User talk:EugeneZelenko/Archive4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Welcome Committee[edit]

Well, even if I do 200 a day, (then I would do nothing else) I don't think we will get the list down by ourselves. :(

Do you notice other people helping correct mistakes? We can invite them to help us as well. They especially don't have to be admins - they just have to know what they're doing. :) I'll make a post on the mailing list. I think no one really reads the village pump anyway, sigh... pfctdayelise (translate?) 16:24, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

I asked help from User:Gildemax and User:Rüdiger Wölk. --EugeneZelenko 14:04, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
I like this tool User:Orgullobot/Welcome log! It helps a lot. --gildemax 22:32, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Was heißt das, was Du mir auf die Benutzerdiskussion geschrieben hast? -- Abbatissa 20:13, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Daniol[edit]

Hi Eugene!

Could you please block User:Daniol for a week or so. He is insulting me on my discussion page because I have restored the deletion and no source warnings on his discussion page:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AALE%21&diff=2119220&oldid=2111462

Regards!

--ALE! 17:19, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

User:Sanbec blocked Daniol already for 1 week. --EugeneZelenko 14:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Украинское авторское право[edit]

Билеты[edit]

Привет. Я по поводу Image:Donetsk-ticked-2.jpg и подобных. Получается я не могу выкладывать в коммонс отсканированные или сфотографированные лично билеты? А если будет фотка, на которой несколько билетов лежат на столе? И как быть, например, с афишами, значками и т.п.? --Butko 09:37, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

Ещё такой вопрос: Есть ли такой инструмент для Коммонс, который может показать какие из изображений загруженных мной впоследствии были удалены? --Butko 08:45, 12 June 2006 (UTC)


См. наше обсуждение - User talk:Butko#Re: Билеты

Я вот подумал, что раз марки попадают под {{PD-UA-exempt}}, то почему билеты нет? В статье 10 закона Украини об авторских и смежных правах говорится, что "символы и знаки предприятий" надодятся в PD. Билет разве не символ или знак транспортного предприятия? --Butko 12:31, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Наверное, моё сообщение затерялось, но мне хотелось бы получить ответ на запись от 16 ноября--Butko 07:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Логотипы спортивных организаций[edit]

А вот ещё удалили - File:FC Shakhtar Donetsk.jpg - эмблема футбольного клуба. Относится к пункту «символы и знаки предприятий, учреждений и организаций» или нет? --Butko 09:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Я думаю, что логотипы спортивных организаций охраняются как торговые знаки, особенно, если клубы коммерческие. --EugeneZelenko 16:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Спасибо за ответ --Butko 16:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Я нашел в других виках логотип Шахтёра - там он помечен как PD. В немецкой вике, насколько я знаю, строго следят за авторскими правами. См. de:Bild:Shakhtar-Donetsk.png и en:Image:Shakhtar-Donetsk.png --Butko 14:12, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Следят, но вполне вероятно, что просто руки не добрались. В английской Википедии я видел несколько снимков, на которые совсем не в тему был поставлен {{PD-UA-exempt}} - тут всё зависит от фантазии загружающего :-).
Мне кажется, лучше всего в этой ситуации обратится к украинским юристам и желательно к руководству клуба. По идее должен быть государственный реестр зарегистрированных торговых марок (или хотя бы их список с датами, номерами регистрации) - в белорусском законе он упоминается. --EugeneZelenko 15:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: User:Gildemax[edit]

Yes, I agree completely. He is already doing a lot of useful work with tagging images and talking to new users which is great. He has no Commons: namespace edits though (no Village pump). But I think it's not so important. I will wait a little bit and then I will ask him. My nomination of NeilsF is still on COM:A and I think he will have a better chance if I only have one nomination at a time ;) --pfctdayelise (translate?) 15:45, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

He declined, quite sad, but I think he will continue to be very helpful. --pfctdayelise (translate?) 02:19, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Intelliworks logo.gif[edit]

Hi,

I had asked for Intelliworks permission to use their image in the article I am writing on them. They have granted permission to use their logo under GPL. What should I do now? Upload the content again? Honeyuee

I don't think that corporate lawyer read your letter. If you noticed, I reuploaded this image into English Wikipedia with tag that usually applied to logos. --EugeneZelenko 13:59, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks buddy. Honeyuee 14:40, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Comment[edit]

Thank you for voting in my RfA. I do agree to your comments and it was mainly becuse I don't trust my english writing skills that I did apply now, I didn't wannt to do a lot of machine-like editing just to get a bunch of editcount. What I'm good at and willing to do is to revive diffrent forms of delitions (even if I belive my writing in english is en-2 do I belive my understandning is en-4). But I realise that I scholud have showed that I actualy also is able to write and be good att that sort of metawork to, becuse in the things I like to do much communication is also need to be done. I would intend to show this if I don't onlyckly is going away for the next 5 days. But thank you for your reply and what I have learnt from it. /Grön 06:29, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Ukrainian Stamp Fifa World Cup.jpg[edit]

Hi, recently Image:Ukrainian Stamp Fifa World Cup.jpg has been uploaded ([1]). The image claims to be PD-stamp according to Ukranian law. This seems to me like a reupload of Ukrainian_Stamp_Fifa_Wold_Cup.jpg, deleted by User:Thuresson due to FIFA 2006 world cup logo. I advised him and he sent me to you as you probably know better than us if this stamp can stay on commons or not. (is the stamp PD? can Ukrainia give to public domain a derivateve work of a logo?)

Cheers Platonides 10:52, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

FYI: A new tool to help deletions[edit]

it's called "Bad Old Ones". See e.g. [2]. I created a template, {{delete assist}} which should be put on subcats of 'Unknown'. I just put it on the month-level ones, if you want to put it on day-level ones you're welcome to. It will just automatically create the link to Bad Old Ones for that category.

It's good if you want to delete "easy" cases that aren't being used anywhere. :) There's also a 'safe delete' option which creates a backup copy on the toolserver. However Brion is working on undeletion of images at the moment and it might be fixed permanently very soon!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for info. I'll look to new tool later. I tired today after adding many interwikis on be: :-) --EugeneZelenko 14:46, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Israeli-type-H-plugs-and-socket.jpg[edit]

Hi, recently you tagged "missing essential source information" this photo I uploaded 5 days ago... How do I fix that ? What do I have to add to the description so that there is enough information ? In fact, one of my friends (fr:Utilisateur:Kiddo) took the photo and I simply uploaded it... FF7Sephiroth 14:02, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Perspektive Deutschland Zufriedenheit nach Region Beispiel 2005 2006.jpg[edit]

Hi and thank you for letting me know about the missing license info on the above mentioned image. I tried to add the license info today, but somehow could not find a posibility to change the license info of an already uploaded impage in Commons. Concerning the picture itself, I have taken it out of an official press kit (being allowed to be distributed freely) from the organisers of this survey. The image refers to an online poll called Perspektive Deutschland in German Wikipedia. Could you let me know, how I actually amend the license info for the picture? Sorry, for such basic nagging stuff,... Schiehallion 09:02, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:180px EU flags.PNG[edit]

I uploaded these thumbnails because the thumbnails produced by the Wikimedia software are really too worse in order to use them.

Wikimedia


I will delete these thumbs immediately after the issue is solved.

P.S. Please take a look here too: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Village_pump#Low_sharpness
--Lemonc 12:37, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Typhoon Pearl in Shantou.jpg[edit]

Hi, I noticed you commented on User talk:Earthengine about a similarly-named image which has since been deleted. Should this be deleted too? pfctdayelise (translate?) 06:15, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Also... would you be able to talk to this user, please? Somehow I doubt these images are "GFDL-self". Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 10:46, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Image Category Fix[edit]

Hi! You corrected my pic "Florfliege-Makro.jpg" last days... BUT I like to have the ||Category:Chrysopidae|| category in it because otherwise it's not in the siutable place unter the commons button (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Chrysopidae) - so could you please do that??? because i dont know how to do it better than i had done it and it had worked well the way i had done it. Thanks.

dudu

Error?[edit]

What could possibly be wrong with the source info on Otto F. Kernberg.jpg?--DorisH 15:51, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

  • I believe it is called Otto F. Kernberg MD.jpg, it can be found in the Kernberg article: en:Otto F. Kernberg.--DorisH 15:58, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

Question on Image:Maryam-rajavi-june-17-11.jpg[edit]

I saw this tagged as NLD, however I didn't entirely understand your rationale for labeling it such, as the uploader did give a licence (I'll admit that I'm more accustomed to the licenesing system of WikipediA the Commons, so I might have missed something). 68.39.174.238 22:20, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

It's more likely that this images come form website (== copyvio). If uploader claimed to be author, he/she could upload better resolution. If better resolution will not be provided, this image will be deleted. --EugeneZelenko 02:58, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

GNU Free Documentation License.[edit]

I’m confused about this licenses thing. Pubic domain is not a part of GNU free documentation licenses? I’m all ready read about GNU in Wiki, but there are so many documents and I can make a correct idea. Which is the correct permission in this case? (I’m not an English writer user, so be lenient with me)--Scuellar 04:43, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

author and source[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:78159_17.jpg

i have already written the source it's cimoi and i have changed the author and i put cimoi

Закон Болгарии об авторских правах[edit]

К сожалению изпользование изображении болгарских купюр в Википедии невозможно. Конечно есть другие материалы, незащитимые авторским правом по правилам болгарского закона. Т.е. шаблон нужен, но неприложим для данного случая. С поздравом, Zlatko + (talk) 11:32, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Оригинал можно найти очень легко :-) ( http://www.paragraf22.com/pravo/zakoni/zakoni-d/2.htm ). А вот с переводами дела непросты. Если нужна только маленкая часть етого монументального труда, то я попропую перевести. -- Zlatko + (talk) 14:36, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Что-то такое, но не так :-(

1. нормативни и индивидуални актове на държавни органи за управление, както и официалните им преводи;
Если какой-то государственный закон или постановление данного министерства содержит изображение, то последнее является исключением.
2. идеи и концепции;
Аналогично если данная идея включает в себе какое-то изображение, то оное являясь частью идеи/концепции незащитимо.
3. фолклорни творби;
Фольклорные мотивы (скажем в рубахах) ...
4. новини, факти, сведения и данни.
А вот это может получить довольно много толковании - например всё содержание данного сервера возможно интерпретировать как данные ...

В том то и вся проблема, что это не единственный закон, который интерпретируем по разному. -- Zlatko + (talk) 15:04, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


Если Вас не затрудняет, я бы отдал предпочтение удалению главной буквы в словосочетании «могли бы Вы» и заменой гораздо лучшей буковкой «т». С поздравом, Zlatko + (talk) 14:39, 19 June 2006 (UTC)


Ответил с опозданием и ответ сам по себе неутешительный, но ничего поделать не могу. -- Zlatko + (talk) 23:37, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Terraforming[edit]

Hey! I've got tremendous problems categorizing my work since I don't understand, how the categorizing-tool works. I uploades that image recently to the terraforming-article in the German wiki. Then I wanted to make the image accessable to other users in the wikimedia commons. I still can't find it here searching by the keyword "Terraforming", but I replaced the image I already had in the german wiki by this one… Can you help me categorizing it? Thanks a lot, Rokkon

www.pdb.org[edit]

I'm gonna upload from this site several pictures about proteins, like this one or something like that. But previously, I need to be certain that I'm able to do it. That site is by a group of American public laboratories (see here) working with public funds (the list of all the US National Agencies is on the bottom of the homepage)... I think that all their works are released in PD, but I'm not sure, because it's not written clearly. Can you help me? Thanks! --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 15:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Finding the right categories[edit]

Hi Eugene!

I'm new around here. and just trying to get the hang of it. I'm a grandmother. I don't think you've got too many of those around. I'm afraid I'm rather slow at catching on but I'm getting there with a bit of help. Whenever I go looking for the art objects I want on Wikimedia commons, I find all these things that are filed under weird names, or seem to be all out on their lonesome or have some anomally like

  • Art of Austria
  • Art of Belgium
  • Art of Canada
  • Danish Art
  • Art of Egypt

So I never know what to do with anything. Or exactly how to do it. And categories that I expect to exist under a particular heading, don't! I spose people just make up the categories as they go along. It doesn't suit my relatively tidy mind.

So with the Four Martyrs of Westminster Abbey, I simply visited the various sites that I thought might want my pic, Martin Luther King Jnr, Bishop Romero and so on, and dropped the pic into the right place. So it's alreday been used four times.

Now I'm going to have to find things to do with my Chartres Cathedral sculpture and Windows, windows from Canterbury Cathedral, and the odd pulpit or three from Belgium. The pulpits ought to stay together as a group, but they ought also be at the churches that the belong to. Do your categories allow for something to appear at various places?

--Mandy 12:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Greengreen.gif[edit]

EN: Hello! I think that now is ok? I have given the source of the image Greengreen.gif.

PL: Cześć! Myślę, że teraz jest ok? Podałem źródło obrazka Greengreen.gif.

GreenGreen.gif

Krzycho0 22:15, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Sorry I thought that somebody confirimed the license because this image is on EN Wikipedia. [3] Krzycho0 22:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:Gallo and Breton.gif[edit]

Hello, can you specifiy what is unclear about the copyright status of this image? It says right below the licensing tag where it is taken from and that the copyright holder (in other words, the person responsible for the site) did not mind it being used under the circumstances we require it to be licensed under. What licensing information is missing? --Chlämens 19:18, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

You claim that the source is not being given, even though it is ([4]). On this website, the copyright info states that: "In general, and unless otherwise indicated, we allow you to reproduce, transmit and distribute parts of this content for non-profit purposes as long as you identify the source as www.celtia.info.", that is not enough for Commons, so I e-mailed them and asked if the map could be used under our acceptable licenses which includes as the third point "Commercial use of the work must be allowed". I assume the creator of the map read this and responded by writing back "yes, it's fine"; if you want to check this you can also e-mail them at info@celtia.info. What I should have done is specify that the source has to be given, and I fixed that now. --Chlämens 09:31, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Image:R2D2Art2005.jpg[edit]

This file is my photo, and it will be only used in my user page in es:Usuario:R2D2Art2005, but I don´t know which kind of license I need to use, if I authorise to be used anywhere. (English is not my primary language, and I may not express properly) --R2D2Art2005 21:58, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Don't be silly[edit]

Come on, you should have taken a quick look at my contribution page instead of pasting silly templates :-)

It's just the dumb upload form that can't be made remember the licence selection and defaults to none. Taw 16:08, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

And is there some script for automatically selecting {{self2|GFDL|cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} in the upload form ? Taw 23:24, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

image[edit]

The image of the Yu-Gi-Oh card I uploaded was made my me. I wrote the wording and made the image in the middle myself, so it isn't copyrighted. 879(CoDe) 17:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

Commons-l subscription[edit]

Hello EugeneZelenko,

as per Commons talk:Administrators, I am asking all admins to subscribe to commons-l, a mailing list for Wikimedia Commons policy and project discussion. Since many admins are only on Commons infrequently, this is a good way to alert people about important happenings. The mailing list is nominally multilingual, but predominantly English.

If you are already subscribed to commons-l, I apologize for bothering you, and you are free to ignore this message. If you don't want to use your regular e-mail account, feel free to leave me a message, and I can send you a GMail invite. Traffic on the mailing list is relatively low, and we do not expect admins to read all messages to the list, but it would be nice if you could check on it at least every few weeks. Thanks for your time,--Eloquence 23:03, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I did it already. However I didn't received messages from this mailing list yet, so I don't sure I did everything correct :-). --EugeneZelenko 14:26, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
When did you subscribe? The last message is from July 1.--Eloquence 22:04, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
July 2. I had received some messages already. --EugeneZelenko 14:29, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Largo da Sé.JPG[edit]

I have updown a new picture to replace old one. But the new picture does not replace on display. Would you please give some help on it? Is that my problem on operation? --9old9 02:01, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Belarus tactors[edit]

OK- the restoration will happen somewhere in the next 8 hours. -Mak 03:48, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

The bot was a little too persistent. It is being restored again. The B list is stable, so there should be no further retries. Just to make sure though- I killed the entry in its control list. -Mak 01:37, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Commons:Правила удаления (Deletion guidelines / Russian)[edit]

Please, read this text and make the corrections which you consider to be necessary. --Panther 06:51, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Загрузка файла[edit]

Aldekein 09:13, 18 July 2006 (UTC) Взгляните, пожалуйста, на страницу "Загрузить файл" (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Upload):

"После загрузки файла, добавьте его в соответствующие страницы ВикиХранилища и/или других Вики-праектов".

"праектов" следует заменить на "проектов".

Вдогонку[edit]

(сам пока не могу :) "Если Вы не укажите " - "не укажЕте". --Panther 09:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Исправил. Спасибо за вычитку. --EugeneZelenko 14:46, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

User:Maksim[edit]

Hello EugeneZelenko, could you please have a look at the talk_page of this user. I have the impression that the user does not understand what we are talking about. Could you be so kind and write some words in ru ? Thu --- gildemax 09:17, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer --- gildemax 16:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Russian copyright laws[edit]

Maybe you can offer some useful comment? Commons:Village_pump#A_photo_shot_by_my_friend --pfctdayelise (translate?) 01:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

category & gallery[edit]

Hi,

You said "category for all images, gallery pages for selected images". If that is true, could you tell me the "correct" way of structuring this? --Chochopk 04:15, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

Russian empire[edit]

Response on my talk page. Let me know what you think. -Mak 15:28, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

again.
another response for you on my talk page. -Mak 07:34, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Архитектура, марки и т.д.[edit]

Привет. Глянь пожалуйста на мое небольшое исследование относительно Stamp/Ukraine а также User talk:Yakudza. Полагаю, что в Беларуси несмотря на это утверждение ситуация аналогична. Я давно обратил внимание на схожесь многих украинских и русских законов, как будто их писали под копирку. Убедился еще раз в этом после небольшого поиска. См. :

Не являются объектами авторского права ... государственные символы и знаки [5]
почтовая марка - государственный знак почтовой оплаты...[6] --Yakudza
Насколько помню твои замечания, на Украине был легальный прецедент на эту тему. К сожалению, я не юрист и не знаю, был ли соответствующий прецедент в Белоруссии. Я пробовал задать этот вопрос на http://www.belpost.by, но на него, к сожалению, не ответили. С другой стороны, марки USPS (госпочты в США) с 1978 года охраняются авторскими правами.
Например, авторские права на официальные изображения гербов городов и районов принадлежат Комитету по архивам и делопроизводству при Совмине РБ («Гербы і сцягі гарадоў і раёнаў Беларусі» ISBN 985-01-0530-5).
EugeneZelenko 03:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Действительно, есть существенные различия между украинским и белорусским законом. В Украине изображения гербов городов и районов (символіка територіальних громад) в общественном достоянии, а Белоруссии об этом в законе ничего не сказано. Но относительно почтовых марок, как мне кажется, хотя я тоже не юрист, имеется довольно четкое указание в приведенных выше цитатах. Я полагаю, что можно еще проконсультироваться на форуме commons или может здесь --Yakudza 06:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
Мне кажется, более весомым в этом вопросе будет мнение белорусских юристов. Попробую задать этот вопрос на http://praunik.org/ (может есть и другие места). Хотя сейчас период отпусков... --EugeneZelenko 15:13, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

Относительно фото архитектурных и др. объектов (если я правильно понял вопрос). Где-то в английской википедии вычитал, что фотографии двумерных объектов не считаются творческим актом, поэтому авторские права на такие фото не распространяются. Фотографии же трехмерных объектов - творческий акт, поэтому эти фотографии, также охраняются авторским правом. Охрана прав трехмерных объектов заключается в том, что их нельзя копировать в пространстве, т.е. воспроизводить скульптуру, здания и т.д. Фотографирование же копированием в этом случае не считается. Ситуация с белорусским законодательством должна быть аналогичным, т.к. Беларусь подписывала такие же международные конвенции по защите авторских прав, как и большенство других стран. --Yakudza 21:40, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Мне тоже кажется логичным защита только от 3-мерного копирования в случае 3-мерных объектов, но повторюсь, я не юрист :-(. --EugeneZelenko 03:23, 24 July 2006 (UTC)


User:Mela[edit]

My I ask how I can violate my own copyright?

--MelaEckenfels 24 July 2006

user jolle[edit]

I'm sorry, I forgot to add that i take the image in my last trip to Sri Lanka and Maldive islands and that is licensed GFDL, as the rest of the images loaded, and others in next future. I cut slighty this particular image because the head of the guide was in the bottom. jolle 16:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Buran-sunset.jpg[edit]

Hi, could you check source for Image:Buran-sunset.jpg, found here: http://www.buran.ru/htm/foto4.htm , does it have free use copyright? Page is in rushia. --Tomia 18:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

Image:Trinidad-Selling Potatoes.jpg[edit]

I noticed this image is in Category:Trinidad and Tobago, but looking at it, it doesn't look like Trinidad and Tobago. Are you sure this isn't another Trinidad, like Trinidad, Bolivia or Trinidad, Cuba? Guettarda 03:37, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Re: Running for bureaucrat/checkuser?[edit]

Indeed. But what about you??? I think you would do a great job! :)

I think that positions should be taken by persons with much better communication skills then mine :-) --EugeneZelenko 14:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I am already quite tired of petty and repetitive arguments so I am cutting back what I do here, I don't think b'crat/CU are very fun, just more hassle really. What happened to User:Ausir? I think we should harass the existing ones more, first. pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:12, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

I agree that bureaucrat position is just more responsibilities... Unfortunately it's looks like we doesn't have around anybody to harass :-) :-( --EugeneZelenko 14:36, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, they've all gone away, weird. What's wrong with your communication skills?? I really think you should run! Seriously, people know you are active and dedicated and trustworthy. You don't have to be perfect, but you do have to be able to admit when you've made a mistake, so I think you'll be a shoo-in. Please run!!! pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:14, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Strongly Symbol support vote.svg Support :) --Panther 08:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for support. I'll run. --EugeneZelenko 15:13, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Wow. Last night I left a message for Fred Chessplayer proposing that he let me nominate him. I have been leaving messages on the other wikis for bureaucrats even including Andre who seems to be excessively grumpy these days. So far, nothing. I agree with briana- it is weird.
We need two active bureaucrats- I encourge you folks to encourage Fred to accept.

-Mak 15:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Eugene. -Mak 20:15, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

User:Huebi[edit]

Привет! Товарищ упорно очищает свою страницу обсуждения и болезненно реагирует, когда я прошу его не делать этого. Стоит ли мне настаивать, или оставить его в покое? --Panther 17:45, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

I just moved the discussion he found offensive to my page. No big deal to me, let's let it rest. -Mak 18:00, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
If this is discussion about naming, let him clear it. Ignoring and clearing warnings about copyrights matters is much worse crime. --EugeneZelenko 18:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
OK! Thank you all! --Panther 11:24, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

bureaucrat[edit]

You're a bureaucrat now. Congratulations. - Andre Engels 18:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you and all who support me! --EugeneZelenko 18:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
Congrats! The wait is over :) (Don't forget Commons:Changing username) --pfctdayelise (translate?) 06:30, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
I renamed 3 of them and left 3 to Fred chessplayer for training :-) --EugeneZelenko 14:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
So we had to wait for a new blood to do the job... Thanks! :-) --P.B. 07:58, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Landmark North.jpg[edit]

I forgot to add the GFDL self tag - sorry! Oh yes, I will leave the no licence tag there just in case I'm not allowed to take it off. Thanks! Typhoonchaser 14:13, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank

Request for changing my username.[edit]

Dear Mr. Bureaucrat! Would you change my username from Angelix to Emmanuel Chanel? I wrote my request on Commons:Changing_username#From_User:Angelix_to_User:Emmanuel_Chanel. --Angelix 17:13, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Thorsten Fink[edit]

As you wrote me, my image will become deleted, if I do nothing. I have always big problems to put an image into wiki commons. My English isn't so good, that I can understand all (for example permission). Is it possible that you do the rest for my image? I took that foto when he was sitting on the bank of substitutes during a football match. I took the foto with my camera. That's all I can say. Eastfrisian 15:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

30 minutes work, but now I hope, all is right. Eastfrisian 15:52, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sp s.gif[edit]

I'm the author of this image, and I forgot the tag. But it's now there. Fsolda 23:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Main Entrance of Shun Chi Court.JPG[edit]

The picture that you have mentioned is fixed, hope that that problem is solved, thank you for your concern.--Father vice 16:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

thank you! I've put my graphics in the right category. i'm sorry I had not done it before, but I'm new here. thanks for yor help, again!

Ginosal -- messages here!!

Commons:Deletion_requests#Image:Minsk_metro_pass.jpg[edit]

Since you were involved in the initial discussion for deletion, I thought you may wish to be involved in the deletion request. Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 11:07, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

thanks[edit]

Hello and thanks for your guide. I newly redistributed some pix I had uploaded to en:wiki before and categorize them in unavailable categories that I think they are necessary to be created. Does it matter? thanks agian. --Soroush Mesry 09:00, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

upload without copyright[edit]

I have somehow managed to upload without copyright or description (I was sure I did it, but it is my first day so....) I wasable to add the description, but can not figure out how to modify the copyright. Please help


Affine-vs-cartesian.png[edit]

Hello. I am definite that on the moment of uploading the file (actually i had to upload it several times, because of minor corrections), I stated that it is "own work", provided under "GFDL content created by the uploader" and I chose this same license from the drop-down menu. The file was created by me for the needs of the article on Coordinates in the Bulgarian wikipedia here, as were several other images: Spherical-coordinates.png, Spherical-coordinates-1.png. I believe that with the correction just made and the present explanations, the image will not be removed from the commons database. As far as the change of the file format, okay, I will have it in mind. But, can you please explain me what makes this beneficial difference? Thank you. --Spiritia 20:25, 3 September 2006 (UTC)

that german cat name is moved[edit]

-Mak 18:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

IRC[edit]

Just wondering... do you ever get on IRC? We could use a Russian expert at #wikimedia-commons every once in a while, notably with the Template:PD-Soviet debate going on... Cary "Bastique" Bass parler voir 17:16, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

Admin news[edit]

Hello,

If you consent for statistics to be published about your actions as an administrator, please sign here: Commons:Administrator permission for statistics. (I expect that most people will not have a problem with it unless you are especially concerned with privacy.)

Also, please be aware that we now have a Commons:Administrators' noticeboard. Please put it on your watchlist, if you haven't already!

cheers, pfctdayelise (translate?) 05:33, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Template:Welcome/ru[edit]

Hi.

Thanks,
Fred Chess 16:06, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I'll try. I also asked Panther's help. --EugeneZelenko 18:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi again. Because the Russian Village Pump isn't active, and you are the only active Russian speaker I know, I will have to ask for another service: Explain copyrights to user:Квитрон. He already uploaded the same copyrighted images twice. I have now had to block him.

Fred Chess 16:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Done. --EugeneZelenko 18:42, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Strange press inquiry[edit]

I've had the oddest request from a journalist so far... This journalist is looking for "attractive" wikipedians from the Russian Wikipedia and from African languages.

Bastique suggested I contact you about possibly locating people from the ru.wp who might be considered "attractive". Do you have any suggestions on how I might do so? - Amgine 03:49, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Lockwood Huddersfield.jpg[edit]

Could you please delete this duplicate image, which I have done? It was uploaded twice in error. Richard Harvey 13:34, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Done. --EugeneZelenko 14:40, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

...for bureaucrat[edit]

Thanks by your support. I hope my contribution as bureaucrat be useful for Commons users. Greetings --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 23:48, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Still used[edit]

Привет! Подскажи, пожалуйста, какое всё-таки принято решение по таким изображениям. Я честно пытался продраться через переписку в commons-i, но конечного решения так там и не нашёл. Судя по CommonsTicker их всё-таки удаляют, но мне хотелось бы знать, насколько это одобренная практика. --Panther 07:08, 28 September 2006 (UTC)

Полное уважения[edit]

У меня полное уважения к вам и вашим снимкам, тем не менее мы же не пишем Невский Проспект, Ленинград или Калининская Облать с ятьми и ижицами... А также даты у нас тоже ни остают на 13 дней, хотя энциклопедии действительно пользуютья ОБЕИМИ формами. --Kuban kazak 16:33, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Тем не менее, в любой энциклопедии современная форма будет пред историчиской. Может быть усилия приложем чтобы дать один стандарт всему а не воевать. --Kuban kazak 16:38, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Согласен, но на описаниях Рождества Христова в Википедии дата будет стоять наврено 7-го а не 25-го так? А то что до 90-го снимок сделан в Ленинграде, согласен, но когда в Белорусии Мiнск был Meнском, может к снимкам до 30-х годов это относиться... пожалуста, при этом снимки до 17-го можно сделать Минскъ. А можно просто оставить всюду Минск и Мiнск. То же самое к пр-ту Фр.Скорина, сейчас это пр-т Независимости.--Kuban kazak 16:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Могут, а могут и нет, в ближайшие пять лет я этого НИКАК не предвижу, увы :-). А использовать устаревшие именования, действительно создают путанницу. Но если использовать вашу логику, почему бы не вернуть всюду Ленинград, а может еще Петроград, авось переименуют? Тоже самое с Минском. А про Мiнск Менск мне нитак важно, только что-то мне говорит что я не последний который будет править фотографии...--Kuban kazak 16:57, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
И все-таки ради интереса, почему вы настаиваете чтобы был именно Менск? Просто любопытно...--Kuban kazak 12:59, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Change in Category[edit]

Hi EugeneZelenko! You changed the description in the Category Climate diagrams from Weissrussland (the german name) to Belarus. Why? Don't get me wrong, I'm not complainig, only asking to understand! My intention was to sort the countries by their german name, cause all diagrams are in german. I would be happy if you give me an answer! 8) --Hedwig in Washington 19:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Upload/pt[edit]

The page MediaWiki:Uploadtext/pt is protect, the translate is in talk page. Can you do this? Thanks, LeonardoG 16:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Substitutes the translation for portuguese who is in talk in the main (MediaWiki:Uploadtext/pt). LeonardoG 16:18, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

MediaWiki:Uploadtext/pt[edit]

I have made the change. Greetings --Lmbuga gl, pt, es: contacta comigo 22:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Khatyn images[edit]

Could you explain why you deleted Khatyn images, which were apparently made by your brother? --Ghirlandajo 06:37, 18 October 2006 (UTC)


Admin abuse?[edit]

Care to explain this action. Did you try to talk to the user if you think he was mistaken? Or, did you just assume bad faith and enjoyed being able to block the user? Or was it something else? I am puzzled. --Irpen 22:05, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't have time for details explanations, but I think block message was clear enough.
This user was mistaken (in good or bad faith - who knows?) and violated Commons:Licensing too many times (Image:Laika first living being in space.jpg, Image:Venera-7 profile.jpg, Image:Castro Khrushchev.jpg and so on). See Special:Contributions/DDima for details.
As my personal feeling - I never enjoy blocking, I prefer that people just follow project policies, not violating them.
EugeneZelenko 14:34, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Yet, jumping straight to a block was waaay to harsh... -- Grafikm fr 18:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Blind retagging of 50 images in 10 minutes without paying attention to descriptions was not good idea too. --EugeneZelenko 18:21, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
There is a difference between an action of a newbie of whom you should have assumed good faith and an action of an experienced admin who explains resorting to straight execution without even an attempt to talk by being "to busy". The "don't bite the newbies" policy is there for a reason. DDima's spree was indeed not a good idea for which he already apologized. We can be sure that his error won't be repeated but harsh block will remain now in his block log forever and nothing can be done to undo this damage. Your careless abuse of your privileges jutified by "being to busy to talk" is less excusable than DDima's honest mistake because expectation from the admin's behavior to exemplify the best standards are much higher. I will personally go over DDima's contribution and will check the images he erroneously retagged. And I hope you will be more careful in the future with using the tools the community entrusted for you to use wisely to its benefit. --Irpen 21:25, 21 October 2006 (UTC)


Sorry, but user since 2006/02/23 with 769 contributions is not a newbie. --EugeneZelenko 14:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Blocking is a serious matter and should never be applied due to "lack of time" or other reasons of perceived self-importance. A warning or even a polite explanation would have achieved the same result. I would appreciate your unblocking a user, even if it is symbolical, and apologize to him for acting too harshly. On my end, I emailed him explaining the licensing policies. --Irpen 18:08, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

At first, it's not matter of self-importance. I'll apologize for blocking, but I expect apologies from this user for creating unnecessary job for other. Thank you for you help with explaining Commons policies. --EugeneZelenko 18:17, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Image uploads[edit]

Nuvola apps important.png Please check the image uploads - see Special:Contributions/HalnakBot. --HalnakBot

What do you want to check exactly? --EugeneZelenko 18:35, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
I think the bot wants you to check copyright status.... SillyWillyOnWheels 18:36, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Bali, 1934[edit]

Please note Commons:Deletion requests/Image:XylophoneBali1937.jpg and give an answer. -- Simplicius 19:28, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

president.gov.by[edit]

Hello. I was wondering if you can try and contact http://www.president.gov.by/en/press23726.html and see what is their terms of use of images from their website. I understand there is a copyright, but they could have a license similiar to what the Kremlin has. I tried to contact them before, but since my letter was in English, they threw it away most likely. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 02:18, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I looked to Russian version (http://www.president.gov.by/press28825.html, Использование материалов Портала). It's very similar to Kremlin.ru. However question of unrestricted modifications is still open. I'll try to e-mail them tomorrow. --EugeneZelenko 14:57, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you :) User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 23:10, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
I sent e-mail. I hope they'll answer. Please note restrictions for banners on http://www.president.gov.by/press28825.html, Размещение гиперссылки на Портал Президента. --EugeneZelenko 14:35, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
I do note it. I have about 3 or 4 photos from the above website used in various places in EN Wikipedia. If this is free content, then we could have more photos of leaders, places, events that the Commons would be happy about. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 18:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

re: User talk:212.76.33.124[edit]

Howdy, First of all thank You for uploading the images. As for the account I don't really edit much on wikipedia, never the less thanks for the invitation. And I'd like to wish luck overthrowing the Łukašenkas regime. Žyvie Biełaruś! --212.76.33.124 20:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

About Tavolara[edit]

Thanks for your notice, but don't worry, that photo is mine
Tavolara 3.JPG
. By --Shardan 18:53, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Pardon, it was too big!--Shardan 08:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Church photo[edit]

I think the church in Image:Russia-Sergiev Posad-Church1-1.jpg might be the one shown at the bottom of this page. In English we would call it St. Elias Church.

You can follow the links at that site to other pictures of Sergiev Posad churches. --Jmb 18:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Great catch! Thank you! --EugeneZelenko 18:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Not Elias but Elijah. --Ghirlandajo 10:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Unknown bird.jpg[edit]

Hi, The bird community at birdforum.net has identified your bird as being a water pipit Anthus spinoletta --Ltshears 21:02, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for help! --EugeneZelenko 15:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

slug[edit]

Your photo Image:Unknown slug.jpg of gastropod is Bielzia coerulans. --Snek01 13:44, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for help! --EugeneZelenko 15:39, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Recent unknown images[edit]

I have uploaded adjusted versions of your Image:Unknown tank.jpg and Image:Belarus-Volot Transporting BMP-2-1.jpg. Hope you like the changes. Also, do you have higher resolution versions of these images? These would be much better to work with.

Thank you for your help! Unfortunately these images are in original resolution, so I can't provide better ones :-( --EugeneZelenko 17:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Anyway, the changes I made are very simple to carry out using Gimp, a free graphics program. You might want to try it out, if you have a photo which is too dark or too bright. Balcer 17:00, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I'm not good in computer graphics and art (I don't feel which adjustment will be good which will not), so I prefer if people with better knowledge in this area will do adjustments. Again, thank you for your help. --EugeneZelenko 17:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
My knowledge of computer graphics is very basic, but some things are really easy to do with Gimp and related programs. If I can do it, anybody can :). Don't be afraid to experiment. You can always upload improved versions of the image. So, as long as you keep the original, you can do no harm.
The coin pictures look great to me. Why do you want to remove the background? It is of course possible to do this, but I am not sure I can do it well enough so that the image quality does not suffer. Balcer 17:42, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Untifler[edit]

This user seems to have some issue with our policies and is uploading items to Public Domain that are clearly not his to upload. See Special:Contributions/Untifler. He's evidently a Russian speaker. Please inform him! Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 20:56, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Done. --EugeneZelenko 15:25, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

admin[edit]

Thanks!! :) Alhen .::··¨ 16:08, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Seconded. :) --tomf688 (talk - email) 04:10, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
My thanks too. :D Gizmo II 16:43, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Soufi Symbol[edit]

I have added some more information on this picture. I hope this is enough, if not please let me know, i am not that handy on using pictures etc.

Ra-men-hotep 22:21, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Flag map of Belarus[edit]

Greetings Eugene

I noticed that you've protected the following image: Image:Valko-Venäjätynkä.jpg. Would you mind adding [[Category:Flag maps]] to it? It might also be an idea to update the obsolete PD template, btw. Happy editing. Valentinian (talk) 22:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

I added the category. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 00:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Tag updated. --EugeneZelenko 16:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Translations[edit]

Dear Eugene; I need help translating the two settlements in Brest Region, Арабовщина and Большое Гатище. These settlements are mentioned at w:Hero of Belarus. Thanks in advance. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 03:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

I think these name should be transliterated (en:BGN/PCGN romanization of Belarusian) as Arabawshchyna (Арабаўшчына) and Vyalikaye Hatsishcha (Вялікае Гацішча). See also Google queries on Вялікае Гацішча and Арабаўшчына. --EugeneZelenko 04:06, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks a lot. I added the translations into the article. My main goal is to get Hero of Belarus to an FA (again) and I just want to be sure that everything is right. (If Hero of Belarus gets back to FA, it will be the 5th Belarusian FA on English Wikipedia) User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 08:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Press contacts for Commons[edit]

Hello, are you interested in being one for the press release for the one millionth file? Please see here. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 12:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Has the discussion on Commons:Administrators/Requests and votes/Borheinsieg been finished? Otherwise I wanted to write sth. there.--Wappen-stadt-bonn.svgBo-rhein-sieg 17:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Your comment om my Talk page regarding Image:HDS_Flow.png[edit]

You left a message on my Talk page alerting me that the image might be deleted because I had not stated the ownership. The summary on the Image page clearly shows that I stated that I drew the image myself and I also selected the GFDL license option. What more does it take? If I drew it myself then I certainly owned the copyright ... that should be obvious, should it not? If there is soem other wording you deem absolutely necessary, let me know ... but I must say that what I already said should be sufficient.

I am rarely on the Commons, so please contact me on the English Wikipedia if you need me to do anything else. I am User:mbeychok there as well as here. - Mbeychok 02:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Image:NiasvizhCastle1.JPG[edit]

oops Confused.png. Thanks for the warning and sorry for any incovencience. Lugusto҉ 16:33, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

My RFA: Thanks[edit]

Thank you for your support on my RFA. Now that I have been promoted, I promise to be as hardworking and fair with the admin tools as I have been with the other areas here on Commons. See you around and happy editing. Zzyzx11 15:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Переименование[edit]

Здравствуйте. Пожалуйста переименуйте меня в Dennis Myts. Спасибо.--117 10:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Сделано. --EugeneZelenko 16:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Ещё раз спасибо--Dennis Myts 16:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Unknown bird-2.jpg[edit]

That's a helmeted Guineafowl (Numida meleagris). ArthurWeasley 21:32, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Image:Sintesi_dei_Trigliceridi.JPG[edit]

Hi, thank you for the communication. I thought I had said the source of the picture, but I'm not able to write the terms of use for content from the page. I mean, the file was copyrighted, but I don't know how to write it in Image details. Please answer to me.--Nase 15:42, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Не знаю что делать с этим мужиком[edit]

Здравствуй! Помоги пожал'ста - этот участник загружает те же самые изображения уже пятый или шестой раз. Если моя память не сдохла совсем, загрузка проходит каждый раз с разным лицензом (а может быть проскочит). -- Zlatko + (talk) 15:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Удалил изображения и сделал последнее китайское предупреждение. Потом придётся блокировать. --EugeneZelenko 17:00, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Так как я слежу за Последними правками в бг.уики, увидел твое появление сию же минуту ;) Дела у нас с статьей "Стара Загора" так плохи, что наш самый активный администратор поднял белый флаг. Это тот же самый, который заблокировал и редактировал ее во время блокировки. А Crawer является уроженцем города и видимо склонен обойти практически все, чтобы статья о городе была самой-самой-<чего-то>. -- Zlatko + (talk) 10:48, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
Нет, чтобы сам сфотографировал :-), или друзей/родственников попросил... --EugeneZelenko 15:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Andropov[edit]

I said, I talked to the guy, and he allowed the usage of the pic. --Edgar Allan Poe 20:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

I doubt that this guy is author of image. Of course he/she could use it as fair use. So you could do the same on Croatian Wikipedia (if allowed). --EugeneZelenko 20:28, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the RFA vote[edit]

Smiley in Bow Tie.jpg Thanks for the vote --Tarawneh 00:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Віншую з Новым Годам! --Yakudza 16:58, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Bot status policy[edit]

Hi Eugene,

I think giving file upload bots a bot flag shouldn't be very difficult. As long as the bot is working properly and there are categories, I would appove them. If something goes wrong they can always be blocked later, IMO the bot flag is not a very big deal. Commons:Bots only says that bots have to be requested at COM:A - I definitely don't think they have to meet the same requirements as administrators!! cheers, pfctdayelise (说什么?) 01:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

File:Mutemath promo.jpg[edit]

Hi, earlier today you deleted this promotional photograph. In the image description there was a contact e-mail address for the record company. Could you please post that address so that I can attempt to secure a rights release for the promo material? Spasibo ˉanetode╦╩ 07:14, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Autorail-x2426-2.JPG[edit]

Hello Eugene

the license is OK now

best regards

Roloff 08:28, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Flickr images[edit]

Hi! As you are an admin, you might want to use a template like {{User:Kaveh/flickr}} when uploading images from flickr, instead of leaving it as {{flickrreview}}. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:02, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

Administrator Welcome template.[edit]

Did not know if you were aware of Template:AdminWelcome or its language subpages.

Thank you! I'll use it. --EugeneZelenko 15:16, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

To add my name in Commons:List of administrators, Commons:List of administrators by language & Commons:List of administrators by date. VIGNERON * discut. 10:17, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

cache?[edit]

Hi

Some weeks ago I have uploaded new, corrected version of image:Wiadukt Millau.jpg (proper view here). I asked for removing "old versions of this file", and it has been perfect done, but there are still old (cache?) versions of the old file stored on the servers: it is http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/27/Wiadukt_Millau.jpg/1024px-Wiadukt_Millau.jpg and http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/27/Wiadukt_Millau.jpg/800px-Wiadukt_Millau.jpg

These old versions (1024px and 800px) have important mistake (wrong prepared panorama) and I would like to remove them, but I don't know how to do that.

The same problem is with image:Remontplacugrunwaldzkiego.jpg and its 300px old version http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Remontplacugrunwaldzkiego.jpg/300px-Remontplacugrunwaldzkiego.jpg (wrong perspective)

Could you help me and tell me how to remove that?

Regards Julo 15:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Con[edit]

Hello

I beg you next time do not delete pics, but ad conversation page for statening if it is or is not for deletion. And why didi you delete the marxist pic of Chernenko. It can stay, as well as Andropov. Beacus eit is CC, and it is not color and big like the las one. --Edgar Allan Poe 17:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

It's official Soviet portrait (same as old color version) without any relation to marxists.org (except you take this image from there). So stop believe in Sci-fi and please follow Commons:Licensing. If you'll not follow Commons:Licensing, you'll be blocked. It's your choice. --EugeneZelenko 17:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

Dear Godm is that an official portrait. NO. It is a copy, bw, hi res, and bigger and wider. It is from marxists and under CC. so it can stay. --Edgar Allan Poe 17:46, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

You were advised several times to not commit copyrights violations on Commons. Please start listen to other people, or you'll face consequences. --EugeneZelenko 17:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
He's re-uploaded the Oskar Schindler image (twice, even: Image:OsSch06615.jpg and Image:06615.jpg) that was deleted recently as a copyvio... German WWII images are copyrighted; only in the U.S. or the UK some of them may be PD under these countries' "seized property" rules. Lupo 22:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Translation of system messages into bulgarian[edit]

Hi. Would you explain me how to make this easier. Thanks!--Darsie 10:34, 8 January 2007 (UTC)


Image[edit]

I am sorry.I do not want edit that image,it is only a error.You can delet.

Archivaldo

Please read Commons:Licensing before uploading images here. Movie screenshots are most likely copyrighted and is not allowed on Commons. --EugeneZelenko 16:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Stop it[edit]

The image "psicosis.jpg" is mine.I has altered some aspects,but the work is mine!! it is my work!!!Look at the photograms from the end,that photograms included me,they are not from image.


Archivaldo
Please read Commons:Licensing#Derivative Works. You are not author of original copyrighted images. --EugeneZelenko 17:09, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Correcting GFDL tagging[edit]

How do I corrected the copyright tagging when I accidently didn't mark it? Please see My Talk discussion for more. --Doug Coldwell 22:45, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Special:Contributions/Irena.veldre[edit]

User claims the two images are available according to the website from which she obtained the image. Please have a look at http://www.megalith.ru/copyright and determine if this is correct. Thanks. Cary "Bastiqe" Bass demandez 18:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)