User talk:Finnrind
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
|
Welcome to Finn Rindahl's (user:finnrind) talk page!
Please include a link to the mediafile ([[:image:example.jpg]]) in the header for new topics, NOTE: I will respond to your comments here, |
| A r c h i v e |
User talk:Finnrind | |
|---|---|---|
Contents |
[edit] To bad
Hi Finnrind,
I just saw your request on Meta for removal of your access, I'm sorry to see you leave you have done great work on Commons and I really hope you will return as administrator on Commons when you have more time.
All the best, Huib talk 12:59, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] My account
Hi, can you please flag my account as OK or whatever it is you do as I have to keep typing in silly codes and it is very off putting...Perry Rimmer (talk) 12:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Left a request here and replied to PR on his talk. Finn Rindahl (talk) 13:19, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
OK thanks for your help.Perry Rimmer (talk) 13:21, 9 November 2009 (UTC) You could do me a favour actually, can you fix the correct source pictire links for Category:Boverton I've done the first one but I have to keep typing in the codes again! I just found them easier to upload with a copy and paste.Perry Rimmer (talk) 13:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- That is a very impractical way to do it, means I have to search geograph to identify every one of those images (I'll look into it though for those you have uploaded). If you're uploading more before someone gets around to "confirm" your account, just add the proper links like www.geograph.org.uk/photo/1283611 geograph.org.uk (without the http and the brackets), and I'll trace your steps and activate the links. Finn Rindahl (talk) 13:44, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Don't worry I'll sort it now, just please get them to stio me having to type in silly childish codes...~~
-
- That should be fixed now. Best regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 14:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
- Links for the first six as sorted in the category are fixed btw, leaving the rest up to you then. Finn Rindahl (talk) 14:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
OK thanks. Once that;'s done I have 3 images of en:Aberthin I want to upload.Perry Rimmer (talk) 14:04, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:Henning_Olsen_-_Krone-is_-_P1.jpg
Hei kan du opplyse meg om hvorfor dette bilde ble slettet, hvordan noen ble oppmerksom på det osv. ? --Peter Kaino Jensen (talk) 21:08, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Vel, det ble slettet som følge av Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Henning_Olsen_-_Krone-is_-_P1.jpg. Hvordan Pieter Kuiper oppdaget dette bildet må du nesten spørre ham om (han snakker svensk). Finn Rindahl (talk) 21:44, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Se "File:Henning_Olsen_-_Krone-is_-_P2.jpg" så sjønner du hva jeg skulle fram til. Tenkte det kunne ha noe med at jeg hadde en åpnet is fremfor innpakningen på "File:Henning_Olsen_-_Krone-is_-_P1.jpg" noe som skapet kontrast mellom hva pakkningen innholdt og hva pakken sier pakker inneholder... --Peter Kaino Jensen (talk) 21:47, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
+Blir blidene som slettes lagt et sted utenfor offentligheten, til fremtiden, tenker på at bilder jeg laster opp på commons ikke altid har en backup... --Peter Kaino Jensen (talk) 21:50, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Slettes ikke sikker på at jeg skjønner hva du spør om, men bilder som blir slettet på Commons er tilgjengelige for administratorer og kan gjenopprettes når som helst. Finn Rindahl (talk) 01:29, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Vis du ser på forskjellen på bildene over og leser det jeg skrev en gang til... --Peter Kaino Jensen (talk) 18:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Ok, nå skjønner jeg - begge bildene skulle vært slettet (og nå har det andre også blitt det), ren forglemmelse av administratoren slettet det første. Finn Rindahl (talk) 18:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Vis du ser på forskjellen på bildene over og leser det jeg skrev en gang til... --Peter Kaino Jensen (talk) 18:27, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
- Slettes ikke sikker på at jeg skjønner hva du spør om, men bilder som blir slettet på Commons er tilgjengelige for administratorer og kan gjenopprettes når som helst. Finn Rindahl (talk) 01:29, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
-
[edit] Italian copyrigh laws
I added this statement: *
Keep The Italian law hinted at only refers to works of art by sculptors, painters and architects who are living or who have not been dead for at least 70 years. This is not the case of a 3,000 years old obelisk! The fact that "there is no freedom of panorama" only refers to the fact that some countries, such as Germany or the UK, allow representation of such works in case they are "permanently" on public display, e.g. along a road or in the middle of a square. International copyright laws allow national laws to grant such an exception on a country by country base. Italy chose not to grant it. However, when the work of art in public display was created by someone who died more than 70 years ago, then it is in the public domain and can be freely reproduced. Our concern here should rather go to the "Legge Urbani sui Beni culturali", which gives the State (better, the "Sovraintendenze ai Beni culturali") monopoly over reproduction of works of art in the Public Domain which are owned by the State (actually, this is but a favour Prime minister and tycoon Silvio Berlusconi made his own publishing house, Electa, which by chance publishes now all the catalogues of museums, but this is another matter). It is very doubtuful that such a national law can really overcame international copyright laws, but since this law is valid and enforceable in the Italian territory it is still dangerous for an Italian wikipedian to break it, since the Italian state might, under this law, sue HIM/HER directly. But this is a completely different kind of problem. Best wishes. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 10:08, 22 November 2009 (UTC)