User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive13

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Image Deletion[edit]

Hello, you deleted our file "Einrichten-heute-2011.jpg". It is the replacement of the file "Einrichten-heute-aktuell.jpg" which is currently online. Yes, both are magazin covers, but both, the old one as same as the new "Einrichten-heute-2011.jpg" were declared as free by the author, the editor and the publisher (Einrichtungspartnerring VME GmbH & Co.KG) only few minutes after the upload. There weren't any problems with the old file, so why did you delete the new one? Kind regards, ˜˜˜

Please use Commons:Email templates and Commons:OTRS to document permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Image Deletion[edit]

Hello, you both pictures that were affiliated with our page Gentry_McCreary. One of the photo's were taken by myself and I had consent by both Vanessa Bell-Armstrong and Mr McCreary to upload... There weren't any problems with the files, so why did you delete them? Kind regards,

Could you please be specific about file names? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Account renaming[edit]

Hello, I've already been able to rename my account from "gaby_la_star" to "gbrlhtclcq" in the French and English wikipedia, but in commons.wikimedia.org my user name is still "gaby_la_star". Could you please rename my account from "gaby_la_star" to "gbrlhtclcq" ? That would be awesome. I want to rename because I don't want my name to be associated with "gaby_la_star" anymore. Thanks for any help ! Kind regards, Gaby la star (talk) 07:36, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Edit : Sorry, I now followed the procedure on http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Changing_username#Procedure :)

University Logo Deletion[edit]

Hi, I'm a board administrator of Paul Cezanne's University and I don't understand why you have deleted the logo. It is very important for us to have it on the page so the logo is visible in the community page in Facebook and fit exactly with the space allowed. The logo is free of right as it is available on the university's website. Check it out : http://www.univ-cezanne.fr/pratique/espace-telechargement/logos.html

Please reactivate it, it is very important for our visibility. Thanks !

Sorry, but if logo is artistic enough, it could not be hosted on Commons (see Commons:Licensing). You could upload it to projects which allows fair use images. Or if University will agree to license it under terms of free license (which means everybody could use it for any purpose), you should use Commons:Email templates and Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

School Logo Deletion[edit]

Hi Eugene, I recently noticed you deleted the logo from the infobox on The Thomas Adams School page. Can I ask why? You stated that it was 'School logo. Not text only'. I was not aware that it had to be text only, as I have seen oover pages with the school crest on the info box. Also, I attend the said school, and I have worked out (using registers) that there are exactly 1,056 students, currently attending. Please can you provide me a reason(s) why the image was deleted. I will change the student back however. Please do not start an edit war, as I feel I have the most experience in this area.

Thanks Tom Dutton (talk) 21:56, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Reason is Commons:Licensing. You could upload here only {{PD-textlogo}} or public domain by age logos. More complex modern logos could be uploaded in projects which allow fair use. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

I've talked with the head, and the logo i public domain, as it was created over 150 years ago. I also checked with the IT department, and it turns out that students (i.e. me) are allowed to use it, and under some sort of school rule, we end up as a 'copyright holder'.

Tom Dutton (talk) 16:37, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

I undeleted image. Please add all relevant information about date of creation/creator. I think {{PD-old}} should be used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:42, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyright Things?[edit]

Yo've deleted National Football Federation Logo that i've created manually on Fireworks... Took me about 2 hours to quadrate it... Why you've deleted my OWN! work?!

I want it back... THERE... Please...

Cheers.

Are you original author? I doubt so. You could upload your image into project which allows fair use images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 6 January 2011 (UTC)

Photo Copyright from Korea[edit]

Dear Eugene,

This is Secretary Cho working for Rep. Korea National Assemblyman Song Minsoon. We recently uploaded photos onto Mr. Song Minsoon's wiki page but have found that you have removed them from Wikicommons because of copyright issues. As we are their rightful owner we, as a South Korean government agency, believed we took the necessary measures to ensure that the photos are used properly when we uploaded them. We would be grateful to know why this may not be the case so that we can make ammendments as necessary. One other question is why one photo was NOT removed (the main photo). If that photo has the right copyright settings, we believe that the other photos should be okay if they are of the same settings.

Thank you.

{{PD-KoreaGov}} doesn't list government images as exempted from copyrights. So you need to send permission to use file under term of free license(s) compatible with Commons:Licensing (see example of permission on Commons:Email templates) to Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Flickr image[edit]

Hi, Eugene! Can you look, please, at this Flickr image? It says "Some rights reserved", with a link leading to this license description page. Can I upload it on Commons? Thank you. --Michael Romanov (talk) 03:09, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

No. Only {{cc-by-2.0}} and {{cc-by-sa-2.0}} are allowed. However, you could try to convince photographer to change a license. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Yes, I want to contact the photographer (she had even some edits in the past). But where can I find her email address)? --Michael Romanov (talk) 02:58, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
OK, I figured that out. :) --Michael Romanov (talk) 03:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Удалить File:Jubcoin 2000 2rub gorodgeroileningrad revers.gif как плохую версию [1]. Нигде не используется. --Vizu (talk) 03:38, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Butko опередил :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Сделано. Всё-таки перед тем, как озадачивать робота, имеет смысл проверить, а надо ли это… --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
Спасибо. Вероятно, надо, потому что некачественными изображениями, где не видно деталей, иногда заполняются статьи, когда рядом есть гораздо лучше. --Vizu (talk) 19:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Tagging images as no source and no author[edit]

Hello. I think you are erroneously tagging some files as not having sources and not having authors. This file for example. It has a source and an author, yet you tagged it as having neither. If this was a mistake, I don't think it is a big deal. If you noticed the source and author, disagree they are valid, and want the image deleted, I suggest that you don't use the {{no source since}} template if the file has a source and author.--Rockfang (talk) 23:38, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

I've reverted some of your additions of that template to images.--Rockfang (talk) 23:47, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

I nominated these images for deletion. I'll also appreciate if you'll read comments in history. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you for replying here. If you are referring to this edit, I did read the edit summary. I think that edit summary is partially incorrect. There is a source listed on that image's page. The source may be incorrect, but there is a source. Tagging a file for speedy deletion as "no source" when there is a source listed seems wrong to me. I'm not going to revert you again, but I suggest that in the future you do not tag files for speedy deletion as "no source" if there is a source listed. Also, it appears you may have forgotten to notify the uploader that this file is tagged for deletion. I have done it for you.--Rockfang (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
Please suggest reasonable process for images wich has incorrect source (like scan of historical photo with claim of own work, without referring to original source). Listed source dosn't always and necesasry mean that it's correct or absolute true.
I notify uploader only on first problematic image in series, otherwise talk pages became bloated with warnings.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
If a file has a questionable source listed, I suggest starting a deletion request for it. I understand your reasoning for not putting multiple template warnings on a user talk page, but you might consider just putting one template warning and then manually type a list underneath the template that includes all other recently tagged files as well. Just a thought.--Rockfang (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Whitehouse Moscow[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko,
could you take a look at Commons:Deletion requests/Whitehouse Moscow. As a native speaker you might easier figure out whether there is a real problem or just a baseless user complaint. --Túrelio (talk) 17:03, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately some prefer to express emotions instead of looking to the root of problem (current copyrights law). Question of freedom of panorama in Russia was discussed many times in Russina Wikipedia forum, but looks like concept still not comprehended by many. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:13, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for the feedback. --Túrelio (talk) 21:54, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Right to vanish[edit]

Hello Eugene,

Last week I requested a change of my username, which you did on 17 November.

However, I have found that one of my contributions (an image called 'Three step search.PNG') is under my old name.

Also, I have checked that it is possible to enter my old user talk through Google, only to find a redirection to the new one (User talk:Ciberwiki.com).

I would like to remove all traces of my old username due to my current job. Would it be possible to remove the old talk page to avoid this redirection?

Thank you for everything!

--Ciberwiki.com (talk) 12:00, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

I deleted redirect to your talk page.
File:Three step search.PNG looks OK (it's uploaded under your new name). May be it was task queue issue. Please let me know if I'm mistaken.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
You are right, but I don't know why, if you access the same image through the Spanish wikipedia (http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Three_step_search.PNG), the username there is the old one. Could you do something about it or should I talk with an admin from the Spanish site?
Thanks again!
--Ciberwiki.com (talk) 18:48, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
For me it attributed to your new name. May be you need to clear/refresh browser cache/purge page? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Politkovskaya photo[edit]

Hi Eugene,
could you check the validity of the speedy-request for File:Anna Politkovskaya byZelenskaya.jpg, as it is an important image. --Túrelio (talk) 23:25, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

I think deletion request have merit. Granted license is unclear. And especially if you take in account free of charge (бесплатная) wording. I think uploader should be given some time to ask proper permission with Commons:Email templates and Commons:OTRS, so deletion request should be converted to regular. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Death_Penalty_World_Map.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Death_Penalty_World_Map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Artem Karimov (talk | edits) 15:18, 27 November 2010 (UTC)

Change username[edit]

Hello, I believe you're the person who took care of my former username's change problem last week (on november 24/ 25 ). So I'd like to say thank you very much for your attention. It is really appreciated. There's an extra request I'd like to ask, hoping I'm not abusing. May I ask you to do the same for my former username talkpage: that is to say removing all trace of visibility of this former talkpage. This is for reasons of privacy. Thanks for your time and comprehension. Regards. Akteon (talk) 13:46, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done. I also oversighted log entry for talk page rename. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very very much! Greetings!Akteon (talk) 13:17, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Просьбы[edit]

Здравствуйте! Можете удалить низкокачественную неиспользуюмую копию http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Russia25roubles.gif этого файла http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RR5115-0030R.gif . Имеется в виду быстро, а то незнающие русский админы подумают, что различны слишком. Заранее благодарю. --Serjio-pt (talk) 17:11, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

Ещё, если можно, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RR5117-0025.gif сотрите и создайте перенаправление
#REDIRECT[[:File:RR5117-0026.gif]]

[[Category:Commemorative coins of the Russian Federation, 2004]]

- коряво, но вы поняли - что внутри pre-pre --Serjio-pt (talk) 17:25, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

:Ещё, если можно, [4] сотрите и создайте перенаправление

#REDIRECT[[:File:RR5117-0035.gif]]
[[Category:Commemorative coins of the Russian Federation, 2004]]

-так же как и выше --Serjio-pt (talk) 13:44, 1 December 2010 (UTC) - отменено, не тот МД

Но уж точно http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RR5615-0001.gif?uselang=ru сотрите и создайте перенаправление
#REDIRECT[[:File:RR5115-0036.gif]]

[[Category:Commemorative coins of the Russian Federation, 2004]]

- у этой монеты аверс тот же, цельносеребряный --Serjio-pt (talk) 14:11, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Файл удалил. По поводу названий и перенаправлений. Я бы всё-таки посоветовал давать фалам более понятные названия, чем номера из каталога (если не ошибаюсь). Думаю название для монеты должно содержать страну, год выпуска, номинал, сторону (если одна) и название для юбилейных монет. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
Благодарю. Каталожный номер для российской монеты - не номер из какого-то там каталога, а является, в общем, нечто вроде паспорта - а вот собственных названий может и не быть! Для БР свойственно выпустить несколько монет и назвать их одинаково, а уж потом начнутся варианты что там изображено и как это назвать.

Плюс к тому монет российских много очень, за 20 лет около 1000, ~50 в год. И так возиться с каждой невозможно. Не зря ведь Рубин бота пускал - огромный кусок этой работы, проведённой Пермяком, здесь есть. Надо лишь дополнить его. Посмотрите на http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_commemorative_coins_of_Russia_(2009) - его админ склада делал, и тот всё по кат.номеру! К тому же в рувики я делаю каталог языком шаблонов, если у файлов будут имена вида RRкат.номер - то это сильно облегчит труд!

Когда я это сам впервые увидел, сам подумал - номера, вздор какой-то. Начал думать, что кто-то ленился. Понял, что это нехорошо. Позже понял, что лучше сделать не получится! И так сейчас много названий монет на украинском, немецком, ещё каких-нибудь дурацких! Цирк и пестрота!

Что я делаю - похоже на перевод на метрическую систему, многие сопротивлялись, признавали её неудобной и ненужной. Но сила - в единстве.

Я уже давно ищу админа, который не будет ставить телегу посреди лошади, то есть правила википедии выше чем конечный результат её участников. Я был бы рад, если бы им были ВЫ. Подумайте, пожалуйста, и доделайте 2 др. просьбы.

Спасибо, если прочитали. --Serjio-pt (talk) 16:09, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Думаю, стоило бы обсудить проблемы наименований файлов с другими участниками, интересующимися данной темой.
Названия файлов, отражающие их содержимое — также общее требование Commons.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Ладно, написал много, понимаю вас. Политика в основном говорит о собственных работах, о прочих единичных случаях, но файлы, которые заливаю я - все с сайта банка россии. И делал я это небезосновательно, в http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:File_renaming#What_files_should_be_renamed.3F есть 6 пункт - он здесь в полной мере применим. --Serjio-pt (talk) 16:09, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

К сожалению, пункт 6 не уточняет, что значит гармонизация :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 1 December 2010 (UTC)
По-моему автор статьи вполне пояснил весь этот пункт примерами - 2-мя крайними столбцами.

Вы мне лучше скажите, если что-нибудь в правилах о том, стоит ли администрации идти навстречу активным участникам, или все здесь лишь уборщики-каратели, готовые пустить любой неочевидный вопрос на многомесячное согласование? --Serjio-pt (talk) 16:34, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Не вижу ничего плохого в совете обсудить наименование серии файлов. Всё-таки даже активным участникам стоит помнить, что они не одиноки во Вселенной... --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Мне это тож'Bold text'Bold textе хочется помнить и ощущать. И каким образом вы предложите обсудить? --Serjio-pt (talk) 16:51, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Думаю, что ru:Википедия:Проект:Нумизматика и бонистика — наиболее подходящее место. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Mikałaj Radzivił Čorny - Мікалай Радзівіл Чорны.jpeg[edit]

Вітаю! Памылкова ідэнтыфікаваў гэты партрэт як Мікалая "Чорнага", варта перанесьці ў File:Mikałaj II Radzivił - Мікалай II Радзівіл.jpeg. Загадзьдзя дзякуй! --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 01:59, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Яшчэ просьба: выдаліце, калі ласка, з гісторыі File:Jury Radzivił.jpg хібную 2-ю выяву. Дзякуй! --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 11:53, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Зроблена. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Переименование[edit]

Добрый день! Хочу попросить переименовать меня в User:Sasha Krotov, эта учетная запись без вклада уже существует и создана мною же, её хотелось бы наоборот переименовать в User:Sk, с помощью предварительного переименования, сейчас напишу подтверждение, что это действительно моя запись. --sk (talk) 21:34, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

подтвержение --Sasha Krotov (talk) 21:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
Сделано. ✓ Done User:Sasha Krotov was renamed to User:Sasha Krotov (usurped) and User:Sk was renamed to User:Sasha Krotov. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Felixde → felixd[edit]

I've done 5th step. Grretings. --felixd (talk) 19:10, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Forgotten license[edit]

Sorry, I have forgotten to select a license from the menu. Can I upload the images again with the license CC-BY-SA? Dimitar Manolov (talk) 09:57, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Sure, you could re-upload images with correct license. But please re-upload them in original camera resolution to avoid any doubts in authorship. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 8 December 2010 (UTC)

Can you see if I was more successful this time? Can the photos be returned back in the articles now? Dimitar Manolov (talk)

I think, images are OK and you could use them in articles. Мерси. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Michael Minsky[edit]

The photograph you took away, is free!!! We are studygroup of the University, so we know, what we are doing. The same with the photograph of Serge Jaroff and the Don Cossack Choir Serge Jaroff. And Don Cossack Choir Serge Jaroff is the OFFICIAL NAME of the choir (see the web site please). So, we ask you kindly, to put the photographs back.213.17.78.32 08:43, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Please be specific about images. And you should always proper credit author/date of creation/license for public domain images. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

The photographs are made by family of Michael Minsky and we have permission to use these. You can become information about that in the Historical Centre in Zwolle (Holland) were are his archives. 213.17.78.32 11:32, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Please login. Use is not precise definition. You should ask permission of copyrights holder (family) under terms of one of free license. Please use Commons:Email templates and Commons:OTRS for this purpose. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

The photographs are from Michael's family and free to use for everybody.213.17.78.32 15:07, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for repeating, but terms use may have different meanings. Only use compatible with Commons:Licensing is allowed. And you need proof of such permission. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Help with image[edit]

Hi Eugene,

In a few months ago I tried to upload some files but they were marked as a copyright violation. I talked with the photographer of the photos and he send the permission of use the images to permissions@wikimedia.org.

Im trying to make the upload again using the information below

Description
Português: Jac Motors: J3 Preto
Date
Source Own work
Author Hilton Ribeiro
Permission
(Reusing this file)

{{OTRS pending}}

But it still appereaing this message : If you do not provide suitable license and source information, your upload will be deleted without further notice. Thank you for your understanding.

Can you help me, please? Thanks! Jacmotor.br(talk) 17:32, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

At first, if you uploaded images made by other peson, you can't claim them to be Own work.
Most likely you forgot to select correct license, if yo see {{no license since}} message. You could edit this pages and replace this template with appropriate license given by author.
Sorry, I don't have OTRS access, but you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 15 December 2010 (UTC)

DAAU image[edit]

I just recieve a message about this fils: File:091021_DAAU_promo_tomverbruggen_genthology_CR.jpg

I probably made a mistake with the licence, but I had the permission to use this image. I found it ont he website of the band, and it was wrote that this file can be taken for promotion on the web. What can I do? The link of this permission on the website (http://www.daau.com/download/091021_DAAU_promo_tomverbruggen_genthology_CR.jpg) is broken... --CrAz (talk) 10:50, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Commons require permission to use file for anybody for any purpose (see Commons:Licensing.
You could request such permission (see Commons:Email templates) and send it to Commons:OTRS.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

deletion of pictures in the French Emaux de Briare WP article[edit]

Hello, I was a contributor to the Emaux de Briare article and now it looks barren without all the pictures, which I cannot put back. Can you explain in plain language (no abbreviation or references to unknown policies) what the reason might be for an immediate destruction and what might be wrong with the contributor "Jolies Ceramiques" status / way of doing things?

Thanks in advance for your comments. Chaanara (talk) 20:20, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

If you are referring to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Carreau-four.jpg, reason for deletion requst was unclear authorship of images. It's likely not own work which require evidence of permission for free license. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 1 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year![edit]

Evgenij, happy New 2011 Year! --Vizu (talk) 02:53, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Спасибо большое! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Deletion Requestion on Emaux de Briare artical (Carreau-Four.JPG picture)[edit]

Hello,

I was wandering why you would have requested the deletion of this picture. It is quite clear by my ID and email address that I work for Emaux de Briare. Every single picture we have IS our property and we have all the rights we need to use them freely because we took those pictures and because we did those projects.

If you need any proof of my working for emaux de briare maybe I should send you a copy of my contract with them or something like that.

We have been trying for months now to make a nice and interesting contribution to wikipedia, but it seems the comunity just doesn't want it.

Hoping our picture will be back on the article soom.

Paule CLUZEL EMAUX DE BRIARE p.cluzel@emauxdebriare.com +331 46 07 03 26

Please send permission (see Commons:Email templates as example) to Commons:OTRS to confirm ownership/copyrights transfers (images came form several authors, I guess?)/free license release. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

abnormal deletion of Emaux de Briare pictures[edit]

Sir,

We do not understand your position: we ("joliesceramiques" is not only the username for WP but also the official name of the company that holds the sole ownership of the intellectual property and other assets of emaux de Briare) have the rights to the pictures we took and do not see who we should ask permission to (ourselves???).

You have all necessary elements to identify us and we trust that you will re-establish promptly the pictures that were deleted by you or under your instructions for very unclear reasons.

Sincerely

Joliesceramiques (talk) 16:29, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Please confirm ownership of files and their release under free licenses with Commons:OTRS. Will be good idea if company legal department will handle this issue. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:32, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Graphic Lab[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko. You made a request here earlier and was wondering if it can be marked resolved or if the work hasn't been done... Thanks. --ZooFari 02:26, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

I think it may be closed. Most of text pages were processed. Sure there is some work to do, but it should be done only when folks have free time. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Happy New Year and again a similar problem...[edit]

First of all, happy new year and best wishes for 2011. I though I had proceeded to writing more information on a file erased not that long ago "El be negre" but well since I can't see it anymore I'm not able to see if I had done the changes or not. These actions are really bothersome and I'm afraid I won't contribute here anymore if this happens one more time... Sincerely, Capsot (talk) 12:57, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for congratulations! Could you please be more specific about file in question? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Пераносы[edit]

Мае вітаньні! Імкнуся быць як мага больш ахайным, аднак на жаль, гэта не заўжды выходзіць. Маю чарговую просьбу: варта перанесьці дзьве загружаныя мною выявы: File:Bahusłaŭ Radzivil. Багуслаў Радзівіл.jpg у File:Bahusłaŭ Radzivił. Багуслаў Радзівіл.jpg (граматычная памылка) і File:Radziviły - Jan, Albrecht, Mikałaj. Радзівілы - Ян, Альбрэхт, Мікалай.jpg у File:Radziviły - Jan, Albrecht, Kryštap. Радзівілы - Ян, Альбрэхт, Крыштап.jpg (памылкова паставіў ня тое імя). Загадзьдзя дзякуй! --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 02:28, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Зроблена. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
Дзякуй вялікі! Выпадкова заўважыў яшчэ праблему - гэтым разам з альфабэтам: адначасна запампаваў File:Rаman Sanhuška - Раман Сангушка.jpg і File:Rаman Sanhuška. Раман Сангушка.jpg з кірылічнай літарай а пасьля R у імі Raman. Як будзе час перанясіце, калі ласка, у File:Raman Sanhuška - Раман Сангушка.jpg і File:Raman Sanhuška. Раман Сангушка.jpg адпаведна. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:12, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
Зроблена. Мяркую, што у назьве файлаў варта было бы выкарыстоўваць імя мастака альбо дату для ананімных твораў. Гэта будзе адрозьніваць файлы лепей за сымбалі пунктуацыі :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Шчыры дзякуй! Думаў пра гэта, аднак на жаль, далёка не заўжды вядомы дакладны час стварэньня твора і аўтар, хаця для выпадкаў кшталту File:Raman Sanhuška - Раман Сангушка.jpg цалкам слушна. У далейшым буду выпраўляцца :) --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:38, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Добрый вечер! Исправить карточку автора. Там ложь: не Симферопиль, а Симферополь (по-украински), не Украина рождение, а Российская Империя, не Украина смерть, а РСФСР, не Мыкола, а в крещении и подписи Николай. Не знаю, где это делается. Спасибо! --Vizu (talk) 18:53, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

Карточка находится тут. Я исправил название стран рождения/смерти по-английски. Надо было бы посмотреть про страны (непросто с учётом гражданской войны :-), где он работал. Извиняюсь, но сегодня времени нет :-(, может закончишь самостоятельно? Да и в украинском я не силён :-(, хотя вряд ли там дело в языке... --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Copyright?[edit]

I recieved a message from you about the licensing of File:Wes_Mannion_y_Steve_Irwin.jpg. I am the author of that image, that means, I drew it. I based my drawing on a photograph posted in the website that I specified in the description (unfortunately, Geocities is closed). Basically, I took the picture on the web, I made a drawing (or sketch) based on the photograph, then I scanned that drawing, and then I uploaded it to Commons. Is there any copyright problem with that? Some originality issue?

Thank you. --André Oliva (talk) 15:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

It's Commons:Derivative work. Source proto should be free (public domain or free license) if you want to make free drawing based on it. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:24, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Ok, since I have no idea about the copyright of the photograph, and since the website is closed and I can't check it, I have no problem if you or someone else decide to delete the file. --André Oliva (talk) 21:46, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Права на фотографии из ателье[edit]

Посмотрите, пожалуйста, если не сложно дискуссию на форуме руВП [5]. Там было IMHO достаточно неплохо обосновано, что заказ в ателье после оплаты переходит в полную собственность заказчика (если иное не оговорено договором).

Не следует забывать, что существует не только 4я, но и 1я части ГК. Из первой части видно что договоры могут быть устными, а также подразумеваемыми (заключенными по обычаям делового оборота). Каждый раз, когда Вы покупаете в магазине, стрижетесь в парикмахерской, едите в кафе - и (сюрприз!) фотографируетесь в фотоателье - вы заключаете сделку. Если при этом Вы не заключили письменного или устного договора, значит сделка была заключена по обычаям делового оборота, т.е. по тем устойчивым обычаям, которые сложились в данной сфере деятельности. Разумеется, для неавторской фотографии этим обычаем всегда была передача прав заказчику. --Erohov 00:41, 17 января 2011 (UTC)

Ценник, висящий на стене в фотоателье, есть публичная оферта (ст. 437-2). Эта публичная оферта сообщает, что всякий, кто готов заплатить за фотографию установленную цену, получит фотографию на условиях договора авторского заказа (ст.1288) с отчуждением в его пользу исключительного права на фотографию (ст. 1234). Всякий, кто уселся в кресло и попросил себя сфотографировать, свои действием акцептует эту оферту, и тем самым договор становится заключенным (ст. 438-3). На ценнике не были расписаны столь подробные условия - не беда, они просто применяются по умолчанию по обычаям делового оборота (ст.487). Так как ценник был печатным, данный договор есть письменный (ст. 434-3), т.е. соответствует требованиям ст. 1234. Вот что можно уразуметь, если читать ГК в совокупности всех его частей, а не только четвертую часть изолированно. --Erohov 16:11, 17 января 2011 (UTC)

Значит ли это, что полным и единственным владельцем прав на фотографию из ателье является заказчик этой фотографии (обычно изображенное там лицо) или его наследники? Являются ли эти, приведенные выше, обоснования достаточными, чтобы загружать фото из семейных альбомов на викисклад под свободной лицензией? Разобраться в вопросе очень хотелось бы, т.к. участники часто готовы передавать фотографии из семейных архивов в ОД, но сейчас часто не могут сделать. Даже на фото из ателье, за которое было заплачено и, которое, вроде бы, должно принадлежать заказчику по Договору Заказа... Сори, что длинный пост получился.. Samal2010 (talk) 18:50, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

К сожалению, я в такие глубины законодательства не вникал :-( Мне кажется, что доводы Erohov вполне разумны, но я не юрист :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Не подскажите, к кому можно обратиться, кто действительно в этом разбирается? Просто у меня порой складывается ощущение, что в этом вопросе "слепые руководят слепыми"... Т.е. "есть сложившееся мнение", его из раза в раз повторяют. Но поскольку никто из повторяющих сам юристом не является, то новые доводы они сами оценить не могут.. А вопрос достаточно актуальный.. Такое ощущение, что мы теряем достаточно много изображений, которые давно могли бы быть переданы в свободное пользование. Зато приобретаем кучу конфликтов, непониманий и отрицательный имидж Википедии.. Не очень хороший обмен... К сожалению я сам тоже не юрист, и юристов (специалистов по АП) найти пока не получается.. --Samal2010 (talk) 17:49, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Да, и еще, а как на Викискладе решается подобные вопросы? (например "фото из ателье - может ли его передать в ОД владелец/заказчик фотоснимка"?) "Простым голосованием" или "опросом" - вроде, не верно, ибо не тот случай.. А с юристами по АП, как понимаю, тут тоже туго... --Samal2010 (talk) 17:53, 18 January 2011 (UTC)
Подобные вопросы обсуждаются на Commons talk:Licensing. Но вряд ли возможен общий ответ из-за специфики законодательств отдельных стран. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 19 January 2011 (UTC)
Угу, пасиб. Будем разбираться дальше.. --Samal2010 (talk) 14:20, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Ukraine-Lviv-Cathedral_of_George-4.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ukraine-Lviv-Cathedral_of_George-4.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

195.110.6.202 09:13, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Belarus-2002-Coin-1-80_Years_Anniversary_of_Belarusbank.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Belarus-2002-Coin-1-80_Years_Anniversary_of_Belarusbank.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Azgar (talk) 11:46, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your good work on Wikimedia Commons[edit]

Bonjour Eugene, I am new person on Wikimedia-Commons. Thus I am not familiar with all the procedures . I look to delete 2 photos which I took and which will not be used. Because the 2 photos are inferiors quality to compare my anothers photos which I put on the page Wikipedia en:Congregation Dorshei Emet:

the 2 photos for delete are: 100px 100px

Thanks, merci --Geneviève 18:09, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done You could use {{speedydelete|reason}} for such cases in future. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

ah ok, thanks, merci --Geneviève 18:06, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

User:Butko опередил :-) Я удалил старые названия за ненадобностью. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
А вот этот File:Герб Александровска утвержденный в 1811 из гербовника Винклера.png в File:Александровск 1811 из Винклера.png можно? --Vizu (talk) 19:00, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Спасибо! И такой вопрос: как по-английски оформить (точно перевести) категорию "Гласные гербы" как можно короче? Суть - ru:Гласные гербы --Vizu (talk) 19:11, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
    Даже затрудняюсь сказать, уж очень термин специфический... Тут стоило бы специалисту в геральдики посмотреть. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:18, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
    Специалисту в английском) --Vizu (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sabzevar_sampad.jpg[edit]

I know that if I close this as a delete, and just delete the one file, you'll leave a note on my talk page asking me why I did not delete the others. But the others don't have DRs on them, so according to the rules, before deleting the others, we have to add a DR to each and wait a week. That's appropriate because, while I share your suspicion, these are not obvious -- the ones I checked don't show up on Tin-Eye, nor does the image of Mahmoud Dowlatabadi show up in Google Images.

It seems to me, if you want to nominate all of this user's files for delete, then you might list them all in a mass delete and add the {{delete}} tags to all of them. Otherwise, you are, in effect, asking the closing Admin to do a lot of work, which encourages us to just pass by it, as I will do here.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 14:39, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

I think several files may be listed in DR. And on my mind mentioning all contributions will serve this purpose too. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

User name change[edit]

Hello, can I have my user name changed from "User:Snake311" to "User:a7x"? Thanks, —§ stay (sic)! 05:37, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

I think will be good idea if you'll find more unique name. There are several a7x accounts without SUL. Are all of them belongs to you? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 6 February 2011 (UTC)
Yes. The reason I want to rename this account is to make it more consistent with my other user account names. —§ stay (sic)! 06:55, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
Please follow step 5 of Commons:Changing username#Procedure. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour Eugene[edit]

I still apologize for appealing to your help. I want to remove my personnal photo because it brings me some troubles with boys in Wikipedia. I try to make as you have me explain but it does not work. I am new, forgive me in my clumsiness.

and

Thanks, merci --Geneviève 14:37, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done for Commons image and redirect. fr:Fichier:Photo-personelle14.jpg is uploaded locally to French Wikipedia and you need to ask help of local administrator. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Genuine Bottled Kvass.JPG[edit]

What's the problem? I made that picture myself. -- Wesha (talk) 20:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

It was Commons:Derivative work from bottle label. Sorry, but I don't see how commercial packaging is required to illustrate квас. Plastic bottle is definitely not traditional packaging method of this product. --EugeneZelenko 15:44, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Дыёд Шотткі пазначэнне.svg[edit]

Арфаграфічная памылка, правільна ШоТкі. Дзякуй. --Maksim L. 17:45, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Зроблена. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

2 DRs[edit]

Dear Admin Zelenko,

Isn't it about time that someone--perhaps you--make a decision on this long DR? I don't see how it can be kept and yet no one has made a decision to keep or delete the picture. The reason to delete seems clear: there is no FOP in the UAE and the building in the image is of modern architecture. This DR is more than 2 weeks old now.

✓ Done. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Secondly, do you know anything about the Russian church in this DR No one has said if it is a modern or ancient church. Thank You and please feel free to make a decision on what you are comfortable with only. I just raise these 2 issues to your attention. Maybe you can make a comment in the second DR? Best regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

I think will be good idea to add information about construction date and links to Wikipedia descriptions into all photos of this church. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
  • Sadly many people don't know that FOP expires 70 years after the death of the author or architect. I forgot to check the category here and this was my mistake. My apologies, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:05, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
    No problem :-) This is why I think that links and dates in description will be good idea :-) Just to make things more evident :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

File:I9000.jpg[edit]

Hi... You deleted File:I9000.jpg because a supposed copyright violation (software screenshot). Why is that? The picture is just a shot of an Android page, not an specific non free software. There are a lot of pics with devices showing Android pages. I request reconsideration. Thanks ----Cratón (talk) 15:09, 9 February 2011 (UTC)

Isn't every company produced Android device could use own copyrighted graphics? See also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Mass deletion of partially-copyrighted mobile phone photos and screenshots. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)


a special Wikicookies for Eugene[edit]

Choco chip cookie.png

Thanks you so much for your kindness, your availability to help and your work. 
--Geneviève 21:40, 10 February 2011 (UTC)
Merci! Very tasty one :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Hi, i am Vitrubius32[edit]

Hi some of the images I uploaded to commons are my personal digital archives, other as I have mentioned are found in Google. I hope you know understand, please, if I made a mistake, be so kind to make amends. thanks and greetings.

I think best solution will be if you'll add this comments in deletion requests. Some of old photos may be in public domain, but you need to provide relevant data: country of origins, author/date of creation. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Vitrubius32'm back ...[edit]

Of course I understand that, but sorry, this photograph I scan of the original sixty years old, as also happened with the election of Dr. Carias poster with the image of Joaquin Urquia I do then? the image of the army of Honduras and General Vicete Tosta if they were found on the web. thanks for your attention.

If you just scan old photos, you are not an author, and they can't be declared you own work. This images may be kept on commons if they are in public domain. According to {{PD-old}} Honduras has 75 years term. So you need to provide information about author or if it's impossible, date of creation. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Тĕп страница?[edit]

Hi Eugene, could you kindly take a look whether Тĕп страница and Template:Sisterprojects-cv make any sense or is just a hoax/vandalism/whatever? Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 21:22, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I don't know Chuvash language :-( I think will be good idea to ask help on village pump of Chuvash Wikipedia. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
I asked for help on cv:Википеди:Канашлу/Ют чĕлхе#Страницы на чувашском в Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
Oops, I thought it was russian. Anyway, thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 16:13, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Closing a RFA[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko, when you close a rfa could you please include successful or unsuccessful in the edit summary (per this discussion)? Thank you, Multichill (talk) 22:21, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

I'll try to not forget this :-) However, archive provide this information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
[6] ;) –Juliancolton | Talk 16:55, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Russia-Moscow-Georgy_Zhukov_Monument.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Russia-Moscow-Georgy_Zhukov_Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:46, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

файл Fc-piter-small.jpg[edit]

Уважаемый Евгений, прошу отменить удаление файла Fc-piter-small.jpg, я в комментарии описал ситуацию с этим логотипом, и файл будет использоваться для размещения на странице клуба в Википедии. спасибо.

````

Всё-таки стоит прояснить ситуацию с правами на логотип. Если Вы делали его на заказ, то скорее всего права должны были передаваться клубу. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:38, 17 February 2011 (UTC)


так и есть. более того, клуб не возражает против размещения логотипа в вики, и против статьи в вики тоже. что требуется сделать, чтобы решить этот вопрос?

````

Клуб должен оформить разрешение по образцу Commons:Email templates и послать его в Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:52, 17 February 2011 (UTC)


гм.. если я правильно понял, нужно отправить по емайл эту форму, и указать на ссылку на файл в викискладе? Вы же его вроде удалили ) или достаточно просто имя файла указать? сорри, я просто первый раз.. ) ````

Представитель клуба (желательно юрист) должен отправить эту форму. Мия файла можно указать в письме (или же просто "логотип клуба XYZ"). Для проверки разрешения можно попросить помощи на Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard или User:Butko. Тогда же можно файл и восстановить. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

User:RobotMichiel1972[edit]

Hello Eugene!

This bot User:RobotMichiel1972 (operated by User:Michiel1972) is uploading loads of french demography diagrams. This bot is operated without permission; the requeest was declined. Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 13:41, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for notice it! I left message on user's talk page. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Could you please have a look at the bot request? Multichill (talk) 21:03, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

NordiskaMuseetBot[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko. Just wondering if you could take a look at this bot request which seems to have largely gone unnoticed. Cheers Lokal_Profil 10:03, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

There is still no test run performed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
Docu picked up on the request just after I posted here. =) /Lokal_Profil 11:00, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Commons talk:Administrators/Requests[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko. I would be glad if you would consider this wish next time. Thank you. --Leyo 16:33, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

I'll try to not forget next time :-) But sorry, why archive is not enough for this purpose? When things will became more complicated, it much more easy to forget about them :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
The reason is stated in the talk page linked above. :-) --Leyo 18:17, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Multiplying number of information copies may improve reliability through redundancy, but is prone to process problems. :-) Why don't watch archive page and look to results? :-) We don't have too much RfAs these days, so it's not too much additional mouse clicks :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Logo OMC[edit]

Estimado Eugene Zelenko:

Si es tan amable, podría reevaluar la eliminación de la imagen Logo_omc.jpg, ya que tiene permiso autorizado por su dueño, y remitido a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org el 21 de febrero de 2011 10:10:35 GMT+01:00

¡Muchas gracias! Un cordial saludo: --Raimundo Pastor (talk) 16:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't know Spanish :-( If you have permission you could ask help on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:44, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Вопрос с кириллическим алфавитом[edit]

Добрый вечер! После обновления медиавики почему-то не ставятся в алфавитном порядке файлы на русском языке: [7] Или это только я один так вижу? В самом низу категории файлы, загруженные после обновления программы, на по алфавиту. Загруженные до обновления - по алфавиту. --Vizu (talk) 20:22, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

У меня тоже самое. Скорее всего беда с новой версией. Может также быть проблема с обновлениями (отключены или в очереди). Стоило бы сообщить разработчикам. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Идиотизм: получается два алфавита: ранее загруженные файлы - один алфавит, новые - ниже ещё один... В категории же 230 изображений, как найти нужное? --Vizu (talk) 20:12, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
Сообщил в bugzilla:27741. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Спасибо! --Vizu (talk) 23:26, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Вроде бы вылечили, но пока до Commons не дошло :-( --EugeneZelenko (talk) 23:29, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

NilfaBot[edit]

Hi, I've just started using the bot at full speed on the task requested at Commons:Bots/Requests/NilfaBot (description there). The category its tackling has ~1000 images to sort, that will give ample discussion material. I don't particularly want to have to wait around for weeks for approval for a simple task - if you have an issue with pre-empting the request there, feel free to block the bot.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:08, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

I archived request as approved. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Why did you delete my images?[edit]

It seems that you deleted 2 images that I created from the page: Middle Eastern Geodatabase for Antiquities (MEGA).

Why did you do that? Please replace them. Thanks.

One of image was web site screenshot (see Commons:Screenshots). Other didn't have license information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:45, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Переименовать неправильные названия File:Василь 1852 из Винклера.jpg в File:Васильков 1852 из Винклера.jpg, а File:Венсенштейн 1788 из Винклера.jpg в File:Вейсенштейн 1788 из Винклера.jpg Спасибо. --Vizu (talk) 02:11, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Спасибо! Можно ли удалить File:Ярославская губ МВД Бенке.jpg (дубликат)? --Vizu (talk) 21:27, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Опередили :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Еще просьба переименовать File:Coat of Arms of Yaroslavl, 1856..jpg в File:Ярославская губерния МВД Бенке.jpg Поскольку неточность: герб губернии, но не города, и для алфавитности в категории. И удалить две первые версии тут: [8] (это не Курская губерния). --Vizu (talk) 00:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Image descriptions[edit]

I've received a request on my talk page for the descriptions for several files listed below that I tagged as copyright violations to be made available to Jeff Bedford in order for him to upload the images to Wikipedia with fair use rationales. Would you be able to copy and paste them onto his talk page? In retrospect I should have held off on nominating them for speedy deletion until they were all copied over to Wikipedia. I apologize for the inconvenience.

  1. File:Diet_Mountain_Dew.jpg
  2. File:Mountain_Dew_SuperNova.jpg
  3. File:Mountain_Dew_Distortion.jpg
  4. File:Mountain_Dew_Baja_Blast.jpg
  5. File:Mountain_Dew_Code_Red.jpg
  6. File:MTN_Dew.jpg
  7. File:Mountain_Dew_Energy_UK.jpg
  8. File:Mountain_Dew_White_Out.jpg
  9. File:Brain_Wakey_Juice.jpg
  10. File:Mountain_Dew_Voltage.jpg
  11. File:Mountain_Dew_Live_Wire.jpg
  12. File:Mountain_Dew_Special_Edition_bottle.jpg
  13. File:DewThrowback2010.jpg
  14. File:GAME_FUEL_Halo_3.jpg
  15. File:Mountain_Dew_Revolution.jpg
  16. File:Mountain_Dew_Game_Fuel_2009.jpg
  17. File:Mountain_Dew_Game_Fuel_2009_Horde_Red.jpg
  18. File:Diet_Mtn_Dew_The_New_and_Old.jpg
  19. File:Dewmocracy2flavors2010.jpg
  20. File:Dew_Drinker_Designed_2008.jpg

– Adrignola talk 17:39, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:13, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Название категории[edit]

Я создал категорию "Погоня" и закачал в неё гербы. Потом оказалось, что существует другая категория "Пахоня", причём калька на английский не с наркомовки, а с тарашкевицы. Сейчас все гербы из обеих категорий находятся в категории Pogonja (с Пахони перенаправление). Просьба как администратору-белорусу выбрать одно из 4 названий: Pogonja (рус.) or Pogon (польск.) or Vytis (лит.) or Pahonia (тарашкевица). Это герб 8 воеводств Польши (Речи Посполитой), из которых белорусское одно - Витебское, и более чем тридцати городов Речи Посполитой; соответственно, 24 города Российской Империи (источник - Винклер, 1899). Обсуждение здесь, предлагаю просто переименовать категорию по-польски: Pogon, но не прямой калькой с белорусского (АИ - майки?). С уважением, --Vizu (talk) 02:07, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Дрейден[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Dreiden_1.jpg

File tagging File:Ferrari_F355.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ferrari_F355.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Cecil (talk) 09:04, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Odessa St. Gregory the Illuminator Armenian Church.jpg[edit]

Do you have any views on flickrpassing this image based on Nyttend's comments in the image talkpage? It seems to appear the flickr owner did agree to a "cc by sa 2.0" license. But I can't read the language. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:18, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes, owner agreed. However will be good idea to ask him to change license on Flickr page. Just for those who doesn't know Russian :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
OK. Sadly I cann't do this task as I can't speak Russian or write Cyrillic script. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 21:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
You could ask uploader of image on Commons to do so :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Another ProlineBot[edit]

Would you flag NordiskaMuseetBot? --  Docu  at 20:06, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

board games[edit]

Hello,

This is a conversation I had with user Tryphon , about some photos of board games. I explained that I wrote to the Israeli Copyright law expert, but still did not get a reply. I will let you know when I get his reply.

In the meantime you deleted all the photos, so if his reply is that they are within the Israeli law I would be happy if you will also restore them

Thank you,

--Yoavd (talk) 04:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC)


Hello,

All the photos that I uploaded are board games pre world war II, so at least 65 years old, some of them even more. The photos are recent but the games are old and there is no copyright problem. Please remove the speedy deletion mark.

--Yoavd (talk) 14:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Copyright expires 70 years after the death of the author, so 65 years old is certainly not old enough. In any case, we need to know who's the author of the work. –Tryphon 14:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
According to Israeli copyright law this is different. Any way I am asking out expert lawyer (user:Deror avi) to check in this issue. Please wait before deleting the photos. --Yoavd (talk) 14:15, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
As far as I know, Israeli copyright law was only different for photographs. Everything else is copyrighted for 70 years pma. I'm not an admin, so I'm not going to delete anything, and they can be restored if it turns out they were allowed. –Tryphon 14:42, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

You have deleted a picture!?[edit]

I don't write english as well but well i can be understandable. You have deleted a picture that i have uploaded before (logo fc barcelona.jpg) it isn't a copywright violation it was dowloaded from a free web. And it is necessary for the official web of the F.C. Barcelona on wikipedia and an userbox on the wikipedia too. I ask you please that you restore it. Thanks [Mi user page in wikipedia,[[Mi discussion page on wikipedia] answer me please.

Sorry, but dowloaded from a free web is not compatible with Commons:Licensing. Only {{PD-textlogo}} and public domain by age logos are acceptable on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Просьба пра перайменаваньне[edit]

Вітаю! Калі будзе час перанясіце калі ласка наступныя загружаныя мною файлы з хібнымі назвамі: File:Stanisłaŭ Banifacy Jundził. Станіслаў Banifacy Юндзіл (1850).jpg -> File:Stanisłaŭ Banifacy Jundził. Станіслаў Баніфацы Юндзіл (1850).jpg, File:Valenci Vańkovič. Partret Kazimiera Pasieckaha.jpeg -> File:Valenci Vańkovič. Partret Kazimiera Piasieckaha.jpeg, File:Jazep (Jocif) Rucki. Язэп (Ёсіф) Руцкі.jpeg -> File:Jazep (Josif) Rucki. Язэп (Ёсіф) Руцкі.jpeg, File:Catholic Church of the Immaculate Conception of Blessed Virgin Mary in Udzela.jpg -> File:Catholic Church of the Immaculate Conception of Blessed Virgin Mary in Udzieła.jpg, File:Castel in Vysokаje.jpg -> File:Sapieha Castle in Vysokаje, N. Orda.jpg + засталося File:Pahonia = Пагоня, Grand Duchy of Lithuania COA (1575).jpg -> File:Pahonia - Пагоня, Grand Duchy of Lithuania COA (1575).jpg, File:Pahonia = Пагоня, Grand Duchy of Lithuania COA (1614).jpg -> File:Pahonia - Пагоня, Grand Duchy of Lithuania COA (1614).jpg, File:Pahonia = Пагоня, Grand Duchy of Lithuania COA.jpg -> File:Pahonia - Пагоня, Grand Duchy of Lithuania COA.jpg (здаецца, гэта апошнія са знакам "="). Яшчэ варта выдаліць першую вэрсію файла File:Žygimont Karybutavič - Жыгімонт Карыбутавіч, Pahonia - Пагоня.jpg, бо тамака памылкова зусім іншая выява. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 16:01, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

Зроблена. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
Дзякуй вялікі! Што б бяз вас рабіў :) --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:43, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
І яшчэ, калі ласка, перанясіце File:Kazimier Sapieha. Казімер Сапега.jpg у File:Francišak Sapieha. Францішак Сапега.jpg - ад пачатку памылкова атрыбутаваў гэты партрэт. Загадзьдзя дзякуй! --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 17:02, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
Зроблена. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:Loveantell.jpg[edit]

One of your deletions, did you want to handle it?  — billinghurst sDrewth 15:54, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Kvass[edit]

Hi, I just can't guess why my file about Kvass Tarass has been deleted. There are hundreds of pictures about commercial products with a label on (see Category:Beer bottles for instance), but especially this one had to be deleted. Perhaps because beer is authorized, and kvass not ? It's really discouraging always to see his own work deleted without any understandable reason. Bye. Félix Potuit (talk) 12:12, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but you don't need commercial package with copyrighted art to illustrate product itself. See also Commons:Derivative works.
I clean-up Category:Kvass. You could help to clean-up beer categories.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Мустафа Шокай[edit]

Евгений, Вы удалили фото человека, умершего в 1941 году. Фотографии более 70 лет и она уже перешла в общественное достояние! Настоятельно прошу вернуть фото обратно, иначе это будет считаться вандализмом! МаратД

Вы не могли бы пояснить, о каком файле идёт речь? Кроме того, произведения переходят в общественное достояние через 70 лет после смерти автора (если известен). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Файл "Mustafa_Soqay_Qazaq.jpg". Файл удалён с Commons участником EugeneZelenko. Причина: Missing essential information such as license, [[commons:COM:PERMISS). Автор фото неизвестен! МаратД
    • В описании автором значится участник, загрузивший изображение (Albergenius) и лицензия Creative Commons, что никак не может быть корректным. Надо выяснить хотя бы откуда было отсканировано изображение, не говоря про время создания и оригинального автора. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
  • Мне кажется, в Википедии неправильно подходят к авторству документальных фото. Масса людей делают свои документальные и портретные фото в уличных фотостудиях. Фотомастер получает оплату за сделанное фото и отдаёт его заказчику. Поэтому юридически владельцем таких фото является сам персонаж. Это фотомастеру, чтобы публиковать такие фото, надо испрашивать разрешение у заказчика! Но если персонаж скончался 70 лет назад, то его личные документальные фото юридически переходят в общественное достояние. В данном случае юзер Albergenius - автор не фото, а автор загрузки этой фотографии. С уважением МаратД, 2 April 2011.
    • Мне кажется, что надо просто правильно указывать источник. Без источника рассуждения про анонимность фотографа - гадание на кофейной гуще. Загрузка к авторству не имеет никакого отношения. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
  • В Алма-Ате вышел новый номер (№ 07, 2011) журнала "Аныз Адам" (Великие люди) тиражом 37 000 экз, 52 стр., который полностью посвящён Мустафе Шокаю. Номер богато иллюстрирован ч/б фотографиями, которые ему предоставил в свободное пользование из своего архива профессор Университета им. Мимара Синана (Турция) Абдиуакап Кара. Там и все наши спорные фото. Могу выслать фото обложки журнала с изображением Мустафы Шокая (крупно лицо) на Ваш и-мейл. Вот мой - MaratD2008@yandex.ru. 10 April 2011, С уважением Марат.
    • Думаю, было бы очень полезно спросить Абдиуакап Кара про источники фотографий. Опять же коллекция к авторству отношения не имеет. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Usurp requests[edit]

Thanks, --M Peinado (talk) 06:40, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

And thanks. :) - Toh (talk) 05:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Logo_fcforum-nuevo.png[edit]

Hi, EugeneZelenko. I've notice you deleted the image Logo_fcforum-nuevo.png that I had uploaded. I took it from http://fcforum.net/. It has a Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) license and they even have a link to download the logo, so I can't see why is a copyright violation. Please restore it. Regards --Pepa gotera (talk) 21:18, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

I restored image and corrected license tag. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Request for bot flag[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, EugeneZelenko. You have new messages at TeleComNasSprVen's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

The page is actually at Commons:Bots/Requests/(1.VSNCT)Bot, but I seem to be unable to use the {{talkback}} to specify that page. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 23:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Dégustation_de_Sauternes.png[edit]

Could you please delete this file? I requested it 1,5h before, but no admin does it... --FalconL ?! 15:05, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done, but File:Dégustation de Sauternes.jpg.png in not correct name either because of 2 file type extensions. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
Yes, I know. This was the reason why I requested deletion of the page: I wanted to move File:Dégustation de Sauternes.jpg.png to the correct name File:Dégustation de Sauternes.png. Regards, FalconL ?! 16:18, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

переименовать File:1Терская область изд.Сукачова.JPG в File:Терская область изд.Сукачова.jpg. --Vizu (talk) 22:40, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 1 April 2011 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 4 April 2011 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Спасибо! --~~~~

Buridava[edit]

Hi, I am inquiring about this Buridava art image. I see it gone but it was important for many articles related to Dacians. I don't remember who the original uploader was but I remember there was a government license mentioned. I can't see now the old details as the file is gone. I am trying to find a way to undelete since I find it vital for quite a few articles. Thanks. --Codrin.B (talk) 16:54, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, but {{PD-RO-exempt}} doesn't mention images produced by government. Also file description didn't contain any verifiable source information. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

WHY did you delete mi picture ?[edit]

I put the logo from a ONG "Por el Barrio Libertad" today on line you deleted it, why ? (i speack little english)

Only {{PD-textlogo}} of public domain one are allowed on Commons. For everything else you need explicit permission from creator. See Commons:OTRS and Commons:Email templates. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

I have the autorisation from the creator ! How can I prove it ?

See links above and read instructions there. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Humboldt[edit]

Hello Eugene, "Humboldt" is the name I use for my user page but not my user name, Humboldt (talk) 14:36, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

My question was who made Special:Contributions/Humboldt? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Product_anti_box_03.png[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&wpDestFile=Product_anti_box_03.png Добрый день! Скажите, как я могу загрузить этот файл, чтобы его не удалили? Я представляю компанию-разработчика, какой тип лицензии выбрать?

Надо, чтобы компания оформила разрешение по образцу и отправила его в Commons:OTRS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

CC-BY-SA and permissions[edit]

Hello, EugeneZelenko I uploaded several images to Wikimededia Commons and I received a copyright violation notice. These images were for several articles I'm contributing to about free culture. The license of all the images I used is CC-BY-SA and I provided links to the original sites. On the bottom of the sides there is a CC license. Thay's why I assumed I didn't need permission. One of the images you deleted is the cover of the book Los Piratas Son los Padres, published under a CC license. Can you restore the images or clarify this? This is the link for downloading the book: http://la-ex.net/english/the-oxcars/oxcars08/program/piratesbook Thank you! --Pepa gotera (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Could you please provide URL for image page with image of File:Foto simona levi.png. Is work attributed to site or particular photographer? Also using self for other people works is not correct.
I was not able to open http://www.exgae.net (2 deleted images originates there).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello again This is the link for the picture of Simona Levi: http://la-ex.net/proyectos/oxcars-08. You have to scroll for the pictures. The CC-BY-SA license is at the bottom of the page. I've just found out that is attributed to a photographer. I will correct this. I took the image Gala de los oxcars.jpg from http://oxcars09.la-ex.net/. At the bottom of the site, there is a Licencia Poética (Poetic License) http://oxcars09.la-ex.net/licencia_poetica/ The text is in Spanish, but they say that if you use all or part of their work, you may use a Creative Commons by-sa 3.0 or GPL3 license. I used self by mistake. I never intended to claim it as my own work. I should have used Atribution Share Alike 3.0. The page http://www.exgae.net doesn't exist anymore. They had to close the site and change their name to La-Ex because of legal problems with SGAE, Spanish royalties collecting society. I can't find those images on their new site.

Have a nice day. --Pepa gotera (talk) 15:35, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

{{self}} is used in licensing section of File:Foto simona levi.png. Please update this image information with your findings.
I restored images from http://www.exgae.net. Please try to find old version of site in http://archive.org and update information there too (exact source, authorship, license link.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello I've already updated the information about the images. The license is on the bottom of the page. If I click on the license, this is the link provided: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/es/ Thank you --Pepa gotera (talk) 15:55, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Should be OK now. Please use more relevant categories for your files. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Noticeboard[edit]

Hello EugeneZelenko. May I bring your attention to this post? Thank you, --Dferg (talk) 18:11, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Apple Pie-31.jpg[edit]

Hi Eugene, you deleted the above linked image. On the file's deletion request however, I noted several examples of the Apple logo that claim it to be public domain. Could you explain the situation? Jujutacular talk 18:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

This images were definitely not de-minimus use of logo not compatible with {{PD-textlogo}}. Additionally they may be viewed as promotional material, which is not in Commons:Project scope. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
No one is saying it's de minimis, I believe the thought is that it was published in the US without a copyright notice between 1923 and 1977. Note examples: 1 2 3. Jujutacular talk 03:36, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Anyway, unless it was being used on any projects, I guess don't worry about it, if you view it as promotional. Jujutacular talk 03:40, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Monograma lenin.gif[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko i wish that you tell me why did you delete that file, because it doesn't break author's rights. I gat it by my own from the IPVCE Lenin files and it doesn't have copyrights, it's free to copy or any other things. Waiting for your answer --Qban (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)--Qban (talk) 18:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

I think copyrights on logotype belong to organization. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:38, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Apple Macintosh Desktop.png[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko.

I see that you have deleted the file: Apple Macintosh Desktop.png in the Spanish wikimedia commons... but I copied this file from the English wikimedia in this link... I don´t know if the license of this file is correct, but I have assumed that the license was correct...--Kavira (talk) 18:40, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

English Wikipedia allows non-free media, Commons does not. See Commons:Licensing. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
Ok... you know how I can link the original file from wikipedia English to the article in the Spanish versión?, or this not is possible?. thanks--Kavira (talk) 19:22, 9 April 2011 (UTC)
It's not possible. But you could add link to external site with history of Mac OS. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Changing username[edit]

Hello, I've already renamed my account from "Just_Angelus" to "ANGELUS" in the Italian Wikipedia, but in commons.wikimedia.org my username is still "Just_Angelus". Could you please rename my account? That would be awesome. My request is here. Thank you! Just Angelus (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

You request was already processed by User:Juliancolton. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Image removed for copyright infringement[edit]

Hi, I'd love to know the image I uploaded was removed. The reason would be a copyright violation, right? Well, I wish you tell me what kind of copyright I have infringed, and please, I want a detailed explanation with a lot of evidence to justify the cancellation of a simple emblem of a football team. Thanks. --Sigma1986 (talk) 16:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Why do not you answer? ... --Sigma1986 (talk) 18:42, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
Sorry, but nobody could be day and night in Internet :-) It was sport club logo. Only {{PD-textlogo}} and public domain ones are allowed on Commons. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Просьба[edit]

Добрый вечер. Просьба удалить все версии, кроме 70 кб (открытка) и последней (они только место занимают). --Vizu (talk) 00:32, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Спасибо! Просьба также стереть все версии, кроме последней версии и открытки 1 мб. И здесь и здесь также все, кроме открытки, предпоследней и последней версии. Не нужно сервера Википедии захламлять). Просто первоначальное изображение жёлтое от старой бумаги, его трудно "вытянуть". --Vizu (talk) 18:50, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
    Сделано. На самом деле это более эстетическая мера. Удалённый файлы хранятся на серверах для возможного восстановления. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
    Спасибо! Все миллионы и миллионы удалённых файлов хранятся? Просто иногда (очень редко) кто-нибудь начинает изображения туда-сюда переключать, как, в частности, с деньгами России 1997 года. --Vizu (talk) 21:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
    Да, хранятся все. Но если помогает в борьбе с перезаписями, то почему бы нет? :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Спасибо. Просьба тогда для эстетики стереть всё, кроме открытки, последней и предпоследней версий: [9] и [10] и [11] и переименовать File:Лещинский М.Я. М.М.Синельников 1910е.jpg в File:Лещинский М.Я. Синельников Н.Н. 1910е.jpg (М.М. - подпись к фото - оказалась по-украински). --Vizu (talk) 01:39, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
    Извиняюсь, сделаю чуть попозже. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:40, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
    Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:40, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
    Большое спасибо! --Vizu (talk) 22:28, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
  • Добрый день! Ещё одна просьба: удалить все версии, кроме последней. Мои загрузки не того года, а обрезанные деньги - это порча изображения. --Vizu (talk) 20:50, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
    Сделано. Оставил также первую. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks and Request[edit]

Gene (I'm also a Gene),

First, thanks for posting photos of the Viliya River in Belarus. My grandfather emigrated from a shtetl (small Jewish community or village) in 1900 to America (I live in California, sometimes). So, I was quite taken with your pics. It gives me an idea of what that area looks like until I get the chance to travel there. Doesn't hurt to receive some thanks once in a while, huh?

Anyway, do you know the small villages of Retchki or Kurenets, a bit east of Vilieka, Belarus? I can see from Google maps that they are not too far away. Where were your photos taken? Any chance of taking photos of that area???

Thanks, Gene

Actually, this photos were made by my brother, so all thanks should be addressed to him :-) But they were made during bike trip. I'm not sure will he visit this area or not in near time.
You could look to some photos on http://radzima.org: Kurenets, Retchki, or http://globus.tut.by (Russian only) Kurenets, Retchki. Photos of other places in district are also available there.
I also suggested to create theme maps layers (Orthodox, Catholic, Jewish, etc) to owner of Radzima.org sometime ago, so you could re-iterate request :-)
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

More Thanks[edit]

Good call - those were some good pages (once I used Google to translate them!) with lots of pictures of the area I was looking for, plus some maps, etc. from related sites. Can't thank you enough. I'll try to let you know some time in the future so we can take a bike trip together in that area!

Gene (igenerichards@hotmail.com)

I'm hiker and can't ride a bike :-( And I living in California, so it's not trivial for me to visit Belarus :-( I could definitely recommend http://forum.poehali.net/index.php?board=12 to propose a trip in that area. As far as I know folks there make similar trips with Polish, Russian and Ukrainian bikers. Also many of the are very experienced in off-road biking (like forests, marshes, water crossing, etc.). --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Переименуйте[edit]

Если не сложной переименуйте меня в Mitte27, а то на википедии у меня этот ник, а на викискладе приходится перезаходить под старым. fanSHAXTER (talk) 10:33, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done Сделано. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyright violation[edit]

This image is one copyright violation, the user not have permission of website to use.
--MatheuszFelipe (talk) 15:40, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Fariha Pervez photo marked for deletion[edit]

You have marked the pic File:Fariha Pervez.jpg to be deleted for the reason I don't understand. Its a photo of a Pakistani musician Fariha Pervez. I uploaded that photo so I can create her article here on wikipedia. Since I am new to wikipedia I do not know most of the stuff but 1 thing is for sure that there is no copyright issue on this photo as anyone is free to use to it anywhere. While I also happened to manage the official page of Fariha Pervez which is https://www.facebook.com/FarihaPervez so I do have the right to use this pic and the reason I uploaded that in small resolution so that I wanted it to fit in the info box. Since I am new I didn't know the info that I can adjust the size while adding it wikipedia article. I will be grateful if you un mark it for deletion.

Please use Commons:Email templates and Commons:OTRS to archive permission from photographer. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

Einrichten-heute-2011.jpg[edit]

Hi Eugene, you deleeted File:Einrichten-heute-2011.jpg. Could you please restore the file. There is a licence ticket in OTRS available. Thanks. --Wvk (talk) 07:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:05, 27 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Rick Moranis.jpg[edit]

Dear Admin Zelenko,

Feel free to decide if this is a derivative or a legitimate image. It may be legitimate...I cannot be sure. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:37, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Never mind. The problem seems to have been resolved. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:43, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Перайменаваньне[edit]

Вітаю! Прашу перанесьці наступныя выявы: File:Kryštap Mikałaj Sapieha. Крыштап Мікалай Сапега.jpg -> File:Kryštap Michał Sapieha. Крыштап Міхал Сапега.jpg (памылка ўзьнікла пры перакладзе зь летувіскай), з тае ж сэрыі ўжо ня мой файл File:Mikołaj Józef Massalski 1.JPG -> File:Michał Józef Massalski 1.jpg. Яшчэ, калі ласка, File:Аntаnina Radzivił (Miačynskaja). Антаніна Радзівіл (Мячынская).jpg -> File:Antanina Radzivił (Miačynskaja). Антаніна Радзівіл (Мячынская).jpg (лацінкавая літара a замест кірылічнай), вынік сьпешкі:File:Вінцэнт Герберскі. Vincent Hierbierski.jpeg -> File:Vincent Hierbierski. Вінцэнт Герберскі.jpg. Таксама, калі вы ня супраць, буду складаць сьпіс файлаў з больш дакладнымі назвамі замест варыяцыяў знакаў прыпынку. На жаль, слушнае не заўсёды атрымліваецца абраць ад пачатку. Вось некаторыя загружаныя мною файлы з гэтага ўдакладняльнага пераносу (каб вам было менш працы, я магу сам выпраўляць спасылкі ў вікіпэдыйных артыкулах): File:Leŭ Sapieha - Леў Сапега.jpg -> File:Leŭ Sapieha. Леў Сапега (1833).jpg, File:Leŭ Sapieha -- Леў Сапега.jpg -> File:Leŭ Sapieha. Леў Сапега (1621).jpg, File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha -- Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега.jpg -> File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha. Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега (Svada latina, XVIII).jpg, File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha. Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега.jpg -> File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha. Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега (1747).jpg, File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha - Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега.jpeg -> File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha - Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега (1765).jpg, File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha - Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега.jpg -> File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha. Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега (Svada latina, XVIII).jpg, File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha, Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега.jpg -> File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha. Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега.jpg (замест існага), File:Jan Piotar Sapieha - Ян Пётар Сапега.jpg -> File:Jan Piotar Sapieha. Ян Пётар Сапега (XVII).jpg, File:Kazimier Niestar Sapieha. Казімер Нестар Сапега.jpeg -> File:Kazimier Niestar Sapieha. Казімер Нестар Сапега (1791).jpg, File:Kazimier Niestar Sapieha - Казімер Нестар Сапега.jpg -> File:Kazimier Niestar Sapieha. Казімер Нестар Сапега.jpg, File:Juzef Stanisłaŭ Sapieha - Юзэф Станіслаў Сапега.jpg -> File:Juzef Stanisłaŭ Sapieha. Юзэф Станіслаў Сапега.jpg (цяперашняе перанакіраваньне няслушае + не выкарыстоўваецца), File:Pavał Stefan Sapieha - Павал Стэфан Сапега.jpeg -> File:Pavał Stefan Sapieha. Павал Стэфан Сапега (XVII).jpeg. Гэта былі Category:Sapieha family, з астатнімі, здаецца, менш працы будзе. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 18:18, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Прашу прабачэньня, сёньня не атрымаецца, спадзяюся будзе час заўтра. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 02:07, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Насамрэч гэта ўсё зусім не тэрмінова (ну хіба толькі першыя два файлы з памылковымі назвамі, астатняе - увогуле, драбніцы). Таму як у вас будзе атрымлівацца з часам і каб нічога больш важнага пры гэтым не адкладалася на потым. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:26, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Частку зрабіў. Астатняе потым. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Дзякуй вялікі! Я сюды (ніжэй) пакрысе буду дадаваць у чаргу іншыя ўдакладняльныя пераносы. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 21:56, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
P.S. Вельмі перапрошваю, заблытаўся ў адным файле з Category:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha: на месца File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha. Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега (Svada latina, XVIII).jpg варта паставіць файл-гравюру File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha - Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега.jpg (удакладніў апісаньне, каб было зразумела), а існы файл-карціну перанесьці ў File:Jan Fryderyk Sapieha. Ян Фрыдэрык Сапега (XVIII).jpg. Добра, што вы пераносіце паступова, па частках. Наступным разам буду як мага больш уважлівым. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Вось, калі ласка, наступная ў чаргу невялічкая партыя для пераносу: File:Stanisłaŭ Bohuš-Siestrancevič. Станіслаў Богуш-Сестранцэвіч.jpg -> File:Stanisłaŭ Bohuš-Siestrancevič. Станіслаў Богуш-Сестранцэвіч (1849).jpg, File:Stanisłaŭ Bohuš-Siestrancevič - Станіслаў Богуш-Сестранцэвіч.jpg -> File:Stanisłaŭ Bohuš-Siestrancevič. Станіслаў Богуш-Сестранцэвіч (1827).jpg, File:Jaŭchim Chraptovič - Яўхім Храптовіч.jpg -> File:Jaŭchim Chraptovič. Яўхім Храптовіч (1826).jpg. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:55, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
Зроблена. Здаецца нічога не забыўся і не пераблытаў :-) Варта таксама стандартызаваць пашырэньні файлаў (JPG, jpeg → jpg). Я гэта рабіў, але аднойчы забыўся. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Дзякуй, усё слушна! Наконт стандартызацыі пашырэньняў - рацыя. Буду гэта ўлічвваць пры наступных просьбах пра перанос. Дарэчы, вось калі ласка, з Category:Chodkiewicz family: File:J. K. Chadkievič - Я. К. Хадкевіч.jpg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (1620).jpg, File:Jan Karal Chadkievič - Ян Караль Хадкевіч.jpg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (1830).jpg, File:Jan Karal Chadkievič, Ян Караль Хадкевіч.jpg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (1840).jpg, File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч.jpg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (1780).jpg, File:Jan Karal Chadkievič.jpg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (La Pologne, XIX).jpg, File:Ян Караль Хадкевіч.jpg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (1801).jpg, File:Jan Karal Chadkievič -- Ян Караль Хадкевіч.jpeg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (LDM, XVII).jpg, File:Jan Karal Chadkievič - Ян Караль Хадкевіч (1560 - 1621).jpeg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч.jpg (на вызваленае ў выніку пераносу месца), File:Jan Karal Chadkievič Ян Караль Хадкевіч.jpg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (XVII, I).jpg, File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (XVII).jpg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (Anton van Dyck, XVII).jpg, File:Jan Karal Chadkievič -- Ян Караль Хадкевіч.jpg -> File:Jan Karal Chadkievič. Ян Караль Хадкевіч (XVII).jpg (на вызваленае месца). --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 17:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
Зроблена. --EugeneZelenko 02:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Дапаўненьне ў чаргу для пераносу: File:Albert Gaštold - Альбэрт Гаштольд.jpg -> File:Albert Gaštold. Альбэрт Гаштольд (1840).jpg, File:Jury Tyškievič - Юры Тышкевіч.jpeg -> File:Jury Tyškievič. Юры Тышкевіч (XVII).jpg, File:Jury Tyškievič. Юры Тышкевіч.jpeg -> File:Jury Tyškievič. Юры Тышкевіч (XIX).jpg, File:Jury Tyškievič, Юры Тышкевіч.jpeg -> File:Jury Tyškievič. Юры Тышкевіч.jpg, File:Stanisłaŭ Antoni Ščuka - Станіслаў Антоні Шчука.jpg -> File:Stanisłaŭ Antoni Ščuka. Станіслаў Антоні Шчука (XVIII).jpg, File:Raman Sanhuška - Раман Сангушка.jpg -> File:Raman Sanhuška. Раман Сангушка (XIX).jpg. --Kazimier Lachnovič 23:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
Зроблена. --EugeneZelenko 15:32, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Шчыры дзякуй! Наступны сьпіс: File:Ipaci Paciej. Іпаці Пацей.jpg -> File:Ipaci Paciej. Іпаці Пацей (XVIII).jpg, File:Іпаці Пацей.jpg -> File:Ipaci Paciej. Іпаці Пацей (XIX).jpg, File:Ipaci Paciej.jpg -> File:Ipaci Paciej. Іпаці Пацей.jpg (на выяваленае месца), File:Tadevuš Rejtan - Тадэвуш Рэйтан.jpg -> File:Tadevuš Rejtan. Тадэвуш Рэйтан (XIX).jpg, File:Kryštap Žygimont Pac - Крыштап Жыгімонт Пац.jpg -> File:Kryštap Žygimont Pac. Крыштап Жыгімонт Пац (XVII).jpg, File:Kryštap Žygimont Pac. Крыштап Жыгімонт Пац.jpg -> File:Kryštap Žygimont Pac. Крыштап Жыгімонт Пац (1674).jpg, File:Michał Kazimier Pac. Міхал Казімер Пац.jpg -> File:Michał Kazimier Pac. Міхал Казімер Пац (1686).jpg, File:Michał Kazimier Pac. Міхал Казімер Пац.jpg (на вызваленае месца), File:Kanstantyn Astroski - Канстантын Астроскі.jpg -> File:Kanstantyn Astroski. Канстантын Астроскі (La Pologne, XIX).jpg --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Зроблена. Акрамя File:Michał Kazimier Pac. Міхал Казімер Пац.jpg (на вызваленае месца) (што пераносіць?) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Дзякуй! Перапрошваю, перанесьці варта было File:Michał Kazimier Pac - Міхал Казімер Пац.jpg. Яшчэ ў чаргу, калі ласка, File:Michał Kazimier Ahinski - Міхал Казімер Агінскі.jpeg -> File:Michał Kazimier Ahinski. Міхал Казімер Агінскі (Symon Čachovič, XVIII).jpg, File:Michał Kleafas Ahinski - Міхал Клеафас Агінскі (Józef Grassi).jpg -> File:Michał Kleafas Ahinski. Міхал Клеафас Агінскі (Joseph Maria Grassi, XIX).jpg, File:Michał Kleafas Ahinski. Міхал Клеафас Агінскі.jpeg -> File:Michał Kleafas Ahinski. Міхал Клеафас Агінскі (François-Xavier Fabre, XIX).jpg, File:Michał Kleafas Ahinski - Міхал Клеафас Агінскі.jpg -> File:Michał Kleafas Ahinski. Міхал Клеафас Агінскі (XVIII).jpg, File:Michał Kleafas Ahinski, Міхал Клеафас Агінскі.jpg -> File:Michał Kleafas Ahinski. Міхал Клеафас Агінскі.jpg
З шляхты, здаецца, засталіся толькі Category:Radziwiłł family, таму неўзабаве можна будзе адпачываць :). Вось, калі ласка: File:Albrecht Stanisłaŭ Radzivił - Альбрэхт Станіслаў Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Albrecht Stanisłaŭ Radzivił. Альбрэхт Станіслаў Радзівіл (1758).jpg, File:Barbara Radzivilanka (Radzivił) - Барбара Радзівілянка (Радзівіл).jpg -> File:Barbara Radzivił. Барбара Радзівіл (La Pologne, XIX).jpg, File:Daminik Hieranim Radzivił - Дамінік Геранім Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Daminik Hieranim Radzivił. Дамінік Геранім Радзівіл (XIX).jpg, File:Franciška Ŭršula Radzivił - Францішка Ўршуля Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Franciška Ŭršula Radzivił. Францішка Ўршуля Радзівіл (1863).jpg, File:Jan Radzivił. Ян Радзівіл.JPG -> File:Jan Radzivił Baradaty. Ян Радзівіл Барадаты (XVII).jpg, File:Januš Radzivił - Януш Радзівіл (1579-1620).jpg -> File:Januš Radzivił. Януш Радзівіл (H. Lajbovič, 1758).jpg, File:Januš Radzivił - Януш Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Januš Radzivił. Януш Радзівіл (XVIII).jpg, File:Januš Radzivił -- Януш Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Januš Radzivił. Януш Радзівіл (1641).jpg, File:Januš Radzivił. Януш Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Januš Radzivił. Януш Радзівіл (XIX).jpg, File:Januš Radzivił Януш Радзівіл.jpeg -> File:Januš Radzivił. Януш Радзівіл.jpg (на вызваленае месца), File:Januš Radzivił, Януш Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Januš Radzivił. Януш Радзівіл (1670).jpg, File:Jury Radzivił, Юры Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Jury Radzivił. Юры Радзівіл (XVI).jpg, File:Jury Radzivił - Юры Радзівіл.jpeg -> File:Jury Radzivił. Юры Радзівіл (LDM, XVII).jpg. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:52, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
Фактычна апошняе: File:Kryštap Radzivił - Крыштап Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Kryštap Radzivił. Крыштап Радзівіл (1758).jpg, File:Kryštap Radzivił, Крыштап Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Kryštap Radzivił. Крыштап Радзівіл (1639).jpg, File:Kryštap Radzivił. Крыштап Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Kryštap Radzivił. Крыштап Радзівіл (XIX).jpg, File:Kryštap Radzivił - Крыштап Радзівіл (1585-1640).jpg -> File:Kryštap Radzivił. Крыштап Радзівіл.jpg (на вызваленае месца), File:Mikałaj Radzivił Čorny - Мікалай Радзівіл Чорны.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Čorny. Мікалай Радзівіл Чорны (Schloß Ambras, XVII).jpg, File:Mikałaj Radzivił Čorny. Мікалай Радзівіл Чорны.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Čorny. Мікалай Радзівіл Чорны (1758).jpg, File:Mikałaj Radzivił Čorny, Мікалай Радзівіл Чорны.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Čorny. Мікалай Радзівіл Чорны.jpg (на вызваленае месца), File:Mikałaj Radzivił Stary. Мікалай Радзівіл Стары.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Stary. Мікалай Радзівіл Стары (XVII).jpg, File:Mikałaj Radzivił Stary - Мікалай Радзівіл Стары.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Stary. Мікалай Радзівіл Стары.jpg (на вызваленае месца), File:Mikałaj II Radzivił - Мікалай II Радзівіл.jpeg -> File:Mikałaj II Radzivił. Мікалай II Радзівіл (XVII).jpg, File:Mikałaj Radzivił - Мікалай Радзівіл.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił. Мікалай Радзівіл (1721).jpg, File:Mikałaj Radzivił Rudy - Мікалай Радзівіл Руды.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Rudy. Мікалай Радзівіл Руды (Jan Matejko, Unia Lubelska).jpg, File:Mikałaj Radzivił Rudy -- Мікалай Радзівіл Руды.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Rudy. Мікалай Радзівіл Руды (Schloß Ambras, XVII).jpg, File:Mikałaj Kryštap Radzivił Sirotka - Мікалай Крыштап Радзівіл Сіротка.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Sirotka. Мікалай Радзівіл Сіротка (1745).jpg, File:Mikałaj Radzivił Sirotka -- Мікалай Радзівіл Сіротка.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Sirotka. Мікалай Радзівіл Сіротка (Schloß Ambras, XVII).jpg, File:Mikałaj Radzivił Sirotka. Мікалай Радзівіл Сіротка.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Sirotka. Мікалай Радзівіл Сіротка (1638).jpg, File:Mikałaj Radzivił Sirotka - Мікалай Радзівіл Сіротка.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Sirotka. Мікалай Радзівіл Сіротка (XVII).jpg, File:Mikałaj Kryštap Radzivił Sirotka. Мікалай Крыштап Радзівіл Сіротка.jpg -> File:Mikałaj Radzivił Sirotka. Мікалай Радзівіл Сіротка (XVIII).jpg. Хех, як паглядзець - нават ня верыцца, што загрузіў столькі файлаў :). --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 10:21, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
Зроблена. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
Дзякуй вялікі! Ажно вочы цешацца :). Калі дзе што выпадкова заўважыце з майго загружанага, што можна лепш пераназваць - абавязкова пішыце, мяркую, паразумеемся :), ну і з стандартызацыяй пашыраньняў (.JPG, .jpeg -> .jpg) я магу сьпісы паступова складаць, калі лічыце гэта вартым. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 20:20, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

WillieBot[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, EugeneZelenko. You have new messages at Commons:Bots/Requests#WillieBot_.28talk.C2.A0.C2.B7_contribs.29's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Česky | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | +/−

--theMONO 03:47, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

BRFAs[edit]

Hi Eugene,

Please may I request that you speedily approve both Commons:Bots/Requests/Lucia Bot and Commons:Bots/Requests/Thehelpfulbot, bots that are doing the same task for COMMONS:POTY. We have already started to edit so you can see from the hundreds of edits Special:Contributions/Lucia_Bot and Special:Contributions/Thehelpfulbot, that the bots are working well and doing an uncontroversial task that makes the job for the Committee a lot easier!

Thank you for your consideration in this matter.

Kind Regards,

The Helpful One 12:09, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Thank you so much! :) The bot's shouldn't malfunction because we are running them off our own computers on AWB, so it's a lot easier to keep an eye on them, but I will keep and on it. Thanks again, The Helpful One 15:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Беларусафобія ў commons[edit]

Вітаю! Дапамажыце, калі ласка, вярнуць файлу нармальную арыгінальную назву [12]. Выглядае на нахабнае парушэньне асноўных прынцыпаў найменьня ў commons. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 12:42, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Мяркую, варта ў падобных выпадках прыводзіць апанэнту спасылкі на крыніцы, што ў той час у афіцыйных дакумэнтах БНР Гародня так і называлася. Што тычыцца ангельскай назвы, то Народная звычайна перакладаецца як People. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Напісаў апанэнту, але мяне напрасткі забівае падобае перайменаваньня без абмеркаваньня або хаця б інфармаваньня аплоўдэра (добра, што прадбачліыа стаўлю ўсе файлы ў сьпіс назіраньня). Дарэчы, афіцыйная назва гучыць менавіта як Belarusian Democratic Republic ([13]), хоць і People для мяне непрынцыпова (але ж назву файла зьмянілі не на People, а фактычна на расейскую трансьлітэрацыю). Што да Horadnia, то такая назва нават у сучасным сэнсе ўжываецца, напрыклад, у Historical Dictionary of Belarus. — Lamham. — London: Scarecrow Press, 1998.— 338 p. ISBN 0-8108-3449-9, ды ўвогуле да коскі стаіць (здаецца, няма правіла, што назва мае быць толькі на адной мове). Таму памылак ці недакладнасьцяў, здаецца,тут няма - а варыятыўнасьць, наколькі я ведаю, не зьяўляецца падставаю для перайменаваньняў файла. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 20:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
У зьвязку з тым, што апанэнт ня можа прывесьці нейкіх уцямных тлумачэньняў прашу вас вярнуць файлу пачатковую назву, згодна зь дзейнымі правіламі. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 13:02, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
На мой погляд, дыскусію варта працягнуць, бо пытаньне з назвай гораду не абмяркоўвалася. Але пададзеная крыніца — сучасная, а варта падаць аргумэнты пра менавіта часы БНР. На мой погляд, варта ўсё ж весьці дыскусію ў больш спакойным тоне. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Рэтраспэктыва - звычайная практыка і ў правілах на гэты конт нічога няма. Ці ў выпадку File:Vytis in great seal of Lithuania.png варта падаваць на перайменаваньне, бо як вядома, слова Vytis у дачыненьні да Пагоні ў летувіскай мове зьявілася толькі ў 19 стагодзьдзі (а ў ангельскай, адпаведна, - яшчэ пазьней)? Наконт назвы "Горадня" - ніякай памылкі няма: назва ўжываецца ў АК, дык якія тут могуць быць пытаньні? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 22:50, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
Я пра тое, што лепшы аргумэнт у падобных дыскусіях - першакрыніцы. Бо пазьнейшыя аўтарытэтныя крыніцы ў кожнага могуць быць свае :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Так, але файл загрузіў я, а не апанэнт. Адпаведна, абгрунтаваць перайменаваньне мусіць ён, а ня я. Інакш гэта простае злоўжываньне (маўляў, "проста не падабаецца - таму пераймяную, бо маю такую магчымасьць у адрозьненьні ад апанэнта"). --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:05, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Вядома, апанэнту таксама трэба абгрунтоўваць свае дзеяньні. Наколькі ведаю, асаблівых правоў уласнасьці на назвы файлаў не існуе. На мой погляд, сытуацыя з назвай гораду неадназначная (бо у той час, хто толькі на яго не прэтэндаваў). Паколькі выяве адносіцца до БНР, то і спасылацца лепей за ўсё на афіцыйныя дакумэнты БНР. Гэта будзе лепшым аргумэнтам у дыскусіі. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Вы памыляецеся, існуе сьпіс канкрэтных прычынаў, паводле якіх можна праводзіцца перайменаваньне файлу, загружанага іншым карыстальнікам. Commons:File renaming гэта дакладна рэглямэнтуюць і пункту "бо такая мова або форма імя/назвы больш распаўсюджаная" тамака няма. Адпаведна, усякае падобнае перайменаваньне зьяўляецца злоўжываньнем, а ў дадзеным выпадку яшчэ і дыскрымінацыяй паводле моўнай і нацыянальнай прыкметы. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:19, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
У Commons:File renaming ёсьць пункт 5, тым больш што ён датычыцца перакладу назвы краіны. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Цытую "Correct obvious errors in file names": калі назва ўжываецца ў АК, то пра якую відавочную памылку можна, увогуле, казаць? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Ящчэ раз хачу падкрэсьліць тое, што сучасныя аўтарытэтныя крыніцы ў кожнага свае (назва Grodno напэўна выкарыстоўваецца ў польскіх крыніцах, дый можа і ў ангельскамоўных крыніцах і мапах таго часу). Але вось першакрыніц, накшталт афіцыйных дакумэнтаў, значна меней за іх сучасныя інтэрпрэтацыі. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Прабачце, але я ня бачу ў правілах ніводнай згадкі пра тое, што адрозная назва ў першакрыніцах (якіх?) зьяўляецца дастатковай падставай для перайменаваньня. Гаворыцца проста пра відавочна хібныя назвы і, як мы ўжо вызначылі, ніякіх памылак у назьве не было, - адпаведна, перайменаваньне не адпавядае правілам і файлу варта вярнуць пачатковую назву. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:40, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Відавочны хіб быў з перакладам назвы краіны. Назва гораду - спрэчная. І трэба вырашыць спрэчнае пытаньне перад тым, як перайменаваць файл. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Я вас не разумею ўсё болей: што значыць "відавочны хіб", калі назва афіцыйна выкарыстоўваецца Радай БНР? Што датычыцца назвы места, то яна выкарыстоўваецца ў АК, дык паводле якіх правілаў яе маюць права пераймяноўваць? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Патлумачце калі ласка, у якой частцы былой назвы былі "obvious errors" і на якой падставе робіцца выснова пра "obvious" і пра "errors"? --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 15:55, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Мне цяжка казаць пра тое, ці пераклад Народная як Democratic зьяўляецца вынаходніцтвам цяперашняй Рады БНР, ці тых часоў. На мой погляд, гэта некарэктна і я бы таксама палічыў бы гэта за памылку. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:37, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Мяркую, вы мусіце разумець, што ні ваш, ні мой погляд у параўнаньні з АК ня маюць ніякай вагі. Як мы ўжо высьветлілі, у назьве файла ніякіх "відавочных памылак" не было - значыць, перайменаваньне не адпавядала правілам. Таму я яшчэ раз прашу вас вярнуць файлу пачатковую назву - як зьмененую без дастатковага абгрунтаваньня. Тое, што хтосьці мае ў commons больш правоў, яшчэ ня значыць, што ён можа імі злоўжываць і падобные злоўжываньне мусіць заахвочвацца. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:03, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Прашу прабачэньня, але я бачу спрэчную сытуацыю, а не злоўжываньне. Мяркую, што лепшае выйсьце з падобных сытуацый - паразуменьне бакоў канфлікту. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 19:14, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Добра, бачу што вам няпляваць, што аб беларусаў дэманстратыўна выціраюць ногі. Тады падкажыце, калі ласка, дзе можна атрымаць правы пераносу файлаў і што для гэтага трэба, а таксама куды можна напісаць скаргу на злоўжываньне правамі адміністратара. --Kazimier Lachnovič (talk) 19:18, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Мяркую, што на Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Could You write me why did You deleted file Wodka_Starka.jpg???[edit]

Please send me an answer.

It was Commons:Derivative work form bottle label. Sorry, but you don't need commercial packaging for illustrating wódka, as well as any other beverage. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Категории советских ПМ[edit]

Здравствуйте. Ладно, сделаю те же категории с окончанием s, но мне влом править 25 файлов, и потому я поставлю перенаправления категорий (т.е. шаблон). Есть бот, занимающийся этим. Викимонетчик (✐✙⚖; ) 15:47, (UTC)

Только не забудьте, пожалйста, почистить некорректные названия за роботом. Он сам не догадается :-) --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2011 (UTC)
Извините, я Вас не понял. Викимонетчик (✐✙⚖; ) 16:17, (UTC)
После того, как робот перенесёт файлы в новые категории, надо будет запросить удаление некорректных. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:32, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

С праздником![edit]

Ribbon of Saint George.svgПоздравляю с Днём Победы!--Vizu (talk) 08:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)
Спасибо большое! --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 9 May 2011 (UTC)