотографий для Wikimedia (500 photos for Wikipedia), but if they really want to help Wikipedia, they should explicitly specify license compatible with Commons. So {{no permission since}} is reasonable in this situation. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
I tagged some files with {{no permission since}}, but, sorry, I don't have time to do this for all of them. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much, I'll take care of rest of them, and will wait for their reply.   ■ MMXX  talk  17:00, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Images of stone drawings (?) in Russia[edit]

Hello Eugene Zelenko, you are the most active russian speaking admin I know - here is a gallery [2] of nearly 100 archeological images from russia, several are uncategorized (some are taken from a book?!), most of them only categorized by a bot. As far as I understand they illustrate neolithic drawings and stone sculptures somewhere in russia - can you add categories or do you have a russian-speaking place to discuss it? In parts there may be problems with sources, copyrights too..... Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 06:24, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

PS: just found the english article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ural_pictograms Cholo Aleman (talk) 06:26, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Russian article is ru:Писаница на мысе Еловый, however it's not well known place. So category may be named Pictograms on cape Yelovy. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Memorial for killed in WWII in Zarechnoe.jpg[edit]

Dear Admin/Bureaucrat Zelenko,

I'm sorry to disturb you one final time about this second image by Lzhl. At first glance, it looks very generic and could be kept on Commons....but the presence of the statue makes me think that it might not because the statue makes the monument somewhat unique. Furthermore, the image focuses on the structure, so De Minimis cannot apply here. If my understanding of Russian FOP is correct, please feel free to file a DR here and tell Lzhl in Russian that COM:FOP does not allow this structure in Russia. It is a pity: if this was a picture of 1 to 3 planes or tanks only, it would certainly pass FOP but statues are usually copyrighted sadly. With Best Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:15, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

My opinion that this image could be kept, since it includes surroundings (so it may be argues that this is picture of settlement). However, if you have doubts, you could nominate it to deletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
  • It is good that ZooFari pased it then and Commons can use it. I wasn't 200% sure but I thought the statue made it a monument. But that's OK with me. --Leoboudv (talk) 19:14, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
Of course, this is subjective, but I think, it's necessary to look how big part of picture is occupied by statue and how much of other things are visible around. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Question[edit]

I didn't realize that it was already taken. How about changing it to my first name, Schuylar? Joe Chill 2 (talk) 16:09, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

I think it's fine. Just modify request accordingly. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Stadiumsoccercity.jpg[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko--you tagged this image as not having a source. I'm not sure why you did, but I thought I would tell you that I undid your edit. Cheers, - Gump Stump (talk) 16:26, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Small size and absence of EXIF information doesn't support own work claim. So I reverted you changes. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Быстрое удаление[edit]

Евгений, добрый день! Прошу Вас удалить этот файл - File:Raflogo.gif - логотип Рижской автомобильной фабрики никак не может быть свободным, ему не место на Викискладе. Спасибо! --Ds02006 (talk) 08:55, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done. Спасибо за помощь! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

User:Meno25[edit]

I'm finishing up a cleanup of the lists of Admins, see Commons_talk:List_of_administrators. The User rights log shows only that you made Meno25 an Admin on 29 June 2008. I can't find anything to indicate that his or her status has changed.

But, the user list does not show User:Meno25 as an admin and the admin count (268) is correct without him or her.

Can you shed any light on this? Am I missing something or do we have a system error? Thanks,      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

I found records in Meta logs, that Meno25 removed Commons rights himself/herself. But I don't know or remember details why. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for quick reply. I don't understand the relationship between Meta and Commons well enough to understand this. I take it it means he is no longer an Admin on Commons?
The same thing seems to apply to User:PeterSymonds. He doesn't show up in the Meta search.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 15:30, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
You are correct, Meno25 is not longer administrator/bureaucrat on Commons and not longer steward.
AFAIK only stewards could remove administrator or bureaucrat rights. I guess this could be done only on Meta. Unfortunately, related log entries are not duplicated/referencied in local right logs.
I think you need just to look on older log pages and use browser search for PeterSymonds.
I entered bugzilla:12984 sometime ago, but it doesn't seems to be interesting for developers :-(
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Dogsled mail[edit]

Пристроил одну из твоих загрузок пока сюда. Возможно, со временем организуем аналогичную статью и на русском. Очень интересный автор, этот Дорошевич! Поэты-убийцы - это cool! Ты где его раскопал?

Спасибо большое! Читал "Сказки и легенды" Дорошевича в юности... Нашёл года два назад опять, перечитал и понял, что это суровая правда жизни :-) На Google Books нашел другие книги и несколько отсканировал сам. Кстати интересно читать старую периодику на злобу дня для того, чтобы понять как мало меняется мир и менталитет. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Нашел одну любопытную статью - w:History of Young Physicists' Tournament in Russia. Это ты там упоминаешься под сноской 38? Жаль, что никто не догадался завести такую же статью и в русском разделе. --Michael Romanov (talk) 13:02, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Да, Ваш покорный слуга :-) Есть ru:International Young Physicists' Tournament ru:Турнир юных физиков. Конечно, жалко, так как событие очень интересное, да и своё, без оглядки на "цивилизованные" страны, да и чему-то учит... --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

User:Summer123[edit]

Hi. I notice you went through the images of Summer123 (talk · contribs) tagging no-source. Am I missing something? Those don't look like questionable photos to me. Just photos of a woman's farm. A few of them have already been deleted, and those look fine to me too. I was going to go to COM:UNDEL but thought I would ask you directly first. Thanks. Wknight94 talk 17:57, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

I think will be good idea to ask uploader to provide full resolution images with EXIF information. Some of them just thumbnails. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:51, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Monument for the explorers in Mirny, Yakutia.JPG[edit]

I hope this image I passed is OK and does not violate COM:FOP in Russia since it was uploaded by an Admin. It does look like a monument to tell you the truth and I don't know have all the answers sadly. I tell you this since you likely know the problem from your comments to Geagea's RfA application. With kind Regards from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:41, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

It was installed in 1970. So I nominated file for deletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
  • I thought that was definitely a sculpture but I wasn't sure and FOP laws are very complicated in each country and subject to many interpretations sadly. I have made a comment in the DR. Best regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:54, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Stadiumsoccercity.jpg[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko. I removed your speedy deletion template on this image again. The source information is there (the uploader claims it is his/her own work). If you think it is a copyright violation, list it for deletion at Commons:Deletion requests rather than applying a speedy deletion template that doesn't apply. What you're doing makes it look like you're trying to get around the deletion process on Commons. - Gump Stump (talk) 13:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, but just removing {{no source}} also doesn't seem to be good way to deal with such problems. I nominated this image for deletion. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Of course! It may indeed warrant deletion; my only point was that it was not a speedy deletion case, and also not a case of not having an image source. Cheers, - Gump Stump (talk) 00:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Учётная запись[edit]

Здравствуйте, Евгений! У меня есть глобальная учётная запись Impro. Я хотел бы авторизовать её и для commons.wikimedia.org. Вы могли бы передать мне неиспользуемый аккаунт Impro? Мой основной аккаунт - в русской википедии Impro. --Impro-en (talk) 07:57, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Сделано.
✓ Done User:Impro was renamed to User:Impro (usurped) and User:Impro-en was renamed to User:Impro.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Спасибо --Impro (talk) 09:00, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Скажите, а почему я автоматически не авторизуюсь в commons.wikimedia.org - так, как это происходит в языковых википедиях? Это какой-то глюк или что-то нужно сделать для этого? --Impro (talk) 15:27, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Вообще-то странно, учётная запись объединена. Может стоит ещё раз объединить? Выйти/зайти? :-) Если не поможет, то наверное стоит удалить глобальную учётную запись (Meta?) и создать её снова. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Перелогиниться не получается. Если зайти с commons.wikimedia.org , то автоматически не подгружаются другие википедии. А где можно отменить единую учётную запись, чтобы создать её вновь? --Impro (talk) 15:56, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
На m:Steward requests/SUL requests#Requests for usurpation or deleting global accounts. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Please, can you delete File:Juan Ramón Jiménez.jpg[edit]

The image was one of my oldest contributions, when I don't know the rules. Can you delete it? Sorry for my bad english. Regards. Escarlati (talk) 14:23, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

I don't think that your English is so bad :-) ✓ Done. Thank you for finding painter information! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Tenzin Rabgye.jpg[edit]

Здравствуйте! Как Вы думаете, это изображение можно считать свободным? Или его нужно отнести к несвободным фотографиям? - В этом случае я его загружу на рувики как несфободное для иллюстрации статьи об изображённом человеке. --Impro (talk) 13:41, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Думаю, что это {{PD-Art}}, если даты в описании верны. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Спасибо, сейчас сменю шаблон лицензии. --217.22.163.126 15:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)


russian speaking help needed....[edit]

Hello Eugene, you are my first idea if I see uncategorized russian images. Here are [3] They look quite in scope and some are used. Can you add categories, please. Best wishes Cholo Aleman (talk) 16:01, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done. Sorry for delay. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Panoramioreview[edit]

Здравствуйте, Евгений. Вы как-то помечали загруженные мной фотографии с Panoramio. Не могли бы Вы пояснить мне почему для файла File:Немецкий полуостров.jpg проверка не требуется. --Insider (talk) 17:10, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Думаю, стоит адресовать этот вопрос User:Truu. Что касается файла, то User:Lupo сделал корректное подтверждение. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Я попросил автора файлов из категории Category:Vostochnoye Munozero вернуть обратно свободную лицензию. Думаю страницы обсуждения к файлам теперь ни к чему? --Insider (talk) 12:22, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
    Перепроверил и удалил страницы обсуждения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Zurab Tsereteli[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko,

About Zurab Tsereteli. If you want I take care the OTRS permition from him. I'll try to get one letter of permission that covers all his sculptures in Russia, Ukraine and Georgia. Geagea (talk) 20:43, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

It'll be great. However will be good idea to ask Wikimedia Russia and Ukraine to sign request too. May be other Wikipedia/Commons users. I think in this case request will have more weight. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 20:47, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
You mean that the request is commonn to a lot of wikipedians not only one? Geagea (talk) 21:01, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Sure. Especially those who wrote articles about Tsereteli and his art. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:02, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
O.K. It can be done. It will take some time bur we might solve big problem with the panorame in the ex-soviet counties. My opinion is that the artists in thos countries will not mind to give permition. Geagea (talk) 21:09, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Who knows? But I think, it's generally polite to ask permissions anyway in not-trivial cases (like taking person photo). Especially when law require it :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
Tel it to paparazzi :-)) Geagea (talk) 21:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
I hope Wikimedians moral virtues much higher then those sort of people :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:30, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

O.k. then. I'll take of it. Thanks for attention. Geagea (talk) 22:14, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Erroneous no-source tagging?[edit]

Hi, Eugene. I'm curious why you tagged File:Barradas.JPG as having no source. It looks like it has a source to me, but I might be missing something. Powers (talk) 17:48, 23 July 2010 (UTC)

Small resolution, missing EXIF is good indicator of problematic image. Other uploads by same user ware also problematic. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Both of those warning flags could be caused by cropping a larger image. I think this image should go through a full deletion review instead of speedy deletion. Powers (talk) 20:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
So you definitely could just nominate image for deletion in such cases. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

This DR[edit]

Dear Admin Zelenko,

A DR was just filed recently and a contributor noticed that the ex-Georgian panoramio account owner and source--otiko--was accused of copyright violations elsewhere. Suspiciously, this account owner recently deleted his panoramio account. But the contributor who noticed the accusation also saw strong evidence for copyright violations here and I have to agree. When otiko uploads images taken by 4 different cameras from 4 different manufacturers in just 2 years, alarm bells should be ringing. I think otiko's images here are likely copy vios sadly. But if you have any views, please make your them known in the DR. Thnak You sir for your time, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:02, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
  • Thanks for making a brief response to this DR. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

About deletion of my photograph[edit]

Hi. A photograph of the canned coffee which I uploaded was deleted, but cannot understand a reason. In a category of canned coffee and Coca-Cola cans, there is a photograph similar with the photograph which I uploaded.--Corpse Reviver (talk) 15:28, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Some of Coca-Cola cans may be explained as {{PD-textlogo}}. Artwork on can you uploaded was more artistic. If you need photo to illustrate this product, just shoot coffee in a cup. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Плагиат[edit]

Уважаемый Евгений, прошу Вас высказать Ваше мнение в этом обсуждении.--Taron Saharyan (talk) 14:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Combined deletion requests[edit]

You have recently took part at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tijeras1.JPG and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tijeras.JPG. As both images were proposed for deletion for the same reason, and the arguments were being copied and pasted at both deletion requests, I redirected the formed to the later, and turned it into a mass deletion request for both images. Belgrano (talk) 20:57, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for doing that! Definitely should be done that way from beginning. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Russia-Moscow-Moscow_State_University.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Russia-Moscow-Moscow_State_University.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.62.215.188 10:56, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Dermatography.jpg[edit]

Hey, you deleted my pic. Could you please explain what I did wrong? It is my pic made by me so it should be OK right? http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Dermatography.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1

File missed license information. And actually you was warned about this fact. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

irc-channel[edit]

Thanks for giving me administratorship. I don't get access to the IRC-channel #wikimedia-commons, but it seems just a chatbox. I presume I can do without? --Havang(nl) (talk) 18:16, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Frankly said, I also don't follow IRC :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

DynamicPageList (DPL)[edit]

Hello! I wanted to ask, do you have installed DPL installed here, on Commons? I tried using both the Wikimedia one, and the third party one. And no one worked. The page where I tried to use them is my user page. Thanks --Tucayo (talk) 20:16, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't have such experience. I think will be good idea to ask such questions on Commons:Village pump. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

Thanks for the help and the message. :) Steven Walling 20:22, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Eugene![edit]

Я немножко подключился к редактированию белорусского раздела. Сейчас там дискуссия идет по названию раздела "Спасылкі". Может, у тебя будет что сказать по этому случаю? --Michael Romanov (talk) 14:44, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Думаю, не стоит в чужой монастырь со своим уставом :-) На мой взгляд, Спасылкі — лучше, если внутренние находятся в Гл. таксама. Всё-таки ссылки могут быть не совсем в Интренет, но и на родственные проекты (Commons, цитаты, словарь и т. д.). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

User Dsip[edit]

Евгений, огромная просьба применить административные действия к пользователю Dsip. Он уже в 3-й раз подряд загружает одну и ту же фотографию, которая уже удалялась по причине нарушения авторских прав. Sergeisemenoff (talk) 05:09, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

User:Herbythyme сделал Dsip последнее китайское предупреждение :-) Если это не наведёт на размышления, то тогда придётся заблокировать. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 18 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 11:16, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Bundesarchiv[edit]

I don't think this is issue of single deletion request. If I'm not mistaken such question asked on Commons:Village pump recently (month-two ago). And it'll be good idea to collaborate with both Bundesarchiv and Wikimedia Germany (who was involved into getting this images on Commons) for clarifying situation with copyrights. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Additionally, can you look at this file, please? ru:Файл:Узницы Равенсбрюка.jpg. Is that photograph in PD? And if yes, what proper license tag can be used? Thanx. --Michael Romanov (talk) 18:30, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
I don't think so if it was made by German of Soviet photographer. Both countries have 70 year term of protection and photo was taken during 1939—1945. Any additional information will help to find out copyrights status. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Changing username/Current requests[edit]

Hey. Just dropping you a not here that there has been some action with my usurp on enwiki and maybe not it's ready over here too.--Hellahulla (talk) 22:55, 22 August 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fernrohr (talk) 21:29, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

File:SPb zoo visiting card of 1865.jpg[edit]

Евгений, обращаюсь к вам, надеюсь вы мне поможете. Я новичок на викискладе и не совсем знаком с процедурой удаления файлов.

Дело в том что вот этот изображение возможно нарушает авторские права, т.к. этот файл изначально был загружен в русскую Википедию участником Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff (весь вклад которого удален с Викисклада, а сам он бессрочно заблокирован как на commons, так и в ру ВП), а позднее был перенесен User:AndreyA на Викисклад. Sergeisemenoff (talk) 12:31, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Если изображение — современное, то конечно же это нарушает авторские права. А нет ли где-то более подробной информации про авторство, желательно с изображениями? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
В том-то и дело, что найти не удалось. Была поднята тема в ру ВП на форуме по авторскому праву, в результате обсуждения выяснилось, что фирма указанная анонимом реально существует, кроме того даже удалось найти сведения о тех дизайнерах, а вот самой фотографии и не видно... Еще кстати говоря о лицензии, первоначально Погребной вообще указал что он является автором этой работы и передает ее в общественное достояние (позже лицензия была изменена другим участником). Sergey Semenov (talk) 15:58, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Согласен, что Погребной — проблематичный участник. Может быть стоит сконтактироваться с фирмой для подтверждения авторства? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Вполне, но у фирмы нет электронной почты, а по телефону выяснять такие вопросы куда сложней, чем по почте, но вот с одним из авторов работы (Тимофеевым Александром Васильевичем) вполне можно будет связаться. Sergey Semenov (talk) 16:13, 26 August 2010 (UTC)
Думаю, что это будет лучшее решение проблемы. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 27 August 2010 (UTC)


Altering user name from KRecourt to Kees Recourt[edit]

Thank you for your reply. Kees Recourt on the English Wikipedia indeed belongs to me. Yes, I will also/want to change my name in the Dutch Wikipedia. I am sorry for the inconvenience. I did not realize there were all these different accounts.

File:Pujagupta.jpg[edit]

Just curious, why tag this as lacking a source? It has an {{own}} template in the source line, and the author is given as Ashishraikar, who also uploaded it. Nyttend (talk) 23:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Small resolution and incomplete EXIF information doesn't support too much such claim. Other files of this user are also problematic. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

delete of the calthorpe badge![edit]

Why did you delete the calthorpe badge in my article about calthorpe motorcycles? Its not a sports Club Logo! Its the offical Sellingbadge of the calthorpe Motorcycle comany in year 1930.

Even if it corporate logo, you still need to find out relevant copyrights information: date of creation, country of origin, etc. so logo could be kept only if it in public domain. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Australianbeef.JPG[edit]

File:Australianbeef.JPG is very similar to one you deleted a while ago from the same author. I'm not 100% sure of the laws involved, but feel free to speedy it if you're sure. John Vandenberg (chat) 08:12, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

I think in this case most of image may be {{PD-textlogo}}, except images in right-bottom part. So may be de minumus is justified? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Указание книжной иллюстрации в качестве источника векторного файла.[edit]

Здравствуйте!

Мою векторную карту - File:Norwegian Arctic Expedition (1898—1902) map-ru.svg - выставили на удаление из-за отсутствия информации об источнике. Указал в качестве источника иллюстрацию из книги «Очерки по истории географических открытий», с которой эта карта, собственно, и была срисована. Является ли такая информация достаточной?

И ещё. Английским я практически не владею. Весь английский текст в описании был сделан при помощи гугл-переводчика, поэтому, если вам не трудно, большая просьба исправить ошибки (если они там есть).

Заранее спасибо. -- Kaidor (talk) 15:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Проблема, в том, что это иллюстрация из современной книги. Думаю, будет лучше, если Вы возьмёте уже существующую в Commons карту-шаблон и будете использовать карту из книгу, только как источник сведений. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Единственное более-менее приемлемое изображение нашёл здесь - File:Ellesmere Island.svg. Могу ли я вырезать из него отдельные острова, менять раскраску объектов, толщину контуров? -- Kaidor (talk) 16:50, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Конечно. Только не забудьте сослаться на оригинал и использовать для Вашего файла те же лицензии. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Сделал. Вот только не пойму. В File:Ellesmere Island.svg три лицензии. Между первой и третьей какая-нибудь разница есть? -- Kaidor (talk) 19:31, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
Нет, это просто повторение с {{self}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Ещё раз здравствуйте. Я опять по той же теме. Дело в том что эта плашка на удаление у же восьмой день висит. Все источники я проставил, несвободные материалы убрал. Можно как-нибудь ускорить процесс её исчезновения? -- Kaidor (talk) 19:28, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Сделано. Также удалил старые версии. Кстати, а нужен ли вариант в PNG? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Теперь наверное не нужен. Просто сначала, из-за технических проблем с SVG-файлом, мне пришлось вставить в статью PNG-версию, у которой таких проблем не было. Но сейчас когда все баги устранены, PNG можно и удалить. -- Kaidor (talk) 15:44, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Update[edit]

Hello, I resigned my admin status earlier today. Would you please update Commons:List of administrators and the other lists? Thank you. SV1XV (talk) 14:54, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done Please let me know if I missed something. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank you Eugene. SV1XV (talk) 15:20, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion[edit]

I notice you delete my files YosriNov2004BotolBudu.jpg (without informing me). As such, as not to pratice double standard, I appreciate if you can also delete the following which have same problem of derivative works.

  • Baileys Original Irish Cream (770ml).jpg
    Deleted. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Bottles of Jameson Irish Whiskey.JPG
    For me it's looks like old city coats of arms + some text. If you think that coats of arms image is copyrighted, feel free to open deletion request. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • Connemara Peated Single Malt Irish Whiskey.PNG Yosri (talk) 23:00, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
    I think will be good idea to remove artwork from left bottle. Text on labels could be {{PD-textlogo}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop chasing away contributors[edit]

with edits like these. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:35, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Pointing out there is "no source" is perfectly acceptable. Rather more so than some of your dealings with users PK. --Herby talk thyme 08:36, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
The uploader indicated all the necessary information. Herbythyme, what are you defending EugeneZelenko's tagging for? Because he is a fellow admin? /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 08:45, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Sure as hell is not "own work" so that is a bad argument. Eugene's page has been on my watchlist for longer than you have contributed here. You may target folk other than admins for your comments but I am not aware of that. --Herby talk thyme 09:02, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
It was uploader's own photo. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
License tag was definitely wrong. I don't know Spanish and I'm not specialist in art. So adding {{no source since}} is good way to indicate that image description has issues. Sure, further help of other people who know mentioned areas will be appreciated. If you could propose better method of resolving such issues, please propose it on Commons:Village pump. Making statements like chasing away contributors will definitely not help to resolve such issues in future --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
It was uploader's own photo, there was nothing wrong with uploader's license, there were no issues, except your lack of Spanish. And I am not tagging every upload that has a description in Russian because I can hardly transcribe Cyrillic writing. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 15:38, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
It's derivative work. Original painter dates of life and country of originwere not mentioned and are not mentioned now. I didn't want to make uneducated guess. Again, if you want to improve process, you was pointed to better place. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Sigh... the name of the painter and the date of the painting were given. Instead of educating yourself, you decided that it was more fun to threaten the contributor with deletion of his upload. Stop doing that, if you want to improve commons. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 16:03, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
Looks like understanding in this discussion could not be achieved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Чем не понравились мои файлы???[edit]

6 сентября 2010

  • (Журнал удалений); 15:22 . . EugeneZelenko (Обсуждение | вклад) удалил «File:Petrogrind-01-2004.jpg» (Copyright violation: Poster)
  • (Журнал удалений); 15:22 . . EugeneZelenko (Обсуждение | вклад) удалил «File:Petrogrind-02-2005.jpg» (Copyright violation: Poster)
  • (Журнал удалений); 15:21 . . EugeneZelenko (Обсуждение | вклад) удалил «File:Petrogrind-03-2006.jpg» (Copyright violation: Poster)
  • (Журнал удалений); 15:21 . . EugeneZelenko (Обсуждение | вклад) удалил «File:Petrogrind-04-2007.jpg» (Copyright violation: Poster)
  • (Журнал удалений); 15:20 . . EugeneZelenko (Обсуждение | вклад) удалил «File:Petrogrind-06-2009.jpg» (Copyright violation: Poster)
  • (Журнал удалений); 15:20 . . EugeneZelenko (Обсуждение | вклад) удалил «File:Petrogrind-05-2008.jpg» (Copyright violation: Poster)
  • (Журнал удалений); 15:19 . . EugeneZelenko (Обсуждение | вклад) удалил «File:PetroGrind-7-Logo.jpg» (Copyright violation: Lo)

С какого перепугу мои файлы "Copyright violation", когда я лично все их делал??? Там даже почти на всех афишах вверху мой ник указан![edit]

В подобных случаях, не помешает подтверждать авторство при помощи Commons:OTRS.
Кроме того, есть другие проблемы с этими изображениями:
  • На них используются логотипы музыкальных групп и необходимо их разрешение на публикацию логотипов на условиях свободных лицензий.
  • Также сомневаюсь, чтобы содержимое файлов соответствует Commons:Рамки проекта.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Chosen Dance Company logo deletion[edit]

Hi there, I noticed you deleted the Chosen Dance Company logo I uploaded. Can you help me understand why, and what I must do to keep it up there? I'm new to Wikipedia.

Logos, which may be uploaded in Commons, should be in public domain or {{PD-textlogo}}. Otherwise you should upload such images in Wikipedia locally (if allowed in your language edition). See also Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Book cover question[edit]

Hello, Eugene! Would it be fine if I transfer this file to Commons and assign PD-RU-exempt (for the USSR stamp image) and PD-trivial to the rest of the image? I don't think this book cover design includes any artistic copyrighted work, it's just a title and an author name printed with a standard font of different size. Please advise. Thank you. --Michael Romanov (talk) 20:44, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

I also think so. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. --Michael Romanov (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
I transfered the file. See File:Znaete-84.jpg if everything is OK with it. --Michael Romanov (talk) 17:21, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
I think will be good idea to crop background and leave book only. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done. --Michael Romanov (talk) 17:43, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Verwijderde foto Jef Ulburghs[edit]

I.v.m. licentie werd een e-mail verzonden aan permissions-nl@svgwikimedia.org! Graag hierop antwoord en ondertussen terug plaatsen van foto http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ulburghs_actie_180.jpg. MarQ (talk) 20:57, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Beste, een foto wordt in principe slechts teruggeplaatst nadat de e-mail werd ontvangen en door het OTRS team werd geverifieerd. Dit kan een tijdje duren. Nadat deze procedure is afgesloten wordt de foto desgevallens teruggezet. Mvg. Lycaon (talk) 07:03, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Need for a neutral view[edit]

Hello Eugene:

Different opinions on this proposal are needed. Perhaps you can leave a note. --80.187.102.47 13:21, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

I look briefly in file discussion, and I didn't notice major problem. However, I don't know Swedish to look into Wikipedia part of conflict. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Belarus-Minsk-Island_of_Tears-1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Belarus-Minsk-Island_of_Tears-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:16, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: Deletion of 'Smith & Jones masala instant noodles.jpg'[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko, I had uploaded the photo of the instant noodles packet, which has been deleted by you. I see lots of pics of commercial products on wikipedia, like maggi instant noodles photo uploaded by users, so I thought I can click & upload of Smith & Jones brand. May I know why my photo was deleted for copyright violation, and how may I avoid that in the future? Thanks Lilaac (talk) 20:15, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

See Commons:Derivative works for explanations. Actually you don't need to shoot commercial packaging to illustrate product. Product itself is enough. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Набережная[edit]

  • Добрый день! Как по английски "набережная"?) --Vizu (talk) 08:16, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
    Тяжёлый случай :-) Пришлось лезть в словарь: embankment, quay, seafront. Соответственно Category:Embankments. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC)
    Спасибо! В ен-вики нет такой статьи) --Vizu (talk) 16:18, 22 September 2010 (UTC)


Category:Orders and Decorations[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Orders and Decorations has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

-- One or more related categories that you created have been listed for a name change as part of the above discussion. Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 12:19, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Австралийская лицензия[edit]

Здравствуйте!

Хотел уточнить. Вот эта лицензия позволяет свободно загружать на склад фотографии отсюда (вернее те из них, что сделаны ранее 1960 года)? Или может быть тот факт, что это сайт австралийского правительства автоматически делает их все общественным достоянием?

Австралийское правительство не делает свои работы общественным достоянием. Надо, чтобы соблюдались соотвтествующие условия, указанные в {{PD-Australia}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Ещё раз для меня непонятливого (извините, с английским языком не дружу): фраза из шаблона «Copyright has expired if ... first published more than 25 years ago» делает любое изображение опубликованное в Австралии более 25 лет назад (не важно — правительством или нет) общественным достоянием. Так? -- Kaidor (talk) 17:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Тот же вопрос по фоткам с этого сайта - сайт американского правительства, возможно ли свободное размещение на складе?

Заранее спасибо. -- Kaidor (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Сайт правительства не делает работы автоматически общественным достоянием. Но National Science Foundation — федеральное агентство, соответственно {{PD-USGov-NSF}}. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Спасибо за разъяснение. --Kaidor (talk) 17:09, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello/dobry den'[edit]

It is starting to be really bothersome to contribute here and see that files are erased without even saying anything about it. I would really have appreciated something about it, like a comment or a warning!! I had this file erased by MGA73 once [4] and had to do the same kind of message. As I had told him I have the written authorization of the author even if the licence may contain restrictions. As he advised me I wrote an email to the permission things but well I haven't received any answer up to this moment (you can have some parts of the authorization on my userpage; and if you don't believe me you can write the author of the pictures...). MGA73 understood the situation very well and brought the files back. I am an ignoramus about the licences but well I can read and understand that the file had been erased and then brought back again, so you didn't bother asking questions to me or to MGA73? I hope this all ends well because I'm really getting tired of writing messages to have these files brought back when I have the authorization of the author... Thanks for your understanding. I wish you all the best! Capsot (talk) 09:55, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

You should use Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates in cases, when original images on Flickr have licenses incompatible with Commons:Licensing. And it's good idea to have permission before uploading files here. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the answer but what next? I sent the Permissions Committee the email about ten days ago to no avail up to this moment... Capsot (talk) 18:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
If you already sent permissions to OTRS, you could use Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to make things faster. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Image deletion[edit]

I notice that you delete 2 of my images without informing me, claming it as Derivative work: Commercial packaging. I would appreciate if you can explain why the following images was not treated likewise (not deleted). I wish reload those images, and not got it being deleted again. I will withdrew my queries if you delete below images also.

Regards Yosri (talk) 14:00, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Sure, everything what if not {{PD-textlogo}} or public domain, is Commons:Derivative works. You could help by adding deletion requests to such images. However, if you want to illustrate product, you could make photo of product itself. Packaging is definitely not required for this purpose. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

Пpocьба удалить файл[edit]

Добрый день, Евгений! Прошу Вас удалить этот файл: File:Aktau-airport.jpg - здесь явно подложная лицензия. Загружатель и автор - разные люди. Спасибо! --Ds02006 (talk) 08:16, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Поставил {{no permission since}}. Если подтверждения лицензии не будет, файл будет удалён. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Re: User:AkBot[edit]

Thanks! Ankry (talk) 15:53, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

User:AusTerrapinBotEdits[edit]

Thanks for the notification and the support. Cheers, AusTerrapin (talk) 17:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

User:KamikazeBot[edit]

Thank you! Karol007 23:25, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

Coat of gymn№8, Minsk.gif[edit]

Добрый день, Евгений. Может данный файл можно не удалять, а как-то заменить условия лицензии. Просто я в этом не очень разбираюсь. Файл-то используется только в статьях про данную гимназию, соответственно как-то и лицензию исправить?--Gruszecki (talk) 18:05, 14 October 2010 (UTC)

Надо загрузить логотип локально, как охраняемый авторскими правами и оформить в соответствии с ru:Википедия:Критерии добросовестного использования, be-x-old:Вікіпэдыя:Крытэры добрасумленнага выкарыстаньня. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Name Change[edit]

Thanks for the account name change Eugene! 96.49.70.186 00:22, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Whoops, guess I should use it eh! The Interior (talk) 00:23, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

Question regarding image uploads and delition[edit]

Can you please advise what would be the proper way to upload the logos of two organizations I represent: CISV International (www.cisv.org) & CISV Bulgaria (www.cisv.bg). I did upload the images:

   Image:Cisv port 2col bul.jpg
   Image:Cisv port 2col ad bul.jpg
   Image:CISVLPS285165RGBA INT.jpg

But they were afterwords deleted. Where did I mess up and what do I need to do in order to have those images on WikiCommons? Thanks!

You could upload only public domain or {{PD-textlogo}} on Commons. More complex logos will require permission form organization/company/etc (see Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates). If you'll not have permission, you could upload non-free logos locally, if project allows such images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Tagging[edit]

Hi Eugene! People wonder how you tag files. Please see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Backlog. --Polarlys (talk) 21:34, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Flag_of_Calgary,_Alberta.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Flag_of_Calgary,_Alberta.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Svgalbertian (talk) 07:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

Rename[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko! I requested to change my username, can you please check if what I did is correct? Thank you so much, Kuviz (talk) 07:59, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 22 October 2010 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Добрый вечер, Евгений! Нельзя ли удалить копии изображений (полные копии): [5] [6] [7] [8] Последней должна быть версия 5,1 мб (как консенсус). Спасибо! --Vizu (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

  • также отсюда нельзя ли удалить все файлы, кроме Спейда и Путника, как не относящиеся к 2001 году (2004 и другая банкнота). Последним должен быть файл Спейда, поскольку не факт, что у Путника этот год (у Спейда - совершенно точно 2001/1997).
  • а также [9] [10] как плохие копии моих же изображений. --Vizu (talk) 20:51, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Сделано кроме последних версий, котое нельзя удалить в одиночку. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Спасибо! Вот эту тоже можно удалить, потому что она совершенно точно 2004 (не 2001) года. --Vizu (talk) 15:25, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 26 October 2010 (UTC)


Монумент на кладбище[edit]

Уважаемый коллега!

Вами поставлен на удаление снимок монумента на кладбище работы Манизера.

Понимаю, что это сделано в соответствие с тем, что автор умер недостаточно давно.

Однако, выражаю сожаление , которое возникает каждый раз, когда формализм торжествует над здравым смыслом.

Применительно к теме данного разговора могу лишь обратить Ваше внимание, что данный памятник и его тематика являются элементами коммунистического официоза, если угодно - официального государственного документа в бронзе и камне и потому вряд ли могут рассматриваться как объект копирайта. Тем более, зная атмосферу, в которой работал автор, трудно себе представить, что, будь он даже жив, посмел бы не только заявить, но и помыслить о предъявлении каких-либо претензий на собственность, добровольно переданную им в пользу государства.

Так что мне остаётся лишь уповать на принцип НДА.

С уважениемВитольд Муратов (обс, вклад) 19:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Прошу прощения, не знаю, что такое НДА. Но есть другой способ — попробовать получить разрешение от скульптора (или наследников) на публикацию снимка на условиях свободных лицензий. А ещё лучше — на публикацию всех снимков всех его/её скульптур. И это будет гораздо лучше размышлений на тему о полезности или вреде того или иного закона. Dura lex, sed lex. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Комментарий: Евгений, под НДА подразумевается "не доводите до абсурда". --Ds02006 (talk) 01:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
Не вижу абсурда в том, что права различных субъектов закона (скульптора и фотографа) регулируются соответствующим законом. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

удаление файла[edit]

Почему вы удалили мою карто-схему из статьи Махачкалинский троллейбус. Это я ее составили. Откуда я ее по Вашему с копировал?Аксянов (talk) 04:04, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Карта, на которой было основано изображение, явно не созданна самостоятельно. Вы можете использовать в качестве основы свободные карты, например, http://www.openstreetmap.org. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

No permission[edit]

Eugene, I'm trying to clear out some "no permission" files. Could you please explain why you tagged all uploads by COMPADMIN as "no permission"? Did you find them them someowhere else on the web, or is there something else that makes you think these weren't COMPADMIN's own photos? Lupo 07:30, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

From images I taggeg: File:Dougcup.jpg originates from Bianchi Cup/Yamil Sued, File:Jessieabbateaction2010.jpg - from NRA Competitive Shooting. Other were tagged by {{User:TeleComNasSprVen. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Постер киножурнала "Хочу всё знать"[edit]

Евгений, Вы удалили постер к проекту "Хочу всё знать" (File:Плакат_Хочу_все_знать.jpg). К сожалению, я не знаю, какой именно тип прав нужно указать, но как pr-менеджер киностудии, не очень понимаю, почему сотрудник киностудии не может разместить постер, нарисованный другим сотрудником киностудии, к проекту, созданному на киностудии, которая является правообладателем всего этого барахла. Наш постер можно использовать для оформления материалов о проекте за исключением коммерческого использования.

Сначала не помешает выяснить, кому принадлежат авторские права на постер: киностудии, современным художникам или оригинальному автору (насколько помню, заставка к «Хочу всё знать» существовала как минимум в 1980-е). А потом просить разрешения у правообладателей на использование изображения на условиях свободных лицензий (смотрите Commons:OTRS и Commons:Email templates).
Кстати, на Commons нельзя размещать изображения, которые запрещено использовать в коммерческих целях. Смотрите Commons:Licensing.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Удалить как полную копию. Также плохая вырезанная из имеющегося изображения копия и [низкое разрешение http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stamp_of_Ukraine_s604.jpg] (нигде не используются; у марок не бывает других серий и номеров, как у денег; чистые все совершенно одинаковы). Спасибо! --Vizu (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2010 (UTC)

Удалил версию первого изображения. А какое изображение марки должно использоваться, чтобы указать его в комментариях к удалению марок? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Вот это. При том испанская версия вырезана (с очень плохим разрешением) оттуда же. --Vizu (talk) 17:14, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

which tools for non-admins?[edit]

Being an admin is disturbing me in the work I should like to do here. Is it possible to have only some tools instead of full adminship; and if so, which tools? --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:54, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Quick Delete, User Messages and Tineye gadgets are definitely helpful. You also may be interested in having Commons:Flickr files/reviewers or Commons:Rollback status and related tools. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
I do use movecat, renamefile, and speedydelete. What about these three? --Havang(nl) (talk) 09:56, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
If they're useful in your job, that's fine. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I like to retire from adminship and keep only these three tools, if possible. --Havang(nl) (talk) 15:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
User:CommonsDelinker/commands is available only for administrator, same think with speedy delete. However, I don't think that is problem in tools. You could try to change your routine in such way, that you'll use administrator tools only in appropriate time. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. I'll change my routine, starting with removing some admin-pages from my watchlist. --Havang(nl) (talk) 16:10, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
I have requested my de-adminship HERE. Kind greetings, --Havang(nl) (talk) 20:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Мае вітаньні! Перапрошваю, што адцягваю ўвагу, але атрымалася даволі прыкрая сытуацыя. Апошнім часам запампаваў шэраг выяваў з выкарыстаньнем у іхных імёнах сымбалю "=" (пачынаючы з File:Pahonia = Пагоня, Grand Duchy of Lithuania COA.jpg). І на жаль, толькі цяпер заўважыў, што, прыкладам, пры выкарыстаньні падобных файлаў у Шаблёне:Падвойная выява праз гэты самы сымбаль "=" выдаецца памылка. Хацеў вось папрасіць пры магчымасьці перайменаваць выявы з заменай "=" на "-" — пакуль яны ня маюць масавага ўжытку і ня ўзьнікла нейкіх іншых, глябальнейшых праблемаў з шаблёнамі. Загадзьдзя дзякуй за дапамогу! P.S. Шчыра выбачаюся, што стварыў дадатковую працу... ці будзе вам зручней, калі я зраблю тут поўны сьпіс файлаў для перайменаваньня? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 21:15, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Частку перайменаваў. Астатнія — потым. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Дзякуй вялікі! --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Souvenir sheet[edit]

Hi, Eugene! I want to move this file to Commons. It has an OTRS permit. So, is it legal to move the file to Commons? --Michael Romanov (talk) 11:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I think will be good idea to ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard to re-verify permission. I'm not sure who have right to issue it: Austrian Post or individual artist. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you. I will try that. --Michael Romanov (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Евгений, Вы не могли бы оформить ОТРС мне от Черкашина В.И. sherkarshin@mail.ru, посланное сюда, на Коммонс, 4 ноября 23:38:07 по Гринвичу? Спасибо. --Vizu (talk) 21:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

К сожалению не могу помочь, так как у меня нет доступа к OTRS. Может попросить User:Butko? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
Спасибо, но как-то его уже достал своими просьбами). А есть кто-то другой русскоязычный с доступом к ОТРС? --Vizu (talk) 18:20, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
CatScan-ом нашёл User:Ahonc, User:Blacklake, User:Rubin16. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Спасибо! --Vizu (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

SpongeBob Barnstar Hires.png[edit]

Добрый день, я заметил, что Вы удалили файл SpongeBob Barnstar Hires.png. Я не знал, что переделанный снимок персонажа запрещён к использованию. Я полностью переделал орден, исключив изображение самого персонажа. Выгрузил пока сюда. Вы не возражаете, если я выгружу уже этот вариант на Викисклад? Antonu (talk) 19:16, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Дело всё-таки не в моих возражения, а в соблюдении Commons:Licensing :-) По новому фотороботу персонажа не опознал :-) Думаю, что всё хорошо. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Понял, выгрузил, спасибо за разъяснение :) Antonu (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2010 (UTC)