User talk:Fir0002

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


If you need to contact me especially about my images and licensing, send me an email or visit my website: www.flagstaffotos.com.au

Archive[edit]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Fir0002!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 13:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Asus a8n VMCSM02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Asus a8n VMCSM02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--110.36.9.13 Correct malformed DR.--Captain-tucker (talk) 14:57, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations![edit]

Congratulations Fir0002! Your image Image:Honeybee landing on milkthistle02.jpg was the Random Picture of the Day for Wikipedia! Go here to see what it looked like. - Presidentman (talk) 21:03, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Profile size and activity criterion for Commons:Meet our photographers[edit]

Dear member of Commons:Meet our photographers,

Two issues have recently been raised at Commons talk:Meet our photographers:

Profile size creep
The page is becoming increasing cluttered due to a tendency among some members to make personal profiles, which are unreasonably large. You are kindly requested to consider the size used by your profile and consider if it has a reasonable size. Note that the same message is being send to all members, so it is up to you to use your own good judgement in this. We are not interesting in setting up exact quantitatve rules. It should be a matter of common sense.
Activity criterion
It has been suggested to introduce an activity criterion in addition to the minimum 10 FPs criterion to be included on the list. You are kindly requested to voice your opinion on this proposal.

--Slaunger (talk) 16:07, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

Deutsch | Español | Italian

Dear Fir0002. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you – Kwj2772 (msg) 02:46, 17 February 2010 (UTC)


File:Potato cakes and chicken pieces.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Potato cakes and chicken pieces.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Pieter Kuiper (talk) 11:33, 1 April 2010 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Andrea (talk) 22:46, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Who took this photo File:Freerange eggs.jpg[edit]

Hi! I just noted that one user uploaded this photo and another user changed the author to a third user. So I'm wondering who really took this photo. --MGA73 (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

It looks like it was originally uploaded by Fir0002 to the English Wikipedia in 2004 and then moved to Commons by someone else. Kaldari (talk) 23:30, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Siberischer_tiger_de_edit02.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Siberischer_tiger_de_edit02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

212.117.142.227 09:56, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Autumn colors[edit]

Hello Fir0002, any idea where this photo has been taken ? Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 09:26, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Old_mushroom.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Old_mushroom.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kgorman-ucb (talk) 19:34, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Welcome back[edit]

Been awhile, no doubt feeling refreashed. I hope you stick around on Commons. :) Bidgee (talk) 12:19, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Bidgee :) Not sure yet how much time I'll be spending here yet but yes I think I'm ready for another stint ;) --Fir0002 www 10:59, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

email[edit]

Hi Peter, could you please activate your email?--Mbz1 (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Hey Mbz - sorry about that, thought it was active... Fixed now --Fir0002 www 11:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 11:02, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Haha thanks - I guess there's been a few changes since I last spent time here --Fir0002 www 11:04, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
  • No problem. Just a few. ;) Not sure if you've noticed Special:MyUploads next to My contributions and Log out. Bidgee (talk) 11:14, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Is there any way to get the old simple uploader back? Special:Upload is better than the wizard but I prefer the flexibility of a single blank form... --Fir0002 www 11:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm assuming that you're wanting the basic uploader? If so, that is the only way to access it. Bidgee (talk) 11:33, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Perfect! Thanks Bidgee --Fir0002 www 10:44, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Camera equipment program[edit]

Hi Fir0002, last year Wikimedia Australia developed the wmau:Proposal:Camera equipment program and we budgeted for a grant application from yourself in this financial year as you have already met many of the conditions of this grant scheme. It is great to see that you've returned, and I hope you'll seriously consider undertaking the prereq. metadata work and applying for this grant. Bidgee is the only applicant so far, and his grant application was approved recently. Bidgee and WMAU committee members are often on IRC channel #wikimedia-au and we can help you with the prereq and grant application. John Vandenberg (chat) 00:25, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Hi John, thanks for bringing this to my attention. JJ Harrison also sent me an email bringing the program to my attention. I have to say I'm extremely flattered that you had budgeted for an application from me, and I think it's a terrific idea that Wikimedia Australia has initiated, but I'm not sure at this stage whether I should proceed with an application -> I'll continue the thought in the discussion Kaldari has linked below. Cheers, --Fir0002 www 10:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Fir0002, please see discussion at User talk:John Vandenberg#Potential problem with the camera equipment grant program. Thanks. Kaldari (talk) 03:46, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Haha, barely two days in and we already cross paths. It's good to be back :P --Fir0002 www 10:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

GFDL + CC-BY-SA-NC[edit]

Hi Fir,

I stumbled on this standard license template Template:GFDL or cc-by-nc-sa. Would that suit your future needs concerning the license change we have discussed recently and previously? Or do you want to stick to the some specific version number for the licenses? --Slaunger (talk) 18:06, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Ah I would definitely like to stick to a specific version of the GFDL licence - being burnt once is quite enough for me! --Fir0002 www 10:52, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
  • OK. I guess for the GFDL it should be 1.2. Which version of the CC-BY-SA-NC? I see some, like Grand-duc does this sort of thing in user space, but I would like a template namespace solution for the license alone. --Slaunger (talk) 11:04, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Sorry for dragging my feet - I know I promised this week but I forgot the Australian Open is on now ;) Anyway I'm quite happy with the current NC licence so I'd be wanting GFDL 1.2 and CC-BY-SA-NC 3.0. --Fir0002 www 12:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Oh incidentally, if I were to go for this WMF grant thing I'll have to do a bunch of geocoding - is your bot able to apply the geocode of Swifts Creek whenever it finds that word in the description? --Fir0002 www 10:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Adding a fixed geolocation for file pages containing "swifts creek" is easy to do. But don't you need some tweaks from position to position? --Slaunger (talk) 11:04, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
  • Well almost all those files are taken around my parent's property and the others are also nearby (within a 10km squared accuracy) so it will be a case of modifying the exceptions of the general rule. --Fir0002 www 12:34, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
  • I usually use this to find out the coords from google maps. JJ Harrison (talk) 09:07, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Black-winged stilt Feb09.jpg[edit]

Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images and other files on Commons must be under a free license and should be useful to the Wikimedia projects. To allow others to use your files, some additional information must be given on the description page. Most importantly:

  • Describe what it is about in a short sentence. (What does the image show?)
  • State the author and the date of creation. If you made it yourself, say so explicitly. If it is from another Wikimedia user, link to the person's local user page. Best to use CommonsHelper.
  • If you did not create the file yourself, state the source you got it from.
  • Add a copyright tag - images without an appropriate license tag will be deleted.
  • Add the image to one or more gallery pages and/or appropriate categories, so it can be found by others. To find out where an image belongs, you can use CommonsSense.

If you copied the file from another wiki, please copy all information given there and say who uploaded it to that wiki. Use CommonsHelper.

It is recommended to use Template:Information to put that information on the description page. Have a look at Template talk:Information for details of the use of this template.

You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file.

Please add as much information as possible. If there is not sufficient information, the file may have to be deleted. For more information, follow the Commons:First steps guide. If you need help or have questions, please ask at the Help desk.

Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, please read the text above again and follow the links in it,if you still need help ask at the ? ->Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 11:40, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Add "{{bots|deny=BotMultichillT,BotMultichill,CategorizationBot,Nikbot}}" to the top of your user page if you want this and a few other annoying bots to leave you alone. JJ Harrison (talk) 10:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
haha, nice - thanks for the tip! --Fir0002 www 10:58, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
An even better tip would be to craft proper image description pages ;-)... Ok bye, I'm outta here. --Dschwen (talk) 13:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
lol, thanks for dropping by ;) --Fir0002 www 12:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
Sorry, user talk page. JJ Harrison (talk) 14:31, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
no probs, fixed that up now. Cheers, --Fir0002 www 12:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Bot task[edit]

Hi Fir,

I have just been enjoying a cold glass of Chardonnay from Southeast Australia, "Ed's Creek" while gathering some data regarding your photos and our job. The results are here (add to watchlist):

I guess these lists of files should define the scope of work more or less. I suggest we gather our work there and communicate back and forth.

Cheers (literally), --Slaunger (talk) 21:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

How very appropriate :) How did you come by the bottle way out in Denmark? Anyway bot page is looking great, I've just added a small request on the talkpage. THanks again for your assistance by the way! --Fir0002 www 04:27, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Danes drink a lot of wine. Every household in Denmark spends an amount equivalent with 610 ASD on wine/year, and among the countries we import from, Australia is ranked fourth (after France, Italy and Chile). So not so unusal here... Concerning your small request, is it the one you placed on my talk page a few days ago? Do you want me to generate a list of all file pages, which are not geocoded? --Slaunger (talk) 07:17, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
I see, that is a considerable amount! I hadn't realised Australian wines were so popular overseas... Anyway It would appear I forgot to save the page -> I had actually written something on the bot talkpage. But yes, essentially what I'm looking for is a link beside each file on the list to directly edit the file description page (so eg http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Rooster_portrait02_dec08.jpg&action=edit). Also it'd be good if you could generate two lists for me - the files which you have done a batch geocode using default Swifts Creek values, and a second list with all other non-geocoded files. Thanks again for your help in all of this -> from now on as you suggested I'll continue the discussion on the bot talkpage... --Fir0002 www 05:37, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
AutoWikiBrowser could probably do this without Slaunger's direct input. JJ Harrison (talk) 05:43, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Some new stuff on the bot page. Direct edit links. I also generated a list of all the files you have uploaded, but which do not transclude a user template. I guess most of them are edits of others works, but I compiled the list just in case you had forgotten to add the template on some of your own works. I also initiated a task list. A couple of ideas: I could let the bot check if a file page is geolocated, has the Information template, or needs categorization and mark it with letters, like G, I, C for your convenience. I have noticed many of your image pages do not have the Information template. I think it would be possible for me to add the info already in the file pages and embed it in an information template. Now that we are at it... --Slaunger (talk) 09:56, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

File:F22 anim02.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:F22 anim02.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Honza chodec (talk) 20:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Wystawa fotografii Picture of the Year - Poznań kpjas 20110924.jpg[edit]

Hi. Could I add a little book containing a copy of GFDL to this copy of your photo? If you wish, we will use the copy of the photo only with a big text of the GFDL. Best regards. Przykuta[edit] 16:28, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Downsampling images[edit]

Hey, I just came across the January discussion regarding down-sampling images taken with equipment purchased via grants. Just to clarify, I do not downsample any images taken with the lens purchased with the grant; you can check my images taken with the 100-400mm lens. --Muhammad (talk) 11:23, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Hey Muhammad - thanks for dropping the note. I guess in the context of that discussion (being mainly on eligibility for a grant - vs practice after getting a grant) I was just referring to the fact you were successful in your application despite adopting more or less the same uploading practice that I have prior to your application... Cheers, --Fir0002 www 13:57, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Bad filenames[edit]

A few years back, you uploaded two files which you named "Before.jpg" and "After.jpg" -- they're meant to depict the difference that Photoshop filters can make. For the sake of comprehensibility and usefulness, I'd like to ask that you give these better, more descriptive file names (did you know that "Before.jpg" and "Before.JPG" are of completely different subjects? So are "After.jpg" and "After.JPG"!). And you know what the photo was, where it was taken, etc. I could probably identify it with a bit of research, but that would take time... DS (talk) 13:57, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Copyright violation ?[edit]

A person claims to be the author of fr:Fichier:Paperbark.jpg which has been uploaded by you from suivant: .flagstaffotos.com.au

Can you explain ?

Thanks

Anthere (talk) 07:31, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Dam[edit]

Do you know where this photo File:Dam.jpg is taken? 71.191.105.29 04:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

"Taken with..." conflict[edit]

Some of your photographs incorrectly ended up in Category:Taken with Canon EF 85mm F1.8 USM - this category is now filled with macro shots like File:Black house spider.jpg that don't belong to the 85/1.8 pool.

You're using two personalized templates for each image. One template (User:Fir0002/150 credits) says "taken with Sigma 150/2.8", another (User:Fir0002/credits) says "taken with Canon 85/1.8". May I recommend removing lens/camera info from User:Fir0002/credits altogether - it's just a general copyright tag. ??? Kaluga.2012 (talk) 06:57, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Thanks for bringing that to my attention -> simple mistake, fixed now. --Fir0002 www 08:21, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

User:Fir0002/credits[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg User:Fir0002/credits has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Plum flowers.jpg[edit]

Am i correct with the en.wp upload log? Is this your work? --Martin H. (talk) 12:37, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Appropriately Licensed[edit]

You participated at the earlier discussion on licence choice for Featured Pictures. A number of users felt that such restrictions should be made at policy level. Please comment at Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. This is a proposal to amend this licence policy to disallow future uploads where the sole licence is inappropriate for the media (e.g., GFDL for images). In earlier discussions there were a number of comments that, while reasonable opinions, did not align with Wikimedia's mission for free content. Please read the FAQ before commenting. Thanks -- Colin (talk) 23:01, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Fir0002, don't you think it's a bit inappropriate to take a stand in this discussion due to your conflict of interest? Whatever justifications you may have, the fact remains that you financially benefit from the current licensing loophole. That seems like a pretty clear conflict of interests to me. Kaldari (talk) 20:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
What a bizarre comment. I suppose everyone who has uploaded GFDL content should also be barred from the discussion because they have a conflict of interest? Great way to win an argument... --Fir0002 www 01:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
+1 --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
-1. The key issue is not that you used GFDL, but that you have a strong interest in monetizing your contributions and want to prevent free reuse of your images. --Dschwen (talk) 15:15, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
I invited Fir0002. His argument (loss of content) is a reasonable one but Commons has already decided on a huge loss of content by not accepting all-rights-reserved "for Wikipedia only" licences, or not accepting "non-commercial" licences. So it is a very weak argument indeed, though it was a very commonly made argument in the discussion. I think a lot of people would prefer if WP/Commons accepted such licences and are only interested in illustrating the Wikipedia website or collecting images they didn't pay for. I respect that opinion, even if it isn't compatible with WP/Commons mission to create free content.
Fir0002 is a contributor here so has a right to comment at any discussion, particularly those that affect him. At least I can understand his argument and it has some rational basis, which is more than can be said for many of the other comments. Colin (talk) 15:56, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

File:World globe.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:World globe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 13:50, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Pacific Black Duck jun08.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pacific Black Duck jun08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:55, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Meerkat feb 09.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meerkat feb 09.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Bananas white background.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bananas white background.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

176.180.8.140 09:21, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Apricot and cross section.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Apricot and cross section.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.215.210.243 09:49, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Classical spectacular laser effects.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Classical spectacular laser effects.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

69.231.197.83 05:08, 17 December 2014 (UTC)