User talk:FDMS4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

[…]

Translated Table test[edit]

I deleted the template and talk there, since it was more to keep track of a specific bug at the time. It is not corresponding to a sandbox and too specific to be a testcase. Esby (talk) 13:07, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Original Barnstar Hires.png The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your rapid and helpful response to my question at the Village Pump! Pleasantville1972 (talk) 03:35, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome!    FDMS  4    12:33, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Special Barnstar Hires.png The Special Barnstar
Thanks for fixing {{KOAL}} and {{KOGL}}. — revimsg 15:37, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! And sorry for not expressing myself clearly yesterday.    FDMS  4    15:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

Template in File:Autódromo 9 de Julio.svg[edit]

The user Gustavo Girardelli made the old versions of this file by tracing contents from Google maps, which is a copyright violation. So I indicated him to use OpenStreetMap instead, that has a compatible license.

After tracing the map from [1], he added the OpenStreetMap template. I think that the template should not be erased.

Best regards, Alpertron (talk) 13:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

@Alpertron: I don't think the racing circuit is © OpenStreetMap (also, it looks different there), if it's copyrightable at all the "architect" of it would be the copyright holder. However, I certainly don't want to cause any additional confusion for Gustavo Girardelli here, so if you told him it's © OpenStreetMap feel free to revert my removal. Although the CC BY-SA 4.0 is non-revocable …    FDMS  4    13:51, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
He knows a lot about car racing in Argentina so some annotations were done by himself. The only thing that he changed was the tracing of the tracks. I do not want that all of his work be erased just because he traced it from Google Maps. Best regards, Alpertron (talk) 14:27, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Erm … that's not how copyright works. Either a work copyrighted by the original author or someone who acquired the copyrights, or it is not copyrighted at all.    FDMS  4    14:36, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
If he traced the racing tracks from Google Maps, even if he adds his own markings, the result is a derivative work from Google Maps, so he is not allowed to upload the SVG file to Commons. But if he traces the tracks from OpenStreetMap (licensed as Open Data Commons Open Database License) and then he adds his own markings, he can license the SVG file as CC BY-SA 4.0 and upload the work here. Best regards, Alpertron (talk) 15:45, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
No … ? The racing circuit itself isn't copyrightable, as there is FOP in Argentina. The drawing is a derivative work of that circuit, no matter what source has been used to draw it. If the racing circuit was actually a Google Maps hoax, derivative works of it would be copyvios. File:U-Bahn Wien.svg wouldn't be a copyvio either even if File:U (4534631571).jpg was used used to draw it.    FDMS  4    01:13, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

Replaced user talkspace template...[edit]

Hi. Can you explaine why you make these changes ? We've created a template especially for the Photo challenge. Is there some talk about your changes ? Did some "admin" of the Challenge assked you to do it ? --Llann .\m/ (Lie 2 me ...) 01:32, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

"Edit conflict" …    FDMS  4    01:34, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Klaas Jan Mulder.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Klaas Jan Mulder.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Edoderoo (talk) 14:49, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Cats deletion[edit]

Hello. What's goin' on ?? Thib Phil (talk) 02:33, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Edit conflict – I was just about to post something on your user talkpage. Please continue the discussion there.    FDMS  4    02:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

File talk:Cc-nd white.svg[edit]

Sorry, mein edit war ein Flüchtigkeitsfehler. Bei näherem Hinsehen komme ich zur Meinung, dass für U+229C die Unicode-Bedingung gelten sollte. Grüße in den XIX. sarang사랑 18:15, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Kein Problem, wobei ich nicht glaube dass das Symbol vom Unicode-Zeichen abgeleitet ist … Hauptsache PD. Grüße in den Westen,    FDMS  4    19:44, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Prets Brussels 2008-03.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Prets Brussels 2008-03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 00:04, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

@Green Giant: Erm … why? There's {{Remove this line and insert a license instead}} already anyway …    FDMS  4    00:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
That template only categorises under a subcategory of Category:Media uploaded without a license but it doesn't notify the uploader. The notice at the top of that category suggests actions to be taken including tagging with a date-specific template like the no-license one. If you look at Category:Media uploaded without a license as of 2014-10, you will see it has 466 files but the two remaining October subcategories in Category:Media without a license have 428 files so there are 38 files where the uploader hasn't attended to the licensing and nobody else knows about it yet. Green Giant (talk) 01:45, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Well, I think those notifications are quite unnecessary, as there is already a warning in the UploadWizard. In my opinion, the UW could just as well add {{subst:nld}} itself … Will have to propose that at some point in the future :) .    FDMS  4    12:52, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
Let me know when you propose this, so I can add my support. To be honest I think it should also add a no-source and no-author template if those are missing. Green Giant (talk) 13:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation names in categories[edit]

Hi there, and thank you for your message. If a street or a place is unique with its name, then as a general rule it does not need a disambiguation. For further information see here [2]. Disambiguation only makes sense, if there is a realistic chance of the place getting confused with another one, and even in these cases normally the most commonly known place sometimes takes precedence over others (for example Category:White House, Category:Broadway, etc.) Also there is no policy in Wikipedia or Wikimedia which states that disambiguation is mandatory even for singular places. Many of the singular categories started out without the “xyz, Vienna” format in its name, I have restored them back to their original name. Please try to keep it simple instead of unnecessarily overcomplicating names when it makes no sense or there is no basis for it. Thank you for your understanding. Gryffindor (talk) 09:37, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry for commenting in German on your talkpage. I personally agree with you, but other users did not agree with me at User talk:Gugerell#, Vienna.    FDMS  4    19:18, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Nowak wiki.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nowak wiki.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please check my FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 05:15, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Ahem … Jarekt?    FDMS  4    08:59, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

What's happen with the others files[edit]

Sorry for my poor English, but I want to know What's happen with these imagens?

  • File:Sara Kraft frame.jpg
  • Sara Kraft.jpg
  • Sara Kroft.png
  • Power Lass.jpg
  • Jungle Babe.jpg
  • Hexanna.png
  • Go-Gal pp.jpg
  • Got-Gal.jpg

All ot them were deleted and all of them got the same right that Ms Americana.jpg, now restored.

Thanks --Incal (talk) 12:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Incal, the sent eMail only released File:00mrx1new.jpg. Were the other images derived from the now restored image? Ping User:Jcb.    FDMS  4    12:23, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Did you receive email from Caroline?[edit]

She responded to your inquiry. EtienneDolet (talk) 00:27, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

✓ Responded. Thank you!    FDMS  4    13:54, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Norwegian way of life[edit]

Hi, ich räume gerade etwas in der Sparte Painters from Norway auf und habe gesehen, dass du einen redirect von 19th-century norwegian way of life in paintings nach 19th-century paintings from Norway erstellt hast. Formell würde ich mal sagen, dass das so nicht richtig ist. Way of life paintings sind Genre-Gemälde. Gemälde aus Norwegen sollten auch aus Norwegen stammen, doch viele der norwegischen Maler malten gerade im 19 Jh. in Deutschland, also auch die norwegische Lebensart. Ich weiß, es sind im Moment noch nicht sehr viele Gemälde zusammen gekommen, aber ich arbeite daran. Solange würde ich vorschlagen es eher auf Paintings of Norway zu verschieben. Einwände oder hast du einen anderen Vorschlag? - Liebe Grüße --Sjokolade (talk) 09:50, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Sjokolade, dieser Redirect ist dabei entstanden, als ich die Way of Life-Kategorien dieses Jahrhunderts nach einer Kategoriendiskussion aufgelöst habe. Ich habe zwar versucht, mich mit dem Kategorieschema für Malereien vertraut zu machen, allerdings bin ich alles andere als ein Experte. Deshalb: Wenn du eine Änderung für eine Verbesserung hältst, tätige sie bitte.    FDMS  4    14:04, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
wird gemacht, weiterhin frohes Schaffen --Sjokolade (talk) 14:12, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

categorising[edit]

I know. That's why I was removing it while you'd posted to me. Give me a second to correct my faults by myself ;-) Wieralee (talk) 01:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't notice. Will do next time :) .    FDMS  4    01:47, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

PU[edit]

It's not even close to polite this type of edition: [3], this is my PU, you had to remember me that s stills there, and I would remove. With you don't know I have a talk page here: User talk:Rodrigo.Argenton.

And I'm the guy that deserves be punish here... fair enough. Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton (talk) 06:20, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton, I tried not to change your userpage's layout by removing these two boxes. The removal was not intended to be interpreted as a punishment, but as an update. I am really sorry that you think I was "punishing" you by performing it, had I foreseen this (and in controversial cases), I would have discussed it with you on your talkpage first.    FDMS  4    11:27, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Special:Diff/139120324[edit]

hi FDMS4, looking at the categories it seems to be that the overriding category format is "xyz, city" and not in brackets. That is the reason why it was moved. Gryffindor (talk) 08:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)