User talk:Fischer.H

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fischer.H!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:49, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kategorien[edit]

Hallo Fischer.H, vielen Dank für das fleißige Bebildern der Denkmallisten. Bitte beachte doch in Zukunft, die Fotos mit Kategorien zu versehen, damit sie unabhängig von den Wikipedia-Denkmallisten auch hier bei Commons gefunden werden können. Baudenkmäler werden grundsätzlich mit Cultural heritage monuments in ... kategorisiert, also etwa Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Hambach an der Weinstraße. Die Kategorien können gleich beim Hochladen der Datei angegeben (beim UploadWizard mit einer eigenen Maske, die gleich anzeigt, ob eine Kategorie existiert oder nicht) oder im Nachhinein hinzugefügt/korrigiert werden (wie andere Benutzer und ich es jetzt schon für Deine bisherigen Werke getan haben; einfach mal in die Versionsgeschichten schauen). Oft hilft bei Unsicherheiten ein Blick auf bereits bebilderte Listen bzw. Kategorien, um zu sehen, wie andere es gemacht haben. Bei Fragen kannst Du Dich gern an mich wenden. Viele Grüße und weiterhin frohes Schaffen, -- Giorgio Michele (talk) 09:13, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nochmal Kategorien[edit]

Hallo Hallo Fischer, beachte bitte, dass hier deutschsprachige Kategorienamen wie Category:Kulturdenkmale in Hambach an der Weinstraße hier nicht zulässig sind. (Siehe Commons:Categories.) Die richtige Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Hambach an der Weinstraße ist Dir doch oben schon vorgeschlagen worden. Nehme die dann auch bitte! -- Ies (talk) 17:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Klassizistische_Torpfeiler.jpg[edit]

Zum einen ist die Arbeitssprache hier in Commons Englisch - es gibt sicher auch eine Menge Benutzer, die Deutsch verstehen, aber du erhöhst die Wahrscheinlichkeit, dass ein Anliegen bearbeitet wird, ungemein, wenn du es auf Englisch formulierst.

Zum zweiten verstehe ich aber auch auf Deutsch die Löschbegründung nicht (es wäre nett, wenn du diese in einem ganzen Satz formulieren könntest!). Wenn du meinen solltest, dass in der Denkmalliste immer nur ein Bild verwendet werden sollte und du jetzt zwei Bilder von den Torpfeilern hochgeladen hast: Es gibt ja nun durchaus noch weitere Anwendungsfälle für Bilder als die Denkmalliste, und ein Gutteil der Commons-Bilder wird gar nicht in Wikipedia-Artikeln verwendet. Insofern ist das eigentlich kein Löschgrund. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 20:29, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalismus[edit]

Hallo Fischer.H, obwohl es Dir wiederholt erklärt wurde und Du genau weißt, das das falsch ist, gibst Du Deinen Bildern weiterhin deutschsprachige Kategorien, wie z.B.

Was soll das? Warum machst Du Dinge wider besseren Wissens immer wieder falsch? Was willst Du damit erreichen? Willst Du unbedingt wegen Vandalismus gesperrt weden? Anders als Vandalismus kann man Dein Verhalten ja kaum noch deuten. -- Ies (talk) 18:02, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalismus?[edit]

Hallo Fischer.H, was bitte sollte dieser Revert? Ich habe das unkategorisierte Bild mit einer Kategorie versehen, damit es hier bei Commons einsortiert ist und gefunden wird. Ich hoffe, dass es sich hierbei nur um ein Versehen handelte. Am besten für alle Beteiligten wäre es natürlich, wenn du selbst die korrekten Kategorien eintragen könntest. Bei Fragen kannst du dich gern an mich wenden. -- Giorgio Michele (talk) 15:32, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Giorgio Michele, die ganze Angelegenheit beruht auf ein Versehen meinerseits, ich bitte um Entschuldigung, und werde mir Mühe geben, in Zukunft die korrekten Kategorien einzutragen.12:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Fischer.H (talk)

Danke schön. Viele Grüße, -- Giorgio Michele (talk) 16:21, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Abano-078.jpg[edit]

File:Abano-078.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

De728631 (talk) 15:47, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geiskopferhof-Rekonstruktion.jpg[edit]

File:Geiskopferhof-Rekonstruktion.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sitacuisses (talk) 16:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geiskopferhof Flächen.jpg[edit]

File:Geiskopferhof Flächen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Sitacuisses (talk) 16:58, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchturm Alt-Graun.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sumitsurai 11:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zitronenfalter-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good detail on insect --Daniel Case 06:01, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Südpfalz-045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Maby you could change the title as well. The image could have been taken anywhere and has nothing typically from Südpfalz --Ermell 22:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garten-5730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 9541 Mäusebussard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality for me. --Manfred Kuzel 04:13, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vorsicht![edit]

H., sei bitte vorsichtig bei deinen Kategorisierungsversuchen. Category:Natural monuments in Rhineland-Palatinate hat jetzt gar keine übergeordnete Kategorie mehr, Category:Theodor-Heuss-Straße (Lachen-Speyerdorf) auch nicht. Und wenn du eine Kategorie mit HotCat hinzufügst, dann siehst du doch vorm Speichern schon, ob sie existiert, da sind solche Versuche doch nicht nötig. Gruß, --Achim (talk) 15:10, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mäusebussard[edit]

Hallo Fischer.H Was wolltest du denn genau hier nominieren? Die File:Mäusebussard 017.jpg scheint es nicht zu geben, die Nominierung also ungültig, aber wenn du mir sagst was du nominieren möchtest, kann ich vielleicht weiterhelfen. --A.Savin 18:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo A. Savin, herzlichen Dank für deinen Beitrag zum nominieren einer Bilddatei. Habe leider übersehen, daß die erforderliche Datei noch nicht in Commons hochgeladen ist. Werde das umgehend nachholen. Viele Grüße--Fischer.H (talk) 12:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grünfinken 012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garten 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwetzingen 009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 15:12, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garten 056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 18:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garten 079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very weak pro, but I´m not a birdy men. (Mir gefällt einfach die Aufteilung, in so einem kurzem Moment ist das fast Gestaltung. Sättigung könnte höher sein und das Farbrauschen könnte man auch leicht korrigieren.) Aber lassen wir mal gut sein....zumindest für Q1 --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 22:26, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roter Fingerhut IMG 5239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 21:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! P1210671.jpg-Logo Orchideenwelt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:32, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There's something strange there, see note Poco a poco 19:53, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Vecchio IMG 7979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gute Komposition (was viel zu schnell vergeben wird). Aber was war die Idee mit den Farben?? Sieht nach 70er Dia-Film aus. Das kann einem Nostalgiker gefallen, mir leider nicht. Bin mir nicht mal sicher ob es sich "retten" lässt, es geht nicht um die Schattenseite links, aber um die Laterne. Gibt´s da ein RAW davon? Biete mich mal, wenn es nicht eilt --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:15, 19 March 2018 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 14:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That was a big step, around the street light there is still a slight halo and the darker areas are too bright, you should increase contrast or darken the shadows Poco a poco 18:50, 19 March 2018 (UTC) Done Change was made --Fischer.H 15:42, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The halos are still there, and patially coloured due to CA, that needs a fix. Sorry, I am not convinced yet. Poco a poco 18:53, 20 March 2018 (UTC) DoneCa cleared away --Fischer.H 10:34, 22 March 2018 (UTC)Good enough for me --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 03:49, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kürbis-Pyramide P1210668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:01, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichhörnchen - Sciurus vulgaris IMG 1320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments weak Support Für mich der Hammerǃ Und nicht nur weil ich Eichhörnchen mag, es gibt nur leider Fehler im Hintergrund. Mir ist klar das dies bei bewegten Objekten (Tieren) etwas unfair ist. Aber mich interessieren dabei keine Braas-Dachfenster und auch die Stange rechts ist unschön, dann noch etwas Farbrauschen. Wäre das alles nicht ist das ein klares FP, nicht nur QI Was für einen Photoshopper zum freistellen, sonst ist das für mich Dein bisher bestes Bildǃ--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 19:34, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mauereidechse IMG 1537.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 18:59, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eiger-Nordwand IMG 9984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 17:02, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timmelsjoch - Hochalpenstraße IMG 7446.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Photo seems a bit over processed. But okay for me.--Famberhorst 17:03, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume IMG 0012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A little bit too dark, but enough for QI in my opinion. BTW, nice image. Tournasol7 20:17, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedensglocke Concordia 2000 IMG 4239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:08, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotmilan IMG 7373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mauereidechse IMG 1520.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Vielleicht ein leichter Gelbstich, das wäre noch einmal zu überprüfen. Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Fischer.H 06:53, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißburgunder Traube P1120164.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments GQ --Palauenc05 17:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löwenzahn IMG 6874.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. Granada Sat, 28 Apr 2018 19:52:52 GMT

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gescheine auf Weinrebe IMG 7292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment There are some dust spots that need cleaning.--Peulle 10:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)/> Done Removed spots. Thank you for your reviews. --Fischer.H 07:29, 8 May 2018 (UTC)OK --Peulle 19:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edelkastanie IMG 3661.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:13, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Herzogstraße_15_-_19[edit]

Category:Herzogstraße_15_-_19 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

F. Riedelio (talk) 07:13, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Herzogstraße_15–19[edit]

Category:Herzogstraße_15–19 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

F. Riedelio (talk) 07:15, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Herzogshof_(Gimmeldingen)[edit]

Herzogshof (Gimmeldingen) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

F. Riedelio (talk) 07:20, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Herzogstraße_15_-_19_(Gimmeldingen)[edit]

Category:Herzogstraße_15_-_19_(Gimmeldingen) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

F. Riedelio (talk) 07:25, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Europäischer Laubfrosch P1220839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 15:27, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Küchenschelle IMG 7257.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 09:14, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn IMG 7452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holzbrücke Essing P1230044.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Looks flareless. --Trougnouf 13:35, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großblumiges Mädchenauge IMG 1742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful flower, and enough of it is sharp. -- Ikan Kekek 21:35, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eselsdistel IMG 7757.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Question: Is the category right?--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Fischer.H 17:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nachtkerze IMG 7734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:33, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schmuckkörbchen P1230577.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 21:14, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißstorch IMG 14856.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice.--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eselsdistel IMG 7836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sehr gut. -- Ikan Kekek 09:41, 22 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löwenzahn (Leontodon crispus) P1230540.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dahlien P1230675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments My German is not so good, so I apologize for writing in English. Could you please decrease the noise? -- Ikan Kekek 19:53, 23 June 2018 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 07:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I suppose the flower could be a bit sharper, but I do like it better without noise and think it's good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 04:02, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turmfalken IMG 2154.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice!--Agnes Monkelbaan 18:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Himbeere 7825.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:56, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eselsdistel IMG 7947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:15, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Kakteen 7900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. But: You should improve the filename. --XRay 10:06, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Sonnenblume 8116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Colourful! --Basotxerri 18:57, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Holiday Park 8084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Some minor spots in the sky. --Basotxerri 16:26, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Holiday Park 8079.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:40, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Sonnenblume 8147.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 00:10, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Sonnenblume 8178-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the cut off petal underneath. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 06:09, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Kornblume 7482.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some noise. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 17:07, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hibiscus P1230969.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 17:15, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Sonnenblume 8242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful! Well here and there a green halo.--Famberhorst 18:15, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Arnica 8587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 16:45, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Hambacher Schloss 8284.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Rosen 8460.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:12, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Kühltürme 6170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 19:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Damhirsch 1356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 27 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Honigbiene 7069.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:58, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Rothirsch 7292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:51, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donau-Radtour 0615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please try some perspective correction, a small tilt to the right and a tighter crop would be nice. Greetings --Dirtsc 06:45, 31 July 2018 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 09:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good for me now. --Dirtsc 10:16, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rathaus der Stadt Wanfried, Hessen, Deutschland IMG 5932-1 edit.jpg[edit]

Moin Fischer.H, danke für deine Stimme auf Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rathaus der Stadt Wanfried, Hessen, Deutschland IMG 5932-1 edit.jpg. Zwischenzeitlich habe ich eine Version bereitgestellt, die die von Basotxerri genannten Mängel abstellt. Ich würde mich freuen, wenn du auch die alternative Version bewerten könntest. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 19:50, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblumen 2018.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eselsdistel P1240190.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weinrebe IMG 2599.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --TheRunnerUp 19:01, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gewürztraminer P1120136.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:55, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume IMG 2656.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:51, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silvaner P1240428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. May be you can add a category for the location. --XRay 06:34, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dornfelder P1240238.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Crisp ... looks ready for harvesting --Daniel Case 17:52, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Birstaler Muskat P1240336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muskat Bleu.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 20:14, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Timmelsjoch IMG 7459.jpg[edit]

Hallo Herr Fischer,

schönes Bild, das leider einige Fehler hat, die aber leicht zu beseitigen wären. (zB Sensorspots oben rechts). Was ich anbieten würde, wäre das Bild zu bearbeiten, so bald ich ein raw oder noch besser DNG (ist ein freier converter von adobe) habe. Auf meiner Seite steht meine email-adresse. Ich würde dann das psd schicken, wenn es nicht zu groß ist oder hier hochladen. Damit dürften Sie in Zukunft die Arbeiten in Photoshop selber durchführen können.

Schönes WE, --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 08:00, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserfrosch IMG 9286.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:45, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleiner Fuchs IMG 0595.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Much noise in the background. But good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eigernordwand - Spinne IMG 5957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:50, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Borretsch IMG 5069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:04, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turmfalke P1200751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 23:20, 22 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blattläuse IMG 4255.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:39, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kernbeiser IMG 6235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Imo OK for QI, a bit noisy, but I´m aware of the problems... --Isiwal 21:30, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichhörnchen IMG 1327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 19:09, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfälzerwald Holzernte IMG 0368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:27, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Timmelsjoch IMG 7468.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Seems a bit unbalanced. But that may have been the case. Good enough for me.--Famberhorst 17:56, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmolata 415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:39, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohe Loog IMG 4685.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful photo --Michielverbeek 18:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 18:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kropsbachweiher IMG 7606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Strong CAs on the left side (see the note). --Halavar 18:58, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review.--Fischer.H 16:24, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 12:45, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Hanooz 04:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Spangenberg IMG 1212.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments All contours show a light rim - maybe the result of a heavy CA-correction? --PtrQs 18:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the review.--Fischer.H 16:40, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this effort, but apart from some raised mid tones I can still see the bright rim between walls and clouds. Didn't you try to reduce the CA-correction? I've marked an example in the picture. --PtrQs 01:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done File was processed again.--Fischer.H 10:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC) Comment The "rims" observed by PtrQs are sharpening halos from too strong unsharp mask algorithm parameters. They have nothing to do with CA correction. --Johannes Robalotoff 13:35, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Johannes Robalotoff: Thank you for this hint - now I can better insult people for using such kinky techniques ;-) The effort was not much, but acceptable now. --PtrQs 01:20, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frühlingsboten P1240659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Looks like alder catkins. --Seven Pandas 17:38, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roter Gutedel P1120129.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --SimonWaldherr 08:53, 20 February 2019 (UTC)--Horst J. Meuter 11:48, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißstorch P1190403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißstorch P1170558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. and nice.--Famberhorst 18:29, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rothirsch IMG 1390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:32, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wegekreuz IMG 9889.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good but it needs more specific categories --Poco a poco 10:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. The categroy issue seems to have been fixed. --Kritzolina 12:42, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weinrebe IMG 9989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eidechse IMG 2990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:13, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Junge Weinrebe IMG 0013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:40, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löffler-Denkmal IMG 9939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good but it needs a more specific category --Poco a poco 19:21, 3 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Fischer.H 08:33, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Piotr Bart 20:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Villa Böhm IMG 0377.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please check the verticals --Ermell 15:42, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Fischer.H 16:21, 9 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The horizontal lines should also be aligned. --Ermell 07:59, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done even the horizontal lines are aligned.--Fischer.H 16:47, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:57, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hunds-Rose P1250095.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 06:41, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohnbüte IMG 0643.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 03:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clematis IMG 0836.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Ok given the size --Poco a poco 21:30, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausrotschwanz IMG 1907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:02, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spatzen P1240484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:39, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn P1250324.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Looks oversaturated --Poco a poco 17:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done Image file edited again. --Fischer.H 07:20, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:01, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acker-Winde IMG 1223.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserturm Duttweiler IMG 1290.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 09:42, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schwalbenschwanz - Schmetterling IMG 2261.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astern IMG 3343.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 17:04, 14 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Depending on how big this flower is, this might be a Featured Picture candidate. How big is the diameter of the flower? -- Ikan Kekek 07:58, 15 June 2019 (UTC) Info Diameter about 40 - 50 mm.--Fischer.H 07:23, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. Can be a FPC too. --大诺史 14:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I agree, though I would suggest adding the diameter to the file description. Also, except in Consensual Review, there's no need for more than one person to promote a file in QIC. -- Ikan Kekek 03:49, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rebenblüte IMG 3750.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Musicaline 05:04, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Malve P1250340.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Given that these flowers are very small per w:Malva sylvestris, this is sharp enough. -- Ikan Kekek 08:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. Can be a FPC too. --大诺史 14:53, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm not at all sure about that. -- Ikan Kekek 19:53, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rapsblüte P1170138.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A little bit noisy, but acceptable. --XRay 07:59, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Primeln IMG 9909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to main object --Michielverbeek 08:57, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rotmilan IMG 7373.jpg[edit]

Hi, Please fix your nomination before inserting it. Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Süßkirschen IMG 1404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 07:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Rotmilan IMG 7373.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rotmilan IMG 7373.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Phacelia IMG 1430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:07, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kornblume IMG 3549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:49, 29 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn IMG 0911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality IMO --PJDespa 20:03, 01 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilde Karde IMG 2026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 17:14, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilde Karde IMG 2069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Sharp and a nice background. --Bernard Ladenthin 08:14, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zinnien IMG 2195.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn IMG 2533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Chenspec 15:30, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acker-Winde IMG 2708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:00, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Naternkopf IMG 2653.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PantheraLeo1359531 11:38, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleine Klette IMG 2731.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A bit noisy, but overall good quality. --Aristeas 11:53, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weizen IMG 2713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. But please improve the categorization. One category is overcategorized too. --XRay 09:48, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korn Rade IMG 2491.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Färber-Distel IMG 2487.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:41, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Königskerze P1250816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:43, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Echinopsis IMG 2981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A bit too dark, but good enough for QI in my opinion. --Tournasol7 08:12, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kakteen IMG 4213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 18:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kakteen IMG 4213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Beautiful and good quality -- Spurzem 18:00, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straucheibisch IMG 2560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ercé 16:43, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume IMG 3119.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 08:01, 11 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kakteen IMG 4213.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kakteen IMG 4213.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlafmohn IMG 2141.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gute Qualität, Subjekt fokussiert, keine Irritationen. --PantheraLeo1359531 20:23, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Riesenschnake Quality image candidate[edit]

Very nice photo but this is Nephrotoma scurra a species in the family Tipulidae.Will you change the German language description. Best regards Notafly (talk) 20:42, 22 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bachstelzen-Nest IMG 1067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 15:57, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bachstelze IMG 3840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergfink IMG 6169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Slightly too dark IMO. --Ermell 08:41, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bachstelze IMG 3840.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amsel IMG 9515.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good focus to the bird --Michielverbeek 06:47, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlehdorn P1250894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. (A bit soft, but IMHO OK given that the fruits are rather small.) --Aristeas 09:30, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Garten-5730.jpg[edit]

Thanks for trying to get the category right, but you can see it still needed fixed. The anchor has to match exactly the text of the sub-heading. Please can you test your link does actually work, rather than continuing to expect others to fix every one of your nominations. -- Colin (talk) 10:41, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passionsblume IMG 3432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:33, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbstblumen P1260256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gute Qualität, Subjekt fokussiert. --PantheraLeo1359531 10:16, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schmuckkörbchen IMG 3106.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 17:05, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weintraube P1260279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
You need to fix that category, what grape is it? --Poco a poco 09:11, 22 September 2019 (UTC) Done--Fischer.H 16:03, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Regent P1260239.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support
Good quality. --Manfred Kuzel 04:52, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passionsblumen IMG 3442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
needs proper categorization --MB-one 19:10, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. Cat fixed. --Stepro 01:06, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 6 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Passionsblume IMG 3432.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passionsblume IMG 3432.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchturm Hambach IMG 3251.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:34, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rebenblatt IMG 3807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Äpfel P1260372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please, add more specific categories --Poco a poco 19:41, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Done--Fischer.H 13:46, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks --Poco a poco 08:09, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbstlaub im WeinbergIMG 3616.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice autumn leaves --Michielverbeek 18:15, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Mikmaq 23:58, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grindelwald 064.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 12:37, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grindelwald IMG 9984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carschten 20:17, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garten IMG 2221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
I would say this is too dark. If you have the RAW file, could you try boosting the exposure to see whether the image can be rescued? --Bobulous 17:58, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality, the exposure is fine for this kind of scene --Uoaei1 05:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mäusebussard IMG 4922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
You should choose a more meanigful title. --Ermell 21:37, 14 November 2019 (UTC) Done--Fischer.H 16:34, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you. --Ermell 21:28, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strohballen IMG 3088.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. I can live with the blown whites because I really like the light. --Carschten 19:25, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I'm not seeing anything blown. I do see at least one and maybe as many as four little dust spots a bit to the left of the upper right corner. Fischer.H, please look for them. I like this photo a lot, too. -- Ikan Kekek 08:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg[edit]

File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fischer.H (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg[edit]

File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fischer.H (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg[edit]

File:Hubschrauber IMG 3201.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fischer.H (talk) 09:17, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulpen IMG 4313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mauereidechsen IMG 4415.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sonya7iv 09:15, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erste Frühlinsboten IMG 4059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:26, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalifornischer Mohn IMG 4878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Why iso 1000? --Moroder 09:50, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirt Bike IMG 4202.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Noisy sky --MB-one 07:29, 4 June 2020 (UTC))[reply]
Done --Fischer.H 16:51, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Better but still very noisy. --MB-one 19:07, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Fischer.H 09:31, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --MB-one 20:57, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn IMG 6448.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Noise should be reduced. --Ermell 21:41, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Fischer.H 15:01, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:51, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donaudurchbruch P1230071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:05, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löwenzahn IMG 5372. jpg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:22, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaktus IMG 5917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:27, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edelkastanie IMG 5671.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 19:29, 20 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Himbeeren IMG 7639.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großer Bocksbart IMG 5372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Königskerze IMG 6063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Hwwo 16:58, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stachelbeere IMG 7121.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for me. --Hwwo 07:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beerenwanze IMG 7591.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good, but could categories be added for the location and maybe one for the plant the bug is on? --Blood Red Sandman 21:54, 23 June 2020 (UTC) Done--Fischer.H 17:03, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. Thanks for the added categories. --Blood Red Sandman 11:48, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roggen IMG 8059.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Mdaniels5757 01:54, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erdbeere IMG 8052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support QI imo. --ArildV 07:58, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bienen IMG 8273.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honigbiene IMG 8242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:39, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:42, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kastanienblüte IMG 7169.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Dirt Bike IMG 4202.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dirt Bike IMG 4202.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hornisse IMG 2860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 18:33, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dubbeglas IMG 6185.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 10:52, 5 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! File St. Gallus IMG 6248.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloßstraße IMG 5354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 16:22, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mäusebussard IMG 4269.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment On the one hand it's quite grainy and could use some noise reduction. However it's actually a nice shot with a good pose and quite some detail. support and oppose meets in the middle here. @Fischer.H: can you try to improve the colour noise a bit? --D-Kuru 20:58, 13 July 2020 (UTC) I think this is not a buzzard. It looks more like a falcon or hawk. Seven Pandas 22:44, 13 July 2020 (UTC) Done Die Abbildung zeigt einen Mäusebussard und keinen Falken. --Fischer.H 15:04, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Even though it's still grainy, considering the object size, focal length shutter speed and ISO it is good enough for me to be QI --D-Kuru 20:57, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weizenernte IMG 6483.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Blood Red Sandman 14:04, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Honigbiene IMG 6696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wetterkreuz IMG 0029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --ArildV 12:16, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weizenernte IMG 6529.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs more specific categories IMO. --Ermell 19:41, 24 July 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 07:20, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:47, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Hausrotschwanz IMG 1907.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hausrotschwanz IMG 1907.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weyher in der Pfalz IMG 6666.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Weak Support. I understand your composition, but the large unsharp tree in the foreground is a little bit disturbing. --XRay 10:22, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bachstelze IMG 3840.jpg[edit]

Hi there. I'd like to use this image in my magazine. Is that OK? Best wishes Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:17, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kugelgasbehälter IMG 6433.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality ReneeWrites 09:46, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raupe P1270551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Category must be more precise. --Ermell 16:49, 24 August 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 17:28, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality--Augustgeyler 20:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eiche P1270645.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 18:06, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenkstein in Essingen P1260741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speyerbachbrücke IMG 4298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dornfelder IMG 6878.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilde Karde IMG 6569.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 20:47, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info ~~Description not correct. Flowers are gone already.~~ --Robert Flogaus-Faust 11:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry for that. There are a few flowers left at the base of the inflorescence. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:07, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zinnie IMG 6777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good image quality, colours and DoF --Tagooty 16:39, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support You forgot to promote. I agree that the center of the flower is good quality, and that's quite sufficient. -- Ikan Kekek 22:17, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siegerrebe IMG 6784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ReneeWrites 20:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rebschule IMG 6961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The disturbing branches at the right side should be cropped out. --Ermell 20:30, 15 September 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 16:12, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:16, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maisernte IMG 6818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ziegenbock P1270633.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support GQ --Palauenc05 16:48, 24 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Huxelrebe IMG 6794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zinnmann 07:45, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume IMG 0315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 16:43, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Supermarket in recife, pernambuco, Brazil.jpg[edit]

Dear Fischer,

I have uploaded a new improved version in this nomination, please, take another look and tell me what you think. Thank you very much --Wilfredor (talk) 11:31, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mohn P1260987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 04:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speyerer Dom IMG 6844.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:26, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Deidesheim IMG 7260.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 22:48, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deidesheimer Hof IMG 7256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:14, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dreifaltigkeitskirche IMG 6834.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very good! (I know it is not easy to get a photo of that church without many peope or even cars before it.) There are just two dustspots in the sky which I would suggest to remove. --Aristeas 09:01, 4 October 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 09:20, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 08:51, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bussard IMG 9541.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gute Qualität, schönes Foto --PantheraLeo1359531 20:29, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:IMG Kühltürme 6170.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:IMG Kühltürme 6170.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Edesheim P1200107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Nice, I just wonder if it isn’t leaning a bit to the left – maybe rotating it by 1° or so clockwise would fix that. --Aristeas 09:43, 14 October 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 09:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you, but maybe I have been very unclear – I meant rotating it in the other direction, sorry. --Aristeas 18:31, 15 October 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 14:37, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 09:53, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Speyerer Dom IMG 6839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Needs a perspective correction and a bit more of sky on the top --Poco a poco 17:47, 13 October 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 09:27, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
More sky, that's good, but you have applied a pincushion perspective correction and it just needed a vertical perspective correction --Poco a poco 18:44, 14 October 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 09:06, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is QI --Poco a poco 08:55, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirt jump IMG 7609.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support amazing action shot --Augustgeyler 17:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support excelent --Christian Ferrer 18:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rübenroder IMG 7449.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 16:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rübenlader IMG 7492.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Gute Qualität, schönes Bild. Hoffentlich wird es eine reiche Ernte :) --PantheraLeo1359531 19:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosskirche IMG 7276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Technically well done. But the traffic sign in the foreground is disturbing the composition. --Augustgeyler 10:08, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
a lot of dust specks (especially around the tip of the tower) --Virtual-Pano 23:32, 22 October 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 16:32, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Removal of dust is well executed - I will leave the eval of traffic sign removal to Augustgeyler --Virtual-Pano 20:17, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you. Very well done! --Augustgeyler 06:25, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Edesheim IMG 7720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flurkreuz IMG 7803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 18:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Dirt jump IMG 7609.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dirt jump IMG 7609.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Provis IMG 8025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 19:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbst IMG 8052.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbst 2020 IMG 7798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very nice! IMHO it is leaning a bit to the left, I suggest to rotate it a little bit clockwise. --Aristeas 11:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 14:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 10:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artischocke P1250828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 11:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karottenvollernter IMG 8249.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support GQ --Palauenc05 17:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Massey Ferguson IMG 8254.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 19:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinpilz IMG 7999.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Can you id the species? --Poco a poco 15:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 10:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I added the cat --Tesla Delacroix 10:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hebst 2020 IMG 8158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality and nice composition! --Radomianin 16:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Agreed. Possible FP, though I don't know how voters there will react to the background. I'd support and might nominate. -- Ikan Kekek 20:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Agree thanks for the rating --Fischer.H 15:54, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eberesche IMG 8231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot top left --Poco a poco 18:47, 20 November 2020 (UTC) and an insect left above the branches, btw quality is good --Michielverbeek 20:54, 20 November 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 15:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
QI for mre now --Michielverbeek 08:31, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Südpfalz IMG 7712.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Leaning slightly to the right side IMO. --Ermell 17:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 18:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Reiterstellwerk IMG 2896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 22:50, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Herbst 2020 IMG 8158.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Herbst 2020 IMG 8158.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuckucksbähnel IMG 0054.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:31, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sturm-Kiefer IMG 8389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 18:57, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche St. Vigil 102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Perspektivkorrektur ist nötig, Kanten des Gebäudes nicht alle senkrecht zum Fotorand. --PantheraLeo1359531 17:34, 6 December 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 09:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ganz linke Gebäudekante ist immer noch um etwa 1,5° schief, sorry --PantheraLeo1359531 15:10, 7 December 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 15:37, 8 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Danke, gute Qualität --PantheraLeo1359531 08:54, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eiger und Mönch IMG 9989.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please add Eiger and Mönch in the Categories. --Moroder 04:47, 10 December 2020 (UTC) Done and thanks for the rating. --Fischer.H 14:38, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dirt jump IMG 7936.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality and sharp. --Baidax 17:52, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ERO-Traubenvollernter P1260933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedensdenkmal Edenkoben IMG 0670.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The strong CA should be removed. --Ermell 23:18, 15 December 2020 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 09:39, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:27, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spinnennetz IMG 8414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:02, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Novembernebel IMG 8271.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:26, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kalmit IMG 0017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Pretty small but ok to me --Poco a poco 17:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saline (Bad Dürkheim) P1220822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A lot of stitching errors should be fixed and the noise reduced. --Ermell 22:11, 1 January 2021 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 18:10, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Just a weak dust spot left in the sky. --Ermell 15:27, 3 January 2021 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 13:38, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume IMG 6394.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:46, 8 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gewürztraminer P1270923.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:14, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Spinnennetz IMG 8414.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spinnennetz IMG 8414.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mittagspause am Wegesrand P1260170.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:19, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichelhäher IMG 5048.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 08:54, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Störche 006.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:06, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halbmond IMG 5204.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Da frage ich mich, ob das wirklich der Schatten des Flugzeugs ist oder vielmehr das Flugzeug selbst. --undefined 18:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Naja, der Schatten liegt auf dem Flugzeug, ich glaube das ist gemeint :) --PantheraLeo1359531 18:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
zum Zeitpunkt der Aufnahme habe ich das Flugzeug nicht wahrgenommen, erst bei der Bildbearbeitung wurde dasselbe erkannt, ich vermute es ist das Flugzeug und nicht der Schatten. --Fischer.H 08:59, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. Und natürlich ist es das Flugzeug, nicht dessen Schatten. --KaiBorgeest 22:56, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is a rare photo, I think it should be VI --LexKurochkin 15:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißstoch P1170549.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Funny shot, maybe a bit oversharpened.. --Palauenc05 17:09, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Weißstorch P1190401.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Weißstorch P1190401.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strommast IMG 8705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:42, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochspannungsmast IMG 8812.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

e-mail[edit]

Hi there, you just sent me an e-mail, but I cannot receive e-mails for some reason. Can you post on my user page please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:06, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dahlie IMG 6387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 18:56, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Dirt jump IMG 7936.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dirt jump IMG 7936.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dahlie IMG.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:41, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserspeier P1280681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Geo coordinates or location categorie is necessary. --Ermell 21:37, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Fischer.H 17:55, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißstorch P1280748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 18:30, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weißstorch P1280737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --PsamatheM 19:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spinnenläufer IMG 0881.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:02, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The English-language name for this creature is house centipede. I will edit the file description to reflect that. Quality is fairly good. -- Ikan Kekek 21:16, 8 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuhschelle IMG 1090.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 21:27, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jacobus IMG 1613.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apfelblüte IMG 1279.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apfelblüte IMG 1547.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:24, 25 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deutsche Bahn IMG 9327.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Next time try more DoF --Wilfredor 19:24, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zierkirsche IMG 9323.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --King of Hearts 14:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gänseblümchen IMG 9277.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fliege IMG 3288.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and kind of scary. -- Ikan Kekek 19:37, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weinguts-Villa IMG 9737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality and beautiful. --Aristeas 08:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eichelhäher IMG 2822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support OK for QI --Charlesjsharp 16:22, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blattläuse IMG 3746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:22, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bildstock IMG 9581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:32, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saline Bad Dürkheim IMG 9876jpg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rote Ameise 3654.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glanrind IMG 4305.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Will be useful to add the location in the Summary and/or CAT. --Tagooty 08:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klatschmohn IMG 0014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:53, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --XRay 18:56, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Golfplatz P1290243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Kellerei IMG 0237.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:42, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damhirsch IMG 0063.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 10:56, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flurkreuz am Petersbrunnen IMG 0256.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:51, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruppertsberg-Teepavillon IMG 9863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:41, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus IMG 0306.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:57, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausrotschwanz IMG 4627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathaus Diedesfeld IMG 0315.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:26, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hausrotschwanz IMG 4802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fendt 828 IMG 4911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:57, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenuhr P1290387.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:46, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! File.Rebschule IMG 0668.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:14, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Getreideernte P1290445.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
All things visible in the picture should be categorised. --Ermell 19:03, 9 August 2021 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 16:34, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What about the machine and the stork? --Ermell 21:10, 10 August 2021 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 07:25, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect. Thank you. --Ermell 21:21, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hartmanndenkmal IMG 0625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ERO Traubenvollernter IMG 0717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Badass thing, good quality. --Superbass 18:12, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heuernte P1290457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 09:52, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altpörtel IMG 0636.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:13, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Flugzeugschlepp IMG 0604.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Ruppertsberg-Teepavillon IMG 9863.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ruppertsberg-Teepavillon IMG 9863.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloßstrasse IMG 5354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:26, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hellerhütte IMG 2369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:39, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hohe Loog IMG 3610.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:44, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hermannsfels IMG 0008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:01, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Westerwinkel IMG 0992.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:52, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 17 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haus Borg IMG 0907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Westerwinkel IMG 0991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the two dust spots in the upper right part of the image. --Carsten Steger 15:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC) Done Thanks for review. --Fischer.H 16:39, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 17:26, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dülmener Wildpferde IMG 0931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 21:31, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jacobus-Kirche IMG 0945.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:03, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserschloss Senden IMG 0950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A perspective correction would improve the image in my opinion. --Carsten Steger 05:48, 19 September 2021 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 16:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! City Star IMG 0819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is a big dust spot under the almost horizontal spoke on the left side that should be removed. --Carsten Steger 19:41, 20 September 2021 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 07:16, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 19:19, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lambertikirche IMG 0976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Well done! --Mosbatho 19:36, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St.-Paulus-Dom IMG 0984.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:31, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenuhr IMG 0970.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:47, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienkapelle P1290617.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Interresting motif. The perspective should be corrected and the noise reduced. --Steindy 09:49, 1 October 2021 (UTC) Done --Fischer.H 06:29, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:54, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POTD Notification[edit]

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐

The file File:Dirt jump IMG 7609.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Schwetzingen 009.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schwetzingen 009.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotmilan IMG 1336.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:21, 30 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossgasse Hambach IMG 5354.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Commonists 21:26, 13 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Improvement for a QI nomination[edit]

Dear Fischer.H,

I nominated this image for QI. Now the reviewers ask for removal of a small branch at the top to promote it as QI. Are you willing and able to do that? --August Geyler (talk) 18:19, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Frohe Weihnachten![edit]

✴ Happy Holidays, Fischer.H ✴

Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!
Желаю вам счастливого Рождества и Нового года!

--Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strommast P1300356.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tomaten P1290762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:36, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sendeturm Kalmit IMG 1302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. -- --Dimljacic 17:42, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glanrind P1290606.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tomer T 11:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mauereidechse IMG 6890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:18, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnentempel IMG 1400.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:19, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßburger Stein IMG 0676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 11:42, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2022 - Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Fischer.H,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 30. Juni 2024 findet zum zwölften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth (kurz: WLE) statt. Dabei können wie immer Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler oder andere Schutzgebiete fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger WLE 2023 – Landschaft
Ramsach, ein linker Zufluss zur Loisach im oberbayerischen FFH-Gebiet Murnauer Moos
Naturdenkmal Sankt-Anna-Linde, eine ca. 300 Jahre alte Winterlinde (Tilia cordata) auf einer Anhöhe südöstlich des Heilbronner Ortsteils Kirchhausen
Buchenwald im Nationalpark Jasmund nach einem Regenschauer

Sieger WLE 2023 – Detail
Großer Blaupfeil (Orthetrum cancellatum) im Naturschutzgebiet Gülper See
Blüte des Knöllchen-Steinbrechs (Saxifraga granulata) im Naturschutzgebiet Dattenbachtal zwischen Kröftel und Vockenhausen (Taunus)
männliche Rohrweihe (Circus aeruginosus) beim Jagdflug im Osten Spiekeroogs, Nationalpark Niedersächsisches Wattenmeer

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze in den Schutzgebieten bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Bayern die Liste der Naturdenkmäler im Landkreis Landshut oder die Liste der geschützten Landschaftsbestandteile in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern mit ihren Unterlisten oder gar einzelne Artikel wie die Landschaftsschutzgebiete Sommerschafweide an Buchhalden und Sommerschafweide auf Hilbertswiese in Baden-Württemberg.

Wir vergeben in diesem Jahr drei Sonderpreise für Fotos von Feldraine und Feldgehölze in geschützten Gebieten.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2024 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 15. Mai bis Mitte Juli 2024 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2024 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --~~~~

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaktusblüte IMG 2241.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:11, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Junge Turmfalken IMG 2659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --IamMM 18:46, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchturmfenster IMG 2596.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Wrong category? (Stained-glass windows in Neustadt an der Weinstraße) --F. Riedelio 10:59, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Fischer.H 09:18, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:41, 16 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turmfalken IMG 2659.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:39, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jacobus IMG 2545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 13:17, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenblume IMG 2918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 17:27, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Junge Turmfalken IMG 8947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:23, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IMG Sonnenblume 3039.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 18:06, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gartenkreuzspinne IMG 9009.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Charlesjsharp 17:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jacobuskirche IMG 2545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:11, 4 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Jacobus IMG 3225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There are a few dust spots --Poco a poco 20:10, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Fischer.H 08:38, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A few more, I added 2 notes --Poco a poco 20:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks for the hint. --Fischer.H 17:42, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Jacobuskirche IMG 2545.jpg[edit]

File:St. Jacobuskirche IMG 2545.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fischer.H (talk) 06:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Jacobus in Hambach IMG 2545.jpg[edit]

File:St. Jacobus in Hambach IMG 2545.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Fischer.H (talk) 06:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weilberg - Ungstein IMG 1701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Dust spot on the sky on the left. Otherwise Ok --Jakubhal 18:24, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thank you for your comment --Fischer.H 16:44, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:59, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ringelblume IMG 9099.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --J. Lunau 20:26, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sühnekreuz IMG 0152.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Sammandi 11:28, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

QI-Kandidat File:Turmfalke_P1320437.jpg[edit]

Hallo Fischer.H, ich habe leider die Hinzufügung der Kategorie und die Angabe des Fundorts in der Description übersehen und Ihr Bild nach Ihrem Wunsch als zurückgeogen gekennzeichnet. Ich habe keine Ahnung, was an der hinzugefügten Kategorie falsch sein soll, wie das ein anderer User behauptet hat. Wahrscheinlich schaffen Sie es nicht mehr, die Zurückziehung zu verhindern. Sie können aber das Bild nochmals als QI-Kandidatenbild einstellen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 22:09, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mäusebussard IMG 4295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Very tentative support. Super grainy photo but the framing and subject are extremely impressive. --Explodingcreepsr 15:10, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Turmfalken IMG 2659.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Turmfalken IMG 2659.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 31 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 - Deutschland[edit]

Hallo Fischer.H,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2023 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Sieger WLE 2022 – Landschaft
Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow, Fischland
Biotop Nördliche Lothdorfer Wiese
Aisch bei Willersdorf im FFH Aischgrund

Sieger WLE 2022 – Detail
Gemeine Goldwespe im NSG Wittenberge Rühstädter Elbniederung
Libellen-Schmetterlingshaft im Naturschutzgebiet Badberg (Kaiserstuhl)
Blüte eines Schmalblättrigen Weidenröschens im Naturpark Taunus

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Sachsen die Liste der Naturdenkmale in Wurzen.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2023 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit der Upload für dich einfacher ist, haben wir in diesem Jahr die einzelnen Hochladeseiten für die Bundesländer abgeschafft, alle Fotos werden über dasselbe Formular hochgeladen. Außerdem haben wir das Layout unserer WLE-Seiten geändert.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2023 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 16:52, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]